Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5201-5220 of 7814 results.
Korban Ali Khan (Md) and Others Vs. Asalat Khan and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Serajul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate—For the Petitioners. AS Md. Ramzan Khan, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 555 of 1992. Judgment Bijan Kumar Das J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 12-11-1991 passed by the Subordinate Judge, 2n......alder and others 48 DLR 175; Abdul Khaleque Vs. Abdur Noor and others 49 DLR 74 & Mantu Faraji alias Jamal Faraji and others Vs. Mahiuddin Khan 50 DLR 147;Tamizunnessa Vs. Umar Ali 18 DLR 572. Lawyers Involved: Md. Serajul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate—For the Petitioners. AS Md. Ramzan Kh..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Hasmat Ali Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....tion 302 of the Penal Code and, as such, the impugned conviction and sentence are hereby upheld. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (2001) 169. ......Islam Khokan & ors Vs. State, 6 BLT 79; Safar Ali and others Vs. State, 1983 BLD 325; State Vs. Mofazzal Hossain, 11 BLD (AD) 202, 43 DLR (AD) 64A; State Vs. Md Shafiqul Islam, 43 DLR (AD) 92. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan with SM Rezaul Karim, Advocates—For the Appellant. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Khaleda Rahman & another Vs. Integrated Services Limited and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....t defendants 1-4 who are plaintiffs 2-4 of the subsequent Title Suit No. 116 of 1999 entered appearance on 10-5-99 and filed written objection and also filed a separate application under Order 39, Rule 4 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for setting aside/vacating the ......nment of the State of Jammu & Kashmir 1973 PLD 62; Lakshmi Narasimhiah and others Vs. Yalakkigowda, AIR 1965 of Mysore 310 & Monowara Begum Vs. Syed Ashrafuddin & ors, 40 DLR (AD) 251. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam with Akhter Imam, Advocates—For the Appellants. Rafiq-ul Hu..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 207
Daily Star and Prothom Alo Patrika Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....State………. Opposite Party Judgment January 28, 2001. Lawyers Involved: M Faruq, Deputy Attorney-General — For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous (Suo Moto) Rule No. 110 of 2001. Judgment SK Sinha J. - This Suo Moto Rule was issued calling up......Asgar Khan J SK Sinha J Daily Star and Prothom Alo Patrika…………….Petitioners Vs. State………. Opposite Party Judgment January 28, 2001. Lawyers Involved: M Faruq, Deputy Attorney-General — For the State. Criminal Miscel..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 189
Hasibur Rahman (Md) Vs. Shakila Begum and another, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....laintiff respectively. Judgment and decree is dated 13-10-1996. 8. Feeling dissatisfied First defendant as petitioner approached this Court in this Civil Revision petition and obtained present Rule. 9. Mr. Mohammad Ali Khan, learned Advocate appeared for the defendant-petitioner. Plain...... August 24, 2000. Cases Referred To- Md. Osman Gani Vs. Mst Kulsum Bibi and others 37DLR (AD) 63; Yousuf and Brothers Vs. Mirza Mohammad Mahdi Pooya and another 16 DLR (SC) 619. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Ali Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md Khurshid Alam K..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Mainul Hosein & others Vs. Sheikh Hasina Wazed, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....ocates have submitted that the principles enunciated by their Lordships in the aforesaid Cases are fully applicable in the instant Case and the instant statement is very much contemptuous for which a Rule should be issued. 5. The learned Attorney General, Mr Mahmudul Islam appeared in this ma...... M Jam Vs. AT Gupta, AIR 1983 (SC) 1151; A Karim Vs. State, 38 DLR (AD) 188;Ch Zahur Hai MNA Vs. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, PM, PLD1975 (SC) 383; Masroor Ahsan Vs. Ardeshir Cowasjee, PLD 1998 (SC) 823. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hosein with Nazmul Huda, Aminul Hoque, Md. Humayun Kabir Bulbul and ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Tarun Karmaker Vs. State and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....e- For the Petitioner Faziul Haque Choudhury, Assistant Attorney- General—For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.6858 of 2000. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- By this Rule, opposite parties were called upon to show cause as to why the detenu Miss Momota Karmaker now ......etitioner Vs. State and ors………….Respondents Judgment December 12, 2000. Case Referred To- BADC Vs. Kibria and Associates Ltd., 46 DLR (AD) 97. Lawyers Involved: Probir Halder, Advocate- For the Petitioner Faziul Haque Choudhury, Ass..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Raisuddin (Md) Vs. Sitaram Bhar and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....earing will determine the outcome of the proceeding under Order 41, rule 19 CPC.” But here in the present Case, the appellate Court has given no consideration on this very vital point of the Rule and gave no finding whether there was any sufficient cause which prevented the appellant from a...... To- Mrinal Kanti Guha & others Vs. Brajendra Lad Dhar & others 44 DLR (AD) 9; Salamat Bibi & others Vs. Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner, Multan, 21 DLR (SC) 353. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mahbub Ali, Advocate— For the Appellant. Reba Kaniz for AK Ah..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Sirajul Islam (Md) and another Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....For Respondent Nos.4-7. AM Aminuddin, Assistant Attorney-General — For Respondent Nos.1 and 2-3. Writ Petition No.2918 of 1999. Judgment Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J.- This Rule nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the order being No.43 date......gment August 10, 2000. Case Referred To- Nesar Ahmed also known as Babul Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Noakhali 49 DLR (AD) 111. Lawyers Involved: Nitai Roy Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Md. Oziullah, A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Syed Mustafizur Rahman Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....arge leveled against him and he is acquitted of the charges. Let him be discharged from the bail bond. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (2001) 125. ......appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Abdul Awal Vs. State 1962 PLD Dhaka 623 =13 DLR 397; Gulak Chand Ragudas Vs. State AIR 194 (PC) 82; Abdul Hakim Vs. State 45 DLR 352 relied (7 & 9) Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim with Syeda Maimuna Begum, Advocates — For the Appellants. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Bibhu Ranjan Das Vs. Hakim Ali and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... if the plaintiff does not appear when it is taken up for hearing, unless the defendant admits the plaintiffs claim or part thereof. For such nonappearance of the plaintiff to prosecute his suit, the Rule provides, the Court shall make an order that the suit be dismissed”. The defendants in this C......i Vs. Upendra Nath Bhattacharjee AIR 1927 Allahabad 193; Pak Flotilla Co. Ltd Vs. Abdus Salam & others, 14 DLR 23, Wali Ahmed Vs. State, 17 DLR 101 and MS Nurul Alam Vs. State, 38 DLR 333. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Not represented ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Abdul Abedin Abdul Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....ry, Deputy Attorney-General with Naima Haider, Assistant Attorney-General—For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 5612 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J. - This Rule has arisen out of an application filed by the petitioner under section 498 of the Code of Crimi......Ruhul Amin J Md Abdul Wahhab Miah J Abdul Abedin Abdul ………Petitioner Vs. State…………………..Opposite Party Judgment October 1, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed with Maharunnessa, Advocates—For the Petitioner. AKM ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Hussain Mohammad Ershad Vs. State and others, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....uantity of land from the owners or the heirs of the owners managed to get their names substituted and as such, these accused were not affected persons under rules 11 and 15 of DIT (Allotment of land) Rules, 1969, that the accused No.1 had dishonest intention i.e. mens-rea behind the passing of the o...... Md. Gholam Rabbani J Md. Latifur Rahman J Hussain Mohammad Ershad………………Appellant Vs. State and others…………………..Respondents Judgment August 24, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbub Hossain with Afzal Hossain, Advocates—For the Appellant (In C..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Mosharaf Hossain (Md) @ Mash Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... the Petitioner. Fazlul Hoque Chowdhury, Assistant Attorney- General— For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.3613 of 2000. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- By this Rule opposite parties were called upon to show cause as to why the detenu Md Mosharaf Hossain now de......hury J Mosharaf Hossain (Md) @ Mash……………….Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others…………………….Opposite Parties Judgment July 17, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Munsur Habib with Zainal Abedin and Shahanara Begum, Advocates—For the Pe..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Yasin Mollah and another Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....ssain, Advocate—For the Petitioner. FKM Ahsan Mahbub, Assistant Attorney- General—For the State. Criminal Revision No. 350 of 1996. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 12-11-1995 passed by the learned Additional Se......al Jurisdiction) Present: Gour Gopal Saha J Yasin Mollah and another…….Petitioners Vs. State……..Opposite Party Judgment August 9, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Khondaker Gulzar Hossain, Advocate—For the Petitioner. FKM Ahsan ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Arabinda Das Vs. Sura Bala Das and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....h Chandra Biswas, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 1164 of 1991. Judgment AK Badrul Huq J. - The subject matter of challenge in this Rule arising out of an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is judgment and ...... AK Badrul Huq J Arabinda Das...........................Petitioner Vs. Sura Bala Das and others………….Opposite Parties Judgment August 19, 1999. Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Not represented- the O..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Abul Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....ain, Advocate-For the Petitioner. Syed Mahmud Hossain, Deputy Attorney General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 228 of 1993. Judgment Nazmun Ara Sultana J. - This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause to why the inclusion of Holding No. ......ni J Nazmun Ara Sultana J Abul Hossain and others……………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others…………..Respondent Judgment June 12, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbub Hossain, Senior Advocate with Afzal Hossain, Advocate-For t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 18
Ali Azam, Advocate Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... in favour of the assessee applicant. Accordingly, the reference is answered aforesaid and the parties will bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (2001) 92. ......mirul Islam J SANM Rahman J Ali Azam, Advocate………………Applicant Vs. Commissioner of Taxes……………Respondent Judgment August 17, 1999. Lawyers Involved: AFM Firojuddin Bhuiyan, Advocate — For the Applicant. Not represe..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Nafisa Choudhury Vs. United Food Complex Ltd. and another, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....aging Director by the respondent No. 2 there has been mismanagement or unfair management in the affairs of the company or whether the usurpation of powers of the Managing Director in violation of the Rules of the company i.e. the Articles of Association, is oppressive and prejudicial to the interest...... M Moorthy Vs. Drivers and Conductors Bus Service P Ltd (1991) 71 Company Cases 136 (Mad); Faruk (Md) Vs. Abdul Hamid and others 51 DLR (AD) 48; HR Harmer Ltd (1958) 3 All England Reports 689. Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed with Saqwat Seraj, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Rok..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 198
Safiqueuddin Ahmed (Md) and another Vs. House Building Finance Corporation, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... Shaheed Alam, Advocate — For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.8745 of 1991(Dhaka) Civil Revision No.195 of 1989(Rangpur) Judgment Md. Joynul Abedin J.- This Rule calls in question the order dated 7.2.1989 passed by the learned District Judge, Dinajpur in Mi......l Abedin J Safiqueuddin Ahmed (Md) and another…………. Petitioners Vs. House Building Finance Corporation ……. Opposite Party Judgment June 29, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Not represented- the Petitioners. Shaheed Alam, Advocate — For the..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 78
36933692369136903689368836873686368536843682368136803679367836773676367536743673