Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5081-5100 of 6668 results.
Kataruddin and others Vs. Md. Nurul Huque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1594 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2332 of 2002). ......learned counsel for the petitioner also could not point any misreading/non reading and non consideration of evidence and the materials on record and/or any other illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division and accordingly no interference is called for. The petit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Abdul Zakir Khondakar and others Vs. Bimal Kumar Kunda and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-4. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1491 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 18.4.2005 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 714 of 1991). Judgment......rial Court, considering all these facts minutely, decreed the suit. 5. We are of the view that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The learned Advocate-on-record could also not point out any infirmity of the kind calling..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Enayet Hossain Vs. Nur Islam Howlader, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1131 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 20.06.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2384 of 1991). Jud...... the learned Advocate-on-Record. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision, that miscellaneous case was barred by limitation. There is no cogent reason to inter..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Md. Abdus Satter Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1469 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 23.08.2005 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka in Miscellaneous Appeal No......t does not suffer from any infirmity calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 573. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Secretary, Rahmat-E-Alam Islam Mission & Etim Khana Vs. Md. Shafiqul Huq, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....0 (In both the cases). Not represented-For Respondent Nos. 11-31(In both the cases). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 949 & 951 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 23.02.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 3992 & 2974 of......cts and circumstances of the case and in view of the discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. Both the civil ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Dr. Zahirul Haque Bhuiyan & others Vs. Dr. Shamsuddin Jahangir & another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondents. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 271 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 12.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.6654 of 2002)......s misconceived. The High Court Division accordingly rightly discharged the Rule. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 537. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Jalal alias Md. Jalal Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ppellant. Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney General instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 09 of 2003. (From the, judgment and order dated 21.05.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 3145 of 2000.) Ju......ground to interference. In this view of the matter the appeal is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 534. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Murari Mohan Sarder and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 297 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 17.01.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3102 of 1993.) Judgm...... not suffer from any illegality. 15. We have perused the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The learned Single Judge considered the facts and circumstances and came to a correct decision in discharging the rule. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Badiuzzaman Vs. Parvin Akhter Jahan & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....yed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent No.2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 757 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 09.05.2005 passed by the High Court Division in F. A. No. 114 of 2000.) Judgment ......itted. 9. Therefore, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Abdul Khaleque Pramanik Vs. Rajab Ali Pramanik and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1-3. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 4-9. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 333 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 28.11.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2341 of 1996). Jud......iew of the discussion made above, the petition appears to be without any merit. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 515. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Padma Bibi Vs. Headmaster & Secretary, Moheshkhali High School & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....A.K.M shahidul Haq, Advocate-On-Record- For the petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1186 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 7th January, 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2100 of 1996). ......hali High School is in possession of the suit land. 6. Accordingly we are of the view that the High Court Division on proper appreciation of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent ground to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
N.G. Shaha Steel Ind. (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Custom Excise VAT Aplt. Tribunal, Dhk & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....lants. A.J. Mohammad Ali, Attorney General instructed by Ahsan Ullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No.117 of 1999. (From the judgment and order dated 23.05.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.281 of 1998.) Judgmen...... facts and circumstances stated above, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 507. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 2005). Not represented-Respondent Nos. 3, 4 & 6-7(In Civil Petition No. 480 of 2005). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 479-480 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 7th & 8th December, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 2173 &a...... SABINCO and Dutch Bangla Bank Ltd. have already cancelled the bank guarantee executed by the writ petitioners-respondents-applicants Annexure-3 to the affidavit dated 12.04.2004 and in view of the decision of Sonali Bank vide letter dated 22nd March, 2006 to withdraw civil petitions for leave to..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Hefazatur Rahman Tipu and others Vs. Forkanul Islam and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Siddique, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented -Respondent Nos. 2-4. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 438 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 25.3.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Order No. 1097 of 2007). Judgment......n did not commit any illegality or infirmity so as to call for any interference. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 443. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Bombay Sweets & Co. Ltd. Vs. President, Appeal Tribunal, Customs, Excise & VAT, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....or the Respondent No. 2. Md. Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 576 of 2005 (From the Judgment and Order dated January 13, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.1161 of 1998). ......judgment of the High Court Division. The contentions made in the grounds raising which leave petition filed have been addressed by the High Court Division and in our view the findings and decisions made by the High Court Division in respect of the contentions of the writ petitioner..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Sultan Ahmed & others Vs. Md. Munsur Ali & another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....te-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 334 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 14.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 6049 of 2001.) Judg......the same should not succeed. 8. In view of the discussions made above, wt are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials or record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The petition is dismissed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Sk. Mohiuddin Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 3, Dhaka & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ullah, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 3 Not represented-For Respondent Nos. 1-2 and 4. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1542 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated.5.9.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.7497 of 2007.) Judgment......cluding the impugned judgment. We do not find any substance in the points raised. The High Court Division upon correct assessment of the legal position and materials on record arrived at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingl..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Sri Sri Hari Thakur Deb Bigraha & others Vs. Md. Abdul Hannan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....te-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1176 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 11.05.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2939 of 1994.) Judg......d in favour of the plaintiff and accordingly made the rule absolute. We are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Dhaka Memon Anjuman, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....tioners. A. K. M. Shafiqul Alam, Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 870 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated the 27th April, 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.8891 of 2005). J......ubstance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (AD) (2008) 349, 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 7...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Golam Rabbani Vs. Chairman, Court of Settlement and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....s. 1-2. Muhammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent No. 4. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 3. Civil Appeal No. 284 of 2001. (From the Judgment and Order dated 2nd July, 2000 passed by, the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2 of 1993) Judg......he above facts and circumstances of the case and the discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 10,000/- Ed. This Case is also ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 119
26922691269026872686268426832681268026792678267726752674267326722671267026692668