Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6661-6668 of 6668 results.
Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....hy;ed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No.1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-4. Civil Appeal No. 184 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 24 August 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.......r. T.H. Khan, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the trial of a suit should not be ordinarily be held piecemeal and the trial Court no longer has discretion to avoid decisions on fact. It is now mandatory to and determine the issues of fact along with the issues of ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Anil Ranjan Deb Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-Record- For respondent No. 1 Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-5. Civil Petition For Leave To Appeal No. 1458 of 2001 (From the judgment and order dated 17th April, 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 576 of 1991) J...... service of notice under section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act and the alleged default of payment of rent by the petitioner are based on no materials on record and as such the findings and decisions as arrived at by the learned S. C. C. Judge are erroneous and can not be sustained in law...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....que-Ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 1st and 2nd November 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Contempt Petition No. 3 of 2003......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lved: Muhammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented-Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 229 of 2002. (From Judgment and order dated 2.8.2001 passed by the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 51 of 1998 with C......w that the High Court Division has rightly dismissed the aforesaid Misc. appeal and discharged the connected Civil Rule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is d..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General- For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 257 of 2003. Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.11.2001 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal dismissing the Miscellaneous Appeal......IRD for implementation of the judgment dated 24.6.1996 and 20.12.1998 of the Administrative Appellate Tribunal as aforesaid. 7. The IRD then sent the petition to the Ministry of Establishment for decision and forwarded summary of the appellant's case (prepared by the NBR) to the Ministry of Esta..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-7. Civil Appeal No. 52 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated June 8, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5011 of 1998). Ju......rged and fabricated. It may be mentioned that the Respondent No. 1 as petitioner in the Miscellaneous Case no. 297 of 1994 prayed for return of the shop no. 235(kha). On the aforesaid findings and decisions the Court of Additional District Judge allowed the Miscellaneous Case upon setting aside ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....1-8 & 11-13. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 9-10 & 14-23. Civil Appeal No. 66 of 2003 Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin, J. - This appeal by leave is against the judgment and order dated August 7, 2001 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Rule No. 800 (condonation......ed decree. Further a dealing assistant whose name and particulars are not there has been picked up as a scapegoat to absolve the responsibility of the petitioner to keep informed of the result of the decision in the appeal which was duly conducted by its law officer and such attempt do not inspire a..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....or Leave to Appeal No. 591 of 2002. Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- At the instance of the writ petitioners this petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 18.10.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 940 of 1995 discharging the ......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
330325324323307306303297