Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 561-580 of 4637 results.

Delwar Hossain Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....ate. Md. Quayyum Chowdhury, Advocate - For the Respondent Nos.2, 3, & 4. Criminal Appeal No.4654 of 2005. Judgment Md. Abdul Hye J.- This appeal is directed against the order dated 05.10.2005 passed by Nari-O-Shihu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No.2, Dhaka in Nari-O-Shishu Case No..

Category: Women and Children | Date: 17 Apr, 2006 | Hits: 24

Ershadul Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....inul Islam, (Sanu) Deputy Attorney-General-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.3643 of 2005. Judgment Salma Masud Chowdhury J.-This ap­peal arises against the judgment and order dated 27.7.2005 passed by the Special Tribu­nal Judge No.1, Kurigram in Special Tribunal Case No..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2006 | Hits: 5

Government of Bangladesh Vs. Kalimuddin Pramanic and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....nt Syed Mahmud Hossain J.-This Rule was issued on an application for revision filed by defendant No.1. under section 115 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) against judgment and decree dated 21.4.1990 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 1st Court, Bogra in Other Class (O...

Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 28 Mar, 2006 | Hits: 4

Kishore Kumar Dutta Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....rsons Bhupal Chandra Dutta, Binoy Dutta, Pronoy Dutta and Bijoya Dutta not guilty of charge staged against them and pronounced a verdict of acquittal upon them. Judgment of conviction and sentence is dated 6.3.2004. 20. Judgment of conviction and sentence now stands out to be the subject matter..

Category: Women and Children | Date: 20 Feb, 2006 | Hits: 127

Md. Abdul Hannan alias Khalil Vs. Sate and another, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....Criminal Appeal No.381 of 1999. Judgment Sayed Mohammad Ziaul Karim J.- By this appeal convict appellant Md. Abdul Hannan alias Khalil has challenged the propriety of the Judgment and order dated 31-01-1999 passed by the learned Judge of the Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Pat..

Category: Women and Children | Date: 7 Feb, 2006 | Hits: 78

M. Manzur Ahmed Vs. Mrs. Inge Flatz and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....ormance of contract, it is to be seen whether the plaintiff have been able to prove contract between the plaintiff and the defen­dant and whether the plaintiff is ready and willing at all material dates to perform his part of the contract…………………(31) Law under section 101 of..

Category: Property Law | Date: 15 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 8

M/S. Uttara Properties Ltd. Vs. Joint District Judge and Artharin Adalat No.1, Dhaka and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

.... Ain together, it can be inferred that the leg­islature seemed to have had the intention to preclude the petitioner from furnishing the security at any stage before hearing the objec­tion or any date fixed by the Adalat………………….(6) When the application was fixed for hearing..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 15 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 19

Industries Chemie BV Vs. SMA Quddus and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

..... No one — For the Respondents. Trade Mark Appeal No. 26 of 2001 Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J. - This appeal under section 76 of the Trade Marks Act, 1940 arises out of an order dated 7-8-2000 passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks rejecting an application in Form TM 55 filed o..

Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: 30 Nov, 2005 | Hits: 142

State Vs. Maku Rabi Das, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

...., Habiganj, for confirmation of death sentence imposed upon the condemned prisoner Maku Rabi Das, on his conviction and sentence under section 302 of the Penal Code by the Impugned judgment and order dated 9-9-2003 passed in Sessions Case No. 57 of 2002 arising out of Chunarughat Police Station Case..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: 21 Nov, 2005 | Hits: 82

World Tel Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not Represented—Respondent Nos. 1, 3-6. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 815 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 23rd April 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5135 of 2004). Judg..

Category: Information Technology Law | Date: 25 Aug, 2005 | Hits: 331

M/S. Marine Contacts, represented by Md. Mofazzal Hossain Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

.... show cause as to why they should not be directed to issue Purchase Order in favour of the petitioner or to hold Re-Tender/Fresh Tender in connection with In­ternational Tender No.02 of 2004-2005 dated 9.12.2004 for procurement of Deck Mounted 360 steerable Outboard Propulsion Unit Pow­ered by..

Category: Others | Date: 15 Aug, 2005 | Hits: 6

Raqib Sheikh (Md.) Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

.... Parvin Hannan, Assistant Attorney-General‑ For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.2085 of 2000. Judgment AKM Fazlur Rahman J.- This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13‑8‑2000 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Khulna in Sessions Case No.1..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 1

Sadeque @ Sadequr Rahman Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....ondent. Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2000. Judgment SM Ziaul Karim J.- By this appeal, convict appellant Sadeque @ Sadequr Rahman has challenged the propriety of the Judgment and order dated 22-9- 1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narsingdi in Sessions Case No. 64..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 9

Md. Azizur Rahman Vs. Mosammat Nazmun Nahar, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....r-Rashid, Advocate - For the opposite party. Civil Revision No.4459 of 2002. Judgment Md. Abdul Aziz J.- The opposite party was directed to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 29.7.02 and 31.7.2002 respectively passed by the learned Joint District. Judge, 2nd Court, Joy..

Category: Evidence Law | Date: 26 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 169

Masud Rana Vs. National Board of Revenue & others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

.... provision of Section 196D, 196F and 196G runs as follows: "196D. Appeal to the High Court Divi­sion:- The commissioner of Cus­toms or the other party may, within ninety days of the date upon which he is served with notice of an order under Section 196B, by an applica­tion, pre..

Category: Family Law, Women and Children | Date: 24 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 109

Shafiuddin Vs. Samir Bhuiyan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

.... Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- One Shafiuddin who was elected chairman obtained the Rule upon making an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment and order dated 13‑3-05 passed by the learned District Judge, Narsingdi in Election Tribunal Appeal No.1 of ..

Category: Civil Law, Election Law | Date: 13 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 7

Ashraful Alam (Md.) Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....ment Siddiqur Rahman Miah J.- This criminal revisional application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure at the instance of Md. Ashraful Alam is directed against judgment and order dated 5‑8‑1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nawabganj, in Criminal Appeal No..

Category: Family Law | Date: 4 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 2

Pushpa Rani Saha Podder Vs. Rash Mohan Saha, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

....rd- For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For Respondent Nos. 1-2. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 3-9. Civil Appeal No. 30 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 15.11.1994 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1244 of 1987). Judgment..

Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 127

Swapon Kumar Gain Vs. Amita Golder, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....on No. 4785 of 2000 with Civil Revision No. 1058 of 2001. Judgment Bijan Kumar Das J.- By these Rules the opposite party was called upon to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 12-6-2000 passed by the District Judge, Dhaka in Family Appeal No. 22 of 1993 reversing these ..

Category: Family Law | Date: 25 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 237

Md. Joinul Abedin Vs. Government of Peoples' Republic of Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....2002. Judgment Md. Muzammel Hossain J.-This Rule was issued at the instance of the petitioner calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order vide Memo. No.48/2002/C dated 15.01.2002 passed by the Respondent No.3 and the letter issued by the Respondent No.6 cancelli..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 22 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 3