Fiscal/Taxation Law


Displaying 71-80 of 356 results.
TitleLaws Referred
Premhari Barman and others Vs. Commissioner of Taxation, East Pak. Dacca, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
PHP Float Glass Industries Ltd Vs. Commissioner Customs, Excise and VAT and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)ss.42(1)and 43(1)(3), the Value Added Tax Act (xxii of 1991)
Philips Electrical Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Taxes (South) Zone, Dhaka, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)s. 66, the Income Tax Act, 1922
Peoples Insurance Company Limited Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD) ss.29(viii), 32(7) & 2(15) read with section 31,the Income Tax Ordinance, 28(2)(a) read with Article 6(1) of the 4th Schedule, the 1984 (Ordinance No. XXXVI of 1984)
Payer Mohammed Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Taxes and others, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)ss.82BB (1), 93, the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984
Pakistan River Steamers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Dacca Zone and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)ss. 24, 31, 35, the Income Tax Act, 1922 [Now stands repealed]
Padma Oil Company Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)ss.49 (m), 52, 53(e), the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984
Orascom Telecom Bangladesh Ltd Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)ss.35 and 55, Bangladesh Telecommunication Act, 2001; ss.3, 3(Ga), 5, 5(4), 6, Rules 18 (ক-ঙ), the Value Added Tax Act, 1991,Article 102 (2) (a) (ii), the constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh;s.4, the Wireless Telegraph Act, 1933;the Telegr
Orascom Telecom Bangladesh Limited Vs. National Board of Revenue and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)ss. 3, 6, 7, 31, 32, 55 (3), the Value Added Tax Act, 1991, 11, 17, 22 & 23, the Value Added Tax Rules, 1991
Oram Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs Excise and VAT Commissionerate, Dhaka, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)Rule 3, the Value Added Tax Rules, 1991