Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abu Bakar Siddique (Md) Vs. Kafiluddin and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment April 29th 1992. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, (Md. Azizul Hoque, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record -For the P......ureau, Dhaka whereupon an Assistant Inspector made a preliminary enquiry and then lodged a FIR on 29.12.81 at Tongibari PS. The allegation briefly was that Faiz Ali, Sub‑Registrar, Tongibari, Abdul Jalil, Thana Revenue Officer, Tongibari, Mofazzal Hossain, Assistant Tahsilder, Betka Tahsil ......as not felt aggrieved by the said order. The petition is dismissed. However acquittal in a criminal case does not stand in the way to seek remedy by civil action. Ed. ......p; Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abu Bakar Siddique (Md)……………………Complainant-Petitioner Vs. Kafiluddin and others...............Accused-Respondents &nb..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Qazi Karnal Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....htiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by M Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellant in both the cases. A J Mohammad Ali, Advocate instructed by Md. SaJadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record - For respondent Nos. 1‑3 in CA No. 7 of 1992. Ex ......ner is the appellant in both the two appeals. They have been heard together and will be disposed of by this common judgment. 2. Pursuant to his application dated 21.9.77 respondent No. 4 Md. Abdul Matin was given a provisional allotment of more or less 10 kathas of land at Gulshan Model To......bsolute and it is hereby directed that the name of the appellant be mutated in place of the original lessee Md. Abdul Matin, in the relevant registers and papers of the respondents. Ed. ...... Qazi Karnal ... .........................................................Appellant [In both the appeals] Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha and another .....................Respondents [In bot..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Sheikh Ibrahim & others Vs. Nazma Begum, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....the High Court Division on such an important matter relating to Mohammadan Law. We do not find any reason for expressing any doubt about the matter. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......……………Petitioners Vs. Nazma Begum......................Respondent Judgment August 16th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Record - For the Petitioners. Not Represented - For the Respondent......the High Court Division on such an important matter relating to Mohammadan Law. We do not find any reason for expressing any doubt about the matter. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......n Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Sheikh Ibrahim & others……………Petitioners Vs. Nazma Begum......................Respondent Judgment August 16th, 1992. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 93
Abdur Rashid Vs. Momtaz Ali Karikar and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Single Judge of the High Court Division is liable to be set aside and the pre‑emptor is entitled to pre‑emption. In the result the appeal is allowed without cost, Ed. ......;………….. Pre-emptee-Respondents Judgment March 12, 1992. Cases Referred to- 36 DLR (AD) 1, 51 CWN 644. Lawyers Involved: Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Record -For the Appellant. Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Recor...... Single Judge of the High Court Division is liable to be set aside and the pre‑emptor is entitled to pre‑emption. In the result the appeal is allowed without cost, Ed. ...... Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Karnal J Latifur Rahman J Abdur Rashid ........ ...... Pre-emptors-Appellant Vs. Momtaz Ali Karikar and others………………….. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Subash Chandra Halder & another Vs. Abdul Bari & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....party is necessary within the meaning of Order 1 rule 10(2) CPC or for the ends of justice............(8) Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (SK Sinha, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record -For the Appellants. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate in......(Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Subash Chandra Halder & another.................Plaintiff-Appellants Vs. Abdul Bari & others ..................Defendant-Respondents Judgment April 12, 1992. R......hus cannot be sustained. The order is, accordingly, set aside. The appeal is allowed without any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......ion (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Subash Chandra Halder & another.................Plaintiff-Appellants Vs. Abdul Bari & others ..................Defendant-Respondents Judgment April 12, 1992..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Manik Chand Bibi @ Rezian Nahar & anr Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chy @ Sufi Mia Chy, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Appellant Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment December 3rd, 1991 Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellants. M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - For...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Manik Chand Bibi alias Rezian Nahar and another.........................Appellant Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment Dec...... person entitled to execute the decree and that stage did not reach fill then. Hence, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ivil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Manik Chand Bibi alias Rezian Nahar and another.........................Appellant Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment November...... land comprising 0'080 acres shall henceforth be described as the said land. On 8.12.62 Dilip Kumar, claiming to be the sole owner of the said land, sold it to the plaintiffs for Tk. 5,000'00. One Abdul Mannan Khandaker purchased the said land in execution of a rent‑decree passed against t......appellate Court's judgment was not a proper judgment of reversal. For all the above reasons, we do not find any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abul Khair Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Ahmed Ali Advocate (appeared with leave of the Court) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on -Record- For the Petitioner. B Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For th......and Dr. Delwar but Safiuddin succumbed to the injuries at about 11‑30 AM. The FIR was lodged by informant at 12‑15 PM on the same day at PS Lakshmipur situated at four miles west. PW 12 Abdul Motaleb OC Ramgonj, on being informed that three miscreants upon killing Safiuddin had fled a......elay will merit such commutation. We find no compelling extenuating circumstance in this case and therefore find no ground whatsoever to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abul Khair...............Petitioner. Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. La..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Court with him) instructed by M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Maksumul Hakim, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court (Abdul Hamid, Advocate Supreme, Court with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain, Deputy Att......upreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Hamid Mollah................... Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and anoth......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......esent: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Hamid Mollah................... Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and another…………………... Accuse..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Chairman, Kushtia Cooperative Industrial Union Ltd Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ondent Nos. 1-3. SS Haider, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ranesh Chandra Maitra, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For Respondent No. 4. Moazzem Hossain, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Respondent Nos. 5-6. Contempt Petition No. ......dgment June 10th, 1991 Lawyers Involved: Moinul Huq, Advocate, instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Record - For the Petitioner. Abdul Hug, Advocate, instructed by Mo...... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ......Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Chairman, Kushtia Co‑operative Industrial Union Ltd .............Petitioner Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others...............Respondents Judgment June 10th, 199..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
BD Chemical Industries Corporation & another Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works & ors, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....s Corporation and others…………. Respondents (In CA 36/1991) Judgment March 4th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (In CA 100/1990) Khandker Mahbubudd......heir gradual evolution which exercise, it must be said, has been ably done by the learned Judge in the impugned judgment. 5. To reproduce the said story, it is not disputed that in 1953 one Abdul Sattar Ahmed and Begum Ashrafunessa Khatun established a Match Factory at Shyampur, District ......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ...... Rahman J Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and another………………………………. Appellants Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works and others ..........Respondents (In CA 100/1990) ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Shaikh Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ........……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek Senior Advocate, (Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Shamsul Huq Sid......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ...... Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shaikh Shahidul Islam……………....……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....nd up to the challenge thrown up by the defendant on other grounds. So, the impugned judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is dismissed……….(12,17,18) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate ‑ For the Appellant. Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by ......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Rafiqul Islam (Md)………………………..Appellant Vs. Mir Abdul Ali................Respondent Judgment December 12, 1991. Result: The appeal is di...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Rafiqul Islam (Md)………………………..Appellant Vs. Mir Abdul Ali................Respondent Judgment December 12, 1991. Result: The a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
State Vs. Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ......ustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J State, represented by the Solicitor to the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......................Petitioner. Vs Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others..................................................Respondents ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Duga Mia vs. Crown 7 DLR 395; Shahed Ali Vs. State 13 DLR 414 and Sadik Vs. State (1971) PLD (SC) 713. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellant. M Shamsul ......ostile. 7. The real cause of the incident appears clearly from the questions put by the defence to PW 1. The defence case is that the boro field in question belongs to four brothers, such as Abdul Hamid (father of appellant's‑Siddique Munshi), Taher Uddin, Rashid and Danesh but that......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......iminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal Latifur Rahman J Siddique Munshi ...................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Sec, Min of Food, Food Div., Govt. of Bangladesh, Dhaka & others Vs. M/s. MF Ltd, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... February 10th, 1992. Case Referred to- Pratap Singh vs. Krishna Gupta AIR 1966 SC 140. Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate –on ‑Record -For the Appellants. Khondker Mahbubuddi......o pay the octroi which was long over due. Result of the writ petition was that the rule issued thereupon was made absolute and necessary direction was given for payment of the octroi. 3. Mr. Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, learned Additional Attorney‑General, has urged a number of points in sup......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J Latifur Rahman J Secretary, Ministry of Food, Food Division, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka and others .......... Appellants. Vs. M/s. MF Limited, a Private company limited by shares........................Respondent ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Joynal Abedin and others Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
...., the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ...... Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others................. Plaintiff‑Respondents Judgment January 28th, 1992. Case Referred to- Abdullah & 3 others Vs. Abdul Karim & others 20 DLR (SC) 205. Lawyers Involved......, the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ...... ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Joynal Abedin and others…………….. Defendant‑Appellants Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others................. Plaintiff‑Respondents ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Musa Ali Vs. Nur Ahmed and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......on of possession or alternatively khas possession in the land of Schedule 2 to the plaint and for permanent injunction. It is his case that 6 kanis of land of Schedule 1 to the plaint belonged to Abdul Hakim and others in raiyati interest under landlord Badruddoza Chowdhury who obtained a rent ...... Mohammad, the plaintiff came in picture after purchase in 1958 and as such the appellate Court did not give any importance to the testimony of this witness. The material evidence is of PW 3 Abdul Jabbar, a Tahsildar of the Estate whose evidence had already been mentioned earlier in my judgment ......mal J Latifur Rahman J Musa Ali ..................Appellant Vs. Nur Ahmed and others...................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Hussain Mohammad Ershad Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ad...............Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1992 Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑onRecord ‑For the Petitioner. Aminul Huq, Attorney‑General (Abdu......t January 30, 1992 Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑onRecord ‑For the Petitioner. Aminul Huq, Attorney‑General (Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney‑General, AF Hasan Arif, Deputy Attorney‑General, M Sham......smissed. Stay granted by this Court on 26.1.92 is vacated. No observation in the interlocutory proceedings binds the trial Court on the merit of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ent here. Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hussain Mohammad Ershad...............Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1992 Lawyers In..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 88