Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3521-3540 of 6668 results.
Pavel @ Faysal Ahmed Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... party to show cause as to why the accused petitioner should not be enlarged on bail in Sessions Case No. 131 of 2010 arising out of G.R. Case No. 470 of 2009 corresponding to Kafrul P.S. Case No. 42 dated 24.8.09 under section 302 of the Penal Code, now pending before the learned Janonirapatta Bign...... the trial of the case, the learned trial court may consider the bail of the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Abdul Ohid Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....his rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the accused petitioner should not be enlarged on bail in G.R. Case No. 32 of 2009 arising out of Gowainghat P.S. Case No.01 dated 05.03.2009 under section 302/323/109/34 of the Penal Code, now pending in the Court of Judicia......to make the case ready, the learned trial court may consider the bail of the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Md. Nashir Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... to show cause as to why the accused petitioner should not be enlarged on bail in Criminal Misc. Case No. 8474 of 2010 arising out of G.R. Case No.61 of 2010 corresponding to Khilgoan P.S. Case No.61 dated 27.01.2010 under section 4(1) of the Law and Order Disruption Crimes (Speedy) Trial Act, now p...... to conclude the trial, the learned trial court may consider the bail of the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Jamuna Television Ltd. and another Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....1. Md. Zohirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 3. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2 & 4. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1724 of 2010. (From the judgment and order dated 20.5.2010 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.8100 of 2009.) Order Sur......concise statements within 6(six) weeks form date. The parties will be at liberty to mention the matter for early disposal of the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 141. ..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 585
State Vs. Shamima Arshad, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... Government Appeal No. 04 of 1984. Judgment Md. Abdul Aziz J.- This is an appeal under section 417(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure on behalf of the State arising out of judgment and order dated 16-2-84 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhaka in Session Case No.497 of 1983 acquitting ...... the State appellant also relied upon the evidence of those two witnesses in support of the appeal. We, therefore, do not feel it necessary to discuss the evidence of other witnesses in coming to the decision. P.W.3 Mariam alias Monoara was the maid servant in the house of the accused at the relevan..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
....rul Haque J.- This Rule under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure was issued at the instance of the defendant-petitioners calling upon the opposite party No.1 to show cause as to why the order dated 13-7-1995 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Dhamrai, Dhaka, rejecting an application unde......ce his step at the earliest opportunity, so that if permissible under the law, he may file a properly constituted suit for appropriate relief. Reliance in this respect may be placed in the well-known decision Burmah Eastern Ltd. Vs. Burmah Eastern Employees Union and others PLD 1967 Dacca 190 = 18 D..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Major General (Retd.) Mahmudul Hasan Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 831 of 1998. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- By this Rule opposite parties were called upon to show cause as to why the proceedings of Kotalipara PS Case No.2 dated 26-4-91 corresponding to GR No.9 of 1991 pending in the Court of Magistrate, 1st Class, Kotali......responding to TR No.9 of 1991 pending in the Court of Magistrate, First Class, Kotalipara, Gopalgonj is quashed in respect of the petitioner. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 612...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Syed Sad Ali Vs. Bidhan Chandra Dev and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....te — For the Petitioner. Nirmalendu Deb, Advocate — For Opposite Party No.1. Civil Revision No. 3485 of 1996. Judgment MA Aziz J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 23-9-95 passed in Misc. Appeal No.3 of 1994 by the learned Additional District Judge, Moulavib......ed Sad Ali though a co-sharer of the holding he is not a co-sharer of the land (shop) transferred and, as such, he is not entitled to pre-empt the case shop. The learned Subordinate Judge relied on a decision reported in 35 DLR (AD) 230 in the case of SM Basiruddin Vs. Zahurul Islam Chowdhury and ot..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Md. Abdus Samad alias Kalu and others Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the accused petitioners should not be enlarged on bail in Zinaigati G.R. Case No.65 of 09 corresponding to Zinaigati P.S. Case No.09 dated 23.07.2009 under section 143/148/ 323/ 307/302/114/34 of the Penal Code, now pending in the Co......ty to cancel the bail, if the accused petitioners misuse in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Mohammad Ali and another Vs. Noor Mohammad, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... Opposite party. Civil Revision No. 636 of 2002. Judgment AFM Abdur Rahman J. - This Rule, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is directed against the judgment and decree dated 7.1.2002, passed in Title Appeal No.68 of 1998, by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Comme......tended that the scheme and object of the provision of order 7 rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is to identify the suit land by some means which must be beyond any vagueness and none of the decision of this and the apex Court has ever directed that the suit plot must be identified by certa..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Rupali Bank Ltd. Vs. Chairman, 2nd Labour Court Dhaka & another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....995 but there being no redress he filed Complaint Case No. 86/95 on 26-11-1995 before the respondent No.1. 5. In these cases the respondent State claimed all benefits of permanent workers from the date of joining after they were appointed. The petitioner Bank appeared in the 2nd Labour Court, Dha......e cause of such grievance and the employer shall within fifteen days of receipt of such grievance, inquire into the matter, give the worker concerned an opportunity of being heard and communicate his decision, in writing to the said worker. (b) If the employer fails to give a decision under claus..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 140
Rasharaj Sarker Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
...., Advocate—For the Petitioner. Shueb Ahmed, Assistant Attorney-General—For the State. Criminal Revision Case No. 1738 of 1992. Judgment SK Sinha J.- This Rule arises against the order dated 30-9-92 of the Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Dhaka in Criminal Revision No.302 of 1987......d accused person discharged in pursuance of submission of such report. It may be pointed out here that the learned Additional Sessions Judge maintained the order of the learned Magistrate following a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Abdur Rahman Vs. State, 29 DLR (SC) 256. In the said re..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Moshfiqul Islam alias Bilu Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....525 of 1991. Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- This appeal at the instance of the accused-appellant preferred under section 30 of the Special Powers Act, 1974 arises out of judgment and order dated 27-4-1991 passed in Special Tribunal Case No.59/1990 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,......d not support the prosecution version as to recovery of the arms and ammunition from the possession of the accused appellant. The learned Assistant Attorney-General in this connection referred to the decision in the case of Abul Bashar Shaikh Vs. State reported in 51 DLR 252 referring to paragraph 8..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Zabbar Muhury Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....his rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the accused petitioner should not be enlarged on bail in Sessions Case No.692 of 2009 arising out of Nandail P.S. Case No.01dated 01.03.2007 corresponding to G.R.Case No.35 of 2007 under section 448/302/109/114/34 of the Pen......any witness of the case, the trial Court is hereby directed to grant bail to the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque J.- I agree. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Md. Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ey General-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 5436 of 2010. Judgment AKM Asaduzzaman J.- This appeal was preferred under section 30 of the Special Powers Act against the impugned order dated 08.08.2010 passed by the learned Special Tribunal, Chapainawabgonj in Special Tribunal Case No...... the trial of the case, the trial Court is hereby directed to consider the bail of the appellant. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque J.- I agree. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Sontai Miah Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ant. Bashir Ahmed, Assistant Attorney General-For the respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 3412 of 2008. Judgment AKM Asaduzzaman J. - This appeal was preferred against the judgment and order dated 26.07.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Sylhet in Sessions Case...... directed to set at liberty at once if not wanted in connection with any other case. Send down the L.C. records at once. AKM Zahirul Haque, J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Most. Aleya Begum and others Vs. Rahima Begum and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... Petitioners. Mohammad Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1-5. Not represented-Respondent No. 6. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 2380 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 05.10.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2245 of 2007.) Judgment ......rced in any court of law. In the premises, we do not find any substance in the application. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 134...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Malek Vs. Government of the Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 362 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 1.6.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.406 of 2004.) Judgment Su......tly discharged the rule. This petition merits no consideration. Accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 130, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 440. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Daru Miah Vs. Sonaban and others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
.... Zinnah, Advocates—For Opposite Party No.1. Civil Revision No. 1107 of 1993. Judgment This Rule under section 115 of the code of Civil Procedure is directed against the judgment and decree dated 10-8-1992 passed by Mrs. Nazma Ara Sultana, District Judge, Brahmanbaria in Title Appeal No.40......its that the trial Court is not authorised as per provisions of section 73 of the Evidence Act to compare any disputed signature and thereby has committed an error of law resulting in an error in the decision which has occasioned failure of justice. In support of his contention he cited the case of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Biplob Chandra Das and another Vs. Biren Chandra Das and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....tes - For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 3542 of 1996. Judgment This Rule is at the instance of the defendants, against the judgment and decree dated 23-8-95 passed in Title Appeal No.111 of 1992 by the Court of Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Ma......he defendants and after receiving the consideration they would execute and register the necessary sale deed within two month’s time. 4. Further case of the plaintiff is that in terms of the said decision, the plaintiffs paid the said consideration money. But Gouranga Chandra Das died and, as su..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 108
49104909490849064905490349024901490048924891489048894868486748644860485848574856