Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Musharraf Hossain Chy Vs. GM, Titas Gas Transmission & Dist. Co. Ltd. & ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....view of the above observations, the appeal is dismissed, the Judgment and order of the High Court Division is upheld. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...................................Appellant (In C.A. 65 of 1980). vs. Eastern Refinery Ltd. and others.....................................................Respondent Judgment June 12, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. Backkar, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Bangladesh Steamer Agents Association Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... any lawful authority. Ed. ......ngladesh Steamer Agents Association...............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh & ors .............................................Respondent Judgment May 31, 1979. Lawyers involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, with Asrarul Hussain, Senior Advocates, Md. Khalilu..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 110
Khandaker Ehtehshamuddin Ahmed @ Iqbal Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated Jane 13, 1979 passed by the High Court Division in Writs Petition No. 508 of 1979. The appellant was tried by the Special Martial Law Court No. II, Dacca on a charge under section 302 of the Bangladesh Penal Code in M.L. C......ration of Pakistan vs. Saeed Ahmed, PLD 1974 (SC) 151, State vs. Dosso (1959) 11 DLR (SC) 1; PLD 1958 (SC) 533, Nusrat Bhutto vs. Chief of Army Staff and Federation of Pakistan, PLD 1977 (SC) 657. Lawyers Involved: MH Khondker, Senior Advocate (Kh. Mahbub Hossain, Advocate with him) instructe..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 292
Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Abdur Rab, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
.... the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the writ re-called. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (19781) 143. ......an application under Article 102 of the Constitution against the Screening Board dealing with the respondent who belongs to the disciplined force as defined in the Constitution………….(15,16) Lawyers Involved: B. B. Roy Chowdhury, Assistant Attorney General, instructed by M. R. Khan, Adv..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 102
S.Z.M. Nurul Huq Vs. State, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ls is whether the Sessions Judge reviewing the proceeding of Summary Martial Law Court is a persona designata. 2. The appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 1979 was tried by a Summary Martial Law Court, Patuakhali, on the charge of misappropriation of Taka 1, 53,949/00 by misus......p;……………………………………………..Respondent Judgment January 14, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid Advocate instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record&mdash..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Nani Gopal Saha Vs. Jatindra Lal Chowdhury and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....s an order in excess of its power as provided under Articles 3 and 7 of the President's Order No. 13 of 1972. In the result, the appeal fails and it is dismissed with costs, Ed. ............................................Appellant Vs. Jatindra Lal Chowdhury and others....................................Respondents Judgment December 11, 1980. Lawyers Involved: B.B.Roy Chowdhury, Senior Advocate instructed by Abdur Rab-II, Advocate o..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 153
Binode Behari Saha Vs. Nitya Gopal Shaha, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ection (1) of section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 131. ......) 50 Indian Case 917, AIR 1931 Lah. 332, Jogir Ahir vs. Bishen Dayal (1891) 18 Cal, Somavhai Premchand vs. Wadilat Premchand 83 (1907) 9 Bom LR 883,—Jeun Muchi vs. Budhiram Muchi, 32 Cal. 339, Cal. Law Journal 143, Suraj Prosad vs. Baldeo, AIR 1928 All. 111, 50 All. 254, Gedi Mai vs. Huna Mal, 19..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 147
Nurunnessa and ors Vs. Babr Ali Bepari and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the poÂwer of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦..Appellants Vs. Babr Ali Bepari and others......................................... Respondents Judgment August 27, 1980. Lawyers Involved: M.G. Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by B.C.Panday, Advocate-on-Record.—For the..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 128
Abdus Samad & ors Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ge cannot be sustained, therefore, the appeal is allowed with costs and the Judgment of the High Court set aside. Judgment and order of the lower Appellate Court are restored. Ed. ......ip;…………Appellant Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others..................... Respondents Judgment March 18, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Khadomul Islam Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....for disposal in accordance with law. Let the operation of the order dated 12th July. 1979 be stayed till the disposal of the matter in the High Court Division There will no order as to costs. Ed. ......drul Haider Chowdhury J Khadomul Islam Chowdhury…………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………………………..Respondents Judgment July 21, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate instructed by Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocat..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 160
Shamuj Ali and other Vs. Kamalarma Bibi and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......arwari A.I.R. 1925 Pat. 1; Somamndaram, A.I.R. 1917 Mad. 185; Venkatraraju, A.I.R. 1943 Mad. 248; Kurgodlgouda A.I.R. 1917 Bom 210; Hamidal, A.I.R. 1921 Bom 67; bhaunath, A.I.R. 1934 Pat. 246(2). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, InstrucÂted by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Ful Chand Das and others Vs. Mohammad Hammad and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ent of the High Court Division is maintained. Consequently, this appeal stands dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 68. ......p;………… Respondents Judgment March 23, 1982. Case Referred to- Mohandra Lal Jaini vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1963 (SC) 1019. Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, Senior Advocate instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Sultan Ahmed, AdÂvocate and others Vs. Haji Sultan Ahmed and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division dated 5 June 1981, order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 30th November 1979 and the order dated 16 October 1978 of the learned Magistrate are set aside. Ed. ......hellip;…………... Appellants Vs. Haji Sultan Ahmed and others..................................Respondents Judgment July 27, 1982. Lawers Involved: M. Fazlul Karim, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate- on-Record..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Govt. of BanglaÂdesh Vs. Md. Arshad Ali, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....e sustained. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Vs. Md. Arshad Ali………………………………......... Respondent Judgment February 25, 1982. Lawyers Involved: A Wadud Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, B. Hossain, Assistant Attorney G..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 171
M/s. Everett OriÂent Lines Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Ctg Zone, Ctg, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....esult, therefore, both the appeals are allowed. The judgement of the High Court Division is set aside and the orders of the Tribunal are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Agencies of Bangladesh Ltd..... Appellant. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Chittagong Zone, Chittagong……Respondents Judgment March, 11, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Advocate. Mohammad Hossain, Advocate instructed by S. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Messrs. Haji Noor Ali Sowdagar & Sons Ltd. Vs. Comm. of Sales, Tax, Ctg Zone, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....hy;tention of the assessee cannot be accepted. In my opinion the question has been correctly decided by the High Court Division. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......lip;……………………………………………Respondent Judgment April 13, 1982. Lawyers Involved: M, Hassan, Advocate instructed by S.M, Huq, Advocate-on-Record, — Fo..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Mofizur Rahman Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ...... Corp. City of Abmadabad Vs. New S.S. & Wag Ld. AIR 1970 (SC) 1292; Farzand Ali V West Pakistan (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 208; Sai Md. vs. W st Pakistan PLR (1958)(SC) 181; Millner V. Raita Commonwealth Law Report Vol 66(1942-43): Basanto Co. Ghosh vs. EmÂperor AIR 1944 (P.C.) 36. Lawyers Involved..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
Abdul Halim Mollah @ Monohar Mollah & anr Vs. Member, App Tribunal Dacca & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......Cases Referred To- Dr. Hori Ram Singh V. Emperor, AIR 1939 P.C. 43; S. Kuppuswami Rao V. King AIR 1949; F.C.I. Golzar Hasan Shah V. Gholam Murtaza (1970) 22 DLR S.C. 258. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. Basel Majumder, Advocat..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Misfor Ali and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ges, the appeal must succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;……………………………………………Respondents Judgment March 18, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Matiur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advoca..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 100