Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 4981-5000 of 5018 results.

Nazem Uddin Vs. Election Tribunal & Others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)

.... the same.  In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 17  ...... the same.  In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 17  ......;….(13)  Cases Referred to- Sk Tabibar Rahman Vs Election Tribunal 1981 BLD 298;  Hosne Zaman vs. Election Tribunal, 38 DLR 435; Zulfiquar Ali Bhutto vs. Bangladesh and others 41 DLR 379; Md. Mokbul Hossain vs. Shamsul Alam and others 14 ......ent:   Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Nazem Uddin .............................................Appellant Vs. Election Tribunal & Others...............................Respondents  Ju..

Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 109

Shahid Miah Vs. State, 2000, 30 CLC (AD)

.... section 561A Cr.P.C. by the High Court Division. 6. The submissions do not merit consideration. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 11. ...... section 561A Cr.P.C. by the High Court Division. 6. The submissions do not merit consideration. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 11. ......ion of personal appearance of the accused before such court does not fall within the meaning of section 561A Cr.P.C. Lawyers Involved: Nazrul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Not resented—The Respondents. Criminal Peti...... section 561A Cr.P.C. by the High Court Division. 6. The submissions do not merit consideration. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 11. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 109

Hosne Ara Begum and another Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)

....ory power under Article 109 of the Constitution is not available. For the following reason stated above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 9. ......ory power under Article 109 of the Constitution is not available. For the following reason stated above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 9. ......AD) 174. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Md. Nazrul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 914 of 1998......ivision (Civil) Present: Latifur Rahman CJ Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J AMM Rahman J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Hosne Ara Begum and another....................Petitioners Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited.....................................Respondents Judgment ..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 148

Shah Sufi Taj Islam Vs. Begum Rokeya Chowdhury and another, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)

....missions made by Mr. Mahbubey Alam, the learned Advocate for the petitioner, do not merit consideration. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 7. ......missions made by Mr. Mahbubey Alam, the learned Advocate for the petitioner, do not merit consideration. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 7. ......property to their own disadvantage………….(8). Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For Respondent No. 1. Not represented— Respondent No. 2. Civil ...... Present: Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J AMM Rahman J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Shah Sufi Taj Islam........................................Petitioner Vs. Begum Rokeya Chowdhury and anr...........................Respondents Judgment May 18..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 162

Mahmudul Islam alias Ratan vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)

....ge of the High Court Division. Let a copy of this judgment be transmitted to the author Judge of the High Court Division forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 1. ......ge of the High Court Division. Let a copy of this judgment be transmitted to the author Judge of the High Court Division forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 1. ...... Siddique, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondent. B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record — For the Appellant. (In Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1996) Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondent(In Criminal Appeal Nos. 26-28 of 1996) Criminal Ap...... Present: Latifur Rahman CJ Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J AMM Rahman J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Mahmudul Islam alias Ratan.......................Appellant Vs. State............................ ........................Respondent Judgment August 14..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 108

Tara Mia & others Vs. Taru Mia & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....e, we are of the view that the High Court Division did not commit any error in allowing the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is dis­missed with costs.   Ed.  ......e, we are of the view that the High Court Division did not commit any error in allowing the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is dis­missed with costs.   Ed.  ......ara Mia & others...........Appellants. Vs. Taru Mia & others.........Respondents.  Judgment October 20, 2005. Lawyers Involved:  Mahbub Ali, Advocate instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the appellants. Taba......ppellate Division (Civil)  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J  Tara Mia & others...........Appellants. Vs. Taru Mia & others.........Respondents.  Judgment October 20, 2005..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 76

Mostafa alias Mosto Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... the explanations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory.  For the above reasons, this petition mer­its no consideration. Accordingly, it is dis­missed.  Ed. ...... the explanations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory.  For the above reasons, this petition mer­its no consideration. Accordingly, it is dis­missed.  Ed. ......he Deputy Commissioner, Pabna………….. Respondent.  Judgment 21st July 2002  Lawyers Involved:  Muhammad Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Azra Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner.  Not represented- Respondent.   Crimin......  Ed. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 94

State Vs. Nurul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....esh Ali kabiraj of village Putia, Police Station Bhedorganj, District, Shariatpur be arrested immediately and then enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner Concerned.  Ed ......esh Ali kabiraj of village Putia, Police Station Bhedorganj, District, Shariatpur be arrested immediately and then enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner Concerned.  Ed ......3 at about 09.00 A. M. one Monowar Hossain Bepari was proceeding towards Dhamodya from Bhedorganj on his way to Banaripara by rickshaw of one Babul Bepari; when he reached near the house of one Hasan Ali Matbar then three accused persons stopped the rickshaw and one of them struck Monowar Hossain Be......uty Commissioner Concerned.  Ed ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 106

Mahmuda Khatun and others Vs. Abul Younus Talukder, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... the trial Court and rather they accepted it.  8. Thus, in the facts and circumstances of the case we find little substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed with costs.  Ed. ...... the trial Court and rather they accepted it.  8. Thus, in the facts and circumstances of the case we find little substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed with costs.  Ed. ......l CJ Latifur Rahman J Muhammad Abdur Rouf J Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J  Mahmuda Khatun and others.......Plaintiff-Appellants. Vs. Abul Younus Talukder being dead his heirs Mrs. Yunus Ali Talukder and others .........Defendant- Respondents.  Judgment 29th November 1995  ...... Appellate Division (Civil)  Present: A.T.M. Afzal CJ Latifur Rahman J Muhammad Abdur Rouf J Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J  Mahmuda Khatun and others.......Plaintiff-Appellants. Vs. Abul Younus Talukder being dead his heirs Mrs. Yunus Ali Talukder and others .........Defendant..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 83

Agrabad Hotel Ltd. & another Vs. Revenue Deputy Collector, Cox's Bazar & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....e dis­cussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justi­fied in discharging the Rule.  The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost.  Ed. ......e dis­cussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justi­fied in discharging the Rule.  The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost.  Ed. ...... Judgment 28th November 2004  Lawyers Involved: Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by S.R. Khoshnabish Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants  A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney General instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondents&n...... cost.  Ed. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 127

Hriday Ranjan Dey & another Vs. Niranjan Dey and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)

....he High Court Division are set aside and those of the learned District Judge duly affirming those of the learned Munsif are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 16. ......he High Court Division are set aside and those of the learned District Judge duly affirming those of the learned Munsif are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 16. ...... final Court of fact, arrived at on appreciation of the evidence…....................(23) Cases Referred to- Madan Gopal & ors Vs. Maran Bepari, 21 DLR (SC) 448; 30 DLR (SC); Mir Laik Ali Vs. Standard Vacuum Oil Company (ESSO) and Abdur Razzak, 16 DLR (SC) 287; Akrab Ali and others V......Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Mohammad Gholam Rabbani J Md. Ruhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Hriday Ranjan Dey and another................................................Appellants Vs. Niranjan Dey being dead his heirs Probate Dey and oth­ers..........Respondents Judgmen..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 112

Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....its.  4. No other submission of any signifi­cance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference.  The petition is dismissed.  Ed ......its.  4. No other submission of any signifi­cance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference.  The petition is dismissed.  Ed ......er Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior, (Md. Shahidul Alam Chowdhury, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner  Moksudur Rahman, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent No. 1  Not represented- For respondent Nos. 2-4&nb......A.M. Mahmudur Rahman J  Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Dhaka and Assistant Custodian Vested and Non-resident Property, Collectorate Building, P.S. Kotwali , Dhaka.........Petitioner Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others..........Respondents  Judgment 23rd May 1999  L..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45

Moulana Serajul Haque Vs. Md. Saifullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....t Division are hereby set aside and those of the learned District Judge, Chandpur passed in Title Appeal No. 139 1994 and 140 of 1994 are restored.  There is no order of costs.   Ed. ......t Division are hereby set aside and those of the learned District Judge, Chandpur passed in Title Appeal No. 139 1994 and 140 of 1994 are restored.  There is no order of costs.   Ed. ......; 5. The Title Suit No. 93 of 1985 the defendant Moulana Serajul Haque filed written statement claiming that the suit property originally belonged to Harendra and Nagendra who sold the same to Azgar Ali by registered kabala dated 10.11.1962 and subsequently Azgar Ali gifted the suit property to his......Supreme Court Appellate Division  (Civil)  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Abu Sayeed Ahmad J M.M. Ruhul Amin J  Moulana  Serajul Haque ......Appellant.(In both the appeals). Vs. Md. Saifullah ......Respondent  In both the appeals).  Judgement 29 July 2003..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 175

Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & ors Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....n proper per­spective and after assigning cogent reasons arrived at a correct conclusion and hence does not require interference by us.  The appeal is dismissed with costs.   Ed. ......n proper per­spective and after assigning cogent reasons arrived at a correct conclusion and hence does not require interference by us.  The appeal is dismissed with costs.   Ed. ......23rd May 2005  Lawyers Involved:  Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants  Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent Nos. 1-3   Not represented- Respondent No. 4 ......upreme Court Appellate Division  (Civil)  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J M.A. Aziz J  Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & others......Appellants. Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & oth­ers...... .Respondents.  Judgment 23rd May 2005 ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63

Abdul Matlib and others Vs. Abdul Malik, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below.  No order as to cost.  Ed. ......ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below.  No order as to cost.  Ed. ......he went to London for business purpose and returned home on 02-02-1992. After his return he came to know from his neighbors that the appellants No. 1,2 and 3 purchased the case land from Mohammad Taj Ali and Sirajunnessa Khatun opposite parties Nos. 4 and 5 of the revisional application  before......  Ed. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56

Md. Abdul Jalil Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dis­missed. Ed. ......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dis­missed. Ed. ......bdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instruct­ed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the petitioner Not Represented-Respondent Criminal Petition for......me Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: ..

Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 94

State Vs. Abul Kalam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction.  Ed. ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction.  Ed. ...... The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent  Judgment August 3, 2005. Lawyers Involved:  Ramzan Ali, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mr. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner ......sp;                 Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J  The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent  Judgment August 3, 2005. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92

Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory.  This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed.  Ed ......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory.  This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed.  Ed ......Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent  Lawyers Involved:  Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner  Not represented-Respondent.  Criminal Petiti......sp; Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J  Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent  Lawyers Involved:  Md. Nowab Ali, Ad..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89

Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accord­ingly this petition for leave to appeal is dis­missed.  Ed. ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accord­ingly this petition for leave to appeal is dis­missed.  Ed. ......aikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent  Judgment 22nd July 2002  Lawyers Involved:  Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Represented-Respondent.  Criminal Petition N......ppellate Division  (Criminal)  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J  Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent  Judgment 22nd July 2002&..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99

Ali Akbor Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him.  6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.  Ed. ......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him.  6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.  Ed. ......p;   Md. Ruhul Amin J K. M. Hasan J                          Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent  ......san J                          Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent  Judgment      ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90