Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4521-4540 of 6668 results.
Ahmed Meah Sowdagar Vs. S. M. Abdul Alim and another, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....him Khalil, Advocate-on Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not Represented- Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 2219 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 14.07.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1924 of 2004.) Judg...... Ahmed Hossain was not maintainable and these facts were considered by the appellate court below. But the learned Judge of the High Court Division misread these facts and came to an erroneous decision occasioning failure of justice. 7. We have heard the learned Counsel and perused th..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Gopal Chandra Vs. Mitali Rani Chandra, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not Represented-the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1859 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 08.04.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1417 of 2003). Judg......;ference. 10. In such view of the matter, we find no substance in the leave petition and the same is dismissed accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 856. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Moulvi Abdul Wadud Chowdhury Vs. Abdul Motaleb Chowdhury and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....-Record-For the Petitioner (In all the cases) Not represented- the Respondents (In all the cases) Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 513 and 517-518 of 2008 (From the judgment and order dated 5.12.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 4633, 4634 and 4635 of 1997......dences on record and that the High Court Division failed to appreciate the oral evidence of the pre-emptor, who deposed as P.W.1, and also misread the evidences on record and thereby arrived at wrong decision but the learned Advocate could not show from the record as to which part of the deposition ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Md. Jahangir Kabir Vs. Bangladesh, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... Ferozur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1805 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 13.07.2008 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No. 105 of 2005.) ......red and thus we do not find any illegality in the impugned judgment and order. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 828. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 243
Surendra Mohan Bandayapadhya Vs. Lalit Mohan Das, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....d by Nurul Islam Bhuiya, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1373 of 2008 (From the judgment and order dated 23.04.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Second Appeal No. 435 of 1971.) Judgme......ure they surrendered the tenancy in favour of the plaintiff landlords in the month of Agrahayan, 1350 B.S., which correspondence to 1943 A.D. The trial Court framed 5 issues in arriving at its decision and found that the suit was not barred by limitation and the suit was not hit by the Ordin..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Abdul Halim alias Halim Mia Vs. Abdus Sattar and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on- Record-For Respondent No.1. Not Represented-For Respondent Nos. 2-58. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 929 of 2008 (From the judgment and order dated 13.3.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1012 of 2003.) Judgme......connected papers including the impugned judgment. We do not find any substance in the points raised. The High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived al a correct, decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingl..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Saiful Hoque Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....y Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 646 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 2.3.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Order No.1010 of 2008) Judgment ......apers including the impugned judgment. We do not find any substance in the points raised. The High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Sufia Khatun Vs. Amin Hossain Mondal and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....udgment Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This is an appeal of one of the plaintiffs, by leave, against the judgment and order dated February 5, 1997 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Re......d decree of the courts below is based "on misreading and non-reading and non-consideration of the evidence of (sic) record" and thus the appellate Court has "arrived at an erroneous decision and this calls for interference by this court". 7. The law is now settled as to..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Bhawal Raj Court of Wards Estate Vs. Rasheda Begum and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....7-26 (In Civil Petition No.1452 of 2008). Judgment July 19, 2009. Civil petition for leave to Appeal Nos. 1447-52 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 20.05.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 6262 of 2005, 6671 of 200......lenging correctness of the last revised record of rights shall lie in such Tribunal. Mr. Nurul Amin and Abul Quashem adopted the arguments of Mr. T.H. Khan, Mr. Quashed however insisted for decision on title. We can only say if any person on behalf of so-called Bhawal Raj Court of Wards E..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
State Vs. Muhammad Faridul Mollah, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....s Md. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 341 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 09.07.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No.545 of 2003.) Judg...... the discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Md. Bazlur Mohammad Vs. Bangladesh , 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 474 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 05.04.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4487 of 2002). Judg......desh and others, 51 DLR (AD) 152, the virus of section 4 of the above Act, 1974 and the Rules 3, 4 and 10 of Rules, 1975 were challenged and the Appellate Division, considering various decisions pronounced by both the Divisions of the Supreme Court, answered the question in the..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 100
M/S M. A Salam and Co. Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For Addition Party. Civil petition for leave to Appeal No.1287 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 04.06.2008 passed by the High Court Division in writ Petition No.4070 of 2008.) Judgme......nbsp; agreement by paying the decreetal amount. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 797. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Pulin Behari Bairagee and others Vs. Ananda Chandra Dakua and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ted by Giasuddin Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.2275 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 08.05.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3149 of 1998.) Jud......e judgment and decree. 12. In such view of the matter we find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 791. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Abdul Wahab Vs. Abdul Motaleb and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1185 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 15-03-2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4966 of 2003) Judgm......Court. Hence this leave petition. 6. Mr. Md. Nurul Amin, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, submits that the High Court Division erred in law in not complying with the decision of Civil Revision No.890 of 2002 dated 15-03-2003 and the High Court Division failed to co..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Anwar Hossain Vs. Superintendent of Police, Khulna and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....: Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 549 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 23.3.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Administrative Appellate Tribunal Appeal No. ......h indicates that his aforesaid departmental appeal dated 26.05.82 has already been rejected and further even if it is conceded that such appeal was not rejected then in the absence of any decision of the higher administrative authority on the departmental appeal filed by the petition&sh..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Haji Md. Selim Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
...., instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.272 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated the 24th and 25th of October, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.126 o......stance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 777; 17 MLR (AD) (2012) 249. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Md. Suman Mia Vs. Falani Begum and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....y Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.750 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated the 23rd November, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1481 of 2001)...... submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioners deserve no consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 775. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Abdur Rashid and others Vs. Md. Kamal Uddin Master and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....l Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-60. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1854 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 5.11.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3516 of 2002). Judgme......evidence on record and are based on correct principle of law. 6. We are of the view that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any i..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Haripada Goldar Vs. Md. Sahabuddin Sheikh and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....y Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 324 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated 01.08.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1283 of 2000.) Jud......d affirming the judgment and decree of the courts below. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 766. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Abdul Halim Vs. Md. Tatan Mia and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....; Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 486 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated 9.2.2006 & 12.2.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3714 of 200....... We are of the view that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the materials on record discharged the Rule. The learned counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
34923491348934883487348634843483348134793477347634743472347134703469346834673466