Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2061-2080 of 7814 results.
Saleha Khatoon @ Saleha Begum Vs. Abdur Rahman Kha, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....ntained. The order of injunction at the time of issuance of the rule is hereby vacated. Send down the L.C. Records immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 486. ......hbub Elahi represented by Md. Jahangir Alam Vs. Md. Shah Alam and others, 8 BLC page 484; Registrar of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shafiuddin son of late Md. Asuruddin, 10 BLT (AD) 50. Lawyers Involved: A.B.M. Matiur Rahman with Md. Monzur Alam Khan - For the petitioner. No one ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 114
....ansferred to the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Shingair and it was renumbered as Title Suit No.118/83.
4. On 27.02.91 opposite party No.1 Rafique Uddin Ahmed filed an application under order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure for addition of party stating that opposite parties Nos. 3 an......
Vs.
Rafique Uddin Ahmed being dead his heirs 1(Ka) Fatema Begum and others…………………..Opposite Parties
Judgment
February 15, 2010.
Result:
The rule is made absolute.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Mustafizur Rahman - For the Petitioners.
Md. Haroon-Ar-Rashid with..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Sharmin Akhter Vs. Major (Rtd.) Mahbub Akbar Bhuyian, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
.... Akhter…………………….........................Petitioner Vs. Major (Rtd.) Mahbub Akbar Bhuyian…………………....Opposite Party Judgment October 7, 2012. Result: The Rule is discharged with modification. Lawyers Involved: M. Shamsul Haque, Advocate-For the pet.....................Petitioner Vs. Major (Rtd.) Mahbub Akbar Bhuyian…………………....Opposite Party Judgment October 7, 2012. Result: The Rule is discharged with modification. Lawyers Involved: M. Shamsul Haque, Advocate-For the petitioner. No one appears-For the opposi..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Nirmal Chandra Halder Vs. Hasina Begum and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....ddus J Nirmal Chandra Halder…………………............Petitioner Vs. Hasina Begum and others ………..............Opposite Parties Judgment October 10, 2012. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Bhabesh Chandra Ghosh with Md. Mubarak Hossain, Advoc......alder…………………............Petitioner Vs. Hasina Begum and others ………..............Opposite Parties Judgment October 10, 2012. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Bhabesh Chandra Ghosh with Md. Mubarak Hossain, Advocates-For the petitioner. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 73
M. A. Jaher and others Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
.... surrender before the Artha Rin Adalat concerned within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment by that Adalat. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 283. ......M. A. Jaher and others…………………..Petitioners Vs. Sonali Bank and others…………………..Respondents Judgment September 11, 2007. Result: The rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Debdas Sammader, Advocate - For the Petitioners. Asad Hossain Chowdhury, Sen..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Md. Khalilur Rahman Vs. Md. Alam Bepari & others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....Das J Khalilur Rahman (Md.)………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Alam Bepari & others………………………Opposite Parties Judgment July 26, 2007. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate - For the Petitioner. ......an (Md.)………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Alam Bepari & others………………………Opposite Parties Judgment July 26, 2007. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate - For the Petitioner. No one appears - For..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 509
Abdul Matin Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Petitioner Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh………………………………Opposite Party Judgment April 19, 2007. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Doctrine of res judicata Doctrine of res judicata has received a statu......very well rejected in exercise of inherent power under section 151 of The Code…………………(11) Cases Referred to- Carl-Zeiss Stiftung Vs. Rayner and Keeler Ltd. and others, (1967) The Law Reports: Appeal Cases 853 = (2966) 2 All ER; Burmah Eastern Ltd. Vs. Burmah Eastern Employees Un..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Md. Raushan Alam Vs. Mst. Zahura Khatun, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....Md. Raushan Alam ………………….................Petitioner Vs. Mst. Zahura Khatun…………………………………Opposite Party Judgment November 1, 2012. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: No one appears for either of the parties. Civil Revis......…………….................Petitioner Vs. Mst. Zahura Khatun…………………………………Opposite Party Judgment November 1, 2012. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: No one appears for either of the parties. Civil Revision No. 3996 of 1996 ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 105
....nd the publication of the newspaper the daily Ittefaq the parties in litigation may act in pursuance to resolution dated 30‑9‑90.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 597.
......Parshad Jaiswal and another, AIR 1958, (Punjab) 190; Karrnal Distillery Company Ltd. Vs. LP Jaiswal, PLD 1956 (Lahore) 731; H M Ebrahim Sait Vs. South India Industries Ltd., AIR 1938 (Madras) 962.
Lawyers Involved:
Akhtar Imam with Sk Habibul Alam, Advocates ‑ For the Appellants.
Moudud A..
Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 127
Jalaluddin @ Badsha Vs. State, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
.... of the charge. The appellant shall be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in any other connection. Latifur Rahman J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 119. ......aluddin @ Badsha………………………………Appellant Vs. The State………………………………Respondent Judgment March 9, 1986. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Jamiruddin Sircar - For the State. Md. Nowab Ali - For the State. ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 108
M. Anwar Hossain and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
...........Petitioner (In Writ Petition 1059 of 2011) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others…………Respondents (In all the Writ Petitions) Judgment March 22, 2011. Result: All the Rules that sprang from Writ Petitions no7236/10, 826/11, 1048/11 and 1059/11 are made absolute Ca......ssue) BLT (HCD) at page 67; Oacker Vs. Packer (1953) 2 All ER 127 at page-129 H; State Vs. Dosso (1959 11 DLR SC 1; Siddique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh; Liquat Hossain Vs. Pakistan PLD 1999 SC 504, 652. Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud-For the petitioners (In Writ Petition 826 of 2011) Dr. Sha..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Amarbati Natya Mandir Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....n for leave to proceed with the suit after amendment of the plaint is allowed. The order of abatement of the suit is also set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (HCD) (2009) 217. ...... 653; Raghbir Lala Vs. Md. Said, AIR 1943 PC 7; Sitabai Ramchandra Jaltare Vs. Masjid Nurun Mohalla Jingerwadi, AIR 1979 Bom 109; Rikhu Dev, Chela Bawa Haarjug Dass Vs. Som Dass, AIR 1975 SC 2159. Lawyers Involved: Saifur Reza, Advocate — For the Appellant. Appeal from Original Order No. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Agrani Bank Vs. Orbit Enterprise Ltd and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....p;T Board which was ultimately referred to the Arbitration Council. The arbitration council passed an award of Taka 56,78,761 in favor of the respondent and on 30-9- 87 the said award was put to make Rule of the Court before the First Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka by Arbitration Miscellaneous Ca......sed judiciously and not capriciously........................(12) Case Referred to- Chalna Marine Products Ltd Vs. Reliance Insurance, 50 DLR (AD) 100; Thakur Vs. Amolok, AIR 1963 (Raj) 1993. Lawyers Involved: SA Rahim with Syed Abdus Salam, Advocates — For the Appellant. None Appear..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Md. Abdul Jabbar Sarker Vs. State and another, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....mad Ullah J Md. Abdul Jabbar Sarker…………………………..Petitioner Vs. State and another……………………….Respondents Judgment October 25, 2011. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: No one - For the Petitioner. No one - For the O......l Jabbar Sarker…………………………..Petitioner Vs. State and another……………………….Respondents Judgment October 25, 2011. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: No one - For the Petitioner. No one - For the Opposite-Party No.2.&nbs..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Abdul Motaleb and others Vs. Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... and others………………………….Petitioners Vs. Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal…………………………Respondents Judgment December 8, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Value Added Tax Act, 1991 (Act No. XXII of 1991); sections 37, 55 ......ater and PET Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Customs Excise, and VAT, 61 DLR 734; Iqbal Hasan Mahmud Tuku, 60 DLR (AD) 147; Hotel Zakaria International Vs. National Board of Revenue, 30 BLD 388. Lawyers Involved: MG Mahmud (Shaheen), Advocate - For Petitioners. SM Moniruzzaman, Depu..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 135
Rezia Sultan & another Vs. Md. Haroon Malik and another, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....99. Lawyers Involved: Fida M Kamal, Advocate - For Petitioners. No one appears - For Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.156 of 1987. Judgment Sharif Uddin Chaklader J.- This Rule by the plaintiffs directed against Order dated 19-2-1987 passed by the learned Additional Distr...........(6) Cases Referred to- Abdul Khaleque Vs. Abdul Barek Howlader, 2 BLC 276; A,bdul Khaleque Vs. Abdul Barek Howlader, 3 BLC (AD) 174; Muhammad Ishaque Vs. Abdul Haque, PLD (Karachi) 899. Lawyers Involved: Fida M Kamal, Advocate - For Petitioners. No one appears - For Opposite Par..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Muhibur Rahman Manik and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....eof. They are set at liberty at once if not required in connection with any other case. Lower Court Records are sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 279. ......Judgment divorced from the context of the question under consideration and to treat it to be complete law declared by Court……………………………………(18) Administration of Criminal Law and Justice Delivery System Fundamental and basic principles in the Administration of Crimina..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Hashem Ali & Others Vs. Suruj Ali & Others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....an, Advocate - For the opposite parties. Subrata Saha, Advocate with Kamal Hossain, Advocate - For the opposite parties. Civil Revision No.2660 of 2005. Judgment AFM Abdur Rahman J.- This Rule under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, dated 09.7.2005, issued at the instan......-respondent-petitioners Vs. Suruj Ali & Others…………………………Plaintiff-Appellant-Opposite parties Judgment March 22, 2010. Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mohammed Mozammel Haque Bhuiyan, Advocate - For the petitioners. Kamruzzaman..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Khorshid Nayeem and others Vs. Land Appeal Board land others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....oners. Rafiqul Islam, Senior Advocate - For the Respondent No.6. Writ Petition No.3229 of 2004. Judgment AKM Abdul Hakim J.- On an application under Article 102 of the Constitution, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the order dated 9-12-2003 ...... Sujanpur Vs. Surinder Kumar, (2006) 5 SCC 173; SN Chandrashekar Vs. State of Karnataka, (2006) 3 SCC 208; Bombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd., Vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group, (2006) 3 SCC 434. Lawyers Involved: Anwarul Azim Khair, Advocate - For Petitioners. Rafiqul Islam, Senior Advoca..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Dutex Enterprise Co. Ltd. Vs. RMS Textile and Apparels Ltd. and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ndant nos.3-7 and to stop payment of the concerned import bills until his clearance, but with no effect. Hence this suit. 4. In suit, plaintiff by an application dated 21-11 2004 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure sought for temporary injunction restraining defendant......7; Gooryonly (BD) Textile Ltd. Vs. Chartkar Information Holding Ltd. and others, 54 DLR (AD) 70; UCM Vs. Royal Bank of Canada United Trading Corporation Sa Vs. Allied Arab Bank Ltd., (1985) 2 Lloyd's Law Report 554; Zyta Garments Ltd. Vs. Union Bank Ltd., 55 DLR (AD) 56; Training Knit Wear Limited V..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 365
82808279827382728270826982688267826482638262826182608259825882578256825582548252