Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
State Vs. Moyezuddin Sikder and Others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....……………………………Appellant Vs. Moyezuddin Sikder and Others…………Respondent Judgment April 23, 2008. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Emergency Power Rules, 2007, Rule 19(gha) The expression Adalat or Tribunal in rule 19(gha) refer to all Courts ......cretary of State Vs. Mask & Co. AIR 1940 (PC) 105 (67 IA 222); Zafar-Ul-Ahsan Vs. The Republic of Pakistan, PLD 1960 (SC) 113, State Vs. Abdul Wahab Shah Chowdhury and other, 51 DLR (AD) 242. Lawyers Involved: Fida M. Kamal, Attorney General, (Zahirul Islam Mukul, Deputy Attorney General..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 170
Eser Ali Sheikh (Md.) Vs. Md. Mokarram Ali and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....itioner Md. Asaduzzaman Advocate- For the opposite Party No. 1 AFM Zubair, Advocate- for the Opposite Parties 2 and 3. Civil Revision No. 2088 of 1996. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by defendant No. 11 upon making an application under section 115 of the Code of Ci......nal Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Eser Ali Sheikh (Md.) ………..Petitioner Vs. Md. Mokarram Ali and others ……….Opposite Parties. Judgment March 15, 2001. Lawyers Involved: Mir Mokhlesur Rahman with Nasrin Parvin, Advocates—for the Petitioner Md. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Abdul Waresh Vs. Md. Abdul Halim and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....LR 790. Lawyers Involved: Faridul Alam Chowdhury, Advocate—the Petitioner. Not represented— the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 166 of 1992. Judgment Faruque Ahmed J.- This Rule at the instance of the defendant petitioner was issued calling upon the opposite, parties to sh......…Petitioner Vs. Md. Abdul Halim and others …………Opposite Parties. Judgment May 20, 2001. Case Referred To- Roy Charan Das Vs. Santosh Kumar Das and others, 22 DLR 790. Lawyers Involved: Faridul Alam Chowdhury, Advocate—the Petitioner. Not represented— the Op..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Sumikin Bussan Corporation Vs. Chittagong Port Authority and Others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....hman, Advocates—For the Respondent No.8. Salauddin Ahmed with KM Tanjib-ul-Alam, Advocates—For the Respondent No. 9. Writ Petition No.7 of 2001. Judgment Kazi AT Monowaruddin J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondent Nos.1-7 to show cause as to why they shall not be direct...... Chittagong Port Authority and Others.........Respondents. Judgment June 4, 2001. Case Referred To- Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others 39 DLR (AD) 85. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with Sirajur Rahman, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Syed..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 153
Sk Sohrab Ali Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... October 25, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Not represented— the Petitioner. Not represented — the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 190 of 1981. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule is directed against the order dated 4-11-80 passed by the 3rd Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka...... Gour Gopal Saha J Sikder Maqbul Hoq J Sk Sohrab Ali………………Petitioner Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid and others.................Opposite Parties. Judgment October 25, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Not represented— the Petitioner. Not represented — the Opposite Parties...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Hussain Muhammad Ershad Vs. Abdul Muqtadir Chowdhury and another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....rested quarters issued the impugned Notification dated 30-8-2000 without waiting for the outcome of the leave petition filed by the petitioner as stated above. 5. In this background of the case, a Rule Nisi was issued on 6-9-2000 calling upon the respondents which also included the Speaker of the......angeli Vs. Chhakki Lal AIR 1963 All 527; Chandgi Rain Thakar Dass Vs. Election Tribunal AIR 1965 Punj 433; Risal Singh Vs. Chandgi Ram (AIR 1966 Punjab 393); re P. An Advocate, AIR 1963 (SC) 1313. Lawyers Involved: KS Nabi, with Sheikh Md. Serajul Islam, Khaled Hamid Chowdhury, Md. Shahed Au J..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Abdul Mannan Sarker (Md.) Vs. State and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... —For the Petitioner. Fazlul Hoque Chowdhury, Assistant Attorney General—For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 4587 of 1999. Judgment Md. Munsurul Haque Chowdhury J.- By this Rule opposite party was called upon to show cause as to why the impugned proceeding of Motijheel PS ...... Md. Hamidul Haque J Md. Munsurul Haque Chowdhury J Abdul Mannan Sarker (Md.)…………Petitioner Vs. State and others………..Opposite Parties. Judgment January 25, 2001. Lawyers Involved: Sk A Awal with Md. Aminul Islam and Md. Aminul Islam, Advocates —For the Peti..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sazeda Khatun Vs. Asad Ali and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....Hamida Chowdhury, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Surajit Bhattacharya, Advocate—For Opposite Parties No. 1 & 2. Civil Revision No. 3023 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J .- This Rule was obtained by the pre-emptee (purchaser) by making a revision application under section 115 o......ivil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Sazeda Khatun................Petitioner Vs. Asad Ali and others ………….Opposite Parties. Judgment July 2, 2001. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Amin with Hamida Chowdhury, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Suraji..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Abu Sayed Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....he time the Sessions Judge at Pabna Send down the records of the case at once if he is not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 559. ......King, 2 DLR 39; Lutfun Nahar Begum Vs. State 39 DLR (AD) 194; 37 DLR (AD) 139; State Vs. Mukhter Ali 10 DLR 155; Moqbool Hossain Vs. State, 12 DLR (SC) 217; Joygun Bibi Vs. State, 12 DLR (SC) 156. Lawyers Involved: Not represented—the Petitioners. Not represented—the Opposite Party J..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Sultan Mia (Md.) Vs. Hazi Md. Yusuf, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....n with Shahidul Islam, Md. Alamgir and Jail Gazi, Advocates—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 3254 of 2000. Judgment SK Sinha J.- Petitioner is the decree-holder who obtained this Rule against the order dated 11-6-2000 of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, D......l Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: SK Sinha J Sultan Mia (Md.)....................Petitioner Vs. Hazi Md. Yusuf ………………Opposite Party. Judgment August 16, 2001. Lawyers Involved: KS Salahuddin Ahmed, Advocate—For the Petitioner. M Enayetur Rahman with S..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Molla Mahjenul Islam Vs. State and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....ahman with Emdadul Huq Azad, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Abdul Quayum, Deputy Attorney-General—For Opposite Parties. Civil Revision Case No. 2164 of 1999. Judgment SK Sinha J.- This Rule is directed against the order dated 15-6-1999 of the learned Additional District Judge, Naogaon......te and others ……………….Opposite Parties. Judgment July 17, 2001. Case Referred To- Province of East Pakistan and another Vs. Md. Mehedi Ali Khan and others, 11 DLR (SC) 318. Lawyers Involved: Sk Afzalur Rahman with Emdadul Huq Azad, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Abd..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Anwar Hossain Vs. Election Commission of Bangladesh and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....he Petitioner. KS Nabi with Sk Md. Serajul Islam, KR Nabi and Shahed Ali Jinnah, Advocates — For the Respondent No.5. Writ Petition No. 1642 of 2000. Judgment Md. Joynul Abedin J.- This Rule Nisi under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Was issued ......Bangladesh and others……...Respondents. Judgment July 05, 2001. Case Referred To- Secretary, Parliament Secretariate Vs. Khandker Delwar Hossain, 1999 BLD (AD) 276 = 4 BLC (AD) 27. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed with Rokanuddin Mahmud and MK Rahman, Advocates — For the ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 196
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Abdur Razzaque Mollah Vs. Md. Qayum Mollah & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... with Md. Abul Quashem, Md. Zakir Hossain, Advocates—For the Petitioner. KS Zaman Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 4197 of 1998. Judgment NK Chakravartty J.- This Rule at the instance of defendant-appellant-petitioner was issued calling upon the opposites to show......2001. Cases Referred To- 43 DLR (AD) 78; 43 DLR (AD) 125; AIR 1975 All 341; Ram Chand Appellant Vs. Rain Swamp Respondent AIR 1952 Allahabad 654; Jalaluddin Mia Vs. Md. Yunus 1982 BCR 270. Lawyers Involved: KS Nabi, Barrister-at-Law with Md. Abul Quashem, Md. Zakir Hossain, Advocatesâ€..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Ibrahim (Md.) Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....dvocate — For the Petitioner Fazlul Haque Choudhury, Assistant Attorney- General -For the Opposite Party. Criminal Revisional Case No.756 of 2000. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- By this Rule, opposite party was called upon to show cause as to why the order dated 18-7-99 passed by the M...... Present: Md. Hamidul Haque J Munsurul Haque Choudhury J Ibrahim (Md.) ……………..Petitioner Vs. State ……………….Opposite Party. Judgment November 2, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Anisul Haque, Advocate — For the Petitioner Fazlul Haque Choudhury, Assist..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Shuinya @ Suruj Ali Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....a, Advocate— For the Petitioner. Nikhilesh Dutta, Deputy Attorney-General — For the Opposite Party. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 294 of 2000. Judgment Md. Hamidul Hoque J.- By this Rule, the opposite party was called upon to show cause as to why the judgment, order of conviction a......AIR 1922 (Lahore) 138; Mehrdin Vs. The Emperor IC 1927 page 935; Shahdin Vs. State PLD 1961 (Lahore) 704; State Vs. Amir Khan PLD 1963 (Peshawar) 54; Emperor Vs. Nga Lu Gale AIR 1928 (Rangoon) 49. Lawyers Involved: Subash Chandra Shaha, Advocate— For the Petitioner. Nikhilesh Dutta, Deput..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Government of Bangladesh Vs. ASM Ferojuddin Bhuiyan, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....dgment of reversal has been called in question by petitioner in invoking this Court’s Civil Revisional Jurisdiction on laying a petition under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure whereupon a Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why judgment and decree dated 26......Natural Gas Commission AIR 1987 1 Cal:90 CWN 449 and Robertson Vs. Minister of Pensions 1 KB 227 (LR) Kings Bench Division; Central London Property Trust Ltd. Vs. High Trees House Ltd. 1947 QB 30. Lawyers Involved: Bhivash Chandra Biswas, Assistant Attorney-General —For the Petitioners. M..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 96