Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4321-4327 of 4327 results.
Sena Kalyan Sangstha Vs. Haji Sufi Fazal Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ...... Act and was, therefore, without jurisdiction. The decided decision apart from the case of Secretary of State vs. Mask reported in AIR 1945 (PC) 709 notable, amongst others, are Abdur Rauf vs. Abdul Hamid Khan, 17 DLR (SC) 515 and Md. Jamil vs Improvement Trust, Rawalpindi, 17 DLR (SC) 520.......arned Counsel of the petitioners. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ...... Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Sena Kalyan Sangstha and another..............Petitioners Vs. Sufi Fazal Ahmed and others ..................Respondents Judgment July ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Chairman, BADC, Dhaka Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....here is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......ding for final decision, cannot be given by way of interim relief……………………………(16) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate (M. A. Sobhan, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, ......ind merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, Dhaka..........Appellant. Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others.... Respondents Judgment March 12, 200..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
State Vs. Mofizuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rrect decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......00 P.M. the accused persons being armed with deadly weapons such as pipegun, kiris, dagger, iron rod etc. entered into Brahmanbaria Head Post Office breaking grill of a window and killing night guard Abdul Mannan and treasurer Abul Kalam Azad and looted away cash money of Tk. 2,64,290/- in total bre......nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......inal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. M.M. Ruhul Amin J. Md. Tafazzul Islam J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. The State.................................Petitioner. Vs. Mofizuddin and others ......... Respondents. Judgment 29 November 2005 Criminal Petit..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ...... Ministry of Establishment and others………………………………………………….Respondents Judgment May 16, 2005. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Abdul Motalab Mian Vs. Secretary, Establishment Division and others, 1982 BLD 144. Lawyers Invol......s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Hoque Miah……………………....Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and othersâ€..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....dge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Director of Housing and Settlement, Segunbagicha, Ramna, Dhaka ……..... Appellant Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader and others……….....Respondents Judgment December 9, 2003 Re......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Director of Housing and Settlement, Segunbagicha, Ramna, Dhaka ……..... Appellant Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader and others……….....Respondents Judgment December 9, 2003 ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
Aynul Sheikh and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....¦â€¦â€¦....Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 2003) Vs. The State…………….....Respondent (In both the cases) Result: The appeals are allowed in part. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants(In both the cases). Abdur Rouf, Deputy At......s Single judgment. 4. The facts revealed in the leave petitions, in short, are that the convict Aynul Sheikh (not appellant before us) started digging a drain through the middle of the land of one Abdul Gafur Sheikh by damaging his onion crops on 28.01.1996 at about 3.30 P.M. and so Abdul Gafur S...... rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay fine of Tk. 5,000/- each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......im J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Aynul Sheikh and another……….....Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 42 of 2003) Jaber Sheikh…………....Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 2003) Vs. The State…………….....Respondent (In both the cases) Result: The appeals are all..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 97
M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... judgment and order dated 18.10.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 940 of 1995 discharging the Rule. 2. The facts leading to the this petition, in brief, are that one Dr. Abdul Khayrat got lease of the disputed property from the Government on 02.12.1963 who sold the same......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ported in: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
335334331307303302297