Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3761-3780 of 7814 results.
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Ataur Rahman and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....y, Sub-ordinate Courts occupy a special place in the Constitution under Articles 114 to 116A. The recruitment and conditions of service of the members of the Judicial Service are regulated by the Rules made by the President under Article 115 of the Constitution. Since as per Note: 1 of the impug......n, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka-1000 .............................................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ataur Rahman and others…………………….Respondents Order March 13, 2011. Lawyers Involved: M.K.Rahman, Additional Attorney General (with Mustafa Zaman Islam, Deputy Attor..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 441
....e schedule property as described below known as properties of M/s. Bhajalal Todi and Satyapada Todi, 150/152, B.K. Road, Narayanganj was declared as Enemy Property (Jute) after the war of 1965 as per Rule 182 of the Defence of Pakistan Rules. Its assets and liabilities including maintenance and man......Vs.
Bangladesh Muktijoddhya Kallayan Trust, represented by its Chairman, 88, Motijheel Commercial Area, P.S. Motijheel, Dhaka and others ...............Respondents
Judgment
March 9, 2011.
Lawyers Involved:
Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Md. Alimuzzarnan (Reza) and others Vs. Md. Masudar Rahman @ Babul and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....or possession or the deed. 29. A general allegation of collusion implying some kind of fraud is not enough without particulars. Specific pleadings in support of fraud or collusion as per Order 6 Rule 4 are required to be made and those allegations of fraud and collusion must be substantially pr......) 176; Ramappa Vs. Bojjappa, AIR 1963 SC 1633; Sardar Gurbakhsh Singh Vs. Gurdial Singh and another, AIR 1927 P.C. 230; Siddir Gary PS. Case No. 7(11)/93 corresponding to G.R. Case No.309 of 1993. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 76
.... parliamentary affairs, Government of Bangladesh.
Send down the lower Court record.
Communicate this order at once.
Ed.
Md. Nuruzzaman J.-I agree.
This Case is also Reported in:
......er, 46 DLR-136; M/S Dulichand Omraolal VS. Bangladesh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Industries and others, 33 DLR (AD)-30; Nittya Gopal Roy Barmon Vs. Pran Gopal Nandi and others, 32 DLR-11.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Delwar Hossain, Advocate, Advocate with Sihab Uddin Mahmood, Advocate-For t..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
State Vs. Kazol, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... the Druto Bichar Tribunal-2, Dhaka immediately. Send down the Lower Court Records. Communicate this Order at once. Md. Habibul Gani J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......orted in BCR (1985) (AD), 298; Ansar (MD) Chan Mia Vs. State 53 DLR (AD) (2001), 115, 14; Zakir Hossain Vs. State 55 DLR (2003), 137; Siddique Munshi Vs. State 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 169 Paragraph 9. Lawyers Involved: A.M. Md. Azizul Haque, Advocate-For the Condemner Prisoner/ State Defense Lawye..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Oriental Bank Ltd. Vs. Federal Insurance Company Ltd., 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....reasons above cited this Court finds no merit in this Application. In the result, this Application is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......handrojirao AIR 1962 Madhya Pradesh 69 (V 49 C 29); Hariprasad Vs. A.C. Traders (PR) Ltd.; AIR 1964 Madras 519 (V 51 C 176;) Imperial Hydropathic Hotel Co., Blackpool Vs. Hampson, 1882-49 LT 147. Lawyers Involved: Sayyid Shahid Hussain, Senior with Rani Akhter, Advocate- For the Petitioner. ..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 203
Pradip Kumar Malakar Vs. Birendra Chandra Malakar and others, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....such a finding it is not empowered to allow application under Or. 23 r.1 CPC. As no such finding appears to have been reached by the trial Court set aside the order impugned. 3. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. I accord no costs as the Rule is not opposed. Ed. This Case is also Repo...... Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Pradip Kumar Malakar......................Petitioner Vs. Birendra Chandra Malakar and others ………..Opposite Parties Judgment June 15, 1993. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Haque, Advocate ‑ Petitioner. No one ‑ For the Opposite Parti..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Mahmud Ibne Abbas Vs. Begum Momtaz Hossain and another, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....s Involved: Shah MH Rahman, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Rakib Ahmed, Advocate ‑ For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.720 of 1990. Judgment Badrul Islam Chowdhury J.- This Rule arises out of an order dated 28.3.90 passed by the Assistant Judge, First Additional Court Dhak......ion) Present: Badrul Islam Chowdhury J Mahmud Ibne Abbas. ............Petitioner Vs. Begum Momtaz Hossain and another..............Opposite Parties Judgment December 12, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Shah MH Rahman, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Rakib Ahmed, Advocate ‑ F..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
....n this Writ application the Subordinate Judge (Arbitrator) 4th Court, Dhaka was made the first respondent and Md. Ishaque in whose favour the award was made the second respondent. It appears that the Rule was issued on 13th August, 1991 against the respondent but on repeated attempts the Rule could ......ce Station Kotwali in the City of Dhaka...........Petitioner
Vs.
Subordinate Judge, 4th Court and Arbitrator, Dhaka and Others………………Respondents
Judgment
August, 3, 1992.
Lawyers Involved:
B Hossain, Deputy Attorney General ‑ For the Petitioner.
MG Bhuiyan with A..
Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 213
....ith M Saleemullah, Advocates - For the Petitioner.
Fakhrul Islam, Assistant Attorney General‑ For the Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 704 of 1989.
Judgment
Mainur Reza Chowdhury J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause why the enlistment of the petitioner......
Vs.
Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka...........................Respondents
Judgment
November 18, 1991.
Lawyers Involved:
MI Farooqui with M Saleemullah, Advocates - For the Petitioner.
Fakhrul Isla..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission Vs. Md. Al-Amin Sarker and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....দের পদধারীদের নিয়মিতকরন ও জ্যেষ্ঠতা নির্ধারণী বিধিমালা, ২০০৫” (herein after mentioned as the Rules of 2005) and that as per rule 5(1) of this Rules of 2005 the seniority of the petitioners is......angladesh Atomic Energy Commission (BAEC)…………….......Petitioner Vs. Md. Al-Amin Sarker and others.............................................Respondents Order March 6, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Ali Akanda, Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-R..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Trade Channel Vs. Collector of Customs, Customs House Chittagong and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....ad Habibur Rahman J.-The petitioner M/s Trade Channel, a Proprietary Firm, represented by its proprietor Ali Ahmed of 92 Agrabad Commercial Area,PS Double Moorings, Chittagong prays for issuance of a Rule Nisi calling upon respondent Na.1 Collector of Customs Customs, House, Chitagong, respondent No......A Hai and others Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 1988 BLD (AD) 84; A Hannan 42 DLR (AD) 167; Maritime E Ca. Vs. General Dairies, AIR 1937 PC 114; K. Ramdas Vs. Udipi Mum, AIR 1974 SC. 2177. Lawyers Involved: Nurul Islam Chowdhury with Abul Kalam Azad, Advocates ‑For the Petitioner. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Hussain Mohammad Ershad Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....of the High Court. We, having considered the matter find no substance in this application which is accordingly summarily rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (HCD) (1992) 116. ...... Howlader and another Vs. State, 38 DLR 233 & 35 DLR 422, AIR 1945 (Lah) 23 (FB); MS Sherif and another Vs. State of Madras, AIR 1954 (SC) 397; Thakorlal Vadilal Vs. Ambalal B. Patel AIR 1942. Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed with KS Hossain, Md. Munsur Ali and Sk. Rezaul Karim, Advocates ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Mohibur Rahman Vs. Kuti Miah and State, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....azzam Hossain Advocates‑‑For the Petitioner. Syed JR Modassir Hossain Advocate‑For the Opposite Parties. Criminal Revision Case No.416 of 1989. Judgment Habibur Rahman Khan J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.11.89 passed by the Sessions Judge, Habigan......es Referred To- Abdus Salam Master and another Vs. State, 35 DLR 140; Nur Mohammad & others Vs. State, BCR (1987) 244 (9 & 16); Qumruzzaman @ Lal & others Vs. The State, 40 DLR 504. Lawyers Involved: Zakir Ahmed with Moazzam Hossain Advocates‑‑For the Petitioner. Syed JR ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Rezaul Karim (Md) and another Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
.... Hasib J Rezaul Karim (Md) and another……………Petitioners Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others.............Respondents Judgment January 16, 1991. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Sheikh Ali Ahmed Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affa......s Judgment January 16, 1991. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Sheikh Ali Ahmed Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Bangladesh, 40 DLR (AD). Lawyers Involved: Shahid Alam Advocate‑For the Petitioner. Qazi Akhter Hossain, Assistant At..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 174
Muhammadullah and others Vs. Makbul Ahmed and State, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....ry, Advocates‑‑For the Petitioners. SC Das with Subrata Chowdhury, Advocates‑For the Opposite Party No.1. Criminal Revision Case No. 270 of 1989. Judgment Abdul Bari Sarker J.- This Rule arises out of an application under section 561 A of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing......………….Opposite Parties Judgment May 13, 1991. Cases Referred To- Asiatic Oxygen Ltd. AIR 1972 Cal 50; Harish Chandra Vs. Kavindra Narain Sina and others, AIR 1936 All (FB) 830. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with M A Wahab, M L Bhowmik and Emdad Chowdhury, Advocates..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Alesuddin Mondal Vs. Md. Toyezuddin Dewan, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....tioner. Mansur Habib with Mala Routh, Advocates-For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.100 of 1988 (Dhaka) Civil Revision No.252 of 1985 (Rangpur) Judgment Syed Fazle Ahmed J.- This Rule calls in question the legality and propriety of the judgment and order dated 29.4.85 passed by ......visional Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Fazle Ahmed J Alesuddin Mondal ..............Petitioner Vs. Md. Toyezuddin Dewan.................Opposite Party Judgment January 31, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Mashi‑ul‑Islam, Advocate‑For the Petitioner. Mansur Habib with Mala Ro..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Ayub Ali Mohaldar Vs. Md. Shahjahan and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....Abdur Rahim ‑ For the Petitioner. Md. Latifur Rahman ‑ For Contemner Nos.2‑3. Shaikh Razzaqure Ali - For contemner No.4. Contempt Case No.1 of 1989. Judgment Abdul Hasib J.- This Rule at the instance of one Ayub Ali Mohaldar was issued calling upon the opposite party contemners ......Ayub Ali Mohaldar ............Petitioner Vs. Md. Shahjahan and others..........Opposite Parties Judgment August 14, 1990. Case Referred to- AIR 1961, Supreme Court, at page 1367. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim ‑ For the Petitioner. Md. Latifur Rahman ‑ For Contemner..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
....of the learned District Judge, Munishiganj, the plaintiffs‑petitioners approached this Court in its revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure and obtained the present Rule.
8. None has appeared to oppose the Rule.
9. Mr. AKM Shahidul Huq, the learned Advocate a......muddin Ahmed J
Kazi Bashirul Islam alias Laboo Kazi and another…………..Petitioners
Vs.
Naresh Chandra Das and others…………….....Opposite Parties
Judgment
June 3, 1991.
Lawyers Involved:
AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate‑For the Petitioners.
No one ‑For the Opposite..
Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Naresh Lal Saha and other Vs. Bhupati Mohan Roy and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....g and disposal of issues of law alone causes serious prejudice to the other side, such framing of issues cannot be ordered in the interest of justice. Mr. Khandker argues that in view of provision of Rule 3 of Order 15, all the issues relating to law as well as on fact must be taken together. He arg.......…………..Petitioners Vs. Bhupati Mohan Roy and others …………Opposite Parties Judgment February 13, 1990. Case Referred to- Fazlur Rahman Vs. Rajab Ali 30 DLR (SC) 30. Lawyers Involved: Moksudur Rahman with QA Shafiullah, Advocates ‑ For the Petitioners. Khand..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 62
53925391539053895388538753865385538453835382538153805379537853775376537553745373