Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5441-5460 of 6172 results.
Lutfun Nahar Begum Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....antial, to connect the appellant with the murders. There is no direct evidence in this case against her. The learned Deputy Attorney General referred to certain passages in the evidences of P. W. 2 Md. Solaiir an, P. W. 3 Dulia Mia. P. W. 10 Sepoy Yakub Ali and P. W. 20 Serajul Islam Kazmi which,......al is allowed and the order of commitment of the appellant is set aside. The appellant is discharged from the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 29. ......ballav Saha Vs. Gopiballav Saha, 11 DLR (SC) 394; Mozhanil Huq Vs. Ishaque Sardar, 14 DLR (SC) 251. Lawyers involved: Khan Bahadur Naziruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Mr. Behtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record — For the Appellant. A. T. M. Masud, Deputy Atto......rt of Sessions to stand trial on a charge under section 302/109 of the Penal Code. 2. The appellant Lutfun Nahar Begum along with three persons, namely, Sadhan Kumar Mali, Surid Chandra Das alias Suresh Chandra Das and Nagar Bashi Mali were committed to the Court of Sessions by Mr. D. H. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Abdul Matin Munshi Vs. Idris Pandiat and ors., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....r for dismissal. 2. True prosecution case in short is as follows: On 1st Baishakh, 1375 B.S., corresponding to 14th April, 1968, while deceased Shamsul Huq and his elder brother P.W. 2 Md. Tajul Islam were proceeding at about 7 A.M. towards Kaliatoli Bazar for marketing, they were su......;tion 307/34. The result, therefore, is that both the appeals are dismissed subject to the modification of the Penal Code to that under section 302/34 and 307/34 of the Penal Code. Ed. ......;tion 307/34. The result, therefore, is that both the appeals are dismissed subject to the modification of the Penal Code to that under section 302/34 and 307/34 of the Penal Code. Ed. ......;tion 307/34. The result, therefore, is that both the appeals are dismissed subject to the modification of the Penal Code to that under section 302/34 and 307/34 of the Penal Code. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali and others, 1974, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 1974). Subhas Chandra Ghose…… Respondent (In Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1974). Alam Shaikh & another……. Respondent (In Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1974). Md. Tara Miah …………………..Respondents. (In Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1974). Khalil M......y of the circumstances indicated in the preceding paragraph can be shown to have rendered the proceeding relating to him coram non judice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) 16. ......resent: AM Sayem CJ AB Mahmud Hussain J Muhammad Abdullah Jabir J Ahsanuddin J Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh…………...Appellant (In all the appeals) Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali……………... Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 1974). Dr. Abdul Malek…………......y of the circumstances indicated in the preceding paragraph can be shown to have rendered the proceeding relating to him coram non judice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) 16. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Mazharul Huq Vs. Returning Officer & Circle Officer, (Dev.) Double Moorings, Ctg, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....in Chowdhury, J.—This appeal by special leave, is against an order of a Bench of the High Court Division dismissing an application under article 102 of the Constitution. 2. Respondent No.14, Mr. Md. Abdullah and one Dr. Shafiqur Rahman, were the only contesting candidates for Chairmanship of No......Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ......Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ......so Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Abdur Rashid Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......ed Dao blows on Maleka and then ran away towards east. The remaining two witnesses are P. W. 3 Dr. Salahuddin who held the post-mortem examination on the dead body of Maleka and P.W. 6 Mir Murtaza Ali who investigated the case and submitted charge-sheet against the prisoner. The Doctor found the......de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Shamsuddin Ahmed @ Tofa Mia & others Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ah 18 C.W.N. 890, Kheyali Prosad vs. Mullick N. Islam 20 C.W.N. 1048; Radhakishan Toshniwal vs. Shidhar Ramchandra. A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 1368; Ram Saran Lai vs. Domini Kuer AIR. 1961 SC 1747 Begum vs. Md. Yakub ILR 16 All. 344; Sitaram Bhaurao vs. Jiaul Hasan Khan AIR 1923 P.C. 41; Jadu Lal Sahu vs...... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ......e plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 124 of 1962 in the second court of Munsif at Brahmanbaria for pre-emption under the Mohammedan Law against the appellants stating, inter alias, that one Jonah Ali Daroga owner for the suit plots in tenure right sold half of the property to the responden......ember 28, 1962 the plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 124 of 1962 in the second court of Munsif at Brahmanbaria for pre-emption under the Mohammedan Law against the appellants stating, inter alias, that one Jonah Ali Daroga owner for the suit plots in tenure right sold half of the property..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sunil Kumar Biswas Vs. Mohammad Idris and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sanjib Kumar Bose and another Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents Judgment April 22, 1981 Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, Md. Yasin, Advocate, with him, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Ap......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Dr. Jamshed Bakht Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.....; Sanjibi Raddy vs. Konary Raddy, 1926 I.L.R. 49 Mad. 315; Ahmedbhai vs. Framji (1903) I.L.R. 28 Bom 228; Golapjan vs. Bholanath Khattry (1911) I.L.R. 38 Cal. 888. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. B.K. Das, Advocate, instr......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......ent Judgment September 3, 1980. Cases Referred to- Kimber vs. The Press Association Limited 1 QB.(l&93) 1 Q.B. 65; Voni Madho Prosad Singh vs. M. WajidAli A.t.R. 1937 All 90; Bishum Porshad Norain Singh vs. Phulman Singh, 19 C. W. N. 935; C.R. Crowd......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Abdur Rouf and others Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ......d and structures. Thus, while the appellants were possessing the said land in Ejmali with Sakina Bai the latter sold the B' schedule land and structures for the sum of Tk. 25, 000/- to one Keramat Ali, predecessor in-interest of the respondents Nos. 1-6 by a sale deed dated October 30, 1972 and ....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Mohd. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others , 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......eme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J K.M. Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Mohd. Jabed Ali and others.................................... Appellants. (For all the appeals) Vs. ......e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Amanullah Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abdul Hafiz and ors, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Commissioner of Taxes & another Vs. M/s. Mullick Brothers, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review application is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ......rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review application is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ....... H. Khan, Senior Advocate, with Muzammel Huq Bunyan, Rabia Bhuiyan, Advocates, instructed by B. Hossain Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Asrarul Hossain Senior, Senior Advocate with C.R. Ali, Advocate, instructed, by Abu Bakkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Review ......rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review application is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Durjan Ali alias Siddique Hossain and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....late Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Md. Abdul Jalil …………………………&hel......re-emption. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The Judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate court is restored. Ed. ......lip;…………………………………………………….Appellant Vs. Durjan Ali alias Siddique Hossain and others…………………&helli......…………………………………………………….Appellant Vs. Durjan Ali alias Siddique Hossain and others……………………&h..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Dr. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....S.C. 280; Bisnunrayan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1965 S.C. 1967. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahmudul Islam, Jamiruddin Ahmed, K.Z. Alam with him, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Hug, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant K.A.Bakr, Attorney-General and A.K. Bh......osts. The decision of the High Court Division is set aside and the impugned order declared to be of no lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 201, 1981 BLD (AD) 140. ......R, 1968, 694; Bombay vs. Saubhagachand M. Doshi AIR 1957 S.C. 892; Krepa Ram Gupta vs. R.K, Talwar AIR 1970 All. 296; A.M. Khan Leghery vs. Govt. of Pakistan, PLD 1967 Lah, 227 ; Pakistan vs. Liaquat Ali Khan (1959) 11 D.L.R (SC) 73; Zaibtun Textile vs. Central Board of Revenue PLD 1971 Kar. 333; Re......osts. The decision of the High Court Division is set aside and the impugned order declared to be of no lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 201, 1981 BLD (AD) 140. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 180
Musharraf Hossain Chy Vs. GM, Titas Gas Transmission & Dist. Co. Ltd. & ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....llant (In C.A. No. 169 of 1979). S.R, Pal, Senior A. S. C. (Mohammadullah, A.S.C.) with A. Rab II, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents No. 1 & 2. Mozammel Huq Khan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent 3. M. Nurullah, Advocate, instructed by ......view of the above observations, the appeal is dismissed, the Judgment and order of the High Court Division is upheld. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......hury................................. Appellants (In C.A. No. 169 of 1979) vs. General Manager, Titas Gas Transmission & Distribution Co. Ltd. & ors...........Respondent And A.K.M. Ayub Ali..............................................................Appellant (In C.A. 65 of 1980). ......rvant applied to him. Further the appellant was governed by the terms and conditions as laid down in his letter of appointment issued by the Company before its nationalisation. It was stated, inter alias, that the allegation made against the General Manager were false and made only for the purpose..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Goutam Ranjan Sen and other Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....sp;Dulichand Omraolal vs. Bangladesh (1981) 33 D.L.R (AD) 30. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A- Rib-II, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Md. Moksudor Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by A W. Mian, Advocate-on- Record.—F......rt, in that, the decision of the High Court is confirmed subject to this modification that the suit shall remain stayed so long the suit property. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......rt, in that, the decision of the High Court is confirmed subject to this modification that the suit shall remain stayed so long the suit property. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......rt, in that, the decision of the High Court is confirmed subject to this modification that the suit shall remain stayed so long the suit property. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Khandaker Ehtehshamuddin Ahmed @ Iqbal Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....at the order passed by this Division staying execution of the sentence to continue for further ten days from the date of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (1981) 154. ......at the order passed by this Division staying execution of the sentence to continue for further ten days from the date of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (1981) 154. ......at the order passed by this Division staying execution of the sentence to continue for further ten days from the date of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (1981) 154. ......ite the Proclamation of 6.4.79”. 4. The appellant along with his mother Syeda Bag am and Driver Anwar Hossain were prosecuted on the allegation that the appellant murdered his wife Saleha Begum alias Khuki on April 18, 1978 at about 1.30 PM; and he in collusion with Driver Anwar Hossain and mo..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 292
S.Z.M. Nurul Huq Vs. State, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....that an order passed by the reviewing authority is not revisable under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the result both the appeals fail and the same are dismissed. Ed. ......that an order passed by the reviewing authority is not revisable under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the result both the appeals fail and the same are dismissed. Ed. ......that an order passed by the reviewing authority is not revisable under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the result both the appeals fail and the same are dismissed. Ed. ......that an order passed by the reviewing authority is not revisable under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the result both the appeals fail and the same are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Binode Behari Saha Vs. Nitya Gopal Shaha, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ull Bench of the Bombay High Court in V.M. Assam Mohammad vs. ME Rahim Sahib (1920) 43 Mad. 579 corresponding to 55 TC 977 (FB). Seshagiri Aiyyar, J. dissenting and agreeing with the reasonings in Md. Fazil Ali vs. Karim Khan. Allahabad High Court also followed the majority view in Suraj Prosad v......ection (1) of section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 131. ......f the proviso. Case Referred to- Gedi Mal Dharam Das vs. Huna Mal Shedu Ram, AIR 1931 Lah. 332, V. M. Assan Mohammad Sahib vs. M.E. Rahim Sahib, ILR 43 Madras 597, 55 TC 977 (FB) Mohd. Fazil Ali vs. Karim Khan (1894) 108 PR 1894, Rughu Nath Das vs. Pana Lal, 1910 54 PR 1910, Mukandi Lal vs.......ection (1) of section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 131. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 147
15791578157715761575157415721571157015691565156015591558155515541552155115491547