Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5141-5160 of 6668 results.
Md. Abdul Bari Vs. Md. Abdul Aziz & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 892 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 23.05.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2852 of 2004). Judgm......ted the possession of defendants in the suit land. 8. Therefore, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Md. Babar Ali Vs. Md. Shamsul Alam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; Not Represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1268 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 6th July, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 357 of 1998). ...... 6. As it appears the High Court Division on proper consideration of the materials on record and applying the correct principle of law as applicable in the present case, arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The petition is dismissed...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Abdur Rahman & others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Review Petition No. 67 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 08.03.2005 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal No. 81 of 1999). Judgment&......dated 15.09.1967 requested the Government to declare the suit plots along with other lands as reserve forest which is under active consideration of the Government. This clearly shows that no final decision was taken in the matter. So, the Defendant-Government cannot claim the land. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Digandra Chandra Pandith Vs. Abdur Razzaque and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1084 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated March 27, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5059 of 1998). ......rt has misconstrued the provision of Section 24 of the Non-Agricultural Tenancy act and thus was in serious error in holding the period of limitation would be the matter for consideration after the decision as to the nature of the document by which transfer has been made, that the trial Court he..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Robiul Islam & ors Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat & ors, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1686 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 20.11.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 4703 and 5470 of 2003). ......Bhuiyan. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record and appreciation of law arrived at a correct decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Mosharraf Hossain and others Vs. Md. Shahid Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1284 of 2004. (From the Judgment and Order dated January 17, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in a civil review petition arising out of......ound of the discussions made herein above we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 296. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Sylvia Akter Nazma Vs. M. M. Ishak, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Criminal Review Petition No. 4 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated 11.12.2005 passed by the Appellate Division in Criminal Petition for leave to Appeal No. 240...... the leave petition. We find no substance in the review petition. 9. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007)1009. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Serajul Islam Vs. Shaikh Hayet Ali and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not Represented- Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1572 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 5.5.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2469 of 2000). Judgme......the filing of the leave petition is that the plaintiff petitioner instituted the said Title Suit No. 27 of 1990 in the Court of the learned Assistant Judge, Dohar, Dhaka for a declaration that the decision of the authorities in renewing his lease in respect of only half of the suit land was void..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Matiar Rahman Vs. Assist Custodian of Enemy Property Lands & Buildings, Bakerganj, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the appellants. Ex-parte-the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 291 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated 26.11.1996 passed by the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 9 of 1982). ......y a decree or order from which an appeal is allowed, but from which no appeal has been preferred. (b) by a decree or order from which no appeal is allowed, or (c) by a decision on a reference from a Court of Small Causes, and who, from the discovery of new and..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Army Habilder Abdul Gafur Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - For the Petitioner. Not represented – the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 102 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 09.02.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 06 of 1998). Ju......atter the trial court appears to have convicted the petitioner rightly. 15. It appears that the High Court Division in the facts and circumstance and evidence on record arrived at a correct decision upholding the judgment and order of convication and sentence. We do not find any gro..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Abdur Rahman and others Vs. Sultan @ Sultan & others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... Referred to- Local Government Code vs. Arlidge 1915 A.C. 120 (at 138). Civil Appeal No. 85 of 1981. (Arising out of C.P.S.L.A. No. 188 of 1981. On appeal from the judgment and order date 3.3.1981 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1122 of 1977). Judgmen......ndolent respondent cannot claim any equitable relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
G. M. Majid Vs. Amjad Hossain Lablu and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....titioner. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not Represented- For Respondent No. 2. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 149 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 5.5.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.739 of 2004). ......onnected papers. We regret, we do not find any merit in the points urged and we are of the opinion that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and rightly quashed the proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case. There is therefore no..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Rezaul Karim Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
...., Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Not Represented- For the Respondents. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 430 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 28.8.2006 and 29.8.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 3128 of 200......6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record and appreciation of law arrived at a correct decision. There is, therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Md. Kamruzzaman alias Rentu Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.322 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 29-01-2007 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 244 of 2002). J......ered from the possession of the petitioner. It further appears that the High Court Division as well as lower Courts found to have correctly sifted the evidence on record and followed the decision of the Superior Courts in the above matter. So, it appears that the submissions of th..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Md. Abdul Karim Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....hidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not Represented- For Respondent Nos. 2-10. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1098 of 2005. (From the judgment and order, dated 26.6.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 6589 of 2002). Judgm......In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record and appreciation of the law arrived at a correct decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Md. Delwar Hossain Akter & another Vs. Md. Nazrul Islam Khan & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Syed Mahbubur Rahmen, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 918 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 08.05.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3794 of 2000). Jud......l below. Accordingly, the High Court Division discharged the Rule. 7. In our view, the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Ziarat Hossain Vs. Md. Jaher Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 537 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 4th January, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3313 of 1999). ......ordingly the High Court Division made the Rule absolute. 5. We are of the view that the High Court Division on consideration of the evidence and the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The learned counsel could not point out any misreading of evidence or non considerat..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Md. Abdul Muttalib Vs. Md. Abdul Wahab, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....h M. Nurul Amin, Advocate) instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 835 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 19.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1386 of 2002). Judgm......a minor is not a valid document in the eye of law. 7. Therefore, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
BFDC Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Respondent No. 2 (In all cases). Not Represented- the Respondent No. 1 (In all the cases). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1054-59 of 2007. (From the Judgment and Order dated February 26, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 746, 747......ontentions made earlier and before the High Court Division in support of the Rule obtained in the writ petitions reiterated the same contentions. 7. The High Court Division noticed the decision reported in 49 DLR (1997) 396 wherein the petitioner herein was a party. In the said repor..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Bangladesh Vs. Kopil Das, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... J. N. Deb, Advocate, instructed by A. K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 378 of 2007. (From the Judgment and Order dated December 4, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1178 of 2005). ......ground of the discussion made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 214. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
26002594259325922591258825832582258125782577257625752573257025662565256425582557