Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3921-3940 of 4189 results.
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Messres A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....28 DLR (AD) 120. ......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election Commissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... J.— This appeal by Special Leave is against an order of a Bench of the High Court Division summarily rejecting an application under Article 102(2) of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and refusing to interfere with the judgment of an Election Tribunal which set aside the e......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem, C. J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another…&hel......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ion In Criminal Revision No. 360 of 1969). Judgment Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J.—These two appeals, by special leave, arise out of a single judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Bangladesh refusing in exercise of powers under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to q......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Cr.P.C. and on conclusion of the trial they were found guilty and convicted under section 19(A) & (f) of the Arms Act read with President's Order No. 50 of 1972, namely, Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order and sentenced to rigorous imprison......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....DLR.442; Azizul Huq Vs. M/S. Hanif Ltd. and others, (1955) 7 DLR; 287; Aswad Mia and another vs. Shahidulla Mia, (1958) PLR Dacca 1163; Anil Das and others Vs. Mostaque Ahmed, (1966) 18 DLR 86; IDBP (Bangladesh) Vs. M/S. Master Industries, (1974) 36 DLR 157 and Bangladesh Fisheries Society Ltd. Vs. ...... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295....... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295....... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295...Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Bikash Ranjan Das Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Not represented—Respondents. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 123 of 1977. (From the Judgment and order dated the 28th January, 1977 passed by the High Court of Bangladesh in Writ Petition No. 355 of 1975) Judgment: ......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 151
Afsar Ali Moral Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J: The petitioner along with one Akkas AH Dafadar faced a trial on three charges viz. under section 148 read with Article II(c) of Bangladesh Collaborators (Special Tribunal) Order, 1972, 364/34 and 302/34 in the alternative under...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Fakhruddin Mia and other Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Special leave to appeal No. 153 of 1977. ( From the judgment and order dated the 9th November,1976 passed by the High Court of Bangladesh in Civil Revision No. 1458 of 1970) Judgment: &nb......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
K. M. Zaker Hossain Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J: The petitioner K.M. Zaker Hossain faced a trial in the Court of the Special Judge, Pabna on two charges namely, under section 409 of the Bangladesh Penal Code as well as under section 5 (2) of Act II of 1947. He was acquired of the char......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....al No. 1, Bogra. 2. The appellant along with 11 others were put on trial before the aforesaid Special Tribunal on charges under section 302/34 Penal Code read with Article 11 (a) and (b) of the Bangladesh Collaborators (Special Tribunal) Order, 1972, which is commonly known as President's Orde......bbar Dewan along with his wife, children and nephews Abu Bakar, Altaf Hassain and Amjad Hossain who are sons of Saimuddin, went to India immediately after the 26th March, 1971. His nephews joined the Mukti Fauz and fought against the Pakistan Army. The appellant and the other co-accused were col......n of the appellant as well as of Pakistan Army in killing Saimuddin in the manner it were done. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 246. ......n of the appellant as well as of Pakistan Army in killing Saimuddin in the manner it were done. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 246. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Mansur Ali Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Mansur Ali............................. Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and another............... Respondent Judgment ...... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ...... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ...... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf Vs. Appellate Tribunal and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e cigarettes and another shopkeeper named Harunur Rashid. The police after investigation submitted a charge sheet when the appellant faced the trial before the Special Tribunal under section 392, Bangladesh Penal Code read with section 28 of the Special Powers Act. The trial ended in conviction ......nths more. The sentences are accordingly modified. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with the modification of the sentence indicated. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 211. ......nths more. The sentences are accordingly modified. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with the modification of the sentence indicated. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 211. ......nths more. The sentences are accordingly modified. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with the modification of the sentence indicated. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 211. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Punjab Ali Pramanik and others Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....954 S. C. 349 where it had been held that the Court would not invoke the inherent power to circumvent the mandatory provisions of the Code. 79. A Division Bench of the pre-constitution Bangladesh High Court had to consider the question of the applicability of section 151 of the Code f......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Bangladesh and another Vs. M/S. A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ion (Civil) Present: Syed A.B. Mahmud Husain C J Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Bangladesh and another………………………&hell......show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Kumar Ram Narain Roy Chowdhury & anr. Vs. Sonatannessa Bibi & ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ce Company vs. Mis. Muralidhar Benechand, reported in (1955) 10 D.L.R. (S.C.) 136: P. L. D. 1958 S.C. 138, that in the absence of a reciprocal arrangement between the Governments of India and Bangladesh regarding examination of witnesses on commission the Court had no jurisdiction to issue ......e, is that the appeal is allowed, and the order of the Subordinate Judge dated 31-5-75 is set aside. There shall not however be any order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......e, is that the appeal is allowed, and the order of the Subordinate Judge dated 31-5-75 is set aside. There shall not however be any order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......e, is that the appeal is allowed, and the order of the Subordinate Judge dated 31-5-75 is set aside. There shall not however be any order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Mosharraf Hossain Vs. Bangladesh Jute Industries Corporation and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....hellip;……………………………………………………..Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh Jute Industries Corporation and others……………&hell......gned order has anything to do with the non-suiting of the plaintiff, if he has an arguable case on merit. For these reasons we find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed. Ed. ......gned order has anything to do with the non-suiting of the plaintiff, if he has an arguable case on merit. For these reasons we find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed. Ed. ......gned order has anything to do with the non-suiting of the plaintiff, if he has an arguable case on merit. For these reasons we find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Haji Abdul Motalib Sowdagar Vs. Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Second Appeal which was preferred by the petitioner to the Dacca High Court against the appellate decree mentioned above. The Second Appeal was dismissed the High Court Division of the Supreme Com of Bangladesh on 8-1-74. When after the disposal of the Second Appeal, the proceeding the execution cas......ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ......ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ......ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Nurun Nabi Mondal and others Vs. Joynal Abedin Khondkar & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....of Dacca High Court also has adopted the same reasoning in the judgment under appeal before us. 63. This Court had to examine in one of its recent decisions, Messers Amin Jute Mill Ltd vs. Bangladesh in the relative role of the preamble of an enactment in the interpretation of its enacti......nbsp; ......nbsp; ......nbsp; ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Ashraf Ali Sikdar and another Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....w was not vitiated for want of any previous sanction of the District Magistrate under section 29 of the Arms Act as the instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is d......e instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......e instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......e instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
957947946945944937934931930928927926924923922921920919918917