Judgment search - Chancery Law Chronicles

Displaying 4881-4900 of 7814 results.

Md. Ali Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ireen Mahbub, Deputy Attorney-General—For the State-Respondent. Criminal Revision No. 1104 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abdul Quddus J.- Rule was issued at the instance of convict appellant petitioner Md. Ali under section 439 of the C......l Islam Chowdhury vs. State 1999 BLD (ad) 18; Asimon Begum vs. State 1999 BLD (AD) 119 = 51 DLR (AD) 18; 51 DLR 83; Ashraf Miah vs. Bangladesh 27 DLR (AD) 106; A Hafiz Sarder vs State 28 DLR 253 . Lawyers involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ireen Mahbub, Deputy ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30

Zamir Ali (Md.) and others Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....ellants be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Let a copy of the judgment along with the LCR be sent down immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 433.......iq J Zamir Ali (Md.) and others……………………Convict-Appellants Vs. State…………………………………………………….Respondent Judgment March 28, 2007. Lawyers involved: Subrata Chowdhury Advocate—For the Convict-Appellants. Humayan Kabir Bulbu..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30

New Zealand Milk Brands Ltd. Vs. Unilac Sanowara (BD) Ltd. & ors., 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....the Trade Marks Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for rectification of the Register of Trade Marks by removal of registered trademark No. 62724 in Class 29 from the Register. 2. Rule was issued calling upon the respondent-opposite parties to show cause as to why the Register of...... 157; Pakistan Soap Factory, Chittagong vs. Chittagong Soap Factory, 22 DLR (SC) 400; Surya Brothers vs. Messrs Dada Soap Factory Ltd., PLD 1971 Karachi 189, Ford vs. Forster (1872) 7 CH 611 . Lawyers involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Advocate with Md. Moazzem Hussain, Ziaul Hasan and KS Salahud..

Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 187

Salina Begum Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....……………………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others……………………………Opposite Parties Judgment June 19, 2006. Result: The Rule is discharged without any order as to the costs. The concurrent findings of fact should not......94, Khurshed and others vs. Noorjahan Bewa and others, 1995 BLD (AD) 82, Raja Sreenath Roy and others vs. Moharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahai Deo, Indian Cases Volume No. 82 Privy Council at page 879. Lawyers involved: Mushfiquddin Bakhtiar with Jabunnessa Mushfique, Advocates—For the Petitioner..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 40

Samiran Haider and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....ith Karuna Moy Chakma, Deputy Attorney-General—For Respondent No. 1 (In all the Writ Petitions). Petition Nos. 1006, 2045-2056, 2357-2360 of 2002. Judgment Tariqul-ul-Hakim J.- Rules Nisi were issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned Notificatio......of India AIR 1987 SC 386; JB Chopra vs. Union of India AIR 1987 SC 357; SP Sampalh Kumar vs. Union of India has been overruled by the case of Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India AIR 1997 SC 1125. Lawyers involved: Amirul Islam with Dr. S Shirin Chowdhury Advocates —For the Petitioners (..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 107

Barrister Md. Rafiqul Islam Mia Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

.... Mia (in person) Advocates—For the Petitioner. Karunamoy Chakma, Deputy Attorney-General— For Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Writ Petition No. 2028 of 2001. Judgment Tariq-ul-Hakim J.- This Rule Nisi has been issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the order of sanction......desh and others……..Respondents Judgment October 18, 2006. Cases Referred To- Syed Mustafizur Rahman vs. State 53 DLR 125; Abdul Hakim vs. State, , Alfazuddin vs. State 45 DLR 325. Lawyers involved: Rokanuddin with Md. Rafiqul Islam Mia (in person) Advocates—For the Petitione..

Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 140

Mahbub-ur-Rahman Chowdhury Vs. DG, Bureau of Anti-Corruption and others , 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....uty Attorney-General with AKM Salahuddin Khan and Rubaiyat Hossain, Assistant Attorneys-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 2401 of 1998. Judgment SAK Md. Dabirush-Shan J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order under Memo N...... Cases Referred To- Md. Habibur Rahman vs. State reported in 2006 BLD (AD) 59= 58 DLR (AD) 12; Begum Tahmina vs. Bangladesh 52 DLR 503 and Mustafizur Rahman vs. DG, Anti-Corruption 2 BLC 605. Lawyers involved: AKM Faiz with HS Deb Brahman, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Zaman Akhter B..

Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 150

Ratan Sarder and others Vs. Bishai Bepari and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....ad Fazlul Karim J. – The appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated the 17th day of March, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2308 of 1993 making the Rule absolute setting aside the judgment and decree dated 10.05.1993 passed by the Subordinate Judge...... Bishai Bepari and others………..........Respondents Judgment August 3, 2009. Cases Referred To- 45 DLR 15; Md. Matlabur Rahman and others Vs. Madan Meah Chowdhury 33 DLR (AD) 286. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Amin, Advocate instructed by Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Recor..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28

Shahjahan Ali (Md.) @ Md. Shahjahan Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

.... sentence dated 22-3-2005 is upheld and confirmed. Send down the lower Court records at once along with a copy of the judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 396. ....... State, 11 DLR (SC) 365; Eradu and others vs. State of Hyderabad, PLD 1956 SC 286; Ismail Sarker and others vs. State, 33 DLR 320; Golam Rasul vs. Emperor, 107 IC 1928 774; AIR 1984 (SC) 759. Lawyers involved: Md Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate—For the Convict-Appellant. Moklesu..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29

Abdul Mannan Sheikh (Md) Vs. Soleman Bewa and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....lved: JH Afric, Advocate—For the Petitioner. ASM Rahmatullah, Advocate—For the Opposite-Party. Civil Revision No. 2328 of 2001. Judgment SM Ziaul Karim J.- This Rule calls in question the legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 25-3 2001- passed......s MA Mannan 46 DLR 621; Abul Khair Mia vs Abdul Latif Sardar 32 DLR (AD 167 and Abtabuddin Fakir vs Sowdagar Rabi Das 43 DLR 42; Kalu Ram vs Babu Lal AIR 1932 (All 485 (FB) = ILR-54 (All) 812. Lawyers involved: JH Afric, Advocate—For the Petitioner. ASM Rahmatullah, Advocate�..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26

Syed Salahuddin Ahmed Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....ondent No. 6. Writ Petition No. 3681 of 2003. Judgment Syed Mahmud Hossain J.- In this application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order issued ...... 28, 2007. Cases Referred To- Haji TM Hassan Rawther vs. Kerala Financial Corporation, AIR 1988 (SC) 157; Ramana vs. International Airport Authority of India AIR 1979 (SC) 1628. Lawyers involved: Md. Ozair Farooq with MNA Afgani and Sk. Md. Morshed, Advocates—For the P..

Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 200

Khorshed Alam Khan and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

.... Mihir Kanti Majumder, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Adilur Rahman Khan, Deputy Attorney-General— For Respondent No.1. Writ Petition No. 1745 of 1996. Judgment Tariq-ul-Hakim J.- This Rule Nisi has been issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the order dated 25-1-......�……………………..Respondents Judgment August 13, 2006. Cases Referred To- Bangladesh vs. Subash Chandra Das 46 DLR (AD) 63; Subash Chandra Das vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 106. Lawyers involved: Mihir Kanti Majumder, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Adilur Rahman Khan, De..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57

Bangladesh Film Development Corporation Vs. Chairman, Labour Court & another, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....howdhury Sanawar Ali with Mohammad Jahangir Alam, Advocates—For Respondent No. 2. (In all the Writ Petitions). Writ Petition Nos. 746-751 of 2006. Judgment Quamrul Islam Siddiqui J.- These Rules were head together and are being disposed of by this common judgment as they do involve common......udgment February 26, 2007. Cases Referred To- Film Development Corporation vs. Chairman, Labour Court, 49 DLR 396; Managing Director, Sonali Bank vs. Md. Jahangir Kabir Molla, 48 DLR 395. Lawyers involved: Md. Saidur Rahman, Advocate—For the Petitioners. (In all the Writ Petitions)...

Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 181

State Vs. Kajal Ahmed Jalali, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....thwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Send down the LCRs along with a copy of the judgment to the Court below forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 345.......vs. State, 45 DLR 489; Habibullah vs. State, 21 DLR (SC) 88; Muslimuddin vs. State, 1987 BLD (AD) 1 = 38 DLR (AD) 311; State vs. Fazal, 39 DLR (AD) 166 and Anaddi @ Ayenuddin vs. State, 6 BLC 310. Lawyers involved: ABM Waliur Rahman Khan, Deputy Attorney-General and Fara Mahmuda, Assistant Att..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 109

Jakir Hossain Vs. Jel Vanu, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

.... with Shahidul Islam, Advocates—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 2063 of 2004. Judgment Syed Refaat Ahmed J.- In this application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party No. 1 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment ......tun vs. Sheikh Md Ramjan Ali 10 MLR (AD) 194; Md Badruddin Khan vs. Bangladesh 36 DLR (AD) 52; Radha Prasad Singh vs. Gajadhar Singh AIR 1960 SC 115; Gola Bewa vs. Md. Abdur Rashid 4 MLR (AD) 420. Lawyers involved: Md. Muzibur Rahman, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Azra Ali with Shahidul Is..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32

Bonlac Foods Ltd. Vs. Unilac Sanowara (BD) Ltd. & another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....he same was registered under application No. 33243 as of 11th August 1992. It is alleged that such registration is in violation of sections 10(1) and 8(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1940 ("the Act") and Rule 24 of the Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963 ("the Rules"), thus creating confusion amongst the tr......5. Cases Referred To- KR Chinna Krishna Chettiar vs Sri Ambal & Co AIR 1970(SC) 146; Supermax International Private Ltd vs Samath Razor Blades Industries Ltd 4 BLC (AD) 229 . Lawyers involved: Dr. M Zahir, Senior Advocate with Ziaul Hasan, Advocates—For the Petition..

Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 199

Farida Begum and others Vs. Kapil Krishna Goldar & another, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....stant Attorney-General—For the State-Opposite Party. Miscellaneous Case No. 801 of 2001. Judgment AFM Abdur Rahman J.- Accused petitioners, Mosammat Farida Begum and 5 others obtained this Rule on 4-2-2001, under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, calling upon the complainant......ue J AFM Abdur Rahman J Farida Begum and others…………..Accused-Petitioners Vs. Kapil Krishna Goldar & anr ……..Complainant-Opposite-Parties Judgment July 26, 2006. Lawyers involved: Not represented—the Accused-Petitioners. AKM Nurul Alam, Assistant Attorne..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 28

Mobarak Hossain alias Jewel Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)

....minal Revision No. 611 of 1998 Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Challenging the legality of an order refusing to furnish certified copy of statement of co-accused under section 164 CrPC this Rule was obtained by the accused-petitioner upon an application under sections 439/435 of the Code o......d to- Queen Empress vs. Arumugam & ors 20 ILR (Mad) Ill; Emperor vs. Mithis Swaniyar 30 ILR (Mad) 466; State of Madras vs. G Krishnan AIR 1961 (Mad) 92; Hussain Ershad vs. State, 48 DLR 95. Lawyers Involved: Golam Kibria, Advocate — For the Petitioner. M Imman Ali, Deputy Attorney-..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25

N Mohd Engineering Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)

....ibunal without examining the materials on record most illegally confirmed the other disallowances. 9. It appears from the impugned order that the DCT disallowed entertainment allowances as per IT. Rule 65 on the ground that the company incurred loss during the assessment year in question and the ......eering Industries Ltd…………………………….Applicant Vs. Commissioner of Taxes……………………………………………….Respondent Judgment December 2, 1999 Lawyers Involved: AFM Ferojuddin Bhuiyan, Advocate—For Applicant. Dabiruddin Ahmed, Deputy A..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 72

Bhaskar Chakraborty Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....e Station Case No. 67 dated 20-9-2000, initiated under sections 406/420 of the Penal Code comprised in GR Case No. 3452 of 2000, pending before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka, obtained this Rule under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, on 18-2-2001, challenging the legality an......……………………………..Opposite Parties Judgment August 15, 2006. Case Referred To- Dewan Obaidur Rahman vs. State 1999 BLD (AD) 128 = 4 BLC (AD) 167. Lawyers involved: Shakila Rowshan, Advocate—For the Accused-Petitioner Shamim Ara Do..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81

Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search