Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 221-240 of 1885 results.

Zamini Bala Das Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....f the trial Court restored. The suit is decreed as prayed for. Send down the record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 774.       ......brothers acquired the land with the income of the joint family. Bhim Das Poddar died leaving a son Bhupati Bhushan Das as his only legal representative. By a family partition effected by a registered deed in 1936 Juthisthir and Arjun and their nephew Bhupati Bhusan Das partitioned their entire prope..

Category: Property Law | Date: 17 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 4

Nurul Haque and others Vs. Abdus Salam Chowdhury and ors. 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

....ment of the High Court Division is not at all a proper Judgment of reversal. Accordingly, the same is liable to be interfered with. The appeal is thus allowed with cost.  Ed. ......d in schedule A to the plaint with the plaintiffs properties situated at Jalpaiguri in India along with 10 shares of Nipuchapur Tea Estate described in schedule‑B to the plaint. Thereafter, a deed of agreement was drawn up and signed by the parties in September, 1960 and in terms of the dee..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 13 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 196

Oriental Bank Ltd. Vs. Rina Alam and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....nsel for the petitioner to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 51. ......to the petitioner bank for any loan amount, the so-called Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed dated 17‑3­-1988 was forged, concocted and illegal, the plaintiff is entitled to get back the title deed along with other supporting documents lying with the bank and a decree of Taka 75,00,000 as c..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 5 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 171

Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and oth­ers, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......the seller opposite party are co-sharers of the khatian and that pre-emptees failed to estab­lish that there had been partition of the land of khatian by the decree of the Court or by a reg­istered deed of partition. The trial Court also held that the Miscellaneous Cases were not barred by limitat..

Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 43

Sultan Miah (Md) Vs. Kazi Abu Siddique and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

....ned. Judgment of the, High Court Division causing failure of justice in making the Rule absolute. Therefore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......and Miah got one ­third each of the suit land on amicable partition. It is further stated that the plaintiff became the owner of the suit land by purchase on various dates through registered sale deeds and thereafter his name was mutated and he paid rent, that on 5‑11‑1994, the defen..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 8 May, 2004 | Hits: 825

Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

.... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565.   ......rade Marks Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with rule 65 of the Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963, in TM 26, the prayer for renewal of the registration on a plain paper rejecting the deed of assignment given by the respondent earlier in favour of the appellant was not maintainable i..

Category: Others | Date: 5 May, 2004 | Hits: 4

Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......so con­firmed by his rent case No. 43 of 1993. Thereafter he has created a new tenancy with one Abdul Jalil, happened to be the co-sharer of the suit property. Then he claimed title through purchase deed from Abdul Jalil and it has been categorically stated in the additional written statement that ..

Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69

Nurul Huq (Md) @ MN Huq Vs. Nirmal Chandra Dutta & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....ave been executed by the respondent and to decide the appeal iii accordance with law. The plaintiff of the suit shall bear the costs of the examination by the Handwriting Expert.  Ed. ......n 26‑5‑1982 he, however, revoked the power of attorney because the defendant (Md Nurul Huq) had sold his valuable property and misappropriated the sale proceeds and also inserted into the deed of power of attorney a recital to the effect that he had allegedly taken loan of Taka 4,50,000 ..

Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 103

Aftab A (Capt Retired) Vs. SM Kutubuddin being dead his heirs: Nuzhat Banu & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....n merit. 12. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. 13. The First Appeal No. 191 of 1992 is remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit. There is no order as to costs. Ed.......sion as a first Court of appeal could have compared the signatures themselves, that the High Court Division erred in law in sending the case on remand for examination by a Handwriting Expert when the deed of agreement was proved by the plaintiff himself and by two other attesting witnesses, PWs 2 an..

Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 20 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 106

Akram Hossain (Md.) Vs. Sahera Khatun and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....nt District Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ...... in the schedule to the plaint at a consideration of Taka 14,00,000 and on 15‑9‑2002 paid Taka 1,00,000. As said opposite parties on 25‑10‑2002 declined to execute and register necessary sale deed the plaintiff was constrained to institute the suit on 20‑11‑2002. 3. On 18‑1‑2003..

Category: Contract Law | Date: 8 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 5

Jalil Brothers and ors. Vs. Humayun Majid and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....e matter in its proper perspective and we find no illegality or irregularity in the decision of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ilding situated at Holding No. 21, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka occupied by the appellants and respondents Nos. 3‑17 stating, inter alia, that former Government of East Pakistan by a registered deed of lease dated 6‑10‑65 granted lease of the land situated at Holding No. 21, Motijheel Comm..

Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 18 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 133

Abdus Sattar (Md) and ors. Vs. Lalon Mazar Sharif & Seba Sadan Committee & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....onsideration of the evidence on record has arrived at the correct finding and, as such, no interference is called for.  Accordingly, this leave petition is dismissed.  Ed. ......a registered kabala dated 3‑7­1356 but did not deliver possession of the transferred land and then the defendant Nos. 14‑16 on payment of kabala money to Munshi Chand Ali Mollik got a deed of reconveyance and to the knowledge of all including the plaintiff SA Khatian No. 193 has been..

Category: Property Law | Date: 11 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 127

Selim Saial Vs. A. Majid Molla and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

.... parties to bear their respective costs of the litigation. Lower Court's Record be sent down as immediate as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 69. ......: a. (i) First opposite party of Revision petition, in the capacity of co-sharer by purchase, as pre emptor presented a petition under section 96 of The Act for the land delineated in sale deed dated 17.7.1997 in favour of stranger pre-emptee second opposite party of Revision Petition in..

Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 6

Mirpur Mazar Co-Operative Market Society Ltd. Vs. Capital Tower (Pvt) Ltd & Ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....mode of allotment of the plot in question.  12. In view of the discussions made herein over we find no substance in the petition.  Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.   Ed. ...... Suit No. 1 of 1995 (the Title Suit No. 92 of 1993 was transferred from the 1st Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka) decreeing the same in part in the following manner: "It is declared that the deed of lease in respect of the suit land and in favour of the defendant No. 6, Capital Tower (Pvt) ..

Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 86

Abdus Sobhan Mandal (Md) Vs. Md. Jonab Ali Fakir & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

..... We are fully in agreement with the above findings of the high court Division. For all the above reasons, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......he being a contiguous land owner, has the right of pre-emption against the pre-emptee, who is a stranger thereto and the pre-emptee without serving the statutory notice upon him obtained the disputed deed of transfer collusively in order to defeat his right of pre­ emption and that he for the fi..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 18 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 264

Kadamtala Purba Basaboo Uchcha Bidalaya & ors. V. Hasna H. Sarker @ Hasna Heba Sarker & others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)

....r interference with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and consequently, this appeal is dismissed with costs of a Senior counsel in all stages. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......r interference with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and consequently, this appeal is dismissed with costs of a Senior counsel in all stages. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 8 Dec, 2003 | Hits: 209

Govt. of People's Repub. of BD & other Vs. Md. Shamsul Haque & other, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

.... 10. We do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioners for any interference with the impugned judgment and order. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......209;petitioner forthwith.  4. The case of writ‑petitioner‑respondent No.1 is that he purchased the case property from one Abdur Sattar who failed to execute and register the deed of sale in favour of the respondent No. 1 and thus the respondent No. 1 instituted a suit for ..

Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Dec, 2003 | Hits: 139

Serajuddin Ahmed & ors. Vs. AKM Saiful Alam & ors., 2003, 32 CLC (AD)

.... good conscience." 30. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed with costs in two appeals. Ed. ...... Block‑F, Mohammadpur Housing Estate, for 99 years from the Government on the basis of the allotment letter dated February 12, 1979 and in due course they paid the salami in 4 instalments and lease deed was executed on July 30, 1980 and possession was made over on September 12, 1979, that in 1990 ..

Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 3 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 899

Govt. of BD. Rep. by Adnl. DC Vs. AKM Abdul Hye & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....; 15. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal.  Accordingly the appeal is dismissed.  There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... of Joy Gopal Mondal and thereupon Kartik Mondal got the property in Sarabo Mouza has not been disproved by the contesting defendant Nos. 1 and 2, rather plaintiffs have proved the said fact by the deed (Exhibit 6) executed by the son of Gonesh Mondal. It may be mentioned part of the property out..

Category: Property Law | Date: 29 Oct, 2003 | Hits: 1038

Amir Hossain Vs. Md. Amir Ali and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)

....tered through the Court. In case of default by the appellant to pay the above amount as directed, the appeals shall stand dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 38. ......86. From the statement of D.W.1 we find that he accepted Tk. 10,000/- on 31.8.84, Tk. 27,000/-on 28.9.84 and Tk. 18,000/- on 30.11.84. The defendant introduced a new story that it was agreed that two deeds would be executed, each for taka one lac one deed on 3.8.84 but on that date taka one lac was ..

Category: Contract Law | Date: 20 Oct, 2003 | Hits: 256