Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Chitta Ranjan Das alias Chitta Ranjan Sinha Vs. Shashi Mohan Das, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....the impugned judgment of the High Court Division in the facts and circumstances of this particular case. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 139. ......the impugned judgment of the High Court Division in the facts and circumstances of this particular case. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 139. ......ed accused No.2 Harupada Roy, Tahsilder to give report and accused No.2 gave false report that petitioner's father Shyam Lal Das was shown to be alive though he died long ago and accused No.3, Ershad Ali Process Server gave a false report that the process was duly served and thereby accused No.1 com......ent: Md. Ruhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Chitta Ranjan Das alias Chitta Ranjan Sinha……….....Petitioner Vs. Shashi Mohan Das………………………………………………………Respondent ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 88
State Vs. Chowdhury Nesarul Haque, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....enefit of doubt as the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond all reasonable doubt. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 135. ......enefit of doubt as the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond all reasonable doubt. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 135. ......ue……………...Respondent Judgment February 28, 2005. Cases Referred To- 35 DLR (AD) 119; State Vs. Manzoor Ahmed 18 DLR (SC) 444; Safdar Ali Vs. the Crown 5 DLR (FC) 107. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional A...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The State………………......................... Appellant Vs. Chowdhury Nesarul Haque……………...Respondent Judg..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Begum Mahamuda, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....f the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 128. ......f the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 128. ......f the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 128. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin M. M. Ruhul Amin Md. Tafazzul Islam Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh………………..... Petitioner Vs. Begum Mahamuda………………………Res..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Md. Jahir Uddin Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....r infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 76. ......r infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 76. ...... Rupali Bank Ltd. and others……………….Respondents Judgment August 3, 2006. Case Referred To- Rupali Bank Ltd. vs. Md. Arab Ali 7 BLC (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For t......hul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Jahir Uddin………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others……………….Respondents ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Abdul Mannan Vs. Lal Miah Haji & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ion reversed the concurrent findings of the courts below. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 68. ......ion reversed the concurrent findings of the courts below. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 68. ......lip;………………..Respondents Judgment November 21, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Md. Faruque Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin M. M. Ruhul Amin Abdul Mannan………………..............Appellant Vs. Lal Miah Haji & others…………………..Resp..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Yakub Mia and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....r dated 23.11.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2060 of 1993 is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2008 (XVI) BLT (AD) 60. ......r dated 23.11.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2060 of 1993 is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2008 (XVI) BLT (AD) 60. ......b Mia and another……………………………………………………Respondents Judgment March 14, 2005. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate -on-Record-For the Appellant. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh…………......Appellant Vs. Md. Yakub Mia and another……………………………………………………Respond..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
M. A. Hashem and others Vs. Shafiuddin Ahmed and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 42 ; IV ADC (2007) 631. ...... find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 42 ; IV ADC (2007) 631. ...........Respondents Judgment October 18, 2005. Case Referred to- 31 DLR (AD) 195. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil ......nt: Md. Ruhul Amin M.M. Ruhul Amin Md. Tafazzul Islam M. A. Hashem and others………………………Appellants Vs. Shafiuddin Ahmed and others……….........Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Mohammad Ullah Vs. Sessions Judge, Noakhali, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... in Miscellaneous Case No. 353 of 1996 for fresh trial of G.R. Case No. 1 of 1983 is hereby quashed to secure ends of justice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (XVI) BLT (AD) 34. ...... in Miscellaneous Case No. 353 of 1996 for fresh trial of G.R. Case No. 1 of 1983 is hereby quashed to secure ends of justice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (XVI) BLT (AD) 34. ......at Maijdi Court, Noakhali and others ............Respondents Judgment November 22, 2005. Cases Referred to- State Vs. Golam Mostafa and others, 49 DLR (AD) 32; Yousuf Ali Mollah Vs. King, AIR 1949 PC 264, 1911, 1 K.B. 964; Gopinath Ghosh V. State, 32 DLR (AD) 177; M...... Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohammad Ullah……………........................Appellant Vs. Sessions Judge, Noakhali having office at Maijdi Court, Noakhali and others ..............Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Mrs. Saju Hossain & Others Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....all stages. The respondents are directed to comply the court's order within 4(four) months from receipt of the judgment Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 506; 16 BLT (AD)(2008)5. ......all stages. The respondents are directed to comply the court's order within 4(four) months from receipt of the judgment Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 506; 16 BLT (AD)(2008)5. ......d. Cases Referred to: Nittya Gopal Roy Barman vs. Pran Gopal Nandi and others 32 DLR 11; Lazmi Kanta Roy vs. Upazila Nirbahi Officer and another 46 DLR 136; ADC (Revenue), Dhaka Vs. Md. Mostafa Ali Mridha and others, 48 DLR 193; Artoti Rani Paul Vs. Sudarshan Kumar Paul and others, 56 DLR (AD)......Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mrs. Saju Hosein..............Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 129 of 2001) Mrs. Rani Begum and others.........Appellants (In Civil Appeal No. 130 of 2001) Vs. The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and another.......... Respondents (In b..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Md. Kabir Hossain and others Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....al. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, both the Jail Petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 628. ......al. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, both the Jail Petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 628. ......ghbours and relatives. Three days after the aforesaid occurrence P.W.2 again asked Nannu Mia about Kazal but he was silent and then absconded. Thereafter on 6.11.2002 at 6/6.30 p.m. informant P.W.1 Ali Hyder, the S.I. of Demra Police Station on information went to Dogair Purbapar and recovered t...... Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Kabir Hossain ................Petitioner. (In Jail Petition No. 4 of 2007.) Nannu Miah and another...... Petitioners. (In Jail Petition No.6 of 2007.) Vs. The State..............................Respondent. (In both the cases) Judgment ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Ekramul Hossain @ Anis and others Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....d no reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division and accordingly these jail petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 624. ......d no reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division and accordingly these jail petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 624. ...... Md. Abdul Matin J Ekramul Hossain @ Anis .......Petitioner (In Jail Petition No. 07 of 2005) Minarul Islam @ Mina..........Petitioner (In Jail Petition No. 08 of 2005) Sukur Ali.......... Petitioner (In Jail Petition No.08 of 2005) Vs. The State...............n Jail Petition No. 07 of 2005) Minarul Islam @ Mina..........Petitioner (In Jail Petition No. 08 of 2005) Sukur Ali.......... Petitioner (In Jail Petition No.08 of 2005) Vs. The State...........................Respondent Judgment May 4, 2008. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Meher Banu and others Vs. Abdul Barek and Muslim Bepari, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....o substance in the Appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 618; 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 119. ......o substance in the Appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 618; 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 119. ...... and others.........Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2003) Judgment March 28, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Rafiqul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants (In Civil Appeal No. 228 of 2003). Md. Abdus Sa......azzul Islam J Meher Banu and others........Appellants (In Civil Appeal No. 228 of 2003) Haji Abdul Barek & Moslem Bepari........Appellants (In Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2003) Vs. Abdul Barek and Muslim Bepari ........Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 228 of 2003) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Shamsur Nessa and another Vs. Md. Shajahan Ali and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....sion. As a result, we find no substance in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 614. ......sion. As a result, we find no substance in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 614. ......(Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Shamsur Nessa and another................Appellants Vs. Md. Shajahan Ali and others.............Respondents Judgment November 12, 2002. Lawyers Inv......llate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Shamsur Nessa and another................Appellants Vs. Md. Shajahan Ali and others.............Respondents Judgment November 12, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Md. Asaduzzaman Vs. Kazi Abdus Sabur and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....der of the Land Appeal Board. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 609. ......der of the Land Appeal Board. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 609. .....................Petitioner Vs. Kazi Abdus Sabur and others.........Respondents Judgment September 24, 2007. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For Respo......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Asaduzzaman.............................Petitioner Vs. Kazi Abdus Sabur and others.........Respondents Judgment September 24, 2007. Resu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Kazi Naimul Huq and others Vs. Md. Abdus Sattar Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... consequently High Court Division was not in error in discharging the Rule. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 605. ...... consequently High Court Division was not in error in discharging the Rule. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 605. ...... Md. Abdus Sattar Bhuiyan and others .........Respondents Judgment June 25, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Mustafa Niaz Muhammad, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Munsur Habib, Advocate, instructed by Zahirul I...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Kazi Naimul Huq and others…....................... Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdus Sattar Bhuiyan and others .........Respondents Judgment June 2..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Abdul Malek and another Vs. Md. Sanowar Hossain and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... that the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner have got no merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 603. ...... that the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner have got no merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 603. ...... acres from the eastern side of the case plot to his son Gopal Chandra Dey and on 30-12-1990, the said Girish Chandra Sarker transferred the remaining 10.15 acres of the case plot to one Md. Joshon Ali and Monowara Begum, on 30-06-1991 Gopal Chandra Dey sold the said 0.20 acres of to one Md. Abdu...... Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Malek and another…………............Petitioners Vs. Md. Sanowar Hossain and others..............Respondents Judgment April 6,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Jabbar Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Md. Abul Kashem & another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ate commissioner as was ordered by the appellate court on earlier occasion. In the circumstances we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 598. ......ate commissioner as was ordered by the appellate court on earlier occasion. In the circumstances we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 598. ......ip;…….........Appellant Vs. Md. Abul Kashem & another ......................Respondents Judgment June 19, 2005. Case Referred to- Danish Ali and others Vs. Sakina Bai and others, 4 BLD (AD) 68. Lawyers Involved: Md. Waliu...... M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jabbar Jute Mills Ltd…………………………….........Appellant Vs. Md. Abul Kashem & another ......................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Md. Aftab Uddin Vs. Kosimuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....appeal. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 595. ......appeal. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 595. .........Petitioner Vs. Kosimuddin and others .........Respondents Judgment August 24, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Bodruddoza, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondents. Civil Peti...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Aftab Uddin….....................Petitioner Vs. Kosimuddin and others .........Respondents Judgment August 24, 2006. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
N A Choudhury Vs. Controller of Insurance & Ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....sider it in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations the appeal stands dismissed. The parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 588. ......sider it in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations the appeal stands dismissed. The parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 588. ......nt in the panel does not vest any legal right in favour of the appellant judicially enforceable in a writ petition……………………….(10 & 11) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on-Record-For the Res......esent: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J N A Choudhury, Sponsor Director of Agrani Insurance Company Limited (proposed) ............Appellant Vs. The Controller of Insurance and others. .........Respondents Judgment December 7, 20..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Kataruddin and others Vs. Md. Nurul Huque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....firmity in the decision of the High Court Division and accordingly no interference is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 585. ......firmity in the decision of the High Court Division and accordingly no interference is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 585. ......lip;……….......Respondents Judgment July 2, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1594 of ......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Kataruddin and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Md. Nurul Huque and others………….......Respondents Judgm..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23