Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2241-2251 of 2251 results.
Aung Shwe Prue Chowdhury Vs. Kyaw Sain Prue Chowdhury and others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....ned Notification dated 4.11-96 passed under the orders of the President was published in the Bangladesh Gazette on 21-11-96. 5. Respondent No. 1 in the writ petition (Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh through the Secretary, Special Affairs Division(respondent No.2 in this appea......visional Commissioner were placed before the Prime Minister and the name of respondent No.1 was suggested for approval of the Prime Minister on the ground that the appellant was a collaborator of the Pakistan occupation army and was a Minister of Malek cabinet in 1971, that he was involved in activi..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 203
Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Sharon Laily Begum Jalil, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
.... on 9-8-1993) became, a matter of great controversy and the mother Mrs. Sharon Laity Begum Jalil filed the aforesaid 4 writ petitions under Article 102(2) (b)(i) of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh alleging that the said children were being held in custody by the father Abdu......Court concerned, the British High Commission at Dhaka and the Ministry of Home Affairs (for attention of the immigration authorities). Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD)(1998) 55. ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 250
Bangladesh Vs. Shafiuddin and Others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....tioner-respondent in Civil Appeal No. 15 of 1995 arising out of Writ Petition No. 3193 of 1992, qualified in the Special Superior Service Competitive Examination in 1972 and joined the service of the Republic as a Class-I Officer on 22-10-73. After being absorbed in the BCS (Administration) Cadre by......C) 1942; Gajar vs. U Joromonik Siem, AIR 1961 (SC) 276; Ramesh vs. State of Bihar AIR 1978 (SC) 327; Sant Ram vs. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1987 (SC) 1910; Lalit vs. Union of India, AIR 1972 (SC) 995); Pakistan vs. Sheikh Abdul Hamid, PLD 1961 (SC) 105 = 13 DLR (SC) 100, West Pakistan vs. Din Muhammad..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 185
Azizur Rahman alias Md. Azizur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....beginning of this judgment to be in the positive, namely, that there is jurisdiction to interfere, the appeals arc dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 8. ......ular Division Bench and, as such, the respective impugned orders are without jurisdiction and void ab initio. 5. Chapter III of Part I (volume 1) of Rules of the High Court of Judicature for East Pakistan which are being followed by the High Court Division provides as follows: “Holding of ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 138
Abdus Quddus Vs. Administration of Waqf & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the order of the respondent No. 1 dated 22.07.1999 gave rise to a fresh cause of action and the order being an order passed by a person performing functions in connection with the affairs of the Republic, the aggrieved person could seek remedy as against the said order under Article 102 of the ......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
M/S. Concord Engineers & Construction Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer Road & Highways Dept, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Aziz, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J M/S. Concord Engineers and Construction Ltd.........Appellant. Vs. The Chief Engineer Road and Highways Department, Government of the People's Republic Bangladesh, Sarak Bhaban, PS. Ramna, Dhaka.....Respondent Judgment 13th August...... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order. For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 229
Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....an Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others reported in 44 DLR (AD) 111 considered the maintainability of the writ petition as regard condition and term of service of the persons in the service of the Republic which are matters for adjudication by the Administrative Tribunal and observed as follows: ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Syed Afzal Nowab Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e in Bangladesh, the question of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... issuance of the certificate on 31.8.1980. 5. The trial court on a discussion of the evidence on record held, inter alia, that the plaintiff was a national of Bangladesh and he was stranded in Pakistan and therefore his temporary absence from the country cannot take away his right to enjoy hi..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues including the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ......handra Sarker 4 MLR (AD) 426; 53 DLR (AD) 12 and 51 DLR (AD) 221; Mst. Shamim Akhtar Vs. Syed Alam Hussain and others 1975 SCMR 60; Bibhabati Vs. Ramendra Narayan (AIR 1947 PC 19); Federation of Pakistan Vs. Ali Hasan (PLD 1967 SC 249). Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Sen..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....d order of the Ministry of Establishment dated 10.8.2000 is illegal and void as it is violation of natural justice and Articles 26, 27, 29(1), 135(2) and 140(2)(c) of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 had ample scope to execute the order and the app......s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....late Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J M. A. Rashid and others……….....Petitioners Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dha......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
447438434423364347346345330307297