Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Habibur Rahman alias Habu and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ......inst the judgment and order dated 11.05.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1656 of 2000 dismissing the appeal and thereby affirming the judgment and order of the Sessions Judge, Kishoreganj, in Sessions Case No. 100 of 1984 convicting the accused petitioners under secti..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
State Vs. Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......of the accused respondent was that of innocence and false implication. 4. The prosecution produced 17 witnesses while the defence did not adduce any evidence. The learned Sessions Judge, Narail by the judgment and order dated 26.11.1991 convicted the appellant Moniruzzaman Kazi ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Satish Chandra Mondal Vs. Ayjuddin Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......he High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 473 of 1981 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 8 of 1977 in the 3rd Court of Munsif (now Assistant Judge), Khulna for declaration of title stating, inter alia, that the suit land along with other la..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sree Subas Chandra Sarker , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......n Civil Revision No. 9824 of 1991 making the Rule absolute and thereupon decreeing the suit. The Rule was obtained against the judgment and decree dated May 16,1989 of the 2nd Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge) Sylhet in Title Appeal No.12 of 1989 reversing the Judgment and de..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....er alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......238 days and the said delay was not satisfactorily explained. 2. The revisional application was filed against the judgment and decree dated July 16,1995 of the 2nd Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge) pirojpur in Title Appeal No. 153 of 1993 affirming the judgment an..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other Vs. Mosammat Miration Nessa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ...... in Civil Revision No.2248 of 1991 (Dhaka)Civil Revision No. 271 of 1984 (Rangpur) making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated July, 19, 1984 of the Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Nawabganj in Title Appeal No. 176 of 1982 reversing the judgment..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Sree Promad Chandra Barman & others Vs. Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Sree Promad Chandra Barman & others..............Appellants Vs Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others.........Respondents Judgement February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Ali Asgar Khan Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......gar Khan, Registrar, Supreme Court of Bangladesh & others....Appellants. Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam being dead his heirs; Most. Afroza Begum& others...............Respondents. Judgement July 26, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional At..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......nment of Bangladesh & Ors……...Appellants vs A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan being dead his heirs Mrs Rosey Firoz and others……... ........Respondents Judgement February 10, 2004. Case Referred to- Central London Property Trust..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Moksed Ali Mondal Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Moksed Ali Mondal being dead his heirs Md. Abdul Mannan and others...Appellants. Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others…………..........Respondents. Judgement May 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......l Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Rasheda Begum………………….....Appellant Vs M.M. Nurussafa and others .........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. M..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer Bangladesh Railway Vs. A.P.M. Basher, Advocate & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......l Amin J Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer, Bangladesh Railway……………......Appellant Vs A.P.M. Basher, Advocate and others .........Respondents Judgement February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Shaheed Alam, Advocate, instru..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others Vs. Kad Banu and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......esent: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others…………Appellants Vs. Kad Banu and others........Respondents Judgement February 17, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Shaheed Alam, Advocate inst..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......fazzal Islam J Sonali Bank..................................Appellant Vs Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others…………….........Respondents Judgement June 27, 2004. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Railway Vs. M/s. Sinaf R..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh………....Appellant Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others............Respondents Judgement June 21, 2005. Case Referred to- Abdul Kader Mondal and others Vs Shamsur Rahman ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 156
A. Motaleb Howlader Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ......wlader….................................................................Petitioner Vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Patuakhali…...Respondent Judgement March 17, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Zahirul Haque, Advocate, instruct..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......lip;………...Petitioner Vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and another…………… …...Respondents. Judgement January 14, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Robert Pinaru Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ......ch of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1358 of 1995 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree dated February 26, 1995 of the 2nd Court of Additional District Judge. Chuadanga, in Title Appeal No. 22 of 1994 affirming those of dated February 24, 1994 of the ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
State Vs. Khandker Zillul Bari and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gainst them. In default, the District Magistrate concerned shall take step for effecting their arrest to undergo the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 77. ......6) The Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860), Section 302 We are really surprised to find the peculiar way of disposal of criminal appeal by the learned Judges of the High Court Division who shirked their responsibility misdirecting themselves and shou..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ......tion 7(2) of the Local Government (Union Parishad) Ordinance, 1983, though he has been convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for a period of 6(six) months by the learned Divisional Special Judge, Khulna on 11.04.1994 in Special Case No.4.54. of 1984 under section 409 of the Penal Code r..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104