Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4361-4380 of 7814 results.
....ion. Therefore, we do not find any cogent reason why in both the writ petitions the demands made by the respondents should not be struck down on the ground of invalidity.
24. Accordingly, both the Rules are made absolute. The notification, namely SRO No. 150- Law/2001/315/Mushak, dated 7-6-2001 a....... Vs. Ellis, 165 US 150, Shujat Ali vs. Union of India, AIR 1974 SC 1631, Lachman Das vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1963 SC 22, AIR 1963 SC 268, 41 DLR (AD) 30, Gulf Colorado Rly vs. Ellis (165 US 150)
Lawyers Involved:
Mahmudul Islam with Mizanul Huq Chowdhury and MA Hannan, Advocates—For Petiti..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Selim Reza Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....General—For Respondent No. 1. Sheikh Razzaque Ali with Munshi Ahsan Kabir,Advocates—For the added Respondent No. 7. Writ Petition No. 3028 of 2005. Judgment Md. Joynul Abedin J.- This Rule was issued under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh calling......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………………………. Respondents. Judgment August 13, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Tashadduk Hasan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ms. Nahid Mahtab Assista..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 114
....ostafa Kamal, Advocate—For Respondents No. 4.
Abul Hossain Azadi, Assistant Attorney-General— For the Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 1895 of 1999.
Judgment
Md. Joynul Abedin J.- This Rule was issued under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh calli......……………Petitioner
Vs.
Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land, Secretariat Building & others. ………………….Respondents.
Judgment
March 28, 2001.
Lawyers Involved:
JN Deb, Advocate—For the Petitioner.
ABM Mostafa Kamal, Advocate—For Res..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Commissioner of Taxes Vs. Kushtia Sugar Mills Ltd., 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
..... Accordingly, we answer the questions in the affirmative and against the revenue applicant. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 504.......d Amirul Islam J AKM Shafiuddin J Commissioner of Taxes…………………….Petitioner Vs. Kushtia Sugar Mills Ltd......………………Respondent. Judgment July 19, 2000. Lawyers Involved: MA Rahim Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Applicant. AFM Feroju..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 104
....LJ (PC) 9.
Lawyers Involved:
Moksed Ali, Advocate—For the Petitioners.
Not represented— the Opposite Parties.
Civil Revision No. 2444 of 1993.
Judgment
Md. Shamsul Huda J.-This Rule arises out of an application section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure by Afitan Nessa and ......¦â€¦â€¦.Opposite Parties.
Judgment
August 09, 2001.
Cases Referred To-
Kamal Anwar and others Vs. Md. Kabir Khan, 1985 BLD 157; Raja Debi Baksh Singh Vs. Habib Shah, 1913 CLJ (PC) 9.
Lawyers Involved:
Moksed Ali, Advocate—For the Petitioners.
Not represented— the Opposite..
Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Annada Prosad Das Vs. DC, Khulna and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....on of allegiance is required only in the case of those who apply for a certificate of Naturalisation under the Naturalisation Act, 1926 (Act No.VII of 1926) and also in cases provided for in the said Rules. It is also required in our Constitution by the holder of some high Constitutional offices to ......an Vs. Commissioner of Police, Madras AIR 1965 (SC) 1623, lzhar Ahmed Vs. Union of India AIR 1962 (SC) 1052, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Hoque, 1982 BCR (AD) 143. Lawyers Involved: SS Halder with Joya Bhattacharjee, Advocates — For the Appellant. Bivash C..Category: Immigration and Citizenship Law | Date: | Hits: 190
Anindra Bhusan Ghose Vs. Bangladesh Government, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....l. For the reasons and discussions made above, I find no merits in this appeal. In the result the appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 493.......€¦Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Government ………………Respondent. Judgment May 23, 2001. Case Referred To- Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Bima Corporation, 39 DLR (AD) 76. Lawyers Involved: Sk Habibul Alam, Advocate—For the Appellant. Bivash Chandra Biswas, Assist..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
....ate—For the Petitioners.
Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with Sirajur Rahman and Emaduddin Chowdhury, Advocates—For Opposite Party.
Civil Revision Case No. 4618 of 1999.
Judgment
SK Sinha J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 21-6-99 of the Additional Divisional Commissio......ha J
S K Sinha J
Bangladesh Forest Industries Development Corporation and others……….Petitioners
Vs.
Sheikh Abdul Jabbar……………Opposite Party.
Judgment
June 3, 2002.
Lawyers Involved:
Morshed Ahmed Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioners.
Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with ..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Parul Bala @ Parul Rani Shah Mondol Vs. Suruj Miah and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....lved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan with Nikhles Dutta Advocates—For the Appellant. Kh Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Mirza Hossain Haider Advocates—For Respondent Nos. 1(ka), 1(kha), 1(ga), 1(Uma). Civil Rule No. 128(S) of 1995. Judgment Abu Sayeed Ahammed J.- This appeal is at the instance of Sr......s. Debendra Nath Dutta, 39 CWN, 1076; State Vs. Mask and Co. AIR 1940 (SC); Annamali Chettiar Vs. Palamali and others, 41 ILR (Madras series) 265; Mozammel Hoq Vs. State and another, 1983 BLD 168. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan with Nikhles Dutta Advocates—For the Appellant. Kh Mah..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Nizam Hazari Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....nal No.14, Chittagong in Special Tribunal Case No.757 of 1999 stand maintained. Lower Court Records be sent down immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 475. ......ll get encouragement and the innocent citizens of the country and the society as a whole will suffer. Keeping in view the Latin maxim Salus Populi Suprema Lex, the safety of the people is the Supreme Law and Salus Republicae Supreme Lex, the safety of the State is the Supreme Law, society and innoce..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Titas Gas Vs. Immense Washing Plant and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....the Petitioner. Md. Ozair Farooq with Md. Shawkat Hossain and Sk Mohammad Morshed, Advocates—For Opposite Party No.1. Civil Revision No. 2866 of 2001. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by the defendant No.4 upon making a revision application under section 115 of the ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Opposite Parties. Judgment July 19, 2001. Cases Referred To- Abdul Jalil Vs. Abu Bakar Siddique, 35 DLR (AD) 42; Babul Kanti Das and others Vs. Abdul Hashem, 47 DLR (AD) 6. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hosein with Shamsul Alam, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Md. Ozair F..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 151
Milon @ Shahabuddin Ahmed Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... Ahmed are hereby maintained. Send down the lower Court records along with a copy of this judgment to the Court concerned at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 464. ...... 12; State Vs. Tota Mia, 51 DLR 244; Alkas Mia and others Vs. The State, 25 DLR 398; Alamgir Hossain (Md.) alias Alamgir Hossain and another Vs. State, 49 DLR 590; Saad Ahmed Vs. State, 35 DLR 41. Lawyers Involved: MA Quddus, Advocate—For the Appellant. Shueb Ahmad, Assistant Attorney-Gen..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Abdus Sukur (Md.) and others Vs. Bhasani Mandal and another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... Lawyers Involved: AB Roy Chowdhury—For the Petitioners. Garib Newaz with Maksuda Aktar—For Opposite Party No.1. Civil Revision No. 3535 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by the plaintiffs upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code......IR 1936 Allahabad 422, MA Mallik Vs. NH Mallik, 1986 BCR (AD) 56, Ishaque Mia and another Vs. Abdul Mazid and others, 48 DLR 465, Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizunnessa Chowdhury, 39 DLR (AD) 46 . Lawyers Involved: AB Roy Chowdhury—For the Petitioners. Garib Newaz with Maksuda Aktar—For..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Seastar Shipping Lines Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... Obaidur Rahman Mostafa, Deputy Attorney-General with Mashfiqur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General—For Respondent No. 1. Writ Petition No. 5584 of 2000. Judgment Md. Joynul Abedin J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondent Nos.1-3 to show cause why the impugned order, Annex......ion) Present: Md. Joynul Abedin J ABM Khairul Haque J Seastar Shipping Lines Ltd………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others……….Respondents Judgment May 16, 2001. Lawyers Involved: M Hafizullah with Md. Ohiullah, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Obaidur Rahm..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 212
State Vs. Md. Shamim alias Shamim Sikder and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....der alias Md. Ratan are allowed and they are found not guilty to the charges levelled against them and they are acquitted in this case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 439........ State, 42 DLR (AD) 3; AIR 1946 PC 45; State Vs. Montu alias Nazrul Haque and 7 others, 44 DLR (AD) 287; Abdul Quddus Vs. State, 43 DLR (AD) 234; Chowla Vs. State of Haryana, AIR 1974 (SC) 1039. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate—For the Condemned Prisoner-Appellants. Shamsul ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Gurvinder Singh Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Finance and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....ers Involved: Masood R Sobban, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Moksudur Rahman, Advocate—For Respondent No.3. Writ Petition No. 1672 of 1992. Judgment Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J.- This Rule arises out of an application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic o......: Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J KM Hasan J Gurvinder Singh…………..Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Finance and others…………..Respondents. Judgment July 8, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Masood R Sobban, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Moksudur Rahman, Advocate—..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Hamza Rubber Industries Vs. Golam Dastagir Gazi, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....ul Hossain, with Md. Rafiqul Islam, Abdur Razzak, Arfan Ahmed Siddique, Mizanur Rahman, Iftekhar Ahmed and Md. Aminul Islam Mondal, Advocates—For the Respondents. FMAT No. 285 of 2001 with Civil Rule No. 255 (FM) of 2001. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This appeal was presented by the plai......e 103; American Cyanamid Co. Vs. Ethicon Ltd. 1975(1) All ER 504(HL); Series 5 Software Vs. Clark, 1996(1) All ER 853 (Ch D); Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. 1999(7) SCC 1. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan with Gazi Neamat Hossain, Advocates—For the Appellant. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 230
....
SS Halder, Advocate—For the Petitioner.
Dr. Kazi Rezaul Hoque, Assistant-Attorney-General—For the Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 2512 of 1995.
Judgment
Syed Mahmud Hossain J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and ......vernment of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works Vs. A Jalil, 49 DLR (AD) 26; CQMH Md. Ayub Ali Vs. Bangladesh 47 DLR (AD) 71; Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdul Jalil, 49 DLR (AD) 26.
Lawyers Involved:
SS Halder, Advocate—For the Petitioner.
Dr. Kazi Rezaul Hoque, Assistant-A..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Progoti General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....ormulated by us in the negative and in favour of the assessee petitioner. There will be no order of cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 424, 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 531. ......e 11, 2000. Cases Referred To- Meghna Petroleum Co. Ltd. Vs. CIT 26 BTD (AD) 74 = 50 DLR (AD) 165; Shitaldas Tirathdas 41 ITR 367; Kerala Vs. Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. 90 ITR 3O7. Lawyers Involved: AFM Ferojuddin Bhuiyan, Advocate—For the Appellant. MA Rahim Bhuiyan, Assi..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Sogra Begum Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....eal before the higher Court. The only limitation is that if the appeal is heard first the Order 9 rule 13 application becomes incompetent i.e. the jurisdiction to pass orders on application under the Rule subsists only so long as the appellate Court does not decide the appeal. Similarly, in the inst......rul Islam J AKM Shafiuddin J Sogra Begum………………………….Applicant Vs. Commissioner of Taxes ……………………………Respondent. Judgment August 20, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Md. Altaf Hossain, Advocate—For the Applicant. Not represented—the Resp..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 108
46334632463146304629462846274626462546244623462246194618461646154614461346124611