Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Matiur Rahman (Md) Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....283. Lawyers Involved: HS Deb Brahman, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. MA Samad, Advocate ‑ For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 4540 of 2000. Judgment SAN Mominur Rahman J.- Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause why the order of transfer of the petition......r Rahman Vs. Bangladesh, 48 DLR; Ziban Kumar Barmen Vs. M Abdul Hye, 48 DLR 569; Abdul Muquit Chowdhury Vs. Election Commissioner, 41 DLR 57; Imtiaz Ahmed Vs. Golam Ali Chowdhury, 15 DLR (SC) 283. Lawyers Involved: HS Deb Brahman, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. MA Samad, Advocate ‑ For ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 71
M Mojibul Haque Vs. DG, Bangladesh Bureau of Anti-ÂCorruption & ors., 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....orded necessary sanction by letter dated 24‑5‑2000. The petitioner thereupon challenged the said letter dated 24‑5‑2000 according sanction by filing the present writ petition and obtained the Rule. 3. None of the respondents appeared and contested the Rule by filing any affidavit‑inÂ-o......s. DG, Bangladesh Bureau of Anti-ÂCorruption & ors……….Respondents Judgment August 9, 2001. Case Referred to- Gakul Chanda Dwarkadas Morarka Vs. King, AIR (1948)(PC) 82. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shamim‑ul‑Alam, Advocate‑For the Petitioner Md. Zahurul Islam Muku..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 138
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Osman Ali (Md) Vs. Md. Makbul Hossain and Others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....”For the Petitioner. Zainul Abedin and Prasanta Kumar Basu, Advocates—For the Opposite Party No. 1. Civil Revision No. 7290 of 1991. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J .- On 5, March, 1986 a Rule in Civil Revision No. 149 of 1986 was obtained from the then High Court Division at Rangpur Ben......€¦â€¦Petitioners Vs. Md. Makbul Hossain and Others……………Opposite Parties Judgment December 2, 1999. Cases Referred To- 28 DLR 252; 43 DLR (AD) 128 and AIR 1979 Cal. 196. Lawyers Involved: Md. Marfat Ali, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Zainul Abedin and Prasanta K..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mirza Anwarul Islam alias Tanu Vs. State, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... Mahbubey Alam, Additional Attorney-General with MA Rouf Assistant Attorney-General —For the Respondent. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1325 of 1994. Judgment Abu Sayeed Ahammed J.- This Rule was issued on 14-8-94 at the instance of Mirza Anwarul Islam alias Tanu, the accused petitioner......ed J Md. Ali Asgar Khan J Mirza Anwarul Islam alias Tanu……………..Petitioner Vs. State………………………………………Respondent Judgment October 28, 1999. Lawyers Involved: Jamiruddin Sircar, Advocate —For the Petitioner Mahbubey Alam, Additional ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Firojul Islam (Md) (Firoj) Vs. Zahanara Akter, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....essary harassment to the defendant. 5. Feeling aggrieved, the defendant petitioner approached this Court in an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure and obtained the present Rule. 6. Before deciding the propriety of the order under challenge let me address myself to see ......tion) Present: AK Badrul Huq J Firojul Islam (Md) (Firoj)…………..Petitioner Vs. Zahanara Akter…………………………..Opposite Party Judgment December 2, 1999. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abul Kalam Moinuddin, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Khurshid Alam Khan ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 185
Idrish Ali Bhuiyan (Md) Vs. Dr. Alauddin Ahmed & ors., 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ntire proceedings before the tribunal and (b) that nothing in the Act or rules excluded the application of Order VI rule 17. We entertain no doubt that, on a party of reasoning, nothing in the Act or Rules excluded the application of Order VI rule 16, and as we have seen in Bhikaji Keshao Joshi's ca......(Supreme Court) 1545; AIR 1958 (Allahabad) 858; AIR 1996 (Patna) 226; AIR 1972 (Supreme Court) 1185; AIR 1969 (Supreme Court) 66; AIR 1962; AIR 1958 (Allahabad) 858; AIR 1964 (Supreme Court) 1545. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate‑ For the Petitioner. Fazlur Rahman Khan, A..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Hanif Ali (Md) Vs. Hajera Khatun and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....: NK Chakravarty J Hanif Ali (Md)…………………………..Petitioner Vs. Hajera Khatun and others…………….. Opposite Parties Judgment February 10, 2002. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908); Order XVIII rule ......inal decree. There would be obviously no bar to the Court taking any further steps which it could have taken before the preliminary decree……………………………………..(13) Lawyers Involved: Syed Humayun Kabir Khadem, Advocate‑ For the Petitioner. Mahmudul Islam, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Habib (Md) and another Vs. State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....d Faizee, Advocates—For the Petitioners. Rafiqul Haque with M Nazrul Islam, Advocates—For the Opposite Party. Criminal Appeal No.1156 of 1999. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J. - By this Rule the opposite party was called upon to show cause as to why the proceedings of GR No. 929/98 now......ate represented by the Deputy Commissioner……………………Opposite Party Judgment August 17, 1999. Case Referred To- Latifa Akter Vs. State 19 BLD (AD) 20=51 DLR (AD) 159. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan with Mohammad Faiz Faizal Mahmud Faizee, Advocates—For ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Kalur Hat KC Bilateral School Vs. Sabbir Hossain Chowdhury & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... Rahman, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Md. Nurul Islam with Md. Khasruzzaman, Advocates-For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 3289 of 1998. Judgment Md. Mamtazuddin Ahmed J.- This Rule at the instance of the plaintiff-petitioner is directed against the judgment and order dated 30......Hossain Chowdhury & others………………Opposite Parties Judgment November 2, 1999. Case Referred To- Uttara Bank Vs. Macneil and Kilburn Ltd. and others, 33 DLR (AD) 298. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nazibar Rahman, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Md. Nurul Islam with Md. K..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Shahjahan Ali Khan (Md) and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....s. Shahabuddin Ahmad, Deputy Attorney-General with Quazi Rezaul Hoque, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 2787 of 1996. Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This Rule has been obtained under Article 102(2) (a) (ii) of the Constitution of the People’s Republic ...... Cases Referred To- Province of East Pakistan and others Vs. Sirajul Hoque Patwary 19 DLR (SC) 281; Dr Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh 33 DLR (AD) 201; Kudrat-e-Panir Vs. Bangladesh 44 DLR (AD) 310. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with Sirajur Rahman, Advocates—For the Petitioners. Sha..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 191
Humayun Majid Vs. Bangladesh Bureau of Anti-Corruption and ors., 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....r Articles 31/50 of the Anti-Corruption Manual read with sections 94/116 Cr.P.C. by directing the petitioner to submit the documents and papers of holding No. 21 Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka. The Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the said proceedings shoul......…….Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Bureau of Anti-Corruption and ors………..Respondents Judgment December 3, 2000. Case Referred To- Durga Das vs Emperor, AIR 1943 Lahore 28. Lawyers Involved: MI Farooqui with Ruhul Quddus, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Hasan Shaheen..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 232
Jahiruddin Ahmed Vs. Yasinuddin and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....June 3, 1998. Lawyers Involved: Badruddin Ahmed, Advocate —For the Petitioner. Not represented —the State. Criminal Revision No. 30 of 1993. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 14-10-92 passed by the Additional District Mag......t: Gour Gopal Saha J Jahiruddin Ahmed………………………………Petitioner Vs. Yasinuddin and others………………………Opposite Parties Judgment June 3, 1998. Lawyers Involved: Badruddin Ahmed, Advocate —For the Petitioner. Not represented —the Stat..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Saroj Kanta Sarker Vs. Seraj‑ud‑Dowla & ors., 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....he appeal is allowed with cost. Impugned judgment and decree are hereby set aside. The suit is dismissed. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 39. ......a Sarker being dead his heirs and legal representatives,Asit Sarker and others...........Appellants Vs. Seraj‑ud‑Dowla & ors...............Respondents Judgment August 5, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Mahamudul Islam with Abdul Quayam, Advocates - For the Appellants. Rabiul ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Shahidul Islam (Md) alias HM Shahid Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....used appellant Md. Shahidul Islam alias HM Shahid, son of Md. Afseruddin Howlader be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 35.......ahidul Islam (Md) alias HM Shahid ...............Appellant Vs. State................... Respondent Judgment August 3, 2003. Case referred to- Safdar Ali vs. Crown 5 DLR (FC) 64. Lawyers Involved: Masood R Sobban, Advocate-For the Appellant. Not represented- the Respondent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Abdul Kader Mirza and another Vs. Bangladesh, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... the learned Deputy Attorney-General on this point also specifically, we think this petition (Writ Petition No. 5951 of 20031) can be disposed of by giving direction in the matter without issuance of Rule as it would consume much time and delay for disposal of the proceeding. We have in this connect...... Present: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Syed AB Mahmudul Huq J Abdul Kader Mirza and another…………………….. Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and ParliamenÂtary Affairs and others ....................... Respondents Judgment ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
National Bank Ltd. and others Vs. Habib Bank Ltd. and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....he Habib Bank Ltd is not even entitled to any payment even after 22nd May, 1986 because of the delay in sending the documents to National Bank Ltd. which is itself a discrepancy. Besides, he submits, Rule 46 of the ICC Rules 400 requires that the documents must be sent to the issuing bank for paymen......erred to- Bankers Trust Co. vs. State Bank of Indict (1991) 2 Lloyd's Report 443; Hing Yip Hing Fat Co. Ltd. vs The Daiwa Bank Ltd. of Honk Kong High Court; Miller vs Bahii Madho Das 23 IA 106. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir Senior Advocate with M Hassan, AHM Mizanur Rahman, Advocates-For ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Abul Hossain and others Vs. State and another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....esolved and decided in the case only on a proper discussion and assessment of evidence on record. This application is rejected summarily. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 12. ......(AD) 160; Kashem vs. State 40 DLR (AD) 294; Abdus Salam vs. State 12 DLR 100; Haider Ali vs. Md. Sekender 13 DLR 119; Bhulu Rani Shaha and another vs. Pranballav Podder and another 5 BLC (AD) 122. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Islam, Advocate-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Opposite..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Shahinur Alam @ Shahin Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... merit. Communicate the order at once to the Nari‑oÂ-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal, Rangpur for his information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 10. ......lam @ Shahin ..................Appellant Vs. State...................Respondent Judgment October 26, 2003. Case referred to- Nazrul Islam @ Montu vs. State, PLD 1975 Lahore 1431. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdus Samad Miah, Advocate-For the Appellant. Monowara Begum, Assistant ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 226