Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
State Vs. Md. Ali Kibria @ Shahzijahan and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....side. The condemned prisoner Mohammad Ali Kibria alias Shahjahan is set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection With any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 512........ Evidence of PW3 has no relevancy so far appellant is concerned as he was examined 6 months after occurrence by the CID and he did say nothing to anybody during this six months. 18. PW 4 Jahanara Begum who claimed to have seen condemned prisoner to go away from the place of occurrence at about t......Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Fazle Ahmed J Md. Badruzzaman J The State......................................................Appellant Vs. Md. Ali Kibria @ Shahzijahan...........................Respondent. Md. Ali Kibria @ Shahaj......ase. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 512...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Adam Ali Bepari Vs. Abdur Rahman Dewan & others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....I do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order impugned. In the result, the Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 510. ............Opposite Parties. Judgment February 5, 1991. Cases Referred to- Dulichand Mehesriand and others Vs. Prohlad Chandra and others, 1945 Cal 50; M/s Lutfun Nahar Vs. Syeeda Hasinal Ara Begum and another, 21 DLR 633; Akbar Ali and others Vs. Zahiruddin Kari and others, 30 DLR (SC) 81; ......(1991) 510. ......ourt in this case is whether the lower appellate Court committed an error of law in its decision in dismissing the pre‑emption case holding that the case is not maintainable under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 on the finding that the land under pre‑emption is not an a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Abdul Majid Vs. Akhil Chandra Sengupta and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....s correct. For the aforesaid reasons the judgment cannot be sustained. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. No order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 506. ......s correct. For the aforesaid reasons the judgment cannot be sustained. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. No order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 506. ......991) 506. ......was made erroneously. I have been taken through the judgment by the learned Advocate, It appears that the Court of appeal below while holding that the petitioner's application under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 is barred by limitation committed serious error of law in th..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Gulshan Ara Begum Vs. Moazzem Hossain Chowdhury and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....h law as expeditiously as possible after giving due notices to the parties concerned Let the lower Court's records be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 481. ......This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 481. ......urt High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Mozammel Hoque J Habibur Rahman Khan J Gulshan Ara Begum alias Jhanara and others................Petitioners Vs. Moazzem Hossain Chowdhury and others ..................Opposite Parties. Judgment Febr......h law as expeditiously as possible after giving due notices to the parties concerned Let the lower Court's records be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 481. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Mir Amir Ali Vs. State, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....uashed. It is hereby directed that the accused petitioner be discharged from his bail bond. The Rule is accordingly made absolute. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 250. ......uashed. It is hereby directed that the accused petitioner be discharged from his bail bond. The Rule is accordingly made absolute. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 250. ......0. ...... Court High Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Habibur Rahman Khan J Muhammad Abdul Mannan J Mir Amir Ali ......... ........Accused Petitioner Vs. The State......................... Opposite-Party Judgment December 11, 1991. Cases Referred T..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 104
A M A Wajedul Islam Vs. State, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....ion No.329 (R) 1993 is accordingly disposed of and the connected Rule being Criminal Revision No.3521(R)/1991 for bail is discharged. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 243. ......………Appellant Vs. State……………………Respondent Judgment March 10, 1993. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: MA Malek with M Itnan Ali, Lutfa Ara Begum and AKM Asaduzzaman, Advocates ‑ For the Appellant SB Barua, Advocate ‑ For the State. ......reme Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate jurisdiction) Present: Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J A M A Wajedul Islam……………………Appellant Vs. State……………………Respondent Judgment March 10, 1993. Result: The appe......urt High Court Division (Criminal Appellate jurisdiction) Present: Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J A M A Wajedul Islam……………………Appellant Vs. State……………………Respondent Judgment March 10, 1993. Result: The appeal is d..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Aminuzzaman (Md.) Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....rea, PS Danmondi, Dhaka, now being detained in Dhaka Central Jail at liberty at once if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 242. ......rea, PS Danmondi, Dhaka, now being detained in Dhaka Central Jail at liberty at once if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 242. ...... ......of the respondents, submits that the grounds supplied to the detenu are sufficient grounds for detention of the detenu as his activities as shown therein are highly prejudicial to the security of the State. 7. It appears that the grounds supplied to the detenu contain three grounds out of which g..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. State and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....the petition for bail of the petitioner and we find no reason to grant the prayer for bail. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 227. ......the petition for bail of the petitioner and we find no reason to grant the prayer for bail. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 227. ......rt High Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Mustafizur Rahman....................Petitioner Vs. State and others ......... …….Opposite Party Judgment November 29, 1992. Case Re......igh Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Mustafizur Rahman....................Petitioner Vs. State and others ......... …….Opposite Party Judgment November 29, 1992. Case Referred ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Siddique (Md) Vs. State, 1992, 31 CLC (HCD)
....e Special Tribunal, the prayer for registering the appeal for hearing on merit is rejected. In the result, the rule is discharged. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 214. ......e Special Tribunal, the prayer for registering the appeal for hearing on merit is rejected. In the result, the rule is discharged. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 214. ......993) 214. ......4. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Anwara Rashid and others Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
.... the rules under judgment. In the result all the Rules are discharged without any order as to costs. Orders of stay stand vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 207. ......Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdul Jalil J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Anwara Rashid and others....................................Petitioners (In Writ Petition No. 554 of 1992) Khodeja Begum and another……………………………………..Petitioners (In Writ Petition No. 661 o......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Petitioners (In Writ Petition No.1059 of 1992) Majeda Khatun……………………………………….Petitioner (In Writ Petition No. 1060 of 1992) Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others………………….Respondents (In all the Petitions)......of land under the said Ordinance. It appears from the said letter dated 21.11.91 of the respondent No.3 that correction of decision of CLAC dated 2.11.91 was made with the approval of the Minister of State in charge of the Ministry of Land who was Chairman of CLAC. Subsequently summary sent to the P..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 79
State Vs. Md. Shah Nowroj and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... passed by the Divisional Special Judge, Khulna in Special Case No. 18 of 2003 is affirmed. Send down the lower Court records. Borhanuddin J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......thers……………Respondents Judgment May 25, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Md. Monwar Hossain, Assistant Attorney General -For the appellant. Md. Abdur Razzak with Saira Fairoz and Afifa Begum, Advocates -For the respondents. Govt. Criminal Appeal No.26 of 2004. Judgment Md. Ru......Supreme Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Borhanuddin J Md. Ruhul Quddus J The State………………………………………….Appellant Vs. Md. Shah Nowroj and others……………Respondents Judgment May 25, 2011. Lawyers ......orhanuddin J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....3 passed by the Divisional Special Judge, Khulna in Special Case No. 16 of 2003 is affirmed. Send down the lower Court records. Borhanuddin J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......thers……………Respondents Judgment May 25, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Md. Monwar Hossain, Assistant Attorney General- For the appellant. Md. Abdur Razzak with Saira Fairoz and Afifa Begum, Advocates - For the respondents. Govt. Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 2004. Judgment Md. ...... High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Borhanuddin J Md. Ruhul Quddus J The State……………………………………………………..Appellant Vs. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and others……………Respondents Judgment May 25, 2011. La......Borhanuddin J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 101
State Vs. Sk. Arif Newaz and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ivisional Special Judge, Khulna in Special Tribunal Case No. 13 of 2003 is affirmed. Send down the lower Court records. Borhanuddin J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:  ......………………..Respondents Judgment May 25, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Md. Monwar Hossain, Assistant Attorney General -For the appellant. Md. Abdur Razzak with Saira Fairoz and Afifa Begum, Advocates-For the respondents. Govt. Criminal Appeal No.24 of 2004. Judgment Md. Ruh......t High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Borhanuddin J Md. Ruhul Quddus J The State…………………………………………………….Appellant Vs. Sk. Arif Newaz and others………………………..Respondents Judgment May 25, 2011......din J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:  ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Dr. Kazi Mozammel Hoque Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....s concerned in the case. In the result, the rule is discharged. Let this order be communicated to the trial Court for information. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 197. ......d Abdul Mannan J Dr. Kazi Mozammel Hoque...................Petitioner Vs. State..................Opposite Party Judgment March 9, 1992. Cases Referred to- 35 DLR (AD) 127; Fatema Begum alias Urmila Rani Vs. Gageswar Nath and the Sale, 9 BLD (1989) 469; Sukhendra Chandra Das Vs. ...... Supreme Court High Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Habibur Rahman Khan J Muhammad Abdul Mannan J Dr. Kazi Mozammel Hoque...................Petitioner Vs. State..................Opposite Party Judgment March 9, 1992. Cases Referred to- ......e Court High Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Habibur Rahman Khan J Muhammad Abdul Mannan J Dr. Kazi Mozammel Hoque...................Petitioner Vs. State..................Opposite Party Judgment March 9, 1992. Cases Referred to- 35 DLR ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Philips Electrical Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Taxes (South) Zone, Dhaka, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
.... answer the questions referred to us in the negative and against the Revenue. Parties are to bear their respective costs although. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 190. ...... answer the questions referred to us in the negative and against the Revenue. Parties are to bear their respective costs although. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 190. ......reme Court High Court Division (Special Statutory Jurisdiction) Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Philips Electrical Company Ltd..................Applicant Vs. The Commissioner of Taxes (South) Zone, Dhaka......................Respondent Judgment ...... answer the questions referred to us in the negative and against the Revenue. Parties are to bear their respective costs although. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 190. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 109
State Vs. Dipu Mondal, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... a, District-Rajbari in connection with the case and to admit him on bail to his satisÂfaction till he makes any prayer in that regard. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 267. ...... Mondal had faced trial before the learned Sessions Judge, Rajbari in Sessions Case No.34 of 2000 to answer charges punishable under sections 302/201 of the Penal Code for the murder of his wife Lipi Begum on the night following on 30th October, 1998. According to the prosecution case narratÂed by ......llate Division (Criminal) Present: ABM Khairul Haque CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J The State .....................................................Petitioner Vs. Dipu Mondal ...................................................Respondent Order October......is Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 267. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Firoz Ali and others Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....Âeration. Leave is, therefore, granted on the addiÂtional grounds. Preparation of the paper book is disÂpensed with as prayed for. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 264.......Âeration. Leave is, therefore, granted on the addiÂtional grounds. Preparation of the paper book is disÂpensed with as prayed for. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 264.......d. Abdul Matin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Firoz Ali and others……………………..........Petitioners Vs. The State ……………………………………………..Respondent Order May 13,......tin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Firoz Ali and others……………………..........Petitioners Vs. The State ……………………………………………..Respondent Order May 13, 2010. L..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Nantu Biswas and others Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....se has been made out for review. In such view of the matter we find no substance in this review petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 261.......se has been made out for review. In such view of the matter we find no substance in this review petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 261.......ohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Nantu Biswas and others.................................Petitioners Vs. The State ……………………………………………………………Respondent ......lul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Nantu Biswas and others.................................Petitioners Vs. The State ……………………………………………………………Respondent Judgment ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Amanullah Zahangir Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....r such circumstance, we do not find any merit in the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, as such, this petiÂtion is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 253. ......r such circumstance, we do not find any merit in the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, as such, this petiÂtion is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 253. ...... (Criminal) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J ABM Khairul Haque J Amanullah Zahangir………………………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. The State, repreÂsented by the Deputy Commissioner, Chittagong and another………………......l) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J ABM Khairul Haque J Amanullah Zahangir………………………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. The State, repreÂsented by the Deputy Commissioner, Chittagong and another………………………â€..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Shahidul @ Buidda and others Vs. Mrs. Anwara Begum and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....ived at a correct decision. There, is therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 250. ......resent: Mohammad Fazlul Karim CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J S Surendra Kumar Sinha J Shahidul @ Buidda and others ...........................................Petitioners Vs. Mrs. Anwara Begum and others .......................................Respondents Judgment April 13, 2010. ...... (Criminal) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J S Surendra Kumar Sinha J Shahidul @ Buidda and others ...........................................Petitioners Vs. Mrs. Anwara Begum and others .......................................Respondents Judgment ......ived at a correct decision. There, is therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 250. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81