Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4861-4880 of 6668 results.
Arun Karmakar Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....puty Attorney General, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- Respondents No. 1. Not Represented-Respondents No. 2. Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 12th December, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 6858 ......d Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 577 of 2000 praying for releasing the victim girl to his custody which was rejected by the learned Sessions Judge by his order dated 1.11.2000 holding that the final decision will be taken after taking evidence. The petitioner thereafter challenging the order of d..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Khoka Mollah Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....ate 46 DLR (HC) page 630; Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-in-Record-For the appellant. Ex-parte-the respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 15.07.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Misc, Case No. 5980 of 1998). Judg......asons and discussions made above, we find no merits in this appeal and as such, it is dismissed accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 57; 22 BLD (AD) 229; 8 BLC (AD) 176. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Military Estate officer, Dhaka Cantonment Vs. Sk. Mohammad Ali and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....ocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-Respondent Nos. 2 to 27. Not represented-Respondent No. 1. Civil Appeal No. 29 of 1999 (From the judgment and order dated 25th March, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 206 of 1995). J......that the respondents were evicted from the said lands by an action under the reversed decree and the High Court Division was wrong in allowing the prayer for restitution. He also submits that the decisions cited in the judgment of the High Court Division have no application in the fa..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Md. Anisur Rahman and others Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....s Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Not represented-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 1997. (From the Judgment and Order dated August 8, 1995 passed by the High Court Division Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2560 of 1995......991 passed by Court of Magistrate, 2nd Class, Kushtia, in G.R. Case No. 269 of 1990 in respect of the appellants is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 30. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Laisur Rahman Vs. Most. Nayma Ara Begum and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....r the Appellant. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondents No. 2. Not represented-Respondents No. 1. Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 1996. (From the Judgment and Order dated 21.1994 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.1512 of 1992) Judgme......eal is allowed on modification of substantive sentence to the period already under gone, but the sentence of fine is maintained. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 25. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Abdul Aziz Vs. Khaja Abdul Gani and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....or the Appellant. Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte- Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 40 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 22.6.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3325 of 1997).......tter of evidence and trial and can only be determined by taking evidence. 6. Further there is no bar on proceeding against the accused in both civil and criminal jurisdiction in view of the decision as laid down in 49 DLR (AD) page 132. We have considered the submissions of the lea..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Golam Ambia Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Mymensingh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....Md. Faisal H. Khan, Assistant Attorney General with him instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 238 of 2001 (From the judgment and order dated 4.5.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4559 of 1999). Judgmen......tridges which were seized by the impugned list to the petitioner immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 13. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
State Vs. Abdur Rahim Shikder, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....For the Petitioner (In both the cases) Not represented- Respondents (In both the Cases) Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 498-99 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 4th April, 2005 passed by the High Court &n......this leave-petition. 10. Md. B. Hossain, the learned Advocate-on-Record, appearing for the petitioner, submits that the High Court Division misread the evidence on record and came to a wrong decision by setting aside the impugned judgment and order of conviction of sentence so passed by t..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Dawad Ali Sardar Vs. Kazi Mujibar Rahman & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Criminal Review Petition No. 10 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 05.12.2007 passed by the Appellate Division in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 428......istrate) had no jurisdiction to frame charge under Section 307 of the Penal Code but in fact the trial Court had jurisdiction and as such the High Court Division committed error in arriving at the decision. 7. From the judgment of the High Court Division passed in Criminal Revision No. 68..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Misir Ali and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.129 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated 19.11.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No.878 of 2003.) Judg......shy;ment of the High Court Division calling for interference by this Court. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 258. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
State Vs. Nantu Biswas and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....puty Attorney General instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Not represented- the Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 2000. (From the order dated 23.07.1995 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No.343 of 1990.) Judgm...... disposing of the appeal the High Court Division has not at all discussed the same and wrongly found that the eye witnesses gave false evidence to fit in the post-mortem examination report and the decision is based on surmises and conjectures causing serious miscarriage of justice. It was also s..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Md. Habibur Rahman Islam Vs. Secretary, Ministry of LGRD, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- For Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 800 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 21.6.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4504 of 2003). Judgme......ce. 5. Accordingly we are of the view that the High Court Division on proper consideration of materials on record and the law involved discharged the Rule and accordingly the above decision of the High Court Division does not call for any interference. 6. The petition is d..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Giasuddin Chowdhury & anr Vs. Military Estate Officer, Central Circle, Dhk, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Munsur Habib, Advocate, instructed by Md. Ibrahim Khalil, Advocate-on-record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 109 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 2nd December, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1810 of 2005) ......any cogent reason to differ with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 248. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Nekbar Ali Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....r, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 693 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated the 19th April, 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 6298 of 2003) ...... having stated the part of his villages have not been included in the Pourashava and the petitioner having been deprived of being an inhabitant of a Pourashava due to exclusion of his area and the decision of the Government being discriminatory, the High Court Division is not correct in holding ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Harunullah Akhand Vs. Abdul Latif & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-an-Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented- Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1150 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 26.06.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3214 of 1997.) Judg...... the facts and circumstances of the matter and the materials on record, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petiti..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Raghunath Sarker Vs. Ramnath Sarker, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 21-05-2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 448 of 2000) Judgme......ding Ram Nath notified his brother or whether kept the matter concealed. If after calling for the record or by perusing certified copy, it could be gathered that the plaintiff was notified a decision as regards limitation and acquiescence could have been taken. It is further found by the A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Shahabuddin and others Vs. Mahtab Uddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 812 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 05.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3195 of 1998.) Judg......thout revoking the license. 8. In view of the discussions made above, we are of view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Md. Ashrafuzzaman & others Vs. Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation & ors, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....idullah, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 2. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 1, 3-5. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1634 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 13.07.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4388 of 2003.) Judg......nd (e) Chittagong Urea Fertilizer Ltd. incorporated under the Companies Act and all these companies are placed under the Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation (BCIC). 3. The BCIC took a decision in it's meeting dated 26.09.2000 to promote the process Operator Maintenance Technici..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Ranju Roy and other Vs. Jibesh Ranjan Roy and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....; Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 545 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 24.1. 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3898 of 1997). Jud......tory period of limitation as a licensee does not create any title. 7. We are of the view that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The learned counsel could not point at any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Mst. Sufia Khanam Mst. @ Sufia Khatun & another Vs. Md. Abdul Rouf @ Tara Miah, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....rd-For the Petitioner (Appeared with the leave of the Court). Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 182 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 13.12.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2716 of 2001.) Judg......acts and circumstances of the case and in view of the discussion made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials or record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The petition is dismiss..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
30223021302030193018301730163012301030093008300730053004300329992998299729962994