Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4961-4980 of 6668 results.
Md. Maniruddin Vs. Md. Totab Ali @ Kutub Ali , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Nurul Islam Bhuiyan Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 717 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated February 16, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2754 of 1997)...... calling for interference by this Division, we do not find any merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 846. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19
Chairman, T& T Board Vs. Md. Rafiqur Gaznavi and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....os. 20-24 (In Civil Appeal No. 86 of 2000) Not represented-Respondent Nos. 47-52 (In Civil Appeal No. 87 of 2000). Civil Appeal No. 85-87 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated June 2, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Review petition Nos.4-6 of 1998) Ju......t liberty to take appropriate legal action against the writ-Respondents. 2. It may be mentioned the High Court Division while making the Rule absolute observed that in case authorities take decision to requisition and acquire the land of the writ-petitioners then the authority would be co..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Dhaka Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....by Haridas Paul, Advocate-on-Record - For Respondent Nos. 2-5 Not represented - Respondent No. 1 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 281 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 01.02.2003 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 655 of ......er to be prejudiced by the impugned notification. 7. In the circumstances, we are of the view that the High Court division upon consideration of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent ground to interfere with the same. The leave petition is dismi..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 292
Md. Mokaddas Ali and others Vs. Artha Rin Adalat (Sub. Judge) Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1054 of 2004. Judgment M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.04.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.4782 of ......ngly discharged the Rule. In the light of the discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Farhat Rahman Vs. Roomee Tareque Moudud, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....udgment of January 18, 2000 of the High Court Division as to an order of discharge of the Rule for default obtained in Civil Revision No.4256 of 1999 which was filed against the judgment and order dated November 14," 1999 of the Court of Nari-O-shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Dhaka (h......n merit. The custody of the child shall remain with his mother till disposal of the Rule. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 193. ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 173
Government of Bangladesh and Others Vs. Md. Shamsul Huq, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....vocate and Probir Neogi, Advocate appeared with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-record- For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No.218 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 5th November, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2256 of 2002). ......ons) Act, XXXII of 1975 and by those notifications the Personal Officers of the Secretariat have been given preferential treatment which has been denied to the respondent and as such in view of the decisions in the case of Mujibur Rahman (Md) vs. Government of Bangladesh and others reported in 4..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Tripti Industries Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....bsp; M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - These petitions for leave to appeal are directed against the common judgment and order dated 04.08.2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Trade Mark Appeal Nos. 54......ry as prayed for. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 163. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 172
Bangladesh Vs. Mahmuda Begum (Aloka) and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ppeal Nos. 930-949 of 2003 Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J. - Delay is condoned. 2. These petitions for leave to appeal are by the writ-Respondent Nos.1-4 against the judgment dated April 19, 2003 in Writ Petition Nos.65, 91, 92, 93, 94, 99, 100, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107......e earlier in favour of the Respondent in the respective civil petitions have been issued without lawful authority. 3. The writ petitions were filed stating, inter alia, that Government took decision to allot Plot measuring ¾th kathas of land to the possessors of the land of section..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Bangladesh Vs. Mohammad Ali Khondoker, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ent. Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 884 of 2003. Judgment M. M. Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.02.2003 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1303 of......bsp; Therefore, in view of the discussion above and the materials on record, we are of the view, that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave p..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd. and others Vs. M.A. Kashem and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - For the Petitioners. Not represented - For Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 608 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 14.1.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.90 of 2001). Judgment ......do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 165. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Bangladesh Vs. Sunil Kumar and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....gainst the judgment and order of April 12, 1999 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 915 of 1997 making the Rule absolute which was obtained against the order No. 48 dated November 12, 1996 of the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Bagerhat,......d of the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 142. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Delowar Hossain Mollah and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ahman Khan, Advocate-on-Record - For Respondent Nos. 1-4. Chowdhury M. Jahangir, Advocate-on-Record - Respondent No. 5. Civil Appeal No. 124 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 16.8.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 400 of 1997). Judgme...... published by SRO No. 130-Law/93-Sha:Ma; (Rule-4)RR-60/93 dated 4th July, 1993 vide Annexure 'K' and the minutes dated 11.12.96 of the Department promotion committee headed by respondent No.2 and the decisions taken thereon and signed on 14.12.96 appearing at 3,5 of the said minutes selecting a..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Rani Bilkis Banu Chowdhury Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, Circle -88, Zone-8, Dhaka, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Fakrul Islam, Advocate-on-Record - For the Petitioner. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 793 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 21.04.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Reference Application No.57 of 2000). ......, the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner and perused the judgment of the High Court Division and other connected papers. 8. In taxation matter reference is to be made out of final decision/judgment passed by the Taxes Appellate Tribunal. Since in the instant case, the App..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 67
M/s. Karnaphuli Traders Vs. Joint District Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Petitioner. Not Represented – The Respondent. Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 886 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 12.03.2003 passed by the High Court Division in writ petition No. 4853 of 2002) Judgme......rials on record. 8. It appears that the High Court Division considering the provision of Order 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure and also the provisions of Section 5 of the Ain came to the decision that the private negotiation claimed by the petitioner cannot be allowed in the mortgage e..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Azad Shahnewaz Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Dinajpur and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....petition for leave to appeal is against the judgment passed on May 7, 2003 by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.613 of 2000 discharging the Rule obtained impugning the judgment and decree dated June 16, 1999 of the Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Dinajpur made in Artha Rin Adalat Case (Othe......e documents filed by the Bank in proof of its case were genuine and that the suit was filed within time. It was the contention of the Bank that the writ petition was not maintainable in view of the decision in the case of Gazi M Towfic Vs. Agrani Bank and others reported in 54 DLR (AD) 6 since w..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Kazi Ali Akber Vs. Md. Hafizuddin Ahmed and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Amir Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to appeal No. 1163 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 9.3.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 413 of 2003). Judgmen...... the limits of any area. 6. We are of the view that the High Court Division, on due consideration of the materials on record discharged the Rule and there is no illegally or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dism..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Nasiruddin Vs. Md. Mizanur Rahman, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....das Paul, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Md. Mojibur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1300 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated the 26th February, 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1238 of 2004). ......of the above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 789...Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 151
Mrs. Mohsina Rahman Vs. Abdul Majid, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....n-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1, 3. A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1465 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 21.6.2005 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 87 of 2002). Judgment ...... 6. We are of the view that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 192
Government of Bangladesh Vs. M/S Eastern Industries (BD) Ltd. , 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....r Rahman Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1468 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 5.3. 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1114 of 1998). Judgme......cted papers including the impugned judgment. We do not find any substance in the points raised. The High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the p..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
M/s. F. Jahan Enterprise Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chittagong and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....rd-For the Appellant. Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 6. Ex-parte-Respondent Nos. 1-5. Civil Appeal No. 120 of 1997. (From the judgment and order dated August 28, 1997 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3532 of 1997). ......nted and in the submissions made by the appellant. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 779. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 80
28552854285128492846284528442842284128402839283828372836283528342833283228312830