Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdur Rahim Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....n the prayer of the petitioner let the operation of the order be stayed for 4 days to enable the petitioner to move the Appellate Division. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 231. ......positors by granting irregular loan facilities to the said Messrs. Marshall Services for purchase of JAS Distilleries Limited. In the said show cause notice respondent No.1 in a purported exercise of powers under section 46(2) directed the petitioner to refrain from discharging the responsibilities ......…Respondents Judgment July 10, 1997. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed with Dr. M Zahir, Rokanuddin Mahmud and Faisal Mahmud Faizee, Advocates — For the Petitioner. KS Nabi, Attorney-General with Bazlur Rahman Chhana, Assistant Attorney-General — For Respondent Nos.1, 2 &am......nnexure-A) on the petitioner asking him to show cause why necessary action should not be taken against him under section 46(1) of the said Act for acting contrary to the interest of the depositors by granting irregular loan facilities to the said Messrs. Marshall Services for purchase of JAS Distill..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Sayed Nurul Hossain Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....yment of the petitioner and accordingly no interference is called for. In the result the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 226.......uthority’ as mentioned in section 2(d) above Public Servants (Retirement) Act. 1974 should be regarded as only an authority which is ordinarily charged with the function of self government and have power of making by-laws, of imposing and of maintaining and administering a local fund. 6. Mr. Is......zlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sayed Nurul Hossain…….. Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries.……………...Respondents Judgment June 8, 1998. Cases Referred to: Managing Director and Chairman National Bank of Pakistan vs. Ataul Huq, 17 DLR (SC) 74; 13 DL......yment of the petitioner and accordingly no interference is called for. In the result the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 226...Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Shahidul Vs. State, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....not wanted in any other case. Send down a copy of judgment along with the LC record to the trial Court for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 222.......latest decision on exercise of inherent jurisdiction by this Court under section 561A Cr.P.C. in 46 DLR (AD) 67 where our Appellate Division has held the High Court Division may exercise its inherent power to quash a proceeding or even a conviction on conclusion of trial where the Court concerned go......iminal) Present: Md. Nurul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Shahidul…………….. Petitioner Vs. State ………………..Respondent Judgment August 13, 1998. Cases Referred to- Mofazzal Hossain Mollah and others vs. State 45 DLR (AD) 175 & Md. Sher Ali and others vs......not wanted in any other case. Send down a copy of judgment along with the LC record to the trial Court for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 222...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Ekramul Huq @ Bachchu and another Vs. State, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ribunal may consider the question of granting bail to the accused persons if such application is made. Send down the LC records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 219. ...... trial was not proper and without jurisdiction the judgment, order of conviction and sentence should be quashed and the appellants be acquitted. He is also of the view that the appellate Court has no power to send back the case for its trial by a competent Court. He has also pointed out that the Cru...... Md. Hamidul Haque J Md. Hassan Ameen J Ekramul Huq @ Bachchu and another…………………Appellants Vs. State………….Respondent Judgment March 9, 1999. Cases Referred to- Dharmasena vs. King Criminal Law Journal, 1950 Vol.50 page 1997, Abdul Ghani vs. Emperor Indi......de and the case is sent back to the Senior Special Tribunal, Feni to take necessary steps in the light of observations made above and in accordance with law. The tribunal may consider the question of granting bail to the accused persons if such application is made. Send down the LC records at onc..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Shah Abdul Hannan and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....rder as to cost. All interlocutory orders, issued earlier, are hereby vacated. Mohammad Anwarul Haque J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 386. ......ed and Jalalabad Gas Transmission and Distribution System Ltd., who supply gas, produced by two companies of Petrobangla, named Bangladesh Gas Field Company Ltd. and Sylhet Gas Field Company Ltd., to power plants, fertilizer factories, industrial and commercial concerns and household consumers. Petr......shtra Vs. Lok Shikshan Sanstha (AIR 1973 SC 588); N. Ramanath Pillai Vs. State of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 2641; Sanjeev Coke Mfg. Co. Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (AIR 1983 SC 239); Maharastra SBOS Vs. Paritosh (AIR 1984 SC 1543); Union of India Vs. Cyanamid India Ltd. (AIR 1987 SC 1082); State of UP Vs. ......roleum Development Act 1974. Having received government patronage during the preceding 24 years, Petronas has emerged as an internationally reputed company with operation in 14 countries. It has been granted 15% Carried Interest Participation by the State, meaning, 15% shares are reserved for it out..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 231
Begum Tahmina Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....-2/5231 dated 27-3-94 (Annexure-A) to the writ petition is declared to have been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 503. ....... Learned Deputy Attorney-General Shahabuddin Ahmad appearing for the Respondent No.2 refers to the provisions of section 9 of the Anti-Corruption Act, 1957 and submits that in view of said section 9 power or duty under section 4(1) of the Act upon the Government have been delegated to be exercised ......d To- Mustafizur Rahman and 3 others Vs. DG, Anti-Corruption and others, 49 DLR 599; 51 DLR 728. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Shahabuddin Ahmad, Deputy Attorney- General—For the Respondent. Writ Petition No.723 of 1994. Judgment Md. Abdul Qudd...... harassment through arrest in connection with GD entry No.6767 dated 12-6-93 under section 54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for which she moved the Metropolitan Magistrate Court wherefrom she was granted bail but she was thereafter served with order of detention under Special Powers Act 1974 as ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Wahida Begum Vs. Tajul Islam, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....e sent down at once. Consequently, the order of this Court directing the parties to maintain status quo granted earlier is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 491.......the Evidence Act, he must prove the facts entitling to him the benefits under either of the laws. He is required to prove that ‘he, after taking reasonable care to ascertain that the transferor had power to make the transfer, acted in good faith’. I am supported by the authorities in case of Sun......ainsukhdas Vs. Gowardhandas, AIR 1968 (Nagpur). Lawyers Involved: SN Goswami Advocate—For the Petitioner. Abu Salek with Md. Lokman Hossain, Advocates—For the Opposite Parties Nos. 1 (a) to 1(g) and 2. Civil Revision No. 3078 of 1994. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was......tioners within two months from the receipt of the record by the trial Court. Let the record be sent down at once. Consequently, the order of this Court directing the parties to maintain status quo granted earlier is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 491...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Atiqur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Ainunnahar, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....en absolutely without any merit, the same must be discharged. Resultantly, the Rule is discharged. Order of stay stands vacated. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 453.......ter. (d) The record of the suit was, thereafter, sent back to the Family Court for fresh disposal. (e) The defendant constituted his brother as the Attorney for the litigation purpose through a power of Attorney. The constituted Attorney on 3-3-1998 presented an application before the Court, f...... Present: AK Badrul Huq J Atiqur Rahman (Md.) ……………………..Petitioner Vs. Ainunnahar……………………….Opposite Party. Judgment June 24, 1999. Case Referred to- Hosne Ara Begum Vs. Alhaj Md. Rezaul Karim and others, 43 DLR 543. Lawyers Involved: Lu......en absolutely without any merit, the same must be discharged. Resultantly, the Rule is discharged. Order of stay stands vacated. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 453...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Matiur Rahman Bepari Vs. Wazuddin Bepari & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....-6-91 is maintained. 8. The order of stay granted earlier by this Court is hereby vacated. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 450. ...... (ii) Provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908 shall apply to applications under sub-rule (1). From a reading of the aforesaid Rule it is found that the learned Appellate Court has the power to re-admit an appeal earlier dismissed for default on being satisfied that the appellant was ......rving any copy of the application upon the petitioner’s Advocate the same has occasioned failure of justice. The learned Advocate further submits that in view of the fact that the appellants failed to prove that they were prevented by sufficient cause from appearing before the Court when the appea......ate Judge, 2nd Court, Dhaka in Title Appeal No.226 of 1981 admitting the appeal is set aside and the order of dismissal of the appeal for default made on 6-6-91 is maintained. 8. The order of stay granted earlier by this Court is hereby vacated. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Abdul Awal (Md.) Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....the Appellate Division and hence we allow the prayer and accordingly grant certificate for preferring appeal before the Appellate Division. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 442. ...... of collecting income tax from persons who, in his opinion, have taxable income in any assessment year. A great deal of confidence is reposed on the DCT by the revenue and he is vested with unlimited power in the matter of assessment of total income of a citizen. The DCT enjoys a peculiar legal stat...... accordingly grant certificate for preferring appeal before the Appellate Division. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 442. ......raises an important question of law and, as such, we are of the view that our observations and the decisions may be scrutinised by the Appellate Division and hence we allow the prayer and accordingly grant certificate for preferring appeal before the Appellate Division. Ed. This Case is also R..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Manager, Bangladseh Krishi Bank and others Vs. Al-Haj Md. Nurul Islam & another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....y set aside and Money Suit No.1 of 1991 of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Munshiganj in dismissed. There shall be no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 434. ......in the suit. In support of his contention the learned Advocate referred some decision. There is no cavil on this point and Dr. Rafiqur Rahman also candidly submits that in a proper case the Court has power to take resort to rule 10(2) of Order I. Moreover in the facts and circumstances of the presen......ladseh Krishi Bank and others……………………Defendant-Appellants Vs. Al-Haj Md. Nurul Islam & another………………..Respondents Judgment November 23, 1999. Cases Referred to- Hafizuddin Sarker and Lakjan Bewa being dead their heirs: Nur Hossain and others Vs. Banglad......k is liable to compensate the plaintiff company and pay the damage as prayed for. 4. The defence case as per written statement is that on the prayer of the plaintiff company Bangladesh Krishi Bank granted loan to the plaintiff as per condition contained in the Annexure to the sanction letter and ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Aziz Pipes Limited, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ll realization of the decreetal amount if it is not paid within a period of 90 days from date. The parties are to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ......ll realization of the decreetal amount if it is not paid within a period of 90 days from date. The parties are to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ...... a decree of Tk. 1,44,39,817/- claiming that the said amount was realized by the defendant Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) in excess while making recovery of the loan of Tk. 2,25,40,000/- given to the plaintiff by the BSRS. 3. The plaintiff took the loan from BSRS for a project located at ......ent and decree passed by the High Court Division, Civil Appeal No. 95 of 2001 has been filed by BSRS and Civil Appeal No. 151 of 2001 has been filed by the plaintiff Aziz Pipes Ltd. 10. Leave was granted to BSRS to consider the following grounds:- "Because both the Trial Court and the High C..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 126
State Vs. Moyezuddin Sikder and Others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....rected to take steps for disposal of the application in the light of our findings as above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 82; 28 BLD (AD) (2008) 138; V ADC (2008) 796. ......Division could not entertain the application for bail far less passing any ad-interim order as there is a complete bar under Rule 19(gha) of the Jaruri Khamota Bidhimala, 2007 which has curtailed the power and jurisdiction of the High Court Division to grant bail and as such, the impugned order is l......………Respondent Judgment April 23, 2008. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Emergency Power Rules, 2007, Rule 19(gha) The expression Adalat or Tribunal in rule 19(gha) refer to all Courts including the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. Therefore under rule 19(gha) the Supreme Co...... Rule 19(gha) The expression Adalat or Tribunal in rule 19(gha) refer to all Courts including the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. Therefore under rule 19(gha) the Supreme Court is also debarred from granting bail to persons accused of offences mentioned in rules 14 and 15. However when there is lac..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 170
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Sumikin Bussan Corporation Vs. Chittagong Port Authority and Others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... declared accepting the decision No.8823 dated 13-9-2000 of the Chittagong Port Authority as contained in Annexure-B to the petition. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 599. ......মিটিতে বোর্ডের সচিবকেও এ ক্ষেত্রে অন্তর্ভূক্ত করা হোক।” 27. It cannot be said that the Board has no power to review or revise its own decision. But they cannot take a decision violating the terms and ......din Ahmed with KM Tanjib-ul-Alam, Advocates—For the Respondent No. 9. Writ Petition No.7 of 2001. Judgment Kazi AT Monowaruddin J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondent Nos.1-7 to show cause as to why they shall not be directed to abide by the decision of the meeting No.8823 d...... declared accepting the decision No.8823 dated 13-9-2000 of the Chittagong Port Authority as contained in Annexure-B to the petition. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 599. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 153
Sk Sohrab Ali Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....is order, with notice to the contending parties. Communicate the order to the learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 598. ......0. In the facts and circumstances of the case, find no illegality or impropriety in the impugned order occasioning failure of justice so as to justify interference by this Court exercising revisional power under section 151(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. We find no substance in the Rule. 11. ......diction) Present: Gour Gopal Saha J Sikder Maqbul Hoq J Sk Sohrab Ali………………Petitioner Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid and others.................Opposite Parties. Judgment October 25, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Not represented— the Petitioner. Not represented — t......endant petitioner for adjournment with Taka as CP cost payable to the plaintiff fixing 3-12-80 peremptory hearing. It appears from the record that on an earlier occasion the learned Subordinate Judge granted an adjournment to defendant No.4 with cost, payment of which was a precedent, but the latter..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Hussain Muhammad Ershad Vs. Abdul Muqtadir Chowdhury and another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... with observations made above. Let a copy of this judgment be forwarded to the Secretary to the Parliament. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 569, 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 261....... belongs to the realm of contract and was first enunciated by some American Judges in construing the American Constitution. This doctrine of waiver can be invoked when the constitutional or statutory power or guarantee of a right is not conceived in public interest. But, if the privilege conferred o......arty in the Parliament. 3. While the petitioner was continuing Member of Parliament he was convict criminal case, popularly known as Janata Tower, on 7-6-1993. But he was not declared disqualified to continue as a Member of Parliament. The petitioner, thereafter, again contested the Parliamentary......nds of rights, such as, the right of a convict and the right to remain as a sitting member of Parliament, shall be, of necessity, different from the other. A convict has a right of appeal and also be granted bail in an appropriate case but a sitting member of Parliament loses his qualification at on..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Abu Sayed Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....he time the Sessions Judge at Pabna Send down the records of the case at once if he is not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 559. ......he time the Sessions Judge at Pabna Send down the records of the case at once if he is not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 559. ......rising out of Chaatmohar PS Case No.3 dated 7-3-89 and GR No.10 of 1989) convicting the appellant and three others under section 302 read with section 34 of the Penal Code and sentencing each of them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life. 2. The appellant along with eight other accused were pu......nts decided on 19-6-2000 in Civil Appeal No. 5102 of 2000 the Supreme Court of India in the matter of temporary injunction has observed that, “In appropriate case the appellate Court, apart from granting or vacating or modifying the order of such injunction, may suggest suitable action against ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Sultan Mia (Md.) Vs. Hazi Md. Yusuf, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....e of the matter expeditiously preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the order. Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 555. ......e the decree holder having practiced fraud collusively obtained the homestead of the petitioner and since the learned Subordinate Judge having found such fraud on the face of the record, he has ample power to make an order fort restoration property under section 151 CPC without any inquiry under Ord......ner is the decree-holder who obtained this Rule against the order dated 11-6-2000 of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.31 of 1997 directing him to make over possession of schedule ‘Kha’ land to the third party opposite party. 2. This Rul......e of the matter expeditiously preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the order. Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 555. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82