Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Guljan Bibi and others Vs. Md. Fazlu Miah and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t in error in holding that the plaintiffs' suit was barred by limitation. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLC (AD)(2007) 18. ...... that suit was filed on 27.9,1989 while 60 years expired on 26-12-1988 and thus though apparently it appears that the suit was barred by limitation but because of the provision of Article 4 of the Bangladesh (Legal Proceedings) Order, 1972 (President's Order No. 12 of 1972) the suit was not barr......2 BLC (AD)(2007) 18. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul IslamJ Guljan Bibi and others...............Petitioners Vs. Md. Fazlu Miah and others.....Respondents Judgment August 6, 2006. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Abu Asad Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abu Taher Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLC (AD)(2007) 9, 17 MLR (AD) (2012) 61. ...... the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLC (AD)(2007) 9, 17 MLR (AD) (2012) 61. ......rted in: 12 BLC (AD)(2007) 9, 17 MLR (AD) (2012) 61. ...... (2012) 61. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Bangladesh, Gas Fields Co. Ltd. Vs. Md. Fariduddin Ahmed and ors., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....pellant, the respondent No.4 has the absolute control over the appellant in all matters and any director of the appellant may be appointed and/or removed at the option of the respondent No.4/Government and any vacancy in the office of directors of the appellant shall be filled upon by the ......2008) 324. ...... M.M.Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Bangladesh, Gas Fields Co. Ltd………............... Appellant (In both the appeals) Vs. Md. Fariduddin Ahmed and ors ..........Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 196 of 2000) Md. Osman Gani and ors&hell......: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M.Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Bangladesh, Gas Fields Co. Ltd………............... Appellant (In both the appeals) Vs. Md. Fariduddin Ahmed and ors ..........Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 196 of 2000) ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Abdur Rahman & others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdur Rahman & others…..............Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Gazipur & others......Respond......il) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdur Rahman & others…..............Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Gazipur & others......Respondents Ju......or Advocate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Review Petition No. 67 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 08.03.2005 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal No. 81 of 1999). ......te Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdur Rahman & others…..............Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Gazipur & others....Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Robiul Islam & ors Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat & ors, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ct decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 304. ...... Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Robiul Islam and others....... Petitioners Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat and others..... Respondents Judgment May 27, 2007. Law...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Robiul Islam and others....... Petitioners Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Robiul Islam and others....... Petitioners Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat and others..... Respondents J..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 301. ......d in: V ADC (2008) 301. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md.Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet ........Petitioner Vs. Abdul Aziz and others……..........Respondents Judgment April 9, 2006. Lawye......n (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md.Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet ........Petitioner Vs. Abdul Aziz and others……..........Respondents Judgment April..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19
Mohammad Ali Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....itle and possession in the land and the suit is barred by Section 76 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. The further case of the defendant No.1 is that the suit land is khas land of the Government and was given in settlement to the plaintiff in L.A. Case No. 114/46 (XII) in the year 1...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohammad Ali.........Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others…….........Respondents Judgment March 13, 2007. ......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohammad Ali.........Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others…….........Respondents Judgment March 13, 2007. Lawye...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohammad Ali.........Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others…….........Respondents Judgment March ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Golam Azim and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....shy;ted no error in rejecting the writ petition summarily. Accordingly, petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 295 ; 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 361 . ......Amin CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Golam Azim and another……………….Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others….......Respondents Judgment October 3, 2007. Lawy......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Golam Azim and another……………….Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh......Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Golam Azim and another……………….Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others….......Respondents Judgment October 3, 2007. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
S.M. Nurul Islam Vs. Padma Oil Company Limited and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....out at all considering Ext. 2 in which the petitioner admitted his guilt. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 292. ......nstatement in his service with all arrear benefits on the averments that the respondent No.1, Padma Oil Company Limited, is a public limited company and the shares of the above company are held by Bangladesh Petroleum corporation, the respondent No.3, as well as other financial institutions, pub...... M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J S.M. Nurul Islam……………………Petitioner Vs. Padma Oil Company Limited and others…………….....Respondents Judgment Novembe...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J S.M. Nurul Islam……………………Petitioner Vs. Padma Oil Company Limited and others…………….....Respond..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Md. Shahidur Islam and others Vs. Md. Habibur Rahman and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....y, the learned Counsel submits that the High Court Division has failed to consider that in a suit for cancellation of deed and recovery of khas possession concerned sub-registrar and the Government of Bangladesh are necessary parties and they having not been impleaded as defendant...... Counsel submits that the High Court Division has failed to consider that in a suit for cancellation of deed and recovery of khas possession concerned sub-registrar and the Government of Bangladesh are necessary parties and they having not been impleaded as defendants, the plainti......DC (2008) 289. ......Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Shahidur Islam and others…….... Petitioners Vs. Md. Habibur Rahman and others ......Respondents Judgment May 15, 2007. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Matiar Rahman Vs. Assist Custodian of Enemy Property Lands & Buildings, Bakerganj, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... relating to review and the time tested ground(s) entitling one of the parties in the judgment has been re-stated in the case of Basharatullah, being dead his heirs: Fazle Karim and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others reported in (1996) 16 BLD (AD) 9 wherein it has been held: &qu......to review and the time tested ground(s) entitling one of the parties in the judgment has been re-stated in the case of Basharatullah, being dead his heirs: Fazle Karim and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others reported in (1996) 16 BLD (AD) 9 wherein it has been held: "Consistently......pellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Matiar Rahman being dead his heirs: Shahajada Hossain Mallik and others..... Appellant Vs. Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property Lands and Buildin...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Matiar Rahman being dead his heirs: Shahajada Hossain Mallik and others..... Appellant Vs. Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property Lands and Buildings, Bakerganj and Additional Depu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Abdur Rahman and others Vs. Sultan @ Sultan & others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Ex-parte—Respondent Nos. 5 & 6. Case Referred to- Local Government Code vs. Arlidge 1915 A.C. 120 (at 138). Civil Appeal No. 85 of 1981. (Arising......ndolent respondent cannot claim any equitable relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Fazle Munim CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury A.T.M. Masud J Abdur Rahman and others……………………………&......lip;…………………………………………………………..Appellants Vs. Sultan @ Sultan & ors.…………………&helli..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
G. M. Majid Vs. Amjad Hossain Lablu and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... of the aforesaid criminal case. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 268. ...... of the aforesaid criminal case. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 268. ......sent: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J G. M. Majid……………………………………….. Petitioner Vs. Amjad Hossain Lablu and another ........Respondents Judgment March 21, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Al......Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J G. M. Majid……………………………………….. Petitioner Vs. Amjad Hossain Lablu and another ........Respondents Judgment March 21, 2007. Lawyer..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Abdul Muttalib Vs. Md. Abdul Wahab, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 237. ......Deb, full brother of Mohendra. The plaintiffs further allegation is that the kabala deed dated 21.04.1988 is a forged deed as Pankaj, Taposh and Asim are all Indian citizens and they never came to Bangladesh and never executed the document. 3. The defendants contested the suit by fil......ocate (with M. Nurul Amin, Advocate) instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 835 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 19.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1386 of 2002). ......decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 237. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Nazma Ahmed and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l Kabir Chowdhury J Nazma Ahmed and others………...........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariet Ramna, Dhaka and another ......sent: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Nazma Ahmed and others………...........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Government of t...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Nazma Ahmed and others………...........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represent...... Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Nazma Ahmed and others………...........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Gove..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
BFDC Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ry was conducted according to law, that the opposite party in the complaint cases could not establish, that the case of the petitioners in the complaint cases is governed by the provisions of Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1985 nor could establish, that the petitione......2008) 217. ...... M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Abdul Matin J Bangladesh Film Development Corporation, Tejgaon, Dhaka.......Petitioner (In all cases) Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another......Respondents (In all cases) Judgment January 3, 2008. Lawyers...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Abdul Matin J Bangladesh Film Development Corporation, Tejgaon, Dhaka.......Petitioner (In all cases) Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another......Respondents (In all cases) ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Bangladesh Vs. Kopil Das, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of L......ision (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka...... CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others ......................Petitioners Vs. ...... The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others ......................Petitioners Vs. Kopil Das .............................Respondent Judgment April 4, 2007...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Baki Vs. Md. Fazlul Haque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....eeds. He further submits that the High Court Division failed to show that the defendant-petitioner after purchase of .15 decimals of land from the same vendor mutated his name and paid rent to the Government and got water, gas and electricity connection as well as constructed boundary wall which ......as such no interference is called for in the findings and decisions of the High Court Division and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (200) 209. ...... Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Baki…………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Md. Fazlul Haque and others.........Respondents Judgment May 28, 2007. Lawyer Involved: ...... M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Baki…………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Md. Fazlul Haque and others.........Respondents Judgment May 28, 2007. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Sec, Min. of Energy & Mineral Resource, Govt. of BD Vs. Q.C. Petroleum Ltd. & ors, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Amen J Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Government of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others ........Appellants Vs. ......ision (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Amen J Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Government of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others ........Appellants Vs. Q.C. Petr...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Amen J Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Government of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others .............. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Amen J Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Government of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others ........Appellants Vs. Q.C. Petroleum Limited and others ......................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Sunil Kumar Das Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....High court Division committed no illegality in dismissing the appeal. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 202. ...... 2001 allowing the opposition case and rejecting the Trade Mark Application No. 52139 in Class 25. 2. The facts, in short, are that the petitioner Sunil Kumar Das being the sole proprietor of the Bangladesh Manufacturer and Merchant made an application on 31.07.1997 to the Registrar of Trade Mar.........................Petitioner Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, The Trade Marks Registry Shilpa Bhavan, Annex Building, 91 Motijheel Commercial Area, Police Station-Motijheel, District-Dhaka and another ........................... Respondents. Result: The petition is dismissed. Law......eme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Sunil Kumar Das .......................Petitioner Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, The Trade Marks Registry Shilpa Bhavan, Annex Building, 91 M..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 196