Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 481-500 of 1262 results.

Hellenic Lines Ltd. Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)

.... casualty does not fall within the period by this last definition (1-e) the rules do not apply to it is fallacious, the cause of the fallacy perhaps lying in the sup­position inherent in it that the rights and liabilities under the rules attach to a period of time. I think that they attach to a con..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 463

Selimuzzaman @ Selim and others Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Sar­iatpur, District Sariatpur and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)

.... Order 21 rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure which runs as follows: "32. (1) Where the party against whom a decree for the specific performance of a contract, or for restitution of conjugal rights, or for an injunction, has been passed, has had an opportunity of obeying the decree and has ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 123

Padmabati Biswas Vs. Banglasdesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)

....nd sub‑section (2) have been drafted, it is manifest that it was not the legislative intent to give such a wide retrospective operation to the provision of sub‑section (2) of section 97. The past rights which have already accrued have not been sought to be affected by President’s Order No.137 ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118

Principal, Barguna Darul Ulum Nesaria Alia Madrasha Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Health and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

....a cause of action and if there is no express or implied bar to proceed with the suit, I should have thought that the interest of justice would require the suit to proceed to a hearing. The respective rights and obligations of the parties should be determined in the trial, instead of rejecting the pl..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 146

Director General, Bangladesh Railway and others Vs. Niaz Mohammad Ali and others, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)

....raining out of 60 days the writ respondents were bound to allow them to complete the remaining 13 days of training inasmuch the writ petitioners have acquired legal, vested right and have fundamental rights to complete the course and to sit for examination. Upon hearing Writ Petition No.6501 of ..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 222

Rowshan Ara Begum and others Vs. Doctor's Chemical Works Ltd. & others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)

....red to another decision, namely, Md. Soheb Vs. Uttara Bank Limited (43 DLR, 329) where it was held by this Court that when the papers and documents filed by the parties are sufficient to settle their rights and interest, the jurisdiction of the Company Court is sufficiently wide to resolve the quest..

Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 225

Hasina Karim Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)

....ine. With your financial assistance two organisations namely, Ershad Mukti Parishad and Sangrami Chatra Shamaj have been formed and these two organisations jointly, on the plea of law and fundamental rights preservation committee, brought out a procession and tried to enter into the precincts of the..

Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 299

Matiur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

....Examination. Clearly there is a sinister motive in this. The respondent No.2 is determined to fill up all possible vacant posts to create a further excuse for denying the petitioner and 6 officers’ rights to be absorbed which should have taken place as soon as the Establishment Division recommende..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 216

Serajul Alam Khan Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)

.... the meaning of the Special Powers Act. The detention is in violation of Article 31 of the Constitution, malafide, arbitrary and has been made without any lawful authority in violation of fundamental rights as guar­anteed under the Constitution and thus being illegal and improper is of no legal eff..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 156

Mizan Howlader Vs. Bangladesh, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

.... a particular name to a newly created Division on the authority of section 2(1) of the Bengal Revenue Commission Regulations, 1829 (Beng. Rev. No.1 of 1829) in no way infringes any of the fundamental rights envisaged in Part III of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. Failure to ..

Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 247

Dalia Parveen Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation and another, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

....members are rendering distinct and separate species of service to the Biman. They are special categories of professionals owing to their qualifications, mode of recruitment, conditions of service and rights and obligations. They are governed by special agreements between the Biman and the said appel..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 361

Moudud Ahmed Vs. State, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

....dments the US Constitution the Supreme Court of India held: "It, therefore, follows that neither by invoking the spirit of our Constitution nor by a strained construction of any of the fundamental rights can we spell out the exclusion of evidence obtained on an illegal search." 25. Whether the..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 111

Ajit Kumar Sarkar and others Vs. Radhakanta Sarkar and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)

.... of the evidence taken and an abstract of the decision for preparation of records of right. It may be mentioned that Rules 20‑24 of the Tenancy Rules deal with the mutation of name in the record of rights, which is exclusively headed by a Revenue officer. Preparation of record of rights is dealt u..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 142

MA Jahangir & another Vs. Abdul Malek & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)

....onal approach to the same facts, the amendment will be allowed even after the expiry of the statutory period of limita­tion ..............the object of Courts and rules of procedure is to decide the rights of the parties and not to punish them for their mistakes.......................". 6. The p..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133

Syed Ashfaque Hossain & others Vs. Bangladesh, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)

....ive order but by a statutory amendment. 17. Similarly under sub-section (4) of section 149 of the Act the Government had the power to or­der at any time the correction of any entry in a record-of-rights provided that no appeal under this section had been preferred against such order. By the said..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 129

Additional Deputy Commi­ssioner (Revenue) Dhaka Vs. Md. Mostafa Ali Mridha and others, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)

....t of vested and non‑resident property. He stated that the Ext.-B is the death certificate of Ram Chandra Paul. He was not present at the time of hearing of the proceeding of correction of record of rights. RS record stood in the name of the plaintiff. The plaintiff also paid the municipal taxes an..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 134

Hafiz Ahmed Vs. Ahmedur Rahman and others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

....le; but it is singly a right of substitution, entitling the pre‑emptor, by reason of a legal incident to which the sale itself was subject, to stand in the shoes of the vendee in respect of all the rights and obligations arising from the sale under which he has derived his title." In the instan..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 127

Hazrat Ali Vs. Election Commission & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)

....nd the period of limitation is counted from the date of publication of the Gazette notification. The nature of the notification is such that if allowed to be interfered with then it breaks a chain of rights and plays havoc with the scheme propounded by the legislature in disposing of post-election m..

Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 216

Abu Bakar Sikder Vs. Monowara Begum (Mst.), 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)

....ch possession was on behalf of Abdur Rahman Sikder and the entire family including all the co-sharers. Defendant No.1 in her statement has stated that her name has been duly recorded in the record of rights. She says that the heba properties situated in Bhola are under her possession and she exercis..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 152

Almasuddin & another Vs. A. Wadud Khan & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)

.... Nos.1 and 2 and the common pur­chaser of opposite-party No.4, namely, Abdul Hye Howlader and others and in this suit the exchange deed of the opposite party Nos.1 and 2 is under chal­lenge. As the rights, title and interest of the plain­tiff-opposite party Nos.1 and 2 in the suit premises will b..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 107