HCD’s Observation in Writ Petition No. 6016 of 2000 (5th Amendment to the Constitutition of BD Case)
High Court Division’s Observation in Writ Petition No. 6016 of 2000 (5th Amendment to the Constitution of Bangladesh Case)
1. Constitution of
Bangladesh is the embodiment of the will of the people of the Republic of
Bangladesh.
2. Constitution is the
Supreme law and all other laws and actions must confirm to it.
3. Any law or action
made in violation of the Constitution is void.
4. All functionaries of
the Republic owe its existence to the Constitution.
5. The Legislature, the
Executive and the Judiciary are the three pillars of the Republic, created by
the Constitution, as such, are bond by its provisions.
6. Likewise, the Defence
Services, the Civil Services and all other services of the Republic owe its
existence to the Constitution and must obey its commands.
7. Proclamation of emergency
can only be made by the President of the Republic on the advise of the Prime
Minister, in case of imminent danger to the Security of the Republic.
8. No person can delcare
Martial Law if any body does he will be liable for high treason against the Republic.
9. Constitution
stipulates a Democratic Republic, run by the elected representatives of the
people of Bangladesh but any attempt by any person or group of persons, how
high so ever, to usurp an elected Government, shall render them liable for high
treason.
10. The taking over of
powers of the Government of People's Republic of Bangladesh with effect from
the morning the 15th August, 1975 by Khandakar Mustak Ahmed, an usurper,
placing Bangladesh under Martial Law and his assumption of the office of the
President of the Bangladesh, 20th August 1975, were in clear violation of the
Constitution, as such, illegal, without lawful authority and without
Jurisdiction, consequently all his subsequent actions as the President of
Bangladesh were illegitimate and void.
11. The taking over of
the office of President of Bangladesh is favor of Justice Abu Sadat Mohammad
Sayed, on the 6th day of November 1975 was beyond the ambit of the
Constitution.
12. The taking over of
the office of President of Bangladesh and his such entering in the said office
on the 6th day of November 1975, by Mr. Justice Abu Sadat Mohammad, Sayem and
his assumption of the Powers of the Chief Martial Law Administrator and
appointment of the Deputy Chief Martial Law Administrator and the Proclamation
dated 8th November 1975 were all in violation of the Constitution, as such, all
his subsequent functions and actions as such President and / or the Chief
Martial Law Administrator were illegitimate.
13. The handing over of
the office of Martial Law Administrator to Major General Ziaur Rahman BU, PSC,
by the aforesaid Abu Sadar Mohammad Sayem, by the 3rd Proclamation dated the
29th November 1976, enabling the said Major General Ziaur Rahman, to exercise
all the powers of the Chief Martial Law Administrator being beyond the ambit of
the Constitution, was illegal, without Lawful authority and without
Jurisdiction. Consequently, all his subsequent functions and actions as such
Chief Martial Law Administrator were illegitimate.
14. The nomination of
Major General Ziaur Rahman, BU to become the President of Bangladesh by Abu
Sadat Mohammed Sayem, the nominated President of Bangladesh on 21st April 1971
and also the handing over of the office of President to him, being beyond the
ambit of the Constitution, was illegal, without lawful authority and without
Jurisdiction.
15. The assumption of
office of the President of Bangladesh by Major General Ziaur Rahman, BU on 21st
April 1977, on nomination being beyond the ambit of the Constitution, was
illegal, without any lawful authority. Consequently, all his subsequent
functions and actions as such President of Bangladesh, without lawful authority
and without Jurisdiction.
16. Since addition of
Paragraph 3A to the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution by the Proclamations
(Amendment) Order 1977 (Proclamations Order No. 1 of 1977) dated 23 April 1977
and as amended by the Second Proclamation Order No. IV of 1978, was made by a
usurper and a nominated President, the Paragraph 3A to the Fourth Schedule is
illegal, void and non-est in the eye of Law.
17. The Referendum Order,
1977 (Martial Law Order No. 1 of 1977) published on 1st May, 1977 unknown to
the Constitution, being made only to ascertain the confidence of the people of
Bangladesh in one person, namely, Major General Ziaur Rahman, BU.
18. Since Paragraph 18 to
the Fourth Schedule (Translation Provisions) of the Constitution precluded
Judicial Review defying and undermining the supremacy of the Constitution, this
Provision is unconstitutional being beyond the power of Parliament under
Article 142 of the Construction.
19. MLRs including the
MLR VII of 1977 are also illegal.
20. Violation of the
Constitution is a grave legal working and remain so for all time to come. It
cannot be legitimized and shall remain illegitimate forever, however, on the
necessity of the State only, such a legal wrong can be condoned in certain
circumstances, invoking the doctrine of Status
Populi est suprema lex.
21. Condonation of certain acts and provisions has been made as stated above but such condonation are made not because those are legal but only in the interest of the Republic, those shall remain illegitimate forever.
22. Condonations of provisions were made, among others, in respect of provisions, deleting the different provisions of Fourth Amendment. Condonation of provisions were also made in respect of the words "Bismillah-his-Rahmanir Rahm" but the provision deleting the original four fundamental principles of the Republic as enshrined in the original Constitution was not condoned.
Our registered members can view the full content of the Judgment, here .
Latest Judgment
- Sadharan Bima Corporation, Sadharan Bima Bhaban, 33, Dilkusha Commercial Area, Dhaka and another Vs. Messrs Ahad Jute Mills Ltd. and others, 2016, 45 CLC (HCD) Wednesday, May 18, 2016
- Ahmad Ullah Vs. Md. Younus and Ors, 2016, 45 CLC (HCD) Sunday, February 5, 2017
- A.H. Azam Khan Vs. Bangladesh and Ors, 2016, 45 CLC (HCD) Wednesday, March 22, 2017
- RNR GNG Refuelling and Filling Station Limited Vs. General Manager, Comilla Palli Bidyut Samittee-1 and Others, 2016, 45 CLC (HCD) Monday, March 13, 2017
- Khulna Printing and Packaging Limited Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2016, 45 CLC (HCD) Wednesday, March 22, 2017
- Tariqul Islam Vs. Bangladesh and Others, 2016, 45 CLC (HCD) Monday, March 13, 2017
- Hafizur Rahman Vs. Abdur Rahman Miah and Others, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD) Monday, March 6, 2017
- Yeamin Nobi (Md.) and others Vs. Moklesur Rahman and others, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD) Monday, September 26, 2016
- State Vs. Md. Golam Rabbani, 2016, 45 CLC (HCD) Saturday, March 11, 2017
- Ali Ahsan Muhammad Mujahid Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD) Sunday, December 6, 2015
- Nurun Nabir Sarker Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Education and Others, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD) Wednesday, March 8, 2017
- Abdul Hamid Chowdhury (Iqbal) and Others Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and Others, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD) Monday, March 13, 2017
- Hazi Abdul Late Vs. Abu Naseruddin and Others, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD) Monday, March 13, 2017
- City Vegetable Oil Mills Ltd Vs. Commissioner, Customs, Excise & Vat and Others, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD) Wednesday, March 8, 2017
- Turfatur Ain Chowdhury Vs. Artha Rin Adalat Dhaka and Others, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD) Saturday, March 4, 2017