Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Ekramul Huq @ Bachchu and another Vs. State, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ribunal may consider the question of granting bail to the accused persons if such application is made. Send down the LC records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 219. ......Ameen J Ekramul Huq @ Bachchu and another…………………Appellants Vs. State………….Respondent Judgment March 9, 1999. Cases Referred to- Dharmasena vs. King Criminal Law Journal, 1950 Vol.50 page 1997, Abdul Ghani vs. Emperor Indian Law Reports Vol.29 page 412 and G..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Amora Holding Inc. Vs. Bangladesh, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....h Khondker Gulzar Hossain, Advocates — For the Petitioner. M Faruq, Deputy Attorney-General — For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 1515 of 1988 Judgment Md. Tafazzal Islam J. - This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and ......ne 10, 1998. Cases Referred to- Niaz Ahmed vs. State PLD 1978 Karachi 774; PLD 1981 Quetta, PLD 1979 (Karachi) 68; Sambasivan vs. Public Prosecutor, Federation of Malaysia, 1950 AC 458(479). Lawyers Involved: AF Hasan Ariff with Khondker Gulzar Hossain, Advocates — For the Petitioner. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 198
Md. Monir Hossain @ Babu Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ty to cancel the bail, if the accused petitioner misuses in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.Petitioner Vs. The State ……………………………………………………….Opposite party Judgment March 7, 2011. Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: A.F.M. Md. Zabair Hossain, Advocate-For the petitioner. Bashir Ahmed, Assist..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Motin Gazi alias Motiar Rahman Vs. The State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....y to cancel the bail, if the accused petitioner misuses in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque, J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Gazi alias Motiar Rahman………………………Petitioner Vs. The State………………………………………………………...Opposite party Judgment February 28, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Sk. Md. Jahangir Alam, Advocate-For the petitioner. Bashir Ahmed, Assistant ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Abul Kalam Bepari Vs. The State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... cancel the bail, if the accused petitioner misuses in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......aman J AKM Zahirul Hoque J Abul Kalam Bepari…………………………Petitioner Vs. The State……………………………………Opposite party Judgment March 8, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Ms. Ainun Nahar Siddique with Mrs. Jahanara Sarker, Advocate-For the petitioner..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Shah Abdul Hannan and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....eople of national notoriety, filed the instant Writ Petition with a view to secure an order to prevail over the government to have an energy policy drafted through the Parliament. The Term of the Rule Their petition succeeded to engender a Rule in following terms: “Let a Rule Nisi iss......948 1K B 223); Education Secretary Vs. Tameside Council (1977 Ac 1014); Lazarus Estates Ltd. Vs. Beaseley 1956 1QB 702; Jaichand Vs. West Bengal (AIR 1967 SC 483); Shearer Vs. Shield 1914 AC 808). Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque, with Imran Siddique, Ehsan Siddique, and M. Belayet Hossain, Ad..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 231
Thomarshu alias Majhi Vs. Bangladesh, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ABM Mahbub, Advocate, on behalf of Md. Marfat Ali, Advocate—For the Petitioner. None appeared—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.7243 of 1991. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- The Rule (originally in Civil Revision No. 144 of 1986) was obtained on 03-03-86 by the petitioner in an......¦Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh……………………….Opposite Party Judgment December 9, 1999. Case Referred To- Begum Lutfunnessa Vs. Nizamuddin Ahmed and others, 40 DLR 232. Lawyers Involved: ABM Mahbub, Advocate, on behalf of Md. Marfat Ali, Advocate—For the Petitione..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Rowshan Ali (Md.) Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....his bail bonds immediately to serve out the remaining portion of sentence imposed upon him. Send down the lower Court records immediately. Ed. This case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 510.......riminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Gour Gopal Saha J Rowshan Ali (Md.)…………………Appellant Vs. State …………………Respondent Judgment March 7, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Md. Waliul Islam, Advocate—For the Appellant. FKMA Mahbub, Assistant Attor..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Begum Tahmina Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....yers Involved: Abdul Malek, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Shahabuddin Ahmad, Deputy Attorney- General—For the Respondent. Writ Petition No.723 of 1994. Judgment Md. Abdul Quddus J.- Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order bearing......others………………………….Respondents Judgment August 8, 2000. Cases Referred To- Mustafizur Rahman and 3 others Vs. DG, Anti-Corruption and others, 49 DLR 599; 51 DLR 728. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Shahabuddin Ahmad, Deputy Attorn..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Shamsuddin Ahmed and others Vs. State and another, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....m, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AKM Zahirul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Opposite Party. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.380 of 1995. Judgment Abu Sayeed Ahammed J.- This Rule is under section 561A CrPC on the prayer of the four accused petitioners, namely (1) Shamsuddin...... Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Ali Asgar Khan J Shamsuddin Ahmed and others...............Petitioner Vs. State and another ..............Opposite Party Judgment April 12, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Amir-ul Islam, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AKM Zahirul Islam, Assistant A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Wahida Begum Vs. Tajul Islam, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....€”For the Petitioner. Abu Salek with Md. Lokman Hossain, Advocates—For the Opposite Parties Nos. 1 (a) to 1(g) and 2. Civil Revision No. 3078 of 1994. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by the successors-in-interest of the plaintiff, late Sultan Ahmed against the judg......R 1944 Allahabad 42; Ambabai Vs. HR Dani, AIR 1948 Nagpur 367; Bhagwan Vs. Ujagar, AIR 1928 PC 20; Sunder Kuer Vs. Udey Ram, AIR 1944 Allahabad 42; Nainsukhdas Vs. Gowardhandas, AIR 1968 (Nagpur). Lawyers Involved: SN Goswami Advocate—For the Petitioner. Abu Salek with Md. Lokman Hossain,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Saleha Khatun and others Vs. Fetema Hajura and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....te—For the Petitioners. Kh. Saiful Hoque with Khalilur Rahman Rakani, Advocates — For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 2043 of 1991. Judgment Khademul Islam Chowdhury J.- This Rule issued on an application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed agains......e Parties. Judgment March 30, 2000. Cases Referred To- Maqbul Ahamed and others Vs. Shoeb Chowdhury and others, 44 DLR 156; Md. Matiur Rahman Vs. Lal Banu Bibi and others, 986 BLD 432. Lawyers Involved: Asad Hossain Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Kh. Saiful Hoque wi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Shamim Begum Vs. Chairman Court of Settlement and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....oque, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Obaidur Rahman Mostafa, Deputy Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No.884 of 1995. Judgment Md. Fazlul Karim J.- In this application Rule was issued calling upon the Respondent No.1 to show cause as to why the order dated 20-4-92 pas......hairman Court of Settlement and others ……………………Respondents Judgment August 11, 1999. Case Referred To- Chand Miah Talukder Vs. Chairman Court of Settlement, 45 DLR 304. Lawyers Involved: Md. Azizul Hoque, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Obaidur Rahman Mostafa, Dep..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Atiqur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Ainunnahar, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....Advocates—For the Petitioner. Farida Begum (Khan), Advocate—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 2073 of 1998. Judgment AK Badrul Huq J.- The subject matter of challenge in this Rule arising out of an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is an order date.......Petitioner Vs. Ainunnahar……………………….Opposite Party. Judgment June 24, 1999. Case Referred to- Hosne Ara Begum Vs. Alhaj Md. Rezaul Karim and others, 43 DLR 543. Lawyers Involved: Lucky for Mashuque Hossain Ahmed, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Farida Beg..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Mukta Biri Factory Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....applicant in this reference must be taken to be true. Accordingly, the reference is disposed of, however, without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 451. ......lam J SAN Mominur Rahman J Mukta Biri Factory Ltd. ……………………Petitioner Vs. Commissioner of Taxes ………………….Opposite Party Judgment December 9, 1999. Lawyers involved: AFM Ferojuddin Bhuiyan, Advocate—For the Applicant. Dabiruddin Ahmed, Depu..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Matiur Rahman Bepari Vs. Wazuddin Bepari & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ber 2, 1999. Lawyers Involved: Md. Azizul Hoque, Advocate—For the Petitioner. No one—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 2138 of 1991. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule is directed against the order dated 16-6-91 passed by the Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Dhaka a......ent: Gour Gopal Saha J Matiur Rahman Bepari ………………………Petitioner Vs. Wazuddin Bepari & others………………..Opposite Parties. Judgment November 2, 1999. Lawyers Involved: Md. Azizul Hoque, Advocate—For the Petitioner. No one—For the Opposite P..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Abdul Awal (Md.) Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....the Appellate Division and hence we allow the prayer and accordingly grant certificate for preferring appeal before the Appellate Division. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 442. ......licant Vs. Commissioner of Taxes………………………………Respondent Judgment March 12, 2000. Cases Referred To- 29 ITR 30, 51 ITR (SC) 557, 145 ITR 225 and 55 ITR 630. Lawyers Involved: MA Noor Advocate—For the Applicant. Dabiruddin Ahmed, Deputy Attorney Gene..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Bibi Zarina and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....ed, Advocate—For the petitioner. Obaidul Hasan Shaheen, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition Nos. 548 and 464 of 1994. Judgment Syed Amirul Islam J.- Both the Rules arise out of the same Judgment and order dated 1-12-1991 passed in Case No.719 of 1987 by the ......AN Mominur Rahman J Bibi Zarina and others…………………Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………………………Respondents Judgment December 10, 1998. Lawyers Involved: Miah Abdul Gafur with Md. Faruque Ahmed, Advocate—For the petitioner. Obai..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Manager, Bangladseh Krishi Bank and others Vs. Al-Haj Md. Nurul Islam & another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....the Bank cannot be executable against the Bank itself because Sonali Bank is a juristic person. 27. Referring to this decision Dr. Rahman has drawn our attention to President’s Order 27 of 1972. Rule 2 sub-rule (4) wherefrom it appears that Bangladesh Krishi Bank is also a juristic person that ......s Vs. Hriday Ranjan Das being dead his heirs: Bimal Kanti Das and others, 40 DLR (AD) 56; Dr. Syed Matiur Rob being dead his heirs Shainsun Nahar & others on Bangladesh and others, 42 DLR (AD) 12. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with MA Baqui Ismail and Sirajur Rahman, Advocates—For the..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Aziz Pipes Limited, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ll realization of the decreetal amount if it is not paid within a period of 90 days from date. The parties are to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ..........Respondent (In Civil Appeal No. 151 of 2001) Judgment August 11, 2003. Result: The Civil Appeal No. 95 of 2001 is dismissed and Civil Appeal No. 151 of 2001 is allowed in part. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Ad..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 126