Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6141-6160 of 6983 results.
Rahela Khatun and another Vs. Fayezuddin Shah, 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
....aside. The appellants are given the liberty to adduce additional eviÂdence before the Appellate Court below. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 6. ......aside. The appellants are given the liberty to adduce additional eviÂdence before the Appellate Court below. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 6. ......for making decision in the suit shall have to be taken into evidence on appeal as additional evidence. The Appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Venkataramiah vs. Seethamma, AIR 1963 SC 1526. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Recordâ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Mst. Esarunnessa Bibi Vs. Md. Amir Hossain, 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
..... Judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Appellate Court below are restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 1. ....... Judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Appellate Court below are restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 1. ......ises Rent Control Ordinance, 1963 (XX of 1963), sections 14 (1) (b) and 18 (2). Municipal tax dues had been paid by the tenant and the previous owner had transferred the property to the plaintiff. Law authorizes adjustment of such payment, therefore, the transferee plaintiff cannot claim the rent..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Birendra Chandra Saha Vs. Sashi Mohan Saha and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....e judgment of the High Court is set aside. The case is sent back on remand for disposal of the appeal in the light of what have been stated above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......e judgment of the High Court is set aside. The case is sent back on remand for disposal of the appeal in the light of what have been stated above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Cases Referred to: Bharat Singh vs. Bhagirathi AIR 1966 (SC) 405; Firm Malik Das Raj vs. Firm Peary Lal, AIR 1946 (Lah) 65; Balgangadhar Tilok vs. Srinivash pandit, 42 IA, 135. Lawyers involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by A, Backkar, Advocate-on-Record.&m..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Commissioner of InÂcome tax and another Vs. Zeenat Textile Mills Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....s rightly declared by the High Court of East Pakistan to have been made without lawful authority and being of no legal effect. The appeals are dismissed, but with out any order as to costs. Ed. ......s rightly declared by the High Court of East Pakistan to have been made without lawful authority and being of no legal effect. The appeals are dismissed, but with out any order as to costs. Ed. ......din Choudhury J Commissioner of InÂcome tax and another... Appellants (In all the Appeals). Vs. Zeenat Textile Mills Ltd. ...Respondents (In all the appeals) Judgment Feb 26, 1974. Lawyers involved: A. Wadud Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record. â..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Sona Mia Vs. Collector of Customs, Chittagong and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....ere be any doubt, of if there be two alternative interpretations possible, a taxing statute must be interpreted in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue Authority". This principle is not disputed, but it has no manner of application in the facts of the present case. ......y notice under article 6A (2) of President's Order No. 5 of 1972 has not been served on the Government. So the appeals abated. In the circumstances these appeals abate. Ed. ......a Surana Vs. Nagraj Surana, 56 C.W.N. 812; The Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax, West Bengal Vs. Tarek Nath Mukherjee, 53 CW.N. 725; Province of Bombay Vs. Khushaldas S. Advani, 86 Calcutta Law Journal, 330=A.I.R. 1950 S.C. 222; Rajvi Amar Singh Vs. State of Rajsthan, A.I.R. 1958; State o..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Jabed Ali Sarker Vs. Dr. Sultan Ahmed and another, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....question of fact and since this has been decided by the Courts below, we find no substance in the contention of the learned Counsel. This appeal is accordingly dismissed with cost. ......question of fact and since this has been decided by the Courts below, we find no substance in the contention of the learned Counsel. This appeal is accordingly dismissed with cost. ......another…………………..Respondent Judgment March 17 & 18, 1975. Lawyers involved: Syed lshtiaq Ahmed. Additional Attorney General, M. Nurullah, Advocate, in..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Governor, Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Shamsul Huda Khan and another, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....rightly declared by the High Court Division to be without jurisdiction and of no legal effect. The appeals are dismissed, but without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......rightly declared by the High Court Division to be without jurisdiction and of no legal effect. The appeals are dismissed, but without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......IR 1962 S.C. page 1704; Government of West Pakistan Vs. Fida MuhamÂmad Khan, 12 D.L.R. (S.C.) page 50; High Court, Calcutta and another Vs. Amal Kumar Roy and others, A.I.R. 1962 S.C. page 1704. Lawyers involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate with Dr. Ahmed Hossain, Advocate, instructed by Amin..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Badal Rani Misra alias Badal Rani Goswami and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....d. The case of Gordon, Dadds & co. supports the contention of the learned Attorney-General. There is accordingly no merit in this appeal which is dismissed but without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d. The case of Gordon, Dadds & co. supports the contention of the learned Attorney-General. There is accordingly no merit in this appeal which is dismissed but without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Badal Rani Misra alias Badal Rani Goswami and others………..Appellants. Vs. Bangladesh and others …………….Respondents Judgment May 2, 1975. Lawyers involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, with S. C. Das, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Osman Gani Mondal Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others, 1974, 3 CLC (AD)
....d edition, Volume 3, p. 96, section 5814 which notes that "there is but one way to obey the command 'thou shall not,' and that is to refrain altogether from doing the forbidden act." This principle has been stated in Crawford's "Statutory ConstrucÂtion", page 516, section 261 in the fol......d by the learned Additional Attorney-General thus sucÂceeds. This petition which was lodged on the 14th day of May, 1973 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 61. ......houdhury J Osman Gani Mondal……………….....Petitioner Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others…......Respondents Judgment April 26, 1974. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Mohammad A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record. â€..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Saokat Ali and others Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ......nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ......ish Chandra Vs. Hare Krishna Coldar, 15 DLR 634; Umar Din Vs. Fazal Din, PLR 5 Lah. 196; Visheswar Vs. Durgappa, AIR 1940 Bom. 339; Vithoba Kadhar Vs. Madhar jemedar, (1918) ILR 42 Bom. 344. Lawyers involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Not repre..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Enemy Property ManageÂment Board and ors. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....view of what have been stated above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the learned Judges of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......view of what have been stated above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the learned Judges of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Judgment March 27, 1975. Cases Referred to- M. M. Mansur Ali Vs. Aradendu Shekhar Chatterjee. (1959) 21 DLR (SC) 20; Daulatpur Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Province of E. Pak. (1968) 20 DLR 1209. Lawyers involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attorney-General, with B. B, Roy Chowdhury, Assi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ahmed Nazir, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... India again came up for consideration, and it was held as follows:— "If the Court has jurisdiction to give the main relief to the detenu at the end of the proceedings, on principle and in theory, it is not easy to understand why the Court cannot give interim relief to ......e the Proclamation of Emergency issued on the 28th December, 1974 and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975 dated the 25th January, 1975 effected changes in the said Constitution. Ed. ......F.B.); Special No. 1 of 1964, A.I.R. 1965 (S.C.) at page 745; In re: Prahlad Krishna Kurne, 52 Cr.L.J. 1951 page 305; C.P. Matthen Vs. District Magistrate, Trivandram, AIR. 1939 (P.C.) 213. Lawyers involved: Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmad, Attorney-General, with A.T.M. Afzal, Deputy Atto..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Adam Ali Sardar and others Vs. The State and another, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... A. B. Mahmud Husain, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 37. ...... A. B. Mahmud Husain, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 37. ......;.... Appellants. Vs. The State and another…………………………. Respondents Judgment August 3, 1973. Lawyers involved: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Jamdhar Khan Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......ip;…….....Appellant. Vs. The State………………………....Respondent Judgment February 28, 1973. Lawyers involved: Abdul Hamid, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.&mdash..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Lutfun Nahar Begum Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....e learned Magistrate clearly committed a gross error in recording a positive finding on a mixed question of fact and law, which was outside his jurisdiction. There is no dispute with regard to the principles laid down in the aforesaid cases. Both the cases were founded upon "evidences"......al is allowed and the order of commitment of the appellant is set aside. The appellant is discharged from the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 29. ......al Mazumder Vs. State AIR 1955 Cal. 599; Shamsuddin Sarker Vs. State, 11 DLR (SC) 365; Hariballav Saha Vs. Gopiballav Saha, 11 DLR (SC) 394; Mozhanil Huq Vs. Ishaque Sardar, 14 DLR (SC) 251. Lawyers involved: Khan Bahadur Naziruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Mr. Behtar Ali, Adv..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Abdul Matin Munshi Vs. Idris Pandiat and ors., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....;tion 307/34. The result, therefore, is that both the appeals are dismissed subject to the modification of the Penal Code to that under section 302/34 and 307/34 of the Penal Code. Ed. ......;tion 307/34. The result, therefore, is that both the appeals are dismissed subject to the modification of the Penal Code to that under section 302/34 and 307/34 of the Penal Code. Ed. ...... Nos. 2 & 3 of 1973. (From the judgment and order dated 23rd April, 1970 passed by Dacca High Court in Death Reference Case No. 1 of 1970 and Criminal Appeal No.72 of 1970). Lawyers involved: Promode Chandra Bose, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-Re..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali and others, 1974, 33 CLC (AD)
....rcise of power under section 426 of the Code, on the ground, inter alia, that the said orders are violative of the provisions of Article 10 of P.O. 50 and Article 14 of P. O. 8 and run counter to the principles enunciated by the High Court of Bangladesh in the case of Haji Md. Akil and by this Divis......y of the circumstances indicated in the preceding paraÂgraph can be shown to have rendered the proÂceeding relating to him coram non judice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) 16. ......ers Vs. Emperor, AIR 1945 (PC) 94; Superintendent and Remembrance of Legal Affairs, Government of Bangladesh Vs. Jobed Ali and others, 26 DLR page 1; Haji Md. Akil Vs. The State, 25 DLR page 126. Lawyers involved: Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney General (Mahniudul Islam, Assistant Attorney..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Mazharul Huq Vs. Returning Officer & Circle Officer, (Dev.) Double Moorings, Ctg, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....to have been called for to satisfy the legislative intent of holding a poll for election to the office of Chairman. In support of his contention Mr. Pal submitted that in conformity with the general principle incorporated in the repreÂsentation of the People's Order (President's Order No. 155 of 1......Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed withÂout any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ......uq Chowdhury………...Appellant. Vs. The Returning Officer and Circle Officer, (Dev.) Double Moorings, Chittagong, and others ………….……Respondents Judgment April 17, 1974. Lawyers involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by B.C. Panday—For the Respondent No. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Abdur Rashid Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... is to prove the guilt of the accused and failure on the part of the defence to substantiate any plea taken by it does not necessarily prove the guilt of the accused. According to the settled principle of law the burden to prove the guilt of the accused is primarily and principally upon the......de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ...... Cases Referred to- Khadim Vs. The Crown, P.L.D. 1954 Lahore 69; Abdul Gani Vs. The State, 19, DLR. Dacca 388; The State Vs. Puma Chandra Mondal 22 DLR. Dac. 280. Lawyers involved: Abdur Rashed, Advocate— For the Appellant. Khan, Advocate-o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Shamsuddin Ahmed @ Tofa Mia & others Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... in preference to all other persons by means of pre-emption. The law of 'shufa' has been developed out of some 'hadises' (tradition) of the Prophet of Islam. Its foundation seems to be based on the principle that all members of the society should attempt to preserve joint nature of their ancestr...... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ....... Yakub ILR 16 All. 344; Sitaram Bhaurao vs. Jiaul Hasan Khan AIR 1923 P.C. 41; Jadu Lal Sahu vs. Janaki Koer (1900) 35 Cal 575. Naresh Chandra Dutta vs. Girish Chandra Das ILR 62 Cal. 972. Lawyers Involved: S. K. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
15931592159115901589158815871586158515841583158215811580157915781577157615751574