Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6221-6240 of 7080 results.
M/S. Noor Crokaries and another Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Mr. Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners Not represented- Respondents Judgment 27 October 2002. Lawyers Involved: Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 825 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 07-08-2000 passed by the High Cou..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Yousuf Ali Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......awab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1 A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 2. Not represented- Respondent Nos.3-5 Civil Appeal No.103 of 1999 (From the judgment and order dated 15.04.1999 passed by the High Cour..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Abdul Majid Molla Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ......structed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner A.S.M.Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.30 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 21.10.2001 passed by the High Court..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other.................................Appellants. Vs. Abdur Rahman a......vised on appeal by the Arbitration Appellate Tribunal or by the Superior Court on consideration of the material evidence. So, no error was committed by the High Court Division in not sending back the Appeal to the Arbitration Appellate Tribunal for disposal afresh. The Appeal is dismissed………â€..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Attorney General, instructed by Md. Ahsan Ullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners Not represented- For Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1605 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 29-04-2001 passed by the H..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......nullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Khaled Ahmed, Advocate-on Record- For the Respondent Civil Appeal No.283 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 301 November 2000 passed by the Adm..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......) AD 305. Lawyers Involved: Mansur Habib, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Ex parte- For the Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 2000 (From the judgment and order dated 8th March 2000 passed by the High..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Advocate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1 Not represented-For Respondent Nos. 2-6 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.993 Of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 12.05.2004 passed by the High Court..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
.... government in the treasury by chalan.
2. The case of the writ petitioner is that on 03.08.2003 the Customs Preventive Team filed a Revenue Evading Case N0.16/ MUSAK/2003 dated 03.08.2003 with the Commissioner of Customs, Excise and VAT stating, inter alia, that the officers of Preventive Team co......Senior Advocate (Md. Momtazuddin Fakir, Advocate with him) instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner.
Not represented- the Respondents.
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 835 of 2004.
(From the judgment and order dated 08.05.2004 passed by the High Court Di..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......aheemul Huq, Advocate with him) instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record- For respondent No. 4. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 1-3. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 705 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 16.05.2005 passed by the High Cour..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Mr. Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Mr. A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 337 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 20.03.2006 passed by the High Cou..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......or Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Appellant N. I. Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-record- For Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 3-12. Civil Appeal No. 114 of 1997. (From the Judgment and Order dated August 27, 1996 passed by the High Co..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nvolved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Not represented- For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal N0. 671 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 22nd October, 2000 passed by the ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, insÂtructed by M.S. Khan, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No.83 of 1978. With Civil petition for special leave to appeal No. 148 of 1978. (Fr..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....e no order as to costs. Ed. ......awyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Not represented-The Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 79 of 1977. (From the judgment and order dat..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Amar Chandra Saha Vs. Ajit Kumar Das, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ......i, Advocate, Instructed by Abdur Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant M. H. Khandker, instructed by B, C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 3-D of 1971. (From the Judgment and Order dated 29th November, 1968 of the ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... been so established on any land by a person or person.s other than the owner of the land without the consent of such owner, the land shall not be forfeited, but it shall be lawful for the Deputy Commissioner, (i) to remove the hat or bazar from the land, by using such force as may be necessar...... Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Md. Moksudur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain. Advocate on-Record.—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 156 of 1979. Judgment: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
....e Division
(Civil)
Present:
FKMA Munim J
Ruhul Islam J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Jamal Soap Factory, Narayanganj……………………………....................Appellant.
Vs.
Commissioner of InÂcome-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca..................Respondent
Judgment.
July 10,....... Ali, Advocate, insÂtructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant.
Hubibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Sajjadul Haq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 120 of 1978
(From the judgment and order dated April 3, 1975 passed by the High Court..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. ...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
13101307130613041301129912971296129512941293129212901289128812871286128412831279