Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdur Rahim and 6 others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....the aforesaid Cheora Degree College before 15‑9‑87 and since they acquired vested right in their services before 15‑9‑87 and 19.9‑87 on which date the college was nationalised, their vested rights cannot be taken away by the letter dated 17‑6-97 which was, in fact, given a retrospective ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Abdus Samad and others Vs. Felu Hossain and others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....t in this case the issue of licence itself is the fact-in-issue because of the opposite claim of the defendants. So the principle laid down in that case about prima facie correctness of the record of rights does not by itself prove the fact of licence. This principle is not evidently applicable to t..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 433
Advocate Manzill Murshid and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ers, stating that they are the president and secretary respectively of the organization named “Human Rights And Peace For Bangladesh”(HRPB), which body is engaged in promoting and defending human rights, working to establish rule of law and supporting the victims of human rights violations, felt..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 413
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Hachina Begum and others Vs. Abdul Mannan and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... wrong record of right by itself does not constitute a ground of limitation, when the title is threatened or evasion only then the cause of action would arise……………….(28) The records of rights of the Government which at best are evidence of possession at the time when such records are ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 146
Md. Hafizur Rahman and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....l committee. 6. The Election Commission for Bangladesh published final voter lists of all the 9 (nine) wards of Nabinagar Municipality and its voters including the petitioners applied their voting rights in national election held in October, 2001. 7. At that stage, the District Administration ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Shahidul Haque and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....e as the faulty voter list was prepared and published by the so called Election Board with a mala fide intention to deprive the majority members of the trade organization from exercising their voting rights and the Government in the Ministry of Commerce, or the Director of Trade Organizations failed..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 103
Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 127
M. Anwar Hossain and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....to learn that their illegal trial and punishmentwere discussed at the meetings of the formation commandersled by Major General Ziaur Rahaman at the relevant time. Breaking all ethos of fundamental rights, the so called martiallaw tribunal concluded the so called camera trial and convictedand sent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Amarbati Natya Mandir Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....re the origins of introduction of temples which are religious trusts in India. 16. It was said that in case of Debtor the recipient of the property is the deity as a juristic person and the sebait rights, unless otherwise disposed of remain in the family of the donor and they devolve according to..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Khorshid Nayeem and others Vs. Land Appeal Board land others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... persons Correctly and till today the respondent No.6 did not take any steps in respect of Final Publication of RS Khatian No.76 in the name of the petitioners' predecessor. Since the later record of rights, that is, RS record was finally published in the names of the predecessors of the petitioners..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Aleka Khatun and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....etitioners, submits that on the admitted position of the parties, the land leased in favor of respondent No. 6 encroaches purchased lands of the petitioners and, as such, it infringes the fundamental rights of the petitioners in enjoying their purchased land. 7. Mr. Zaman Akhter, learned Assistan..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Ibrahim Akand and others Vs. Securities and Exchange Commission and others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....and 2 to show cause as to why the amendment of Rule 66 of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Mutual Fund) Rules, 2001 (Annexure-K) restricting Respondent Nos.3-6 from declaring stock dividend or rights issue should not be declared to have been taken without lawful authority and to be of no lega..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 462
Gopinath Das and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ted CS plot 40 by amalnama and dakhila. This claim of the said defendants on the basis of amalnama/dakhila is false as those documents are forged. Rashik Lal or Mohadev had no saleable/transferable rights in the suit land. Said suit is still pending. 12. In the first part of 1975 defendant No.2..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 149
Kazi Aftabuddin and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
.... instrument and such right has not been given effect to. In other words, the petitioners are being deprived of the benefit of such right. The aforesaid letter is not a legal instrument creating legal rights for the petitioners over the unutilised portion of the land. It only lays down the policy of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Muslim Uddin Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....strict Fisheries Office which is a clear violation of law as such this Court has every jurisdiction to look into the matter since the respondents by violating the law have infringed the fundamental rights of the petitioner which is required to be protected under Article 102 of the Constitution. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 455
Sakya Pada Barua & others Vs. State and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....y were submitted were omitted from the schedule of the Special Powers Act, the question substantially is whether the offences which were committed before their omission from the schedule gave rise to rights and liabilities which can be presumed to have been destroyed by such omission. In my consider..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103