Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 581-600 of 2712 results.
Abdul Quddus Vs. Anjuman Khatoon & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ming those of the trial Court. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 312 ......rty. The last paragraph of section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act provides that a contrast for sale of immoveable property is a contract that a sale of such property shall take place on terms settled between parties and it does not of itself create any interest in such property. A cont......man Khatoon & others……………….Respondents Judgment June 9, 1984. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Md. Affan and others Vs. Tazal Hoque and 42 others, 27 DLR 58; Rambaran Vs. Rani Mohit (1967) AIR (SC) 144; Gl..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1984 | Hits: 4
Sarder Ahmed Ali Vs. G. M. Ali Boksh and others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... facts and circumstances of the case, there will however be no order as to costs. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 7. ......ution, as in the instant case, would also not lie because an unwilling master cannot be forced to accept the service of a servant a ad hence if there was any dismissal by causing a breach of the terms of the contract it would cause a breach of a contract for which damage would lie and not reins......n (Jessore Bench) (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J Sarder Ahmed Ali................................Petitioner Vs. G. M. Ali Boksh and ors.........................Opposite-party Judgment April 12, 1984. Result: ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 4
Shababuddin & others Vs. Saijuddin & others,1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... there will be no order as to costs only before this Court. Send down the records as expeditiously as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 337 ......ly by the parties concerned it cannot be said to be finding calling under proviso (1) to Section 92 of the Evidence Act and that being so, plots described in a registered document being the terms of the contract cannot be varied by oral evidence between the parties and the document need be...... Appellant. Syed the Shamsur Rahman- For Respondent Appeal from Apaellate Decree No.153 of 1978. Judgment Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26.7.74 passed by the Additional District Judge Khulna reversing those passed by th..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 7 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 4
M/s. Haque Brothers (Carbide) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... on the aforesaid amount of principal and interest calculating from this day till realization. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 47. ......ten with the expression ‘without prejudice’ on the top of it- Its implication The words ‘'without prejudice" are often written by one party to the other on the assurance that the proposed terms were not to be used against the writer if there is no settlement. The entire object of the wri......ettlement. The entire object of the writer is that the writer expresses in writing that the suit may be settled on the proposed terms. If they are acceptable, the parties will be bound by these terms and the dispute comes to an end. If the proposed terms become infructuous, they cannot be used in fu..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 2 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 105
Fazal Ahmed Vs. Achima Khatun & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....for. The Rule is accordingly discharged. Parties are made to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 144 ......Defendant No.1 did not appear to Contest. He and plaintiff jointly filed a compromise petition by which the claim of the plaintiff in the suit lands was admitted and a prayer was made for a decree in terms of solenama. It, however, does not appear that any decree was passed in terms of the solenama.......ellip;……………Opposite parties Judgment March 18, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred To- Ayna Dasi Vs. Arena Bala Dashi and others, 12 DLR 603 ;Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury and others Vs. Ganl Ahmed and others, 33 DLR (AD) 1..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 3
Trustees of the Port of Chittagong Vs. K. Mahbub Hossain & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....l realisation from the date of institution of the suit. Mohammed Habibur Rahman J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 292 ...... dated 23-2-71. The plaintiff claimed that the loss of the car was covered by policy issued by the defendant No. 2 who is bound to indemnify the loss of the plaintiff due to loss of the car under the terms and conditions of the policy. 7. The plaintiff further alleged that he purchased and impo......mp; others..............................Respondent Judgment March 14, 1984. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred To- Chittagong Port Authority Vs. Md. Ishaque and others, 35 DLR (AD) 364; Central Bank of India Ltd. Vs. M/S-Jan Md. Hazi Ismail 17 D.L.R. 582; C..Category: Contract Law | Date: 14 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 3
Nezamat Ali Vs. Syed Ahmed Chowdhury and others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....peal is dismissed in terms of Clause 36 of the Letters Patent without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 45. ......, namely Syed Ahmed Chowdhury, Md. Yousuf Mia Choudhury, Fazlul Karim, Fazlul Bari and Fazlul Kader are the male heirs of the original Wakf late Ahsan Ali Chowdhury. They are also joint Mutawallis in terms of the registered Wakfnama Ext.1. 3. The case for the plaintiffs respondents is that late...... Present: Fazle Husain Mohammed Habibur Rahman J Syed Mohammad Ali J Nezamat Ali.................................................Defendant-Appellant Vs. Syed Ahmed Chowdhury and others.................Plaintiff-Respondents Judgment January 18, 1984. Result: ..Category: Limitation Law, Property Law, Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 18 Jan, 1984 | Hits: 1
I.C.I. (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/s. G. K. Brothers, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
.... registered through the trial court in accordance with law. Syed Mohammad Ali J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 114 ......l Chemical Industries (Pakistan) Ltd. and Mr. M.G. Kibria (P.W.1) on behalf of the plaintiff. Ext. 2 is the receipt for Taka 33.000/- granted by Imperial Chemical Industries (Pakistan) Limited. Under terms of the sale the predecessor company of the appellant defendant was required to obtain an Incom......eal dismissed Cases Referred to- Buxly Paint (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, (1979) 31 DLR (AD) 266. Lawyers Involved: Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Mirza Hossain Haider and Mokbul Ahmed—For the appellant. Muzammel Hossain with Syed Moazzem Hossain—For ..Category: Abandoned Properties Law | Date: 13 Dec, 1983 | Hits: 8
Shamsul Huda & others Vs. Alauddin & Taiwa Tex¬tile Mills Ltd, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....ting held on or before 31.12.1983 shall be deemed to have been duly held 19th annual general meeting of the company. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 309 ......utbreak of war in September, 1939. Section 42(5) of the Exchange Control Act, 1947 of the United Kingdom, however, made the said Act applicable to a wide variety of persons in the following terms:— "(5) The obligations and prohibitions imposed by this Act shall, subject to ..................Respondent Judgment November 24, 1983. Result: The prayer accepted Rectification of the Share Register Cases Referred To- Fry, Chase National Executors and Trustees Corporation Ltd. Vs. Fry and others (1946) 2 All E.R. 106; Transatlantic Life Assurance..Category: Company Law | Date: 24 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 4
Sultan Ahmed and others Vs. Md. Islam & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....tly allowed. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Syed Mohammad Ali J. —I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) 81. ......f maximum ceiling of land and did not specifically allege that if the pre-emption application is allowed, the added land would exceed the permissible limit. Therefore it is not a sufficient denial in terms of Order 8, rule 3 C.P.C. The rule in Order 8, rule 5 is known as the doctrine of non-traverse......orted in: 36 DLR (1984) 81. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 88
Abdul Hamid Vs. Dbakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd. & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
.... the Rules are discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 257; 4 BLD (1984) (HCD) 54. ......been made (or a provisional liquidator has been appointed) no suit or other legal proceeding shall be proceeded with or commenced against the company except by leave of the Court, and subject to such terms as the Court may impose.” Accordingly the various plaintiffs in these applications ...... are discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shahjahan—For the Petitioner. A. M. Nooruddin Ahmed—For the Respondent. Matter No. 18 of 1983 with Matters No. 19-23, 28-31 and 33 of 1983 Judgment Mustafa Kamal J. – These applications u/s. 171 of ..Category: Company Law, Corporate Law | Date: 16 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 5
Administrator, Zilla Board Vs. Mukhlesur Rahman, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....iff's suit is dismissed without any order as to costs. Let the records be sent back immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 71 ......ce Rules, 1968. But he submits that the plaintiff's Jetier of appointment, which has not been marked as an exhibit in this suit, shows that his "appointment is subject to the usual terms and conditions as laid down by the Government for Works Programme Personnel employed by the Lo......R (S.C.) 41; Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation Vs. Mah-boobHossain Chowdhury, 29 DLR (SC) 41; Bangladesh Biman Corporation, Vs. Chowdhury Md. Yusuf, 31 DLR (AD) 305 29 DLR (SC) 39, 41 and 31 DLR (AD) 305; District Council Vs. Dr. M.K. Rahman, 33 DLR 438. Lawyers Involved: T..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 30 Oct, 1983 | Hits: 1
Khan Sons (a private Ltd. Company) Vs. Motor Vessel YIH SHEN and others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....er is allowed. Let the plaint be kept in the record. The petitioner can obtain a certified copy of the order.” Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 28. ...... no notice was served on any of the defendants. After one week on 8.8.83 the Court permitted the plaintiff to withdraw the suit. 4. It appears that Admiralty Suit No.12 of 1983 was instituted in terms of rule 3 of Admiralty Rules But the suit was not admitted at all. In the ordinary Civil Court......urt High Court Division (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Khan Sons (a private Ltd. Company)...................Petitioner Vs. Motor Vessel YIH SHEN and others....................Opposite Parties Judgment October 10, 1983. Result: ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Limitation Law | Date: 10 Oct, 1983 | Hits: 12
M/s. A.B. Biscuit Co. Ltd Vs. Haque Brothers Ltd, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....ny prima facie finding or observation on the issue of temporary injunction in this judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 107 ......r resemble the Trade Mark and Design of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff-respondent also filed an application under Order 39; rule 2 C.P.C. praying for temporary injunction in the above terms till the disposal of the suit and as stated above obtained an order of ad interim injunction f......d...............................Respondent Judgment October 3, 1983. Result: Appeal is dismissed Cases Referred to- McCain International Ltd. Vs. Country Fair Foods Ltd. and anr., 1981 RFC 69(CA). Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rashid Khan with Ashraf All Kazi—..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: 3 Oct, 1983 | Hits: 12
M/s. A.B. Biscuit Co. Ltd. Vs. Haque Brothers Ltd., 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....t being influenced in any way by any prima facie finding or observation of the issue of temporary injunction in this judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (HCD) (1984) 107. ......ith or resemble the Trade Mark and Design of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff-respondent also filed an application under Order 39, rule 2 C.P.C. praying for temporary injunction in the above terms till the disposal of the suit and as stated above obtained an order of ad interim injunction f.................................Respondent Judgment October 3, 1983. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Case Referred to- Mc Cain International Ltd. Vs. Country Fair Foods Ltd. and another, 1981 R.P.C. (Reports of Patent. Design and Trade Mark Cases) 69 (CA) Lawyers Invol..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: 3 Oct, 1983 | Hits: 290
Alhaj Md. Ruhul Amin Vs. Dhaka Municipal Corporation & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....thin the extended period. Let the records be sent back immediately by special messenger. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 1. ......with outstanding arrear rents in respect of each shop of all the markets including the Government New Market. The members of the plaintiff-Association were merely licensees for a specified period the terms of which had long ago expired and the said licenses had not been renewed. The Dhaka Municipal ......lt: The appeal is allowed. Code of Civil Procedure, 1980; order 47 or 1, 2 & 4 Review of Judgment by a Successor Judge The right of review of a judgment is a substantive right and its scope, extent manner and forum are circumscribed by the statute which confer such right-Revi..Category: Administrative Law, Procedural Law | Date: 29 Sep, 1983 | Hits: 1
Jaha Baksha Par Vs. Fazle Karim Biswas & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....ffirmed without any order as to cost in the facts and circumstances of the case. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 87. ......that the transaction was a lease and not a mortgage but inspite of that the Court in violation of the provisions of section 92 of the Evidence Act had admitted the oral evidence to vary the terms of the said instrument. Hence, the finding of fact that the document Ext. A was not a lea...... Respondent. Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 693 of 1968. Judgment Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J.- This appeal at the instance of the defendant Jaha Baksha Par, son of late Madhu Par and on the death of said appellant his heirs namely, Mozem Par, Ahmed Ali Par and Asmani Bibi is dir..Category: Evidence Law, Property Law | Date: 23 Aug, 1983 | Hits: 4
Md. Hossain Mia Vs. Shujayatullah and others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....her founded fact In the result, this appeal fails and it is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 191 ......ffs in the suit land within 12 years prior to the institution of the suit, the learned Subordinate Judge committed an error of law in affirming the decree of the trial court. He has submitted that in terms of Article 142 of the Limitation Act, the plaintiffs are to prove their possession w......urt High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Sultan Hossain Khan J Md. Hossain Mia....................................Appellant Vs. Shujayatullah and others........................Respondents Judgment August 6, 1983. Result: T..Category: Limitation Law | Date: 6 Aug, 1983 | Hits: 2
Gouranga Chandra Banik & others Vs. Sanjib Kumar Banik & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....mpugned judgment and decree of the learned Addl. District Judge are set aside and those of the Trial Court restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 235 ......B. B. Roy Chowdhury had very little to reply except submitting that Section 91 of the Evidence Act does not prohibit consideration of other evidence for purposes other than the proof of the terms of the written document. Mr. Chowdhury submits that the terms of the amicable partition were n...... This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 235 ..Category: Evidence Law, Property Law | Date: 6 Jul, 1983 | Hits: 3
Azizur Rahman & ors. Vs. Abdus Sakur and ors., 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
..... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (AD) (1984) 195. ......ty Act. There is a clear distinction between a complete conveyance and an executory contract, and events which discharge a contractor do not invalidate a concluded transfer." ''By its express terms s.56 of the Contract Act does not apply to cases in which there is a completed transfer. Th......Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J SM Mohsen Ali J Azizur Rahman & others....................................Appellants Vs. Abdus Sakur and others…..................................Respondents Judgment June 29, 198..Category: Contract Law | Date: 29 Jun, 1983 | Hits: 243
92969062929730829415938791379533953578889384952693899532794093889077941994211838