Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3801-3820 of 7814 results.
Abdul Khaleque (Md) Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....1 had no legal authority to place the petitioner under suspension. As such, the petitioner has challenged the aforesaid order before this Court invoking its writ jurisdiction and obtained the present Rule. 3. The respondent Nos. 1‑3 entered appearance and contested the writ petition by filing a......Md)………………….Petitioner Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka, Collectorate Building, PS Kotwali, Dhaka and others………………….Opposite Parties Judgment November 1, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Shah Md. Habibur Rahman, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Mashuque Hossain A..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Anil Krishna Mondal Vs. Chairman, Labour Court and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Abdul Wahab, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Tufailur Rahman, Advocate ‑ For the Respondents. Writ Petition No.22 of 1987. Judgment AM Mahmudur Rahman J.- The petitioner in this Rule asks us to declare that the order made on September 29, 1986 by the respondent 1 has been made ...... Rahman J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Anil Krishna Mondal ……………..Petitioner Vs. Chairman, Labour Court and others……………….Respondents Judgment August 7, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Wahab, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Tufailur Rahman, Advocate ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Aslam Hossain Chaklader Vs. Ali Nur and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....ry injunction. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. The impugned order of the learned Subordinate Judge is hereby set aside and the petition for temporary injunction is rejected. The connected Rule is disposed of accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 366. ...... Present: Abdul Bari Sarker J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Aslam Hossain Chaklader…………..Appellant Vs. Ali Nur and others…............Respondents Judgment August 26, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate ‑ For the Appellant. M Nurullah with AQM Shafiu..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Abdul Awal and others Vs. Abdul Hamid and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....urt additional evidence should not be admitted in appeal because a party guilty of negligence in the lower Court is not entitled to the indulgence of being allowed to give further evidence under this Rule. Provisions of this Rule are not intended to allow a litigant who has been unsuccessful in the ......ion) Present: Syed Fazle Ahmed J Abdul Awal and others…………………..Appellant Vs. Abdul Hamid and others……………………Respondent Judgment December 12, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam Khan, Advocate ‑ For the Appellants. Mian Abdul Gofur, Advocat..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Anwar Hossain and others Vs. Abul Hossain Molla and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....ars to be well founded. The object of rule 31 of Order XLI CPC is to see that a Judge does not act callously or even mechanically. Its purpose is to put the Judge on the right track and to the extent Rule of Procedure can do it, to see that he acts judicially. It enables the High Court to judge whet........ Appellants Vs. Abul Hossain Molla and others …………………..Respondents Judgment May 7, 1991. Case Referred to- Habibur Rahman Vs. Abdul Wadud and others, 21 DLR 382. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid Chowdhury, Advocate‑For the Appellants. Habib Ahmed, Advocateâ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Dr. Joynal Abedin Vs. State, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....te ‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented ‑ the Opposite Parties. Criminal Revision No.565 of 1991 (Dhaka). Criminal Revision No.70 of 1986 (Comilla). Judgment Abdul Hasib J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the Deputy Commissioner, Feni, and complainant opposite party No.2, to ...... Abedin .....................Petitioner Vs. The State ……………….…..Opposite Party Judgment May 22, 1991. Case Referred to- Rajah Ali and others Vs. State, 37 DLR 174. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ruhul Amin, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented ‑ the Op..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Aslam and others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....ey General ‑ For the Petitioner. JN Dev with Nazrul Islam Chowdhury and DJ Syam, Advocates ‑ For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 194 of 1982 Judgment Qazi Shafiuddin J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos.1‑9 to show cause why the judgment and decree ......ases Referred to- Ajirannessa Vs. Saper Mia, 30 DLR (SC) 41; Abdul Majid Vs. Nabiruddi, 22 DLR 360; Abdur Rashid Vs. Abdus Samad, 33 DLR 260; Kazi A. Khaleque Vs. Kazi Fadur Rahman and others. Lawyers Involved: Syed J R Modassir Hossain, Deputy Attorney General with Fazlul Hoque Assistant ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Nikhil Kumar Sarker Vs. Bangladesh, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....an application by Nikhil Kumar Sarker, Assistant Teacher, Goalundo Shahid Smrity Girl's High School under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh with a prayer to issue Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the order dated 18.8.90 (Annexure‑H...... Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and others…………………Respondents Judgment May 9, 1991. Result: The application is summarily rejected. Lawyers Involved: NH Khondker with Ruhul Amin Shoaib, Advocates ‑For the Petitioner. Not rep..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Haroon and another Vs. Mst. Sufia Khatun and another, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....r. Anil Chandra Sarker with L Gomes and SR Karmakar, Advocates ‑ For the Opposite Parties Nos. 1 and 2. Civil Revision No. 1065 of 1989. Judgment Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J.- This Rule which has been argued at a considerable length raises a short question relating to the executio......R 1962 Andhra Pradesh 72; Gopal Chandra Sadhu‑khen Vs. Sheikh Jamsed and another, AIR 1965 Cal. 51; Salch Ahmed Vs. Md. Zakaria, 37 DLR 296; and Ali Hossain Vs. Rafiquddin, PLD 1977 Lahore 418. Lawyers Involved: Garib Newaz, Advocate ‑For the Petitioner. Anil Chandra Sarker with L Gome..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 89
....tioner
Vs.
Bangladesh University of Engineering and TechnoÂlogy, represented by its Vice Chancellor and another..................Respondents
Judgment
August 13, 1991.
Result:
The Rule is discharged without any order as to cost.
Cases Referred To-
Shiv Narayan Vs. Vice‑Ch......ohammad Hyat, PLD 1964(SC) 321=16 DLR (SC) 251); Ajit Singh and others Vs. Slate of Punjab and another, AIR 1983 (SC) 494; Purshottan: Lal Dhingra Vs. Union of India, 1958 SCR 828; AIR 1958 SC 36.
Lawyers Involved:
Mahmudul Islam, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner.
Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 155
State Vs. Amin Huda, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....cial leave are against the judgment and order dated 28th day of August, 2008 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case Nos. 4678 and 4679 of 2008 making the Rules absolute. 3. Facts giving rise to these appeals are that Md. Idris Ali, Sub-Inspector of RA......a J State……………….........................Appellant (In both Appeals) Vs. Amin Huda………………..................Respondent (In both Appeals) Judgment June 1, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Momtazuddin Fakir, Additional Attorney-General instructed by B Hossain, Advocat..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Government of BanglaÂdesh and others Vs. Excellent Corporation, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... without any order as to cost. The Judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 148, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 433, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 190. ......ent Judgment July 15, 2010. Cases Referred To- Sassoon & Co. Vs. CIT Bombay City, AIR 1954 SC 470; Bangladesh Power Development Board Vs. Muhammad Asaduzzaman Sikder, 9 BLC (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: Murad Reza, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Mr. B Hossain, Advocate-..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 267
Bangladesh and another Vs. Md. Abdul Karim, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....in this petition for leave to appeal is whether any limitation has been prescribed for in the relevant laws, nameÂly, the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1980 (the Act) and the Administrative Tribunals Rules, 1982 framed under the Act for filing an application for restoration of an appeal dismissed fo...... Md. Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Bangladesh and another..........................Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdul Karim.......................................Respondent Judgment May 22, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Karunamoy Chakma, Deputy Attorney-General instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-on..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 181
Md. Jashim and others Vs. The State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... to cancel the bail, if the accused petitioners misuse in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......n J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Md. Jashim and others ……………..………Petitioners Vs. The State ………………………………….Opposite party Judgment March 14, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Md. Harun-Or-Rasid, Advocate-For the petitioners. Bashir Ahmed, Assistant At..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Mohiuddin Ahmed and others Vs. Lutfur Rahman and another, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....oners in place of the name of respondent No.1 in respect of the shares which the petitioners had held on 8.3.85 in the above company. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (HCD) (1992) 48. ...... Mosharraf Hossain Khan, 34 DLR 343; M/s Anath Bandhu Guha & Sons Ltd., 7 PLR (Dac) 159; Nathu Lal and others Vs. Mt. Comti Kuar and others, AIR 1940 (PC) 160; Burns Vs. Siemens Bros. Buckley. Lawyers Involved: M Nurullah with AQM Shafiullah, Advocates- For the Petitioners. Syed Ishtia..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Syed Mokbul Hossain Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....al with Mrs. Hosne Ara Ahsan, Assistant Attorney‑General ‑ For the Respondent No.1. Writ Petition No.196 of 1989. Judgment Mohammad Abdur Rouf J.- The petitioner on 19.2.89 obtained this Rule Nisi calling in question the action taken on 16.10.88 seizing his Passport No. 827638, at Zia I......nt July 17, 1990. Cases Referred to- Government of Pakistan and another Vs. Dada Ameer Haider Khan, PLD 1987 (SC) 504; Schmidt Vs. Secretary of State, (1969) 2 ChD 149; (1969) All ER 904. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, with Nizamul Huq, Advocates ‑For the Petitioner. Md. Delwar H..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 288
Mohammad Mofizuddin Vs. Mohammad Firoj Alam and another, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....it as framed was not maintainable and the courts below committed an error of law resulting in an error in the decision occasioning failure of justice in decreeing the suit of the plaintiff. 7. The Rule is accordingly, made absolute and the impugned judgments and decrees of the courts below are se......titioner Vs. Mohammad Firoj Alam and another……………..…..…….Opposite Parties Judgment July 31, 1991. Case Referred to- Secretary of State Vs. Mask, AIR 1940 PC 105. Lawyer Involved: S A M Mahbub Elahi, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Md. Mostafa, Advocate Pa..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Salahuddin Khan and others and others Vs. Md. Abdul Hai Bahar and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....t and order dated the 16th day of May, 2007 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.591 of 2006 rejecting the application for amendment of the plaint and making the Rule absolute. 2. The short fact necessary for disposal of this appeal is that appellant Nos.1 an......l Huda J Salahuddin Khan and others and others...................Appellants Vs. Md. Abdul Hai Bahar and others…………………...............Respondents Judgment June 15, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Amin, Advocate instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Amin Mia (Md.) Vs. Nazir Ahmed and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... MM Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 7th March, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.351 of 2006 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts as placed before the High Court Division are that the accused Md. N......d. Joynul Abedin J Amin Mia (Md.)……………………………………...Petitioner Vs. Nazir Ahmed and another……………………...Respondent Judgment December 14, 2008. Lawyers Involved: AA Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Sadharan Bima Corporation Vs. Philoship Co. S A, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....e liability for the consequences of her act, except by proving that a competent seaman could not have averted or mitigated the disaster by the exercise of ordinary care and skill. This is the General Rule in the case of ‘collision between a vessel under way and a vessel at anchor’. In such a mat......s…………..…….Defendants. Judgment July 22, 1990. Cases Referred To- Dowell Vs. General Steam Navigation Co.; British Columbia Electric RY Co. Ltd Vs. Loach; Swadling Vs. Coop. Lawyers Involved: Manzur‑ur Rahim, Advocate ‑ For the Plaintiff. M Hafizullah, Advocate â€..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 177
53505349534853475346534553445343534253415340533953385337533653355334533353325330