Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6241-6260 of 7814 results.
Md. Syed Badruddoza Vs. Tawfiq Hasan and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment dated April 27, 2004 passed in Civil Revision No.1202 of 1999 rejecting the application filed under Order 41, Rule 21 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for re-hearing of the Rule upon settin......his legal heirs: Mrs. Arjuman Banu and Others………… Petitioners Vs. Tawfiq Hasan and another .........Respondens Judgment May 23, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioners. Not represe..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Khariat Hossain and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 2 days is condoned. 2. This petition for leave to appeal arises out of the judgment dated 22.6.2003 of the High Court Division passed in Civil Revision No. 1229 of 1992 making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated 12.04.92 passed by the learned Subordinate Judg......sioner and others, Rangpur……………Petitioners Vs. Khariat Hossain and others.....................Respondents Judgment July 23, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Omar Faruq, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Waez Uddin and others Vs. Anwara Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.6.2004 passed in Civil Revision No. 7212 of 1991 by a Single Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule which was obtained against the judgment and decree dated 24.7.1991 passed by the learned Addit...... Tafazzul Islam J Waez Uddin and others…......... Petitioners Vs. Anwara Begum and others……….Respondents Judgment May 25, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Rabi Shankar Chakraborty, Advocate instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, A..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Md. Shamsul Haque and another Vs. Md. Abdul Jalil Khan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the instance of defendant Nos. 1 and 2, is directed against the judgment and order dated 26-06-2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3458 of 1997 making the Rule absolute. 2. Facts, leading to this petition, are that the plaintiff-respondent institu......llip;………Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdul Jalil Khan and others……………….Respondents Judgment August 28, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not repre..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Abdus Sukkur and others Vs. Mohammad Younus and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated May 11, 2005 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 749 of 1996 making absolute the Rule upon setting aside the judgment and decree dated January 22, 1996 of the 3rd Court of Subordin......kkur and others………………… Petitioners Vs. Mohammad Younus and others ........Respondents Judgment December 14, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Kamal-ul-Alam, Advocate instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Re..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Sk. Abul Hossain and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 649. ......Petitioner Vs. Sk. Abul Hossain and others..........Respondents Judgment May 2, 2006. Case Referred to- Ghyasuddin Ahmed vs. Faruque 38 DLR (AD) 296. Lawyers Involved: Ajmalul Hossain QC, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Ad..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (WASA) and another Vs. Md. Abdus Sobhan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... - This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment of August 31, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2072 of 2000 making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated February 28, 2000 of the 5th Court of Subordina......nd another……….Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdus Sobhan ...............................................................Respondent Judgment May 7, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir,..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Khondker Ansar Ahmed & others Vs. A.T.M. Monsur Ali Mallik & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ected against the judgment and order dated 13.08.1995 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1222 of 1981 (heard with Second Appeal No.116 of 1979) discharging the Rule issued in the Civil Revision No.1222 of 1981 and allowing the Second Appeal No.116 of 1979 and ...... & others…………………Appellants (In both the cases) Vs. A.T.M. Monsur Ali Mallik & others…………………Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment April 26, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Kh. Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by S.R. Khoshnabish, Advocat..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Razia Khatun Vs. Idris Ali and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment dated March 13, 2004 of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.4255 of 2001 discharging the Rule. The Rule was issued upon an application filed under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Proc......l Amin J Md. Tafazaul Islam J Razia Khatun.......................Petitioner Vs. Idris Ali and another.........Respondents Judgment October 23, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate instructed by A.SM. Khalequzzaman, Advoca..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Wonder Land Toys Ltd. Vs. Ministry of Finance, Govt. of Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... take steps for early disposal of the rule pending before the High Court Division. The petition is, accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 MLR (AD) 2007, 19. ......ner Vs. Ministry of Finance, Govt. of Bangladesh represented by its Secretary, Bangladesh Secretariat and others.........Respondents Judgment November 18, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Nurul Islam, Advocate..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Hazi Habibur Rahman @ Hazi Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. Ayub Ali Sawdagar, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ircumstances and as such the High Court Division committed wrong in allowing the application for substitution in the absence of sufficient explanation for condonation of delay. 5. Order XXII Rule 9(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure provides for substitution of the heirs where the right to ......n application for condonation of delay may be waived as a mere formality for securing the ends of justice………………………..(5 & 6) Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate, instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advo..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Md. Anwar Hossain Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....erior officers to the higher authority to safeguard himself. The departmental proceeding was started against him for misconduct and corruption under the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1985 and all necessary formalities were complied with in awarding punishment upon him. ...................................Respondents Judgment April 3, 2004. Case Referred To- S. N. Chowdhury Vs Government of Bangladesh and others, Civil Appeal No.50 of 1998. Lawyers Involved: Al-Haj Gius Uddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Peninsular Shipping Service Ltd. Vs. M/s. Faruque Paint & Varnish Manufac. Co Ltd. 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....0% deposit of the decretal money is to be made before filing the appeal or the deposit may be made "any day before the appeal is taken up for action’’ (for action) i.e. for hearing under Order 41 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 7. He then submits that on 23.03.2005 the High Court Div......Faruque Paint and Varnish Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and others ........Respondents Judgment June 18, 2006. Case Referred to- Abdus Sattar and others Vs IFIC Bank Ltd. 52 DLR (HCD) 4. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate (Omar Sadat, Advocate with him) instructed..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 132
Md. Aminur Rahman & others Vs. Fatema Begum & the State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... correct assessment of the materials on record took a correct decision in the matter. 10. The petition is dismissed. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (AD) 2008, 249. ......hul Amin J Md. Aminur Rahman & others ..............Petitioners Vs. Fatema Begum & the State .................Respondents Judgment August 12, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Baset Majumder, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Shadharan Bima Corporation Vs. The First Court of Settlement and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - Both the civil petitions for leave to appeal arise out of the common judgment and order dated 13-3-2004 passed by the High Court Division discharging both the Rules obtained in Writ Petition Nos.2996 and 2997 of 2001 calling in question the common judgment ......2006. Cases Referred To- 48 DLR (AD) 1, Rasheda Begum Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another, 2 BLC (AD) 158; Rahima Begum and others Vs. Court of Settlement, 2 BLC (AD) 108. Lawyers Involved: Tufailur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by S.R. Khoshnabi, Advocate-..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Ayen Ali Howlader Vs. Nazir Ahmed and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....bsp;Md. Abdul Matin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 06.08.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.4404 of 2003 making the Rule absolute. 2. The facts, in short, are that the respondent No.1 as petitioner filed Writ...... J Ayen Ali Howlader...................Petitioner Vs. Nazir Ahmed and others…………….Respondents Judgment November 28, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Md. Rabiul Awal @ Sohel Miah Vs. Md. Abdur Rab @ Abdur Rab, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ul Awal in the suit property however cannot be sustained in law which no doubt occasioned failure of justice and accordingly Civil Revision No.1931 of 2000 is made absolute in part but discharged the Rule in Civil Revision No.2197 of 2000 but direction to hand over possession is maintained unless ej......oynul Abedin J Md. Rabiul Awal @ Sohel Miah..............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Abdur Rab @ Abdur Rab............................Respondent Judgment April 29, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 180
Abul Kalam Azad and others Vs. Mohammad Iqbal Hossain & Ors, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....lt of the appellants for contempt of Court. 7. Accordingly/ this appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (AD) 2008, 205. ...... Abul Kalam Azad and others .............................Appellants Vs. Mohammad Iqbal Hossain & Ors.......................Respondents Judgment April 5, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, (Golam Mahiuddin, Advocate with him) in..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
A.F.M. Wahid Shahjahan Vs. Subordinate Judge , 3rd Court Dhaka & or, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....is petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated January 21, 2004 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.4564 of 1999 discharging the Rule obtained questioning legality of Order No.26 dated June 14,1999 passed by the learned Subordin.......Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), 3rd Court Dhaka and other……………Respondents Judgment August 2, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Sufia Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Md. Dewan Ali Vs. Md. Jasim Uddin and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....l Abedin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 30.6.2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in, Civil Revision No.1727 of 1995 discharging the Rule. 2. Relevant facts are that Mizanur Rahman and Yakub All owned and possessed .42 acre...... Akhlasur Rahman and others Vs. Safarullah and others, 14 BLD(AD) 20; Shi Audh Behari Singh Vs. Gajadhar Jaipura and others, (1955) I SCR 70; Fazaruddin Vs. Maijuddin, 44 DLR(AD) 62. Lawyers Involved: Afsar Uddin Ahmed Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
24322431243024292428242724262425242424232422242124202419241724162415241424132412