Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4981-5000 of 6668 results.
Kaiser A. Chowdhury and others Vs. M/s. Zakir Hossain Re-Rolling Mills and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....dhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1217 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 17-05-2006 passed by the High Court Division in Contempt Petition No.188 of 2005). Ju......ieve that the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners have got no merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 776. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Md. Shahanur Rahaman and others Vs. Alhaj Abbas Ali Mondal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1-3. Not Represented-Respondent Nos. 4-7. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 696 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 29.3.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4644 of 2003.) Judg......bmissions of Mr. Bivash Chandra Biswas. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the evidence and materials on record arrived at a correct decision and rightly dismissed the civil revision warranting no interference by this court. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Azim Howlader, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ructed by B. Hossain-Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1148 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated the 25th June, 2005 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka in Appeal No. 48 ......interest. 5. It appears from the record that Section 6(2) of the Administrative Tribunal Act provides that appeal may be preferred within three months from the date of making of the order or decision given by the Administrative Tribunal and as per Section 6(2A) of the said Act delay may b..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Tayab Ali Vs. Md. Ataur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....anullah Patwary Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1 Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-16. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1113 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated July 5, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 457 of 2004) Jud......; This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 768. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Alhaj Md. Ruhul Amin Sarkar & another Vs. Hargram Trust Board, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....s, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on- Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 886 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated May 10, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5276 of 2002). Judgme......l Procedure. Furthermore, findings of the trial Court that the suit is not hit by Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure appears to be motivated one since it remained meticulously silent about the decision in S.C.C. Suit No. 13 of 1978 upto the Hon'ble Appellate Division". The High Court Division..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Mahmuda Haq Vs. Abdul Mannan Miah and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....te-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1309 of 2006. (From the Judgment and Order dated March 9, 2006 passed by the High Court Division in 2631 of 1996) Judgment ......ackground of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 759. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Bangladesh Bank Vs. A. Latif & Company Limited and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
..... M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on- Record-For Respondent No. 1 Not represented-Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1595 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 03.05.2007 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 02 of 2003 and First Miscel......n is coming which cannot be entertained at this stage. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 753. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Shaymol Mitra Borua Vs. Bangladesh Government and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Not Represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1132 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 5th July, 2006 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal Dhaka in A.A.T. No.71 of 1998...... Police issued removal order who is not the appointing authority of this petitioner and the Appellate Tribunal failed to appreciate thus materials aspect, as such, committed illegality in the decision; that Administrative Appellate Tribunal failed to appreciate that the respondent never too..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Shamim Beg @ Md. Shamim Beg Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....pellant. Golaitt Kibria, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 30 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 07.08.2001 passes by the High Court Division in criminal Appeal No. 1834 of 1999.) Ju......entence and dismissed the appeal. 13. From the discussion above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and as such there is no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the said Divi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Humayun Majid Vhora Vs. Q.S.M. Jahanzeb & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....mder, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 487 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 27.07.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 5691 of 2005......cts and circumstances of the case and in view of the discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Md. Dulal Mia Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....Abdur Rouf, Deputy Attorney General - For the Respondent. Jail Petition No. 6 of 2004 With Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 57 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 11.8.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference N6.41 of 2000.) Judgmen......ected papers including the Impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division. The High Court Division upon correct assessment of the evidence and materials on record arrived at a correct decision and committed no error in accepting the reference. There is therefore no warrant in law to..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Bokkor alias Md. Bokkor Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....irul Hoque Zahir, Deputy Attorney General-For the Respondent. Jail Petition 16 of 2004 With Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 87 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 04-04-2004 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 12 of 2001 with Criminal ......he night of occurrence. 12. Considering all these facts and circumstances of the case, we one of the view that the learned Judges of the High Court Division correctly arrived at a decision after considering all material facts available in the record. We find no reason to in..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Moslema Khatun and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the Respondent Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This petition has been filed seeking review of the judgment dated February 22, 2004 passed in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1105 of 2001. The petition......nd that the original owner of the property did not leave Bangladesh during the war of liberation or thereafter, rather he died in Bangladesh in 1973. In the background of the said finding and decision of the High Court Division this Division having had not found any merit for interference w..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Nazim Uddin Vs. Managing Director and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Lawyers Involved: N.H. Khandker, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 826 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 25.5.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 196 of 2000). Judgment ......িকার পেতে হকদার হয়”। 9. We are of the view of that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the evidence and materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The learned counsel also could not point at any illegality or infirmity in the decision ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Fazlur Rahman Sikder Vs. Abdul Hashem Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 572 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 30th March, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3893 of 1999)......order for registration of the same. 6. We are of the view of that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the evidence and the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The learned counsel also could not point at any illegality or infirmity in the decis..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Shahin Reza and others Vs. Abdul Hamid & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Subash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1089 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 26.07.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4786 of 1999.) Judgment ......y obtaining a declaration from the court. 8. In the facts and circumstances, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dism..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 139
Sheikh Abdul Mazed Vs. Md. Shomrej Ali Mandal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....yed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1133 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated May 7, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1748 of 2004). Ju......District Judge passed under section 115(2) or 115(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure when aforesaid Courts committed an error in respect "of an important question of law resulting in erroneous decision occasioning failure of justice". 8. In the background of the materials on reco..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Hafez Md. Bilal Patwary @ Md. Billal Hossain Patwary Vs. Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record -For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 857 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 05.05.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3787 of 2003.) Judg......nd circumstances of the case and in view of the discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Sayed Ahmed Majumder Vs. Samsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1-4. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 5-14. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 954 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 28th March, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3645 of 2002). ......ding the maintainability of the suit has no basis. 6. We are of the view that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the evidence and the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The learned counsel could not point at any error or infirmity in the decision of the High..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Rahmat Goni Vs. Mrs. Meherun Nessa & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1217 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 30.07.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 16 of 2002.) Judgme......2 and thereupon executed a deed of exchange on 29.10.1997 in respect of the suit land. 8. It appears the court of appeal below which is last court of fact upon concurring with the finds and decisions of the trial court held that the heba-bil-ewaj deed dated. 07.12.1982 executed by defend..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
28292828282728262824282328222820281928182817281628152814281328112810280928072806