Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Capital Properties Ltd. Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....ital Properties Ltd…......Petitioner Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others.........Opposite Parties Judgment July 3, 1991. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- AIR 1959 Bom. 300; AIR 1938 Mad. 372; AIR 1946 Ma...... page 1, 343 DLR (AD) 16; 43 DLR (HCD) page 204; ILR 3 Mad (PC) page 384; AIR 1945 Cal. 492; AIR 1946 PC 103; 1984 BLD (AD) 285; PLD 1966 SC 684; AIR 1939 All. 633; AIR 1954 Mad. 848; AIR 1939. Lawyers Involved: Moinul Huq, Advocate ‑For the Petitioner. Kaiseruddin Ahmed, Deputy ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Selim Ullah Bahadur Vs. Election Commission and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....que J Selim Ullah Bahadur .........Petitioner Vs. The Election Commission and others .....................Respondents Judgment May 24, 1990. Result: The the Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- AC Joshep Vs. Seevan Pillai, AIR 1984 (SC) 925; M......i Vs. Election Commission and others, 1990 BLD 157; AFM Shah Alam Vs. Mujibul Huq and others, 41 DLR (AD) 68=1989 BLD (AD) 78; Abdul Hamid Khan Vs. Miah Nurul,Islam and others, 42 DLR (AD) 49. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzak, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Ad..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 177
Mostain Mollah and others Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....oth the appeals are, therefore, allowed. We reject the letter of reference submitted by the learned Sessions Judge, Narail. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (HCD) (1992) 295. ......ed. Cases Referred to- Hannmart Govind Nargundkar Vs. The State of MP, 1952 SCR 1091; AIR 1952 SCC 343; AIR 1954 SCC 660; AIR 1960 SCC 29; (1980) 1 SCC 530; (1969) 3; SCC 198 (202). Lawyers Involved: Serajul Haque with Mansurul Hoque Chowdhury, Salahuddin Yusuf and ABM Golam ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Mostafizur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of BanglaÂdesh, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ……….Respondents. Judgment March 20, 1991. December 9, 1991. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Mohd. Subrati Vs. State of WB, 1973 SC 207 (211); Jo......le is discharged. Cases Referred to- Mohd. Subrati Vs. State of WB, 1973 SC 207 (211); Jon Martin Vs. State, AIR 1975 (SC) 775KN. Joglekan Vs. Commissioner of Police, 1957 AIR (SC) 28. Lawyers Involved: Kazi Shahadat Hossain with Mofizur Rahman Mazumder, Advocates ‑For the Pet..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Adhir Kumar Shaha Vs. State, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
....resent: Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Md. Hamidul Haque J Adhir Kumar Shaha.................Petitioners Vs. State...............Opposite Party Judgment November 29, 1995. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: None Appears – For the Petitioner. Abdus Salam M......ue J Md. Hamidul Haque J Adhir Kumar Shaha.................Petitioners Vs. State...............Opposite Party Judgment November 29, 1995. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: None Appears – For the Petitioner. Abdus Salam Mamun, Assistant Attorneyâ€..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Sheerin Alam Chowdhury Vs. Captain Shamsul Alam Chowdhury, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
....ptain Shamsul Alam Chowdhury................Petitioner Vs. Sheerin Alam Chowdhury.................Opposite Party (In Criminal No. 604 of 1993) Judgment August 1, 1995. Result: The Rules in respect of Civil Revision Nos. 3451 and 3474 of 1992 are made absolute. The Rule in Civ...... PLD 1967 (Sc) 97; PLD 1959 (WP) Lahore 93; 17 DLR 687; 32 DLR 94; Mst. Khurshid Bibi Vs. Baboo Muhammad Amin, 19 DLR (SC) 97; Bilquis Fatema Vs. Najam‑ul‑Ikram, 11 DLR (WP Lahore) page 109. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with Md. AY Masihuzzaman, Advocates ‑ For the Petitioner (..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 265
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Abdul Gafur Sikder Vs. Mst. Shafia Khatun & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....ker J Abdul Gafur Sikder............................Petitioner Vs. Mst. Shafia Khatun & others...........................Opposite Parties Judgment April 13, 1989. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Nittala Achayya and others Vs. Nittala Yellamma an......ttabji See-tharamayya and another, AIR 1933 (Mad) 436; S. Muhammad Eusoof Maricar Vs. K. Subramanian Chettiar and others, AIR 1950 (Mad) 272; 1953 (Mad) 272; AIR 1933 (Mad)436; AIR 1923 (Mad) 109. Lawyers Involved: Hemayetuddin Ahmed, Advocate - For the PetiÂtioners. Abdul Quayum, Advocate..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 136
Bajla Rice Mills Vs. Bangladash, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....Mustafa Kamal J Md. Mozammel Hoque J Bajla Rice Mills………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladash..............................Opposite Party Judgment May 25, 1989. Result: The Rule is discharged with costs. Cases Referred to- Muhammad Shafi and others Vs. MuÂhammad Sa...... Smt. Hoora and others Vs. Abdul Karim, AIR 1970 Rajasthan 22; Basappa Veerappa Kami Vs. Chanabassappa Shidappa Angadi, AIR 1960 Mysore 190; Muhammad Shafi Vs. Muhammad Sabir, PLD 1960 Lahore 591. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khalilur Rahman with Syeda Afsar Jahan Advocates - For the Petitioner. M..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 325
Suresh Majumder and Others Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....ddin J Suresh Majumder and Others...........................Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others............Opposite Parties Judgment March 23, 1988. Result: The Rule is disposed of. Case Referred to- Baidyanath Nandi and others Vs. Shumma Sundor Nandi and..........Opposite Parties Judgment March 23, 1988. Result: The Rule is disposed of. Case Referred to- Baidyanath Nandi and others Vs. Shumma Sundor Nandi and others, 1943 AIR Cal 427. Lawyers Involved: P.C. Guha, Advocate-For the Petitioners. No one -For the Opposite Party. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 209
State Vs. Md. Sirajul Islam and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....nding circumstances and material evidence. Confession is manifestly a very important convincing material for proving that the offence is committed by such persons making confessions. According to the Rule of law, conviction can be based solely on the confession against the maker, if it is found to b...... State ……………..…. Respondent. Judgment April 9 and 18, 2012. Result: Death Reference No. 87 of 2006 is accepted and all the Criminal Appeals and Jail Appeals are dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Jahangir Alam, Deputy Attorney-General with Md. Ensanuddin Sheikh, Md. Nuru..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Hafez Mawlana Humayun Kabir Vs. Md. Lokman and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....ba Keroya, Raipur, Laishmipur ................ Defendant-petitioner. Vs. Md. Lokman and others ......................Plaintiff-opposite parties. Judgment March 1, 2012. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908); Order XLI, Rule 2......R (AD) 430, 54 DLR (AD) 170, 15 MLR(AD) 12, Kamaluddin Ahmed Sarwar and others Vs. Mohd. Shahjahan and another, 15 MLR (AD) 422, Nurul Islam and others Vs. Doud Hossain and others, 8 BLT (AD) 174. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Nazrul Islam with Syed Al Asafur Ali, Advocates - For the defendant-p..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Wajeda Khatun and others Vs. Saonatun Bewa, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....2 DLR 19. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate—For the Petitioner. No one—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 214 of 1996. Judgment Md. Abdur Razzaque J.-This Rule under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act V of 1908) at the instance of the defe...............................Opposite Party Judgment June 25, 2002. Result: The rule is discharged. Case Referred to- Rafiqul Islam and another Vs. Abul Kalam and others, 42 DLR 19. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate—For the Petitioner. No one—For the Opposite..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 305
Ka Bi Ma Iftekhar Anam Vs. State & another, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... Farah Mahbub J Ka Bi Ma Iftekhar Anam……………………Petitioner Vs. State & another……………………Opposite Parties Judgment February 28, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Shamsul Alam Vs. State, 60 DLR 677; Faridul Alam Vs. S......ses Referred to- Shamsul Alam Vs. State, 60 DLR 677; Faridul Alam Vs. State, 13 BLC (AD) 61; Manzur Alam Vs. State, 55 DLR (AD) 62; Ali Akkas Vs. Enayet Hossain, 17 BLD (AD) 44 = 2 BLC (AD) 16. Lawyers Involved: No one - For the Petitioner. Sakila Rowshan, Deputy Attorney-General - For t..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Abu Hena Mostafa Kamal & another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....dul Hoque J Abu Hena Mostafa Kamal & another…………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others…………………Respondents Judgment January 27, 2011. Result: The Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- 6 ITR 51; 44 ITR 726; 111 ITR 650. Lawyers In...... Bangladesh and others…………………Respondents Judgment January 27, 2011. Result: The Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- 6 ITR 51; 44 ITR 726; 111 ITR 650. Lawyers Involved: Mosharraf Hossain with Bazlur Rashid, Advocates - For Petitioners (In both Wri..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 167
AFM Hamidul Hoque Vs. Director, National Savings Directorate and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦..Petitioner Vs. Director, National Savings Directorate and others……………….Respondents Judgment July 28, 2002. Result: The Rule is discharged. Case Referred to- State Vs. Mohammad Hossain and others, 25 DLR 207. L......Directorate and others……………….Respondents Judgment July 28, 2002. Result: The Rule is discharged. Case Referred to- State Vs. Mohammad Hossain and others, 25 DLR 207. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shahidul Islam Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md. Moklesur Rahman ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 147
Sadia Chowdhury Parag Vs. Chairman, Film Censor Board & others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ry Parag…………………………………………...Petitioner Vs. Chairman, Film Censor Board & others.................Respondents Judgment January 27, 2003. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Shorful Islam Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Si......……………………………...Petitioner Vs. Chairman, Film Censor Board & others.................Respondents Judgment January 27, 2003. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Shorful Islam Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Sigma Huda, Advocate—Fo..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 210