Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Engineer A. B. Siddique Vs. Kazi Akramuddin and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....d by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-7. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1193 of 2011. (From the judgment and order dated 03.10.2010 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.6864 of 2004). Order Sy...... the writ-petitioner. Since handing over of possession of the allotted land to the writ-petitioner was being delayed he filed an application to writ-respondent No.1 on 2.10.2004 informing him about a decision of cancellation of the said allotment and re-allotment of the same in favour of one Enginee..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 138
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 172
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Khairul Bashar (Md.) and 8 others Vs. Collector of Customs and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....92, 1360, 1365, 1366, 1516, 1681, and 1405 of 1993. Judgment Kazi Ebadul Hoque J.- In all these Rules assessments of customs duty by the customs authority on the basis of SROs subsequent to the date of opening of Letters of Credit are under challenge. Common question of law having been involve......ed subsequent to the date of opening of the respective letter of credit vested right of the respective petitioner has been adversely affected and such vested right cannot be taken away in view of the decision of the Appellate Division in the case of Collector of Customs Vs. Ahmed Hossain and others ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Sentu Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....l fixed 2-4-91 for framing charge holding that the Gazette Notification and publication in paper had already been made against the accused petitioner and other absconding accused. Then on 2-4-91, the date fixed for framing charge, fixed 29-4-91 for framing charge and subsequently on 12-5-91 charge w......tion 30 of the Special Powers Act as provided the door is not shut upon the face of the accused petitioner. In support of his contention he also referred paragraph Nos. 13, 14 and 16 of the aforesaid decision where it has been held that- “13. In all such types of cases therefore it will be for ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Dr. Professor MA Hadi Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....ointed in his place as the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine Dhaka University under Article 17(2) of Dhaka University Order, 1973 on 14-8-96 (Annexure-’C’). Thereafter, the petitioner sent a letter dated 24-8-96 to the respondents demanding justice but to no avail. 3. Being aggrieved by the app......e the writ petition is discharged on the ground of maintainability we do not think it is necessary to go into the merits of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 218. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Raquibuddin Ahmed Vs. SAM Iqbal and another, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....andaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with SM Moonir, Advocates - For the Contemner-Opposite Parties. Civil Rule No.130 (R) of 1994 (Contempt). Judgment Md. Mozammel Hoque J.- As per order of this Court dated 29-7-97 the contemner-opposite party No.1 is present in Court in person. 2. This Rule for C......earlier joining letter and this letter dated 20-7-94 is annexed as Annexure-17 to the affidavit-in-reply. On 3-8-94, BSC informed the petitioner that the matter is being placed before the Board for a decision which was never placed despite several meetings held and this letter is annexed as Annexuer..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 142
Kafiluddin (Md.) Vs. Sukkur Ali Mia, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
.... Not Represented - For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 430 of 1992. Judgment AM Mahmudur Rahman J.- In this Rule simple question calls for determination as to why the impugned order dated 7-1-92 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Narsingdi is valid in law or otherwise ca......d land in execution of the decree. But the learned Advocate neither could place anything before me to indicate that the suit was not a suit for specific performance of contract nor he could place any decision that the executing Court can go beyond the decree. There is no bar in law to execute the de..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Bashir Kha Vs. State, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....other materials on record. On scrutiny of the record of the learned Magistrate it appears that in the charge only the above two sections of the Penal Code were mentioned but other particulars such as date, time, place of occurrence, the name of person against whom the offence was committed, nature o......ourts below misappreciated the evidence and the legal position which resulted in failure of justice. Due to misappreciation of the legal position and the evidence, the Courts below arrived at a wrong decision which cannot be upheld. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. The judgment and order..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Khodeja Begum & others Vs. Md. Sadeq Sarkar, 1994, 23 CLC (HCD)
....oners. Faruque Ahmed, Advocate - For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.5195 of 1991. Judgment Muhammad Abdul Mannan J.- This Civil Revision is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 23-3-1986 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Chandpur in Title Appeal No.125 of 1984 reversing t......earned Munsif on considering the facts and circumstances of the case, evidence on record found that the plaintiff failed to prove the marriage and the Kabinnama. He based his judgment on the reported decisions of 21 DLR 218 and 34 DLR 221. 7. The plaintiff being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 185
Saleha Begum Vs. Kamal Hossain, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....gment Md. Joynul Abedin J.- This Rule at the instance of the plaintiff wife arising out of an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure calls in question the judgment and decree dated 18-4-95 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Sadar Noakhali, in Family Appeal No.15 of 1993 affirm......ld to file a suit for maintenance himself or to become a co-plaintiff with his mother in the present suit. The appellate Court below therefore has committed an error of law affecting the merit of the decision by refusing to award maintenance for the child in the present suit. 8. In the result the..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Abdul Jalil Munshi (Md.) Vs. Returning Officer & others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....und that he is a defaulter. On an appeal the Thana Nirbahi Officer dismissed the appeal and affirmed the order of the Returning Officer canceling the nomination paper. 2. It appears from the order dated 5-11-97 as evidenced from Annexure-C to the petition that Sonali Bank, Goalanda Branch by thei......ion is disposed of. Let a copy of this judgment/order be sent to the Returning Officer (respondent No.1) forthwith for compliance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 179. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 153
Syed Masud Ali and others Vs. Md. Asmatullah and others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....Record - For the Appellant. Aminul Huq, Advocate on Record - For Respondent No.3. Ex-Parte - For Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4-26. Civil Appeal No. 45 of 1978. (From the Judgment and Order dated 4-2-77 passed by the High Court in Civil Revision Case No.718 of 1967.) Judgment Kemalud......h Court in revision. 4. The learned Single Judge of the High Court proceeded on the basis that the enrolment made by the Administrator of Waqfs under section 47 of the Waqfs Ordinance, 1962 is a decision under section 50 of the Ordinance and it would be challenged by a person aggrieved. The exp..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 136
Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. M/S. Jamiluddin Corporation Ltd., Bogra, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....Syed Mozaffar Hossain, Advocate, instructed by H. R. Khan Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent (In all the appeals). Civil Appeal Nos. 67, 68 & 69 of 1978. (From the judgment and order dated 16-8-76 passed by the High Court in Applications No.17, 18 & 19 of 1971) Judgment Ba......canvassed that the question as to whether certain income could be said to have accrued to the assessee, is a question of law and, therefore, the reference was validly made. Reliance was placed on a decision of the Indian Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jai Frakash Omprakash Co. Ltd..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 197