Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4661-4680 of 7814 results.
Shafiqul Huq (Md.) Vs. Mina Begum, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... Lawyers Involved: Md. Shofiqul Islam, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Sasti Sarkar, Advocate—For Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 3612 of 2001. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - This Rule was obtained by the defendant upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code ......Bashirrullah Munshi vs. Abdul Bari Bepari, 21 DLR (Dhaka) 183; Arifa Begum vs. Khalique Mohammad Naqvi, 21 DLR (WP) 209 and Golam Akhtar Chowdhury vs. Administrator of Waqf and others, 36 DLR 56. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shofiqul Islam, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Sasti Sarkar, Advocate—..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 185
Sherajul Huq Mullick Vs. Bangladesh, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....lam Afzal and Md. Assaduzzaman, Advocates — For the Respondent No. 30. M.K. Rahman, Advocate—For the Respondent No. 31. Writ Petition No. 308 of 1988. Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.- This Rule Nisi obtained under Article 102 of the Constitution calls upon the respondents to show cause ............Petitioner Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, Through Secretary, Ministry of Local Govt. & Rural Development & others........Respondents Judgment December 5, 1988. Lawyers Involved: Amirul Islam and A. Razzaq, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Kazi A.T. Manowa..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Shahabuddin Vs. Janata Bank, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....ned judge appears to have been silent as to the punitive nature or otherwise of the termination order but has held that the relationship between the parties are governed by the Master and Servant Rule. He has also raised a new question of delegation of authority by the competent authority to the......in Ahmed and others, 29 DLR (S.C.) 39, the State vs. Abdul Awal, 35 DLR 151, the Senior Manager, Dosta Textile Mills Ltd. Ranirhat, Feni and another Vs. Sudhansu Bikash Nath, B.C.R. 1987 (AD) 454. Lawyers Involved: Tapan Kumar Chakraborty, Advocate—For Petitioners. Khan Mofazzel Hossain..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Nur Ahmed Vs. Moktar Ahmed & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....bdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate — For the Petitioner. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 276 of 1984. Judgment AM Mahmudur Rahman J.- This Rule arises out of an order of the learned Munsif, Cox's Bazar dismissing the Miscellaneous Case No....... AM Mahmudur Rahman J Nur Ahmed............................................Petitioner Vs. Moktar Ahmed & others....................Opposite Parties Judgment November 6, 1988. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate — For the Petitioner. Amirul Kabir Chowdhu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Angur Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....e anything for which the pardon already tendered to him can be forfeited. He should be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 66........ State PLD 1969 Lahore 1071, Dip Chand Vs. Emperor AIR 1935 Lahore 799, Emperor vs. Probhu AIR 1937 Lahore 551, Emperor vs. Mathwia, AIR 1934 Allahabad 43= AIR 1929 Oudh 527, AIR 1929 Nagpur 189. Lawyers Involved: Shawkat Ali Khan, Advocate — For the Appellant. S.B. Barua, Advocate — F..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Md. Azad Shaikh alias Azad SK Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....passed against the appellant is set aside. It is directed that he be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 62........ The King Emperor, AIR 1936 (P.C) 253, Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh vs. State of Punjab, PLD 1957 (SC) (Ind.) 555, Nurul Hoque Vs. the State, 20 DLR (Dha.) 780, State Vs. Lalu Miah, 39 DLR (AD) 117. Lawyers Involved: Mansur Habib, Advocate-For the Appellant. Md. Shahjahan, Advocate-For the St..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Abdul Mukit Chowdhury Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....B.K. Das, Mirza Hussain Haider, Advocates—For the Petitioner. S.R. Paul with S.K. Sinha, Advocates— For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 23 of 1988 Judgment Qazi Shafiuddin J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause why the respondent Nos. 1-4 shall not b......ferred to- Presiding Officer Vs. Sadrauddin Ansari, 19 DLR (S.C.) 516, N.P. Ponnswarmi Vs. The Returning Officer Namakkl, AIR 1952 (S.C.) 64, New India Tea Co. Vs. Bangladesh, 31 DLR (AD) 303. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with B.K. Das, Mirza Hussain Haider, Advocates—For..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Warish Miah Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....ddin, Advocates—For the Petitioner. S.R. Paul with S.K. Sinha and Mohammad Hossain, Advocates — For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 14 of 1988 Judgment Qazi Shafiuddin J. - This Rule calls upon the respondent Nos. 1-5 to show cause why the election of the Chairman of No. 4 Uppe......le's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Govt. & Rural Development & others........................................Respondents Judgment December 8, 1988. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, with Amirul Islam, J.N. Deb, B.K. Das and Kazi Shahabuddin, ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Md. Jahangir Alam Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....Khairul Haque J. - This is a petition for leave to appeal in respect of the judgment and order dated 17.11.2009, passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3161 of 2009, discharging the Rule as infructuas. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner is the proprietor......ul Haque J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Jahangir Alam…………………...Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others……........Respondents Judgment January 10, 2010. Lawyers Involved: M. Amirul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Taufique Hossain, Advocate-on-R..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Abdul Khaleque Vs. Md. Nazim Uddin and another, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... District Judge, Dhaka in Civil Revision No.18 of 2004 and then the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2172 of 2004. Subsequently the defendant petitioner moved another petition under Order 6, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure for acceptance of further and better statement. The learned ......Islam CJ Md. Abdul Matin J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Abdul Khaleque…………...........Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazim Uddin and another….......Respondents Order January 18, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Moshfiquddin Bakhtiar, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Moinuddin, Adv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Sonali Bank Vs. Meghna Vegetable Oil Industries Ltd. & ors., 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....preferred against judgment and decree dated 11.03.2007 passed by learned Joint District Judge, 5th Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.176 of 2006 rejecting the plaint on an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The facts, in short, are that th......presented by its Managing Director and another…….........Petitioners Vs. Meghna Vegetable Oil Industries Ltd. & ors……………......Respondents Judgment October 20, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advoc..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Nurul Islam Vs. Artho Rin Adalat and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... an ex-parte decree in the Mortgage Suit No. 4 of 2001 in the Court of Artho Rin Adalat, Gazipur, against the petitioner. In respect of the said ex-parte decree, the defendant-petitioner obtained a Rule in Writ Petition No. 3083 of 2002, on 03.08.2002, praying for setting aside the ex-parte order ......ue J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Nurul Islam…...............................Petitioner Vs. Artho Rin Adalat and others......................Respondents Judgment January 6, 2010. Lawyers Involved: S. N. Goswami, Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 115
....f the People's Republic of Bangladesh is directed against the judgment and order dated the 25th day of May, 2009 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5274 of 2002 discharging the Rule affirming those dated 31.07.2002 passed by the Joint District Judge, Court No.1. Brahmanbaria i......in J
Dilip Datta and another…………………….....Petitioners
Vs.
Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Brahmanbaria and others........Respondents
Order
January 17, 2010.
Lawyers Involved:
A.B. Roy Chowdhury, Advocate intruded by Habibur Rahman Miah, Advocate-on-Rec..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Commissioner of Taxes Vs. Aleaf Enterprise, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....n accordance with law. The result, therefore, is that the question raised is answered in the affirmative. There be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 471. ......tries Model Town, Lahore vs. Central Board of Revenue; Government of Pakistan Taxation Vol. 17 page 247; Assessee vs. Department 1993 BTD 31; Colonial Sugar Refining Co. vs. Irring (1905 AC 369). Lawyers Involved: Sarder Jinnat Ali, Assistant Attorney-General — For the Applicant. AFM Fer..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Pubali Bank Ltd. Vs. Md. Mamunur Rahman and Another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....without any order as to cost. The counter-claim of the defendant No.1 is dismissed as not maintainable. Send down the records forthwith. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 458....... Vs. Md. Mamunur Rahman and Another………. Respondents Judgment December 9, 2001. Case Referred To- Sultana Jute Mills Ltd vs. Agrani Bank 1994 BID (AD) 196=46 DLR (AD) 174. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Hossain, Advocate—For the Appellant. Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Senio..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Shahjahan Faraji and another Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....al trial at Barisal so as to justify the transfer of the case from Barisal to another District. We therefore, find no substance in the revision case, which fails accordingly. 8. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Since charge-sheet has already been submitted in the case, an early trial is fou......tion) Present: Gour Gopal Saha J Md. Abdur Razzaque J Shahjahan Faraji and another……….. Petitioners Vs. State……….. Opposite Party Judgment April 9, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Mostafa, Advocate — For the Petitioners. SM Aminur Rahim, Assistant Attorn..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Ali Sikder (Md.) Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....hahabuddin Ahmed with Ferdausi Shahab, Advocates—For Respondent No. 3. MR Hasan, Advocate—For Respondent Nos. 4. Writ Petition No. 628 of 2000. Judgment Kazi AT Monowaruddin J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned letter dated 21-6-...... Others……….. Respondent Judgment January 22 & 23, 2002. Case Referred To- Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. vs. Bangladesh and others 39 DLR (AD) held not applicable. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Momen Chowdhury with Md. Zahurul Islam, Advocates—For the Petitioner. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
.... Md. Shorful Islam Khan, Afreen Mohiuddin, Advocates—For the Petitioner.
Shaheed Alam, Advocate—For the Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 4095 of 1999.
Judgment
Md. Marzi-ul Huq J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondent to show cause as to why the impugned notice complained a......hers…………...Respondents
Judgment
May 12, 2000.
Case Referred To-
Ralli Brothers Ltd. Chittagong vs. Province of East Pakistan and Others, PLD 1966 (SC) 409 = 17 DLR (SC) 629.
Lawyers Involved:
KZ Alam with Md. Shorful Islam Khan, Afreen Mohiuddin, Advocates—For the Peti..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Moniruzzaman (Md.) Vs. ANM Didar-e-Alam and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....dvocate—For Opposite Party No. 1. ABM Waliur Rahman Khan, Assistant Attorney- General—For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3846 of 2001. Judgment Md. Shamsul Huda J. - This Rule was directed on an application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure calling upo...... Judgment June 18, 2002. Cases Referred To- Ali Akkas vs. State 1997 BLD (AD) 44 = 2 BLC (AD) 16; Nurul Islam vs. State and another 49 DLR 464; Salauddin (Md.) vs. State 51 DLR 299. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Ali Zinnah, Advocate—For the Appellant. Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Shishir Kanti Pal and others Vs. Nur Muhammad and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....—For the Petitioners. KZ Alam with Shariful Islam Khan and AHM Mashfiqur Rahman, Advocates—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 110 of 1994. Judgment MA Wahhab Miah J. - This Rule was obtained by the heirs of deceased defendant Nos. 7, 8 and other defendants against the Judg......d To- Sahera Khatun and another vs. Anwara Khatun and ors 1 BCR 126 = 33 DLR 442; Hasmat Ali vs. Mofizuddin Majhi and others 37 DLR 231; Nurunnesa and ors vs. Babar Ali Bepari 33 DLR (AD) 124. Lawyers Involved: AFM Shahid, Mehir Kanti Majumder with Nahid Yeasmin, Advocates—For the Petiti..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
42974296429542924291429042894288428742864285428442804278427642754274427242714270