Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3821-3840 of 4712 results.
Sonar Bangla Service Station Vs. Government of the People's Republic of BD, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ade hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......stan Karachi and others, 16 DLR (SC) 298; Lyallpur vs. Ch. Faqir Muhammad, 10 DLR (SC) 168; Anantnag and another Vs. Mst. Katiji and others, AIR 1987 (SC) 1353; Province of East Pakistan Vs. Meajan Ali Ahmed and 15 others, 18 DLR (SC) 343; Government vs. Alauddin being dead his heirs, (2001) 6 MLR......doning the delay. 12. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ar Bangla Service Station…………………...Petitioner Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others............... Respondents Judgment May 9, 2006. Cases Referred To- Ata Ull..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 205
Sree Amulya Ratan Chowdhury& ors Vs. Sreemati Shaibalini Ghose & ors., 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
.... Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on- Record-For the Appellants (in all appeals) Nurullah, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab All Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 5 Ex-parte-Respondent No. 1 Not r....... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ....... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......ulya Ratan Chowdhury& ors....................Appellants (In Civil Appeal No. 48 of 1995) Parul Bala Majumder....................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 49 of 1995) Narash Chandra Bhattacharjee.....Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 50 of 1995) Hari Sankar Chowdhury......Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Md. Umed Ali and another Vs. Mst. Hamida Khatoon and another, 1999, 28 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A. T.M. Afzal CJ Latifur Rahman J Mohammad Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Md. Umed Ali and another……………...... plaintiff-Appellant Vs......Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A. T.M. Afzal CJ Latifur Rahman J Mohammad Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Md. Umed Ali and another……………...... plaintiff-Appellant Vs M......lorem Court fee in the trial court for the said relief within 3(three) months from date. 13. The appeal is allowed in the above terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A. T.M. Afzal CJ Latifur Rahman J Mohammad Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Md. Umed Ali and another……………...... plaintiff-Appellant Vs Mst. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......ip;…...Petitioner vs The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna.....Respondents Judgment November 28, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent Criminal Petiti......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......awyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent Criminal Petition for leave to Appeal No. 85 of 2004 (From the Judgment and Order dated 15.02.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 163..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Mahbubur Rahman Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ka Collectorate Building, Dhaka.........Respondent Judgment August 1, 2004. Result: The leave petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Pet......orate Building, Dhaka.........Respondent Judgment August 1, 2004. Result: The leave petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition for ...... made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......k, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 193 of 2003 (Form the Judgment and Order dated 03.08.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 777 of 1987) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Md. Golam Mostafa alias Gholam Mostafa and others Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e. Ed. ...... The State...............................Respondent Judgement February 29, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Kazi Shahadat Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Mvi Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Res......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Golam Mostafa alias Gholam Mostafa and others..............Petitioner Vs The State...............................Respond..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Abul Hashem Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Cox's Bazar...........Respondent Judgment March 7, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondents Crimi......epresented by the Deputy Commissioner, Cox's Bazar...........Respondent Judgment March 7, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondents Criminal Petiti......of case under the Provisions of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes Bidhan) Ain, 1995 in the light of the observation/direction made above. The leave petition is thus disposed of. Ed. ...... Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondents Criminal Petition for leave to Appeal No. 45 of 2004 (From the Judgment and Order dated 10.01.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1250 of 1996) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Mona alias Zillur Rahman Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......onment for life and pay a fine of Tk. 5,000/00 and in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for further 6 months. 2. Case for the prosecution in short is that on 09-07-1990 at 11 p.m Sayed Ali Dewan lodged and F.I.R alleging that his younger brother victim shafique aged about 22 years wh......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......Judgment: Abu Sayeed Ahammed J. - Accused convict seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 29-3-2001 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 283 of 1998 by a Division Bench of the High..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. Md. Ismail and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other.............d. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 16, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner. Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, (Dr. A. K. M. A......) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ......Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 16, 2005. Lawyer..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mohammad Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohammad Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah...........Petitioner vs The State…………&helli..........Petitioner vs The State…………………….Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-the Respondent Criminal Pe......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......rs Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-the Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 214 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 24 05.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1784 of 2003 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Md. Jahangir Alam (Selim) Vs. Md. Hebjul Bari and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... ......lip;……………...Respondents Judgment August 3, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdur Rob Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed ......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ....... R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Jahangir Alam (Selim)....................Appellant vs Md. Hebjul Bari and others…………………...Respondents Judgment ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Chief Engin, Dredger Direct, BD Water Dev. Board. Vs. Chairman, 2nd Lbour Court, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....easons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......ord-For the Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 1998) B.Hossain, advocate-on-Record...........For the Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 100 of 1998) Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record......For Respondent No.2 (In Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 1998) Ex- part......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed A hammed J Chief Engineer Dredger directorate, Bangladesh Water Dev. Board, Narayangonj and others…………….. Appellants (In both Appeals) Vs C..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others Vs. Hamangini Saha, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ind merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... 1. Hamangini Saha being dead her heirs 1 (a) Swapan Kumar Roy and others……….Respondents Judgment March 21, 2006. Cases Referred To- Mir Laik Ali vs. Standard Vacuum Oil Company (ESSO) and Abdur Razzak, 16 DLR (SC) 287; Md. Abu Bakar Mollah ......fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......t any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Shamsul Huq Sarker Vs. Enamul Huq Sarker and ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... Syed J. R Mudassir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shamsul Huq Sarker...............................Appellant vs Enamul Huq Sarker and ors.....................Respondent Judgment March 8, 2006 Lawyers Involved..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Trading Corporation of Bangladesh Vs. Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31), 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....usain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, TCB Bhaban, Kawran Bazar, Dhaka .........Appellant (in all the cases) vs Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31)..............Respondents (in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2005)....... vs Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31)..............Respondents (in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2005). Judgment April 27, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. A. K. M. Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (in all the cases......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ed by A. S. M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1 Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-5 (in all the cases) Civil Appeal Nos. 56-86 of 2005 (From the Judgment and order dated 12,04.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 4919, 4920, 4921..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....al Petition No. 189 of 2003) The State & others...............Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Judgment October 14, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab all, Advocate on Record-For the Petitioner(In both the Cases) Abdul Basel Ma......l Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 190 of 2003 are that after holding investigation by the police while submitting report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure accused respondent Ali Asgar Bepari was excluded from the said police report and as such a narazi petition was filed ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......2003) Not represented-Respondent Nos. 7 &8 (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 189 & 190 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order Dated 26.11.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 527 of 2000 an..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... ..........Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondents Judgment May 24, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Nizamul Huq, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Md. Abdur Rouf, Deputy Attorney General, instruc......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another.............Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondents..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Samar Uddin and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ...... 6. Considering the above submissions, the leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the accused-petitioner.1 Samar Uddin 2. Asrat alias Asarat Ali, both sons of Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on b...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ......Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: K. M. Hasan C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Hamidul Haque J Md.Tafazzul Islam J Samar Uddin and another...........................Petitioner Vs The State……&hellip..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....al is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......llip;…………….Respondent Judgment October 20, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Khondoker Mahbub Hossain Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants M.A. Rouf, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......r the Appellants M.A. Rouf, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2002 (From the Judgment and Order dated 14th November, 2000 passed by the High Court Division, in Criminal Appeal No.772 o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Delip Kumar Shaha Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ion is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......ip;………………………………..Respondent Judgment February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Respondent-Respondent. Criminal Pet...... and accordingly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......awyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Respondent-Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 142 of 2003 (From Judgment and Order dated 22nd January, 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 557 of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
20842083208220762075207320702069206820672066206520622061206020592058205520532052