Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Hafizuddin Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....vocate-For the Appellant. S.B. Barua, Advocate — For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 447 of 1986. Judgment Daliluddin Ahmed J.- This appeal is directÂed against the judgment and order dated 15.7.86 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gazipur in Sessions Case No.167 of 1985 convicting appel......quitted of the charge levelled against him. Let him be released from jail forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 397. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Shahidulla @ Md. Shahidulla & others Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... show cause why the acÂcused-petitioners should not be enlarged on bail in GR Case No.47 of 1987 of the Court of Upazila Magistrate, Nawabganj, Dinajpur arising out of Nawabganj PS Case No.3 of 1987 dated 8.11.87 under sections 147/148/447/324/325/114/326/302/34 of the Penal Code. 2. The facts r......be taken into consideration while considering an application for bail, if it is inordinate or unreasonaÂble. In this connection the learned Advocate for the petitioners has referred to an unreported decision of the Appellant Division of our Supreme Court. In that decision in the case of Ashraf Ali ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 488
Almasuddin & another Vs. A. Wadud Khan & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....yan—For the Opposite Party No.3. Civil Revision No.353 of 1984. Judgment Mustafa Kamal J. - This Rule obtained under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against an order dated 21.5.84 passed by Mr. Shamsunnahar Begum, 6th Munsif, Dhaka in Miscellaneous Case No.105 of 19......mpugned order of the learned Munsif cannot be sustained. In the result, the Rule is made absolute but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 391...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Ujjal Hossain (minor) & Others Vs. Firoja Khatun & Others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....7 and 18. Civil Revision No.96 of 1987. Judgment Md. Mozammel Hoque J.- In this Revisional application Rule was issued directing the opposite parties to show cause as to why the Order No.74 dated 10J2.86 passed by the Munsif, Mirpur Upazila, Kushtia in Title Suit No.75 of 1986, should not ......ners as plaintiffs in the aforesaid suit and also to proceed with the suit in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 481...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Fazlul Hoque & Others Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... cause why the order of Mr. Sirajul Islam, Sessions Judge, Mymensingh passed on 22.9.88 in Criminal Revision No.186 of 1988 out of Trishal G.R. Case No.72(2)87 corresponding to Trishal P.S. Case No.3 dated 20.11.87 under sections 302/323/34 of the Penal Code now pending in the Court of Upazila Magis......n accorÂdance with law expeditiously. Let a copy of this judgment and order be sent to the Upazila Magistrate, Trishal immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 477...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Anwara Khatun & Others Vs. Geasuddin Ahmed & Others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....ision No.636 of 1986. Judgment Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J. - The Rule arises out of an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure and is directed against the judgment and order dated 6.8.86 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Mymensingh in Misc. Appeal No.124 of 1985 dism......The existence of such a perÂsonal right and its invasion by the wrongdoer is the only exception to the general rule as mentioned above. 11. In support of this, reference may be made to an English decision, reported in (1903) I Chancery at page 101 as the case of Attorney-General Vs. Ashbowene RC..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Saju Hosein Vs. Press Appellate Board and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....hury J.- The Rule under adjudication, issued on 08.08.2011 was in following terms: “Let a Rule Nisi be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 27.07.2011 (Annexure-B) of the Press Appellate Board, Bangladesh Press Council of House No.40,......t of publication for the period stipulated in Section 9, the Declaration automatically subsides. 34. Mr. Abdul Matin Khasru, on the contrary, submitted that no error is reflected in the Board’s decision, because, although a Declaration is destined to extinguish by operation of Section 9(3) of ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 171
Parvaj Vs. State, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Ruhul Quddus J.- This Rule at the instance of the convict-petitioner was issued on an application under section 561 A of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashment of the judgment and order dated 30.11.2002 passed by the Metropolitan Special Tribunal No.11, Dhaka in Metropolitan Special Tr......surrender before the trial Court to serve out the remaining period of his sentence. Communicate a copy of the judgment. Mohammad Marzi-ul-Huq J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Md. Shah Alam Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....awzish Ara Begum, Assistant Attorney General - For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 3509 of 2003. Judgment Md. Ruhul Quddus J.- This criminal appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 24.10.1999 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gaibandha in Sessions Case No.48 of 1995 convicting t......hibit-5. In cross-examination he admitted that no ligature mark was found on the neck of the deceased, and that in throttling rib of the chest might be fractured. 20. We have also gone through the decisions and authorities cited by the learned Advocates. The facts and circumstances in 1 MLR (HC) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Md. Manzil alias Md. Manzil Miah Vs. State, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....or the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.2962 of 2002. Judgment Md. Ruhul Quddus J.- This criminal appeal under section 30 of the Special Powers Act, 1974 is directed against judgment and order dated 8.9.2002 passed by the Special Tribunal No.4, Kushtia in Special Tribunal Case No.158 of 2001 ......y the trial Court. In case of his failure to do so, the law will take its own course. Send down the lower Court records. Mohammad Marzi-ul-Huq J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Md. Haider Alam Vs. State, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....eral - For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 2238 of 2002. Judgment Md. Ruhul Quddus J.- This appeal under section 30 of the Special Powers Act, 1974 is directed against judgment and order dated 31.7.2002 passed by the Special Tribunal No.3, Rajshahi in Special Tribunal Case No.172 of 200......entence, if any. In case of his failure to do so, the law will take its own course. Send down the lower Court’s record. Mohammad Marzi-ul-Huq J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Md. Saiful Islam alias Maznu Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....and Ms. Syeda Rabia Begum, Assistant Attorney Generals - For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.413 of 2006. Judgment Md. Ruhul Quddus J.- This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 23.1.2006 passed by the Sessions Judge, Tangail in Session Case No.232 of 2004 (arising out of......custody during the trial will be deducted under section 35A of the Code. Send down the lower Court’s records. Mohammad Marzi-ul-Huq J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Sahajahan and others Vs. State, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Ruhul Quddus J.- This Rule at the instance of the accused-petitioners was issued on an application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure calling in question the legality of order dated 19.7.1992 passed by Special Tribunal No.2, Narayangonj rejecting an application filed by the p......tuted during pendency of the criminal revision, would take away the right of release of the accused as it stood before amendment of the law. The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal by a unanimous decision. His lordship Mr. Justice Mustafa Kamal in paragraph 7 of the judgment observed as follows:..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Taju Mia and others Vs. State and another, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Ruhul Quddus J.- This Rule at the instance of the accused-petitioners was issued on an application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure calling in question the legality of order dated 20.9.1992 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, First Court, Comilla rejecting an applicati......tuted during pendency of the criminal revision, would take away the right of release of the accused as it stood before amendment of the law. The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal by a unanimous decision. His lordship Mr. Justice Mustafa Kamal in paragraph 7 of the judgment observed as follows:..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Third Labour Court, and another, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
..... Writ Petition No.154 of 1985. Judgment Md. Abdul Jalil J. - This Rule Nisi isÂsued on an application filed under Article 102 of the Constitution calls in question the judgment and orÂder dated 30.4.85 passed by the 3rd Labour Court, Dhaka in Complaint Case No.3/84 allowing the case and ...... held under the law and in coming to that finding the Labour Court has jurisdiction to look into the facts of the case although it is not a Court of Appeal. Both the learned Advocates cited different decisions in support of their respective submissions which will be discussed hereinafter. 8. In a..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 160
Bangladesh Can CompaÂny Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Chittagong and others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....r the ResponÂdents. Writ Petition No.155 of 1985. Judgment Mahmudul Amin Chowdhury J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the decision and order dated 25.5.85 passed by the Respondent No.1 in I.D. Case No.19 of 1982 Annexure 'E' to the petition ......akar, Advocate—For the ResponÂdents. Writ Petition No.155 of 1985. Judgment Mahmudul Amin Chowdhury J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the decision and order dated 25.5.85 passed by the Respondent No.1 in I.D. Case No.19 of 1982 Annexure '..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 268
Helal Uddin (Md.) Vs. Government of People's Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....with effect from 1‑6‑1994, which was then changed to that of Taka 4800‑210x16‑8160. After completion of eight years service as Lecturer, on 21‑12‑1999 the College Authority wrote a letter dated 19‑4‑2000 (Annexure D) to respondent No.2, District General, the Secondary and Higher Educ......ts of higher scale submitted an application to him for getting benefits of higher scale given to the petitioner. Thereafter, on 13‑11‑2001 teachers of said college including the petitioner took a decision for approaching this respondent to arrange the amendment of the scale of teachers. On 20‑..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 147
Kazi Rokanuddin Ahmed and another Vs. Labour Court and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ons made against them. 5. The respondent No.1 on perusal of the records, including written objection and other documents took cognizance of the case and issued sumÂmons against the petitioners on dated 28-12-2010. 6. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned order the petitioners ......desh Labour Law (Criminal) Case No.368 of 2010, is hereby declared unlawful, malafide, out of jurisdiction and is of no legal effect. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 382. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 145
Asgar Ali and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....02(1) and (2)(a)(i)(ii) of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order vide Memo No. Shipkam/Hash-1/Clinic-5/93/259 dated 30-12-2002 (Annexure-D) should not be declared to have been made/passed without authority and ......resolved by the Managing Board and when the Managing Board itself is involved in the disputed by the President and member or members of any Unit shall not take any such matter to the Court of law for decision." On perusal of the aforesaid provision it appears that though a remedy has been availab..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 169