Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6081-6100 of 6983 results.
Abani Mohan Saha Vs. Asst. Custodian (S. D. O) Vested Property, Chandpur & ors, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....bhara of the suit property in 1970". Then significantly adds "although it is apparently to that effect". 7. The approach of the trial court appears to be confusing and contrary to the well-settled principles of law. If the question is whether the deed of gift is genuine or not the simple answer......H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ......vs. Hodges (1838); 28 DLR (1976) 437; AIR 1928 (Cab 705; Mohd. Cherag vs. Dullay Khan PLD 1954 (Dhaka) 134; Ihtesham Ali vs. Jamna Prasad and others 48 I.A 365= AIR 1928 (P.C) 56; 32 DLR (AD) 29. Lawyers Involved: B. N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by Shamsul Hoque Siddique, Advocate-on-Re..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Sudhir Chandra Sil & another Vs. Harimohan Das & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......an, 30 DLR (SC) 236. Erfan Ali vs. Joynal Abedin, 35 DLR (AD) 216. Sk. Abdul Latif and another vs. Abdul Malek Kazi, 38 DLR (AD) 22. Nafar Chandra Pal vs. Sukur Sk., AIR 1918 (PC) 92. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. S. S, Ha..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Kalitara Biswas Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......;……………….Appellant. Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others…………Respondents Judgment June 10, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Md..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Sonali Bank, Local Office, Dhaka Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... is not inconsistent with Schedule I of 1981. As such it must be acted upon unless it is found that it has been repealed by necessary implication. Mr. Asrarul Hossain has not specifically invoked the principle of repeal by implication, but when he contends that section 35A has been rendered inoper......on 35A does not come into conflict with the limitation provided in the schedule as to the maximum ad valorem fees which may be determined under the schedule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ingangouda Patil (AIR (31) 1944 Bombay 259); Messrs. Kohinoor Mercantile Corporation vs. Hazera Khatun and another (14 DLR 47); 14 DLR 47= PLD 1963 Dhaka 238; AIR 1955 All, 353; (1941) 2 K.B. 89. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Kobad Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... be understood to have laid down any law that Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908 governs an application under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code. It merely laid emphasis on the principle that the High Court's power to revise an order suo motu is not restricted by any time lim......ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ......;…Respondents Judgment March 9, 1987 Case Referred to- Muhammad Swaleh V. Messrs United Grain & Fodder Agencies PLD 1964 (SC) 97—16 DLR (SC) 155. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Appellant. Ex-parte&m..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Amin Scales Limited and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....e contention as to bonafide dispute. The learned Counsel has also pointed out that the appellants filed the Title Suit after receiving the notice of the winding-up application. 7. The principle of law as to admission of a winding-up application is that mere filing of an application ......her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......shy;pondent (In both the appeals) Judgment March 8, 1987 Cases Referred To- Ellal Textile Mills Ltd., 38 DLR (AD) 26; Re Sulekha Works Ltd, AIR 1965, Cal. 98. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed and Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocates (Mahmu..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Priyatosh Talukdar Vs. Asst. Custodian, Vested & Non-Resident Propty, Ctg & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment. No order as to cost. Ed. ...... order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment. No order as to cost. Ed. ......September 24, 1986 Cases Referred to- Rahima Aktar Vs. Asim Kumar Bose 1985 BLD (AD) 155; Watson v. Winch, 1 K. B. (1916) 688; Surtees v. Ellison (1829) 9 B & C. 750, 752. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, Nurul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate with him instr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
The State Vs. Fazal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....w In the instant case contention of the appellant is that the acquittal has resulted from perverse finding of fact in utter disregard to the evidence on record. I am also quite aware of the general principle enunciated by the Privy Council in the case reported in AIR 1917 PC 25, as referred......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......……....Respondents Judgment March 12, 1987. Cases Referred to- AIR 1917 PC 25; Siraj Din v. Kala, 16 DLR, SC 95; A.I.R 1917 P.C. 25; 16 D.L.R (SC) 94. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdul Malek, Seni..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......nd others……………….......Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. Cases Referred to- Nava Kumar vs. Radhashyam. AIR 1931 (PC) 229; United Provinces Vs. Atiqa Begum, AIR 1984 PC 16. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Lalu Miah and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....tely emphasising certain points, particularly the question of law relating to acceptance of inculpatory part of a confessional statement by rejecting its exculpatory part, keeping in view the general principle that a confession should be either rejected or accepted as a whole. 40. Facts of the ca......sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ......an Upadhyay AIR 1960 S.C. 1125; Kauda Paduyachi vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1972 S.C. 66(69); Bhuboni Sahu vs. The King AIR 1949 P.C. 257 (259); H.S. Rathod vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1979 S.C. 1232. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellant. Habib Ahmed, Advocate, i..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Ayub Vs. Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....the writ petition, the addition of the aforesaid respondents was neither necessary nor proper. The discretion it is submitted has been wrongly exercised, not in keeping with the well-settled principles as to addition of parties." 4. Mr.T.H. Khan, Counsel for the appe...... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ......aria vs. Additional Member Board of Revenue, AIR 1963 SC 786; Zahirul Huq Vs. Ejamul Huq (1982) 34 DLR AD 25; Abdul Khaleque Bains vs. Government of Bangladesh, Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1986. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Mahbub Miah, Advocate with him, instruc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Shafquat Haider & others Vs. M. Al-Amin and another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....tion is that nobody is entitled to represent his goods of somebody else. Foundation of a passing-off action is always deception or possibility of deception, Beaumont, C. J. has elucidated the principle of pasting-off in his decision in the case of K.M. Multani vs. Paramount Talkies AIR 1942......company which was "Exxon Corporation". The defendant company after some time adopted the same word 'Exxon' as part of its corporate name which thus came to be Exxon Insurance Consultants International Ltd. The plaintiff company brought an action against the defendant claiming injunctio......ton, 42 Ch. Division, 128; Office Clearing Services Ltd. v. Westminster Window and General Cleaners Ltd. RPC Vol. 62-63 p. 39; K.M. Multani v. Paramount Talkies, AJR 1942 Bom. 119. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advoc..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 239
M/S. Zaman and Co. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing on the date or hearing of the review application the court ought to have restored the Miscellaneous case after applying the principles section 9 of the Limitation Act. In support of this contention reliance is placed o......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......lip;……...Respondents Judgment August 24, 1986. Cases Referred to- Md. Chand Miah Sowdagar Vs SMH Rahman 1985 BLD 337; Kalu Vs. Sowaria 27 1C 703. Lawyers Involved: Miah A. Gafur, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Khalilu..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....e is a breach of any statute or rule the same can be remedied by Invoking writ jurisdiction. Even if any discretion is left la the statute such discretion must be exercised In accordance with settled principles and not arbitrarily. 30. Mr. Ishtiaq Ahmed traced the historical background of the nat......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......itation AIR 1961 Assam 101; Talekhal Fishermen Co-operative Society vs. Bangladesh 1981 BLD (AD) 103; EFO Vs. Ram Sanchi AIR 1973 (S.C) 205; Ramana V.I.A. Authority of India A.I.R 1979 SC. 1628. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instruc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... Kandaswami v. Vegheesam Pilial AIR 1941 (Mad) 822; Prabirendra Nath Nandy v Narendro Nath Nandy, AIR 1958 Cat. 179; Delhi Gate Service Private Ltd. v. M/s. Caltex (India) Ltd. AIR 1962 Pan. 370. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate, Supr..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Sree Monoranjan Banik & anr Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... reliance is placed on Mohammad Abdur Rouf vs. Ahamuda Khatun 33 DLR (AD) 323. 6. We do not find any substance in these contentions. In this facts and circumstances of the case the principle laid down in Md. Jebed Ali and others V. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others 33 DLR (AD) 30......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ...... others V. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others 33 DLR (AD) 309; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan V. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury 35 DLR (AD) 338; Muhammad H. Rouf Vs. Ahamuda Khatun 33 DLR (AD) 323. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate instructed by Kazi Abdul Hoque, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another Vs. Lasman Dasi & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......hellip;…………………………………………..Respondents Judgment September 2, 1986. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate) instructed by Kazi ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ......R 910; Hari Kailash vs. CIT 22 ITR 195, AIR 1953 ALL 170; Kettlewell Bullen Vs. C.I.T. AIR 1965 S.C. 65; C.I.T. Vs. Chari & Chari Ltd. AIR 1966 S.C. 34; Karam Chand Thapra 80 I.T.R. 167. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advo..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;Respondent Judgment July 14, 1986. Cases Referred To- Ocean Industries Ltd. Vs. Industrial Development Bank. (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 354; PLD 1966 SC 1938. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) in..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......ts Vs. State & another…………………………………..Respondents Judgment May 15, 1986. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellants. Syed Mudassir Huss..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
16571656165516541653165216501649164816471646164516441643164216411640163916381637