Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6621-6640 of 8244 results.
Rowshan Ara Begum Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, BD, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rowshan Ara Begum…………………………..Petitioner Vs Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, Government of Bangladesh and others......Respondents Judgment: December 12, 2006. Case Referred To- M......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......rban Development, Government of Bangladesh and others......Respondents Judgment: December 12, 2006. Case Referred To- Ministry of Works and others vs Helaluddin Ahmed, 4 MLR (AD) 140. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Muinuddin Zulfiquer (Md) Vs. Government of the Republic of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cation by the Administrative Tribunal, relief sought as against the said matter was not available to the writ-petitioner in writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. This Division while dismissing the petition for leave to appeal observed "In the b......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Muinuddin Zulfiquer (Md) .................................Petitioner Vs Government of the Republic of Bangladesh.......Respondents Judgment November 29, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-R..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Ali Hussain Faraji & others Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......en J Ali Hussain Faraji & others......................Petitioner Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another.......Respondent Judgment August 15, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta, Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Meghna PET Industries Ltd and others Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....roup of Industries. The writ-petitioners and two others namely Mr. MF Kamal and Mr. Md. Zakaria were the directors of Meghna PET Industries Ltd. Meghna PET Industries Ltd. obtained loan from Saudi Bangladesh Industrial and Agricultural Investment Company Ltd (SABINCO), a public limited company t......faulter borrowers. Accordingly, the application for dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal Nos. 477-478 of 2005 is allowed. Both the civil petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......faulter borrowers. Accordingly, the application for dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal Nos. 477-478 of 2005 is allowed. Both the civil petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......nother........Petitioners (In Civil Petition No. 478 of 2005) Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others........Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment May 17, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Zahirul Islam, Advocat..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Collector of Customs, Chittagong & anr Vs. M.M Shafullah and ors., 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....he language of S. 167(9B) of the Act. For these reasons this appeal fails and it is dismissed, but having regard to the circumstance of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......he language of S. 167(9B) of the Act. For these reasons this appeal fails and it is dismissed, but having regard to the circumstance of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......he language of S. 167(9B) of the Act. For these reasons this appeal fails and it is dismissed, but having regard to the circumstance of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......dgment June 29, 1977. Cases Referred to: Bal Kissan Vs. Collector of Customs AIR 1959 Calcutta 533; Palrwala Brothers Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs AIR 1958 Calcutta 232. Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakr, Attorney-General with Sultan Hossain Khan, Deputy Attorney-Gene..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Ambia Khatun and anr Vs. Syed Altaf Hossain and another, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....enancy Act also enacted legislation for the control of the rent of the premises let out on monthly basis. The East Pakistan Premises Rent Control Ordinance 1963 which has been continued in force in Bangladesh with necessary charges is the present law for regulating the relationship of landlord an...... of the Rent Control Ordinance, does not come within the mischief of either of the said provisions. We do not find any merit in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ...... of the Rent Control Ordinance, does not come within the mischief of either of the said provisions. We do not find any merit in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ......n and anr.........Petitioner Vs. Syed Altaf Hossain and another…………..Respondent Judgment August 26, 1977 Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakr, Senior Advocate, with Serajuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instruc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Abu Taher Chowdhury & others Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....e Chowdhury @ Kala Mia and (5) Akhtarul Haque Chowdhury be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 253. ......e Chowdhury @ Kala Mia and (5) Akhtarul Haque Chowdhury be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 253. ......e Chowdhury @ Kala Mia and (5) Akhtarul Haque Chowdhury be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 253. ......e Chowdhury @ Kala Mia and (5) Akhtarul Haque Chowdhury be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 253. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Niamat Ali Sheikh and others Vs. Begum Enayetur Noor and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....me. We, therefore, find no ground for interference with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 250 ......me. We, therefore, find no ground for interference with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 250 ......me. We, therefore, find no ground for interference with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 250 ......resh prosecution on the selfsame facts after a proceeding is stopped and accused released under section 339C (4) of the Code. Order of the High Court Division is thus confirmed…………..(7 & 9) Lawyers Involved: KS Nabi, Senior Advocate instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Shaikh Abdul Quader Vs. Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....ent A.B. M. Hussain C.J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Shaikh Abdul Quader…………Petitioner Vs. Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation & ors ……..……&hellip...... petition to decide whether the said view of the learned Judges of the High Court was correct. We do not find anything to interfere with the order. The petition is dismissed.. Ed. ...... petition to decide whether the said view of the learned Judges of the High Court was correct. We do not find anything to interfere with the order. The petition is dismissed.. Ed. ...... Syed. Md. Sakk Vs. Bangladesh (1975)27 DLR 328; P. R. Nayek Vs Union of India, AIR 1972 (SC) 554; Mian Md. Hiyat Vs Province of West Pakistan, (1964) 16 DLR (SC) 251: PLD 1964 (SC) 321. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal, Advocate, with Md. Moksodur Rahman, Advocate instructed by S. M..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Syed Abdul Haque and other Vs. Surendra Nath Majumder & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....sion has not committed any error in making the Rule absolute and thereupon setting aside the judgment of the appellate Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......sion has not committed any error in making the Rule absolute and thereupon setting aside the judgment of the appellate Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......sion has not committed any error in making the Rule absolute and thereupon setting aside the judgment of the appellate Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......p; August 7, 2006. Cases Referred to- 35 DLR (AD) 216; 56 DLR (AD) 53; 25 DLR (SC) 90; 10 DLR (PC) 1; 43 DLR 18; 39 DLR (AD) 237; 48 DLR (AD) 154; 57 DLR (AD) 55. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Adv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shahabuddin and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....rdingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d Advocate-on-Record failed to point out any error in the judgment of the High Court Division of the kind calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d Advocate-on-Record failed to point out any error in the judgment of the High Court Division of the kind calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......azzul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh........................Petitioner Vs. Md. Shahabuddin and others.................Respondents Judgment June 18, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. AKM Shahidul Hu..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 156
AA Raziul Karim Chowdhury Vs. Nasim Bin Rahman & ors., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....iled the suit to get back the possession. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......iled the suit to get back the possession. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......iled the suit to get back the possession. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......6; Mir Abdul Ali vs. Md. Rafiqul Islam, 40 DLR (AD) 75; Progati Industries Ltd vs Shahida Khatun and others, 43 DLR 429; Quazi Din Mohammad vs. Alhaj Arzan Ali and another, 47 DLR (AD) 48. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advoc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Bazlur Rahman Sarker Vs. Kamala Kanta Barman, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....n the instant case. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs at all stages. Ed. ......n the instant case. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs at all stages. Ed. ......n the instant case. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs at all stages. Ed. ...... Amin J Bazlur Rahman Sarker......................Appellant Vs. Kamala Kanta Barman…………..Respondents Judgment November 11, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim. Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Dr. Abdur Rahman and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Dr. Abdur Rahman and others………….. Appellants Vs. Bangladesh……………..Respondents Judgment June 27, 1977......rightly exercised their revisional jurisdiction in setting aside the order of the learned Subordinate Judge. The result therefore is that the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......rightly exercised their revisional jurisdiction in setting aside the order of the learned Subordinate Judge. The result therefore is that the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ....... Abdur Rahman and others………….. Appellants Vs. Bangladesh……………..Respondents Judgment June 27, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate — For the Appellants. Sultan Hos..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Mosharraf Hossain Vs. Md. Amir Hossain, Munsif, Election Tribunal and anr, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....nance does not cast imperative duty on the Tribunal to adjourn a case on the grounds made out in the transfer petition. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to coast. Ed. ......nance does not cast imperative duty on the Tribunal to adjourn a case on the grounds made out in the transfer petition. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to coast. Ed. ......nance does not cast imperative duty on the Tribunal to adjourn a case on the grounds made out in the transfer petition. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to coast. Ed. ...... Mosharraf Hossain…..Appellant Vs. Md. Amir Hossain, Munsif, Election Tribunal and anr………... Respondents Judgment August 15, 1977 Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate with Mahmudul Islam, Advocate, instruc..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Baitul Mukarram Vs. Taxation Officer and another, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....g a different meaning which the legislature did not intend thereby. We find no substance in the contention of Mr. Sobhan. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......g a different meaning which the legislature did not intend thereby. We find no substance in the contention of Mr. Sobhan. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......g a different meaning which the legislature did not intend thereby. We find no substance in the contention of Mr. Sobhan. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......rustees of the Port, Bobbay, AIR 1930 Bombar 44; Commissioner of Taxation Vs. Trustees of St. Mark's Glebe, 1902 Appeal Cases 416; Norman Vs. Norman, 1950 (1) All England Law Reports 1082. Lawyers involved: Ahmad Sobhan, Senior Advocate instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Solicitor represented by State, Govt of of Bangladesh Vs. Anisuzzaman Chy & or, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Solicitor represented by the State, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh…… …Petitioner Vs Anisuzzaman Chowdhury and other&hell...... High Court Division do not suffer from any illegality for our interference. Accordingly, we find no cogent ground for granting leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... High Court Division do not suffer from any illegality for our interference. Accordingly, we find no cogent ground for granting leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......lip; …Petitioner Vs Anisuzzaman Chowdhury and other…………………..........Respondents Judgment August 17, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Faisal H. Khan, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Md. Ahsan Ullah Pa..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Amirul Islam and others Vs. The State and another , 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....oresaid. We are fully in agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and we find no merit in this application. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......oresaid. We are fully in agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and we find no merit in this application. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......oresaid. We are fully in agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and we find no merit in this application. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ip;………………......Petitioners (On bail) Vs The State and another ......................Respondent Judgment August 29, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Majid, Advocate, instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dock Workers Management Board Vs. Muhammad Ismail and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....yed for. Operation of the impugned judgment and Order dated 01.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ petition No.890 of 2003 be stayed till disposal of the appeal. Ed. ......Writ Petition No. 890 of 2003 making the rule absolute and directing the petitioner (writ respondent) to upgrade the post of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 (writ petitioners) with fixation of grade-V of National Pay scale. 3. The aforesaid writ petitioners filed writ petition No.890 of 2003 sta......yed for. Operation of the impugned judgment and Order dated 01.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ petition No.890 of 2003 be stayed till disposal of the appeal. Ed. ......ct-Chittagong and another……………….Petitioners Vs Muhammad Ismail and others........Respondents Judgement December 11, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Maqbul Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-R..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Abdur Rob Mollah Vs. Shahabuddin Ahmed and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... evidence. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... evidence. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... evidence. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......hury Vs. Ajit Kamal Dutta, 6 DLR 267; Dr. Jamshed Bakht Vs. Md. Kamaluddin, (1981) 1 BLD (HCD) 97; AIR 1918 PC 102, 52 CWN 659, 39 CWW 934, 6 DLR 267, 17 DLR (West Pakistan) 26, 22 DLR 664. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Ex-parte- Resp..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 266
23182317231223112310230923082307230523042303230223012300229922982295229422932291