Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Sekander Ali Howlader and others Vs. State, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
.... their sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by each of them. The sentence of fine will remain. The accused-appellants may be released from their respective bail bonds. Ed. ...... their sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by each of them. The sentence of fine will remain. The accused-appellants may be released from their respective bail bonds. Ed. ...... their sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by each of them. The sentence of fine will remain. The accused-appellants may be released from their respective bail bonds. Ed. ......................Accused Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1997) Vs. The State........................................Respondent Judgment November 18, 1997. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (both the appeals)(Mohammad Ziauddin A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Rokanuddin Sheikh Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t the appellant, reducing the sentence to the period of imprisonment already undergone by the appellant. The appellant Rokanuddin Sheikh be discharged from the bail bond. Ed. ......t the appellant, reducing the sentence to the period of imprisonment already undergone by the appellant. The appellant Rokanuddin Sheikh be discharged from the bail bond. Ed. ......t the appellant, reducing the sentence to the period of imprisonment already undergone by the appellant. The appellant Rokanuddin Sheikh be discharged from the bail bond. Ed. ......lip;……………………………………………..Respondent Judgment August 1, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huda Manik, Advocate instructed by Md. A/tab Hossain, Advocate-on-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
S.M. Redwan Vs. Md. Rezaul Islam, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....counsel of the petitioner merit considÂeration. Leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The Petitioner is permitted to add additionÂal grounds. Ed. ......counsel of the petitioner merit considÂeration. Leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The Petitioner is permitted to add additionÂal grounds. Ed. ......counsel of the petitioner merit considÂeration. Leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The Petitioner is permitted to add additionÂal grounds. Ed. ...... Md.Tafazzul Islam J S.M. Redwan…………………………………….....Petitioner Vs Md. Rezaul Islam …............................Respondent Judgement November 24, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Rafiqul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructÂed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Md. Zakir Hossain Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Code, the High Court Division correctly decided the case and discharged the rule. In such view of the matter, this petition is bereft of substance and as such it is dismissed. Ed. ......Code, the High Court Division correctly decided the case and discharged the rule. In such view of the matter, this petition is bereft of substance and as such it is dismissed. Ed. ......Code, the High Court Division correctly decided the case and discharged the rule. In such view of the matter, this petition is bereft of substance and as such it is dismissed. Ed. ......J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Zakir Hossain ..............Petitioner Vs. The State ........................Respondent Judgment November 16, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Subhas Chandra Saha, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Foyej Ahmed Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Additional Sessions Judge, First Court, Chittagong in Sessions Trial Case No.19 of 1990 for securing ends of justice. 9. The petition is disposed with above observation. Ed. ...... Additional Sessions Judge, First Court, Chittagong in Sessions Trial Case No.19 of 1990 for securing ends of justice. 9. The petition is disposed with above observation. Ed. ...... Additional Sessions Judge, First Court, Chittagong in Sessions Trial Case No.19 of 1990 for securing ends of justice. 9. The petition is disposed with above observation. Ed. ......lul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Foyej Ahmed ..................Petitioner Vs The State ......................Respondent Judgment February 15, 2004 Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Zahirul Haque, Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Ali Akbar® Abkar Dewan Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....intaining the conviction of the accused petitioner under section 412 of the Penal Code. The Petition is, accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid modification of the sentence. Ed. ......intaining the conviction of the accused petitioner under section 412 of the Penal Code. The Petition is, accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid modification of the sentence. Ed. ......intaining the conviction of the accused petitioner under section 412 of the Penal Code. The Petition is, accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid modification of the sentence. Ed. ...... Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Ali Akbar® Abkar Dewan .........Petitioner vs The State .............................Respondent Judgment July 27, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Sarwar Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nurul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Bangladesh Shipping Corporation & others Vs. Mohammad Hossain & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ut any order as to cost. Ed. ...... committed error of law in making the Rule absolute and as such judgment of High Court Division requires interference. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... committed error of law in making the Rule absolute and as such judgment of High Court Division requires interference. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... Judgment July 18, 2006 Case Referred to- Muhammad Aboo Abdullah Vs. Province of East Pakistan and the Chief Secretary, Government of Pakistan, PLD 1960 (SC) 164. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, (Bodruzza, Advocate with him) instructed ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Md. Akbor Hossain and others Vs. Md. Safiruddin and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... are of the view that the High Court Division on correct appreciation of law and facts gave its decision which does not call for any interference. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... are of the view that the High Court Division on correct appreciation of law and facts gave its decision which does not call for any interference. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... are of the view that the High Court Division on correct appreciation of law and facts gave its decision which does not call for any interference. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... Md. Safiruddin and others…………………………….Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment: April 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners (In both the cases) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others Vs. BSEHR, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... M.A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others…………………..Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Secretary for the Enforcement of Human Rights (BSEHR) and others....Respondents J......h, calling for any interference by this Court. 17. On the reasons made above, the appeal is liable to be dismissed and hence it is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......h, calling for any interference by this Court. 17. On the reasons made above, the appeal is liable to be dismissed and hence it is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;………..Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Secretary for the Enforcement of Human Rights (BSEHR) and others....Respondents Judgment August 8, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, learned Additional Attorney General, instructed by Saj..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Mst. Jahanara Khatun Vs. Md. Nurul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ereinabove the conÂtentions, so made, in our view, are of no merit. In view of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed.......ereinabove the conÂtentions, so made, in our view, are of no merit. In view of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed.......ereinabove the conÂtentions, so made, in our view, are of no merit. In view of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed.......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦........Respondent Judgment May 25, 2006 Cases Referred to- Abdus Salam Bepari Vs. Shamsun Nahar Bibi and others, 6 BLC (AD) 36; Zaher Ahmed Vs. Manik Sardar, 6 MLR (AD) 44. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 180
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Sultan Ahmed and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....usly instituted suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or any other Court in Bangladesh having jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed, or in any Court beyond the limits of ...... be allowed. 19. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. The parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ...... be allowed. 19. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. The parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ......llip;.. Appellant Vs Sultan Ahmed and others……………………Respondents Judgment March 16, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Alam, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Principal, Pabna Cadet College, Pabna, Bangladesh & anr Vs. A.B.M. Abdul Matin, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....as to costs. Ed. ...... relief to the plaintiff as against the order of dismissal from service in a suit which was not maintainable. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... relief to the plaintiff as against the order of dismissal from service in a suit which was not maintainable. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......rector, Sonali Bank, Head office and others (Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 298 of 1994); Md. Arfan Ali Vs. Sonali Bank and others (Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 26 of 1992. Lawyers Involved: A. H. M. Mushfiqur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossa..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Serjuddowla Sowdagor Vs. Administrator of Waqf & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....cordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......cordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......cordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......ul Islam J Serjuddowla Sowdagor...........................Appellant Vs Administrator of Waqf & others............ Respondents Judgment August 16, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Ahsanullah Patwa..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 190
Runu Akhter Vs. Md. Barkat (Boston) alias Md. Kamal Hossain @ Boston, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... The respondent will remain on bail for a period of 3 (three) months from date. The petitioner is directed to prepare paper book out of court in accordance with Rules. Ed. ...... The respondent will remain on bail for a period of 3 (three) months from date. The petitioner is directed to prepare paper book out of court in accordance with Rules. Ed. ...... The respondent will remain on bail for a period of 3 (three) months from date. The petitioner is directed to prepare paper book out of court in accordance with Rules. Ed. ..........Petitioner vs Md. Barkat (Boston) alias Md. Kamal Hossain @ Boston.............Respondent Judgement August 22, 2004. Case Referred to- 7 DLR 637 Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Senior Advocate (Rehan Husain, Advocate with him), instr..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mahabubul Goni Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ion made above we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision in discharging the rule. Hence the leave petition having no merit is dismissed. Ed. ......ion made above we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision in discharging the rule. Hence the leave petition having no merit is dismissed. Ed. ......ion made above we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision in discharging the rule. Hence the leave petition having no merit is dismissed. Ed. ......l Goni .......... ............Petitioner vs The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and another .............Respondent Judgment February 2, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Adv..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
State Vs. Delwar Hossain Talukder, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ndent, and we are of the view that there is merit in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......ndent, and we are of the view that there is merit in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......ndent, and we are of the view that there is merit in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... The State…………………...Appellant Vs Delwar Hossain Talukder.......................Respondent Judgment May 26, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzak Khan, Additional Attorney General (Faisal H. Khan, A. A. G. w..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Md. Morzul Haque Vs. Government of Bangladesh & ors , 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....t: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ M. H. Rahman A.T.MAfzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Md. Morzul Haque .........Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh & ors .........Respondents Judgment March 3,1994. Lawyers Invo......ac and allowed the appellant to take delivery of the same by paying a redemption fine of Tk. 2.50 lacs in lieu of confiscation under section 181 of the Act. The appellant filed an appeal before the National Board of Revenue on 2-7-90 and the Member (Appeal) of the Board by a judgment and order da......al remedy and no useful purpose will be served in re-opening a matter which has become stale and rusty. The appeal is therefore dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......fa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Md. Morzul Haque .........Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh & ors .........Respondents Judgment March 3,1994. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hosein, Advocate (Md. Joynal Abedin, Advocate with him) Instructed ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Jamuna Knitting and Dyeing Ltd and ors Vs. Messers Yunusco K. Textile Ltd. & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sed the facts in the application for restoration of possession. We find no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel. Accordingly, both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......sed the facts in the application for restoration of possession. We find no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel. Accordingly, both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......sed the facts in the application for restoration of possession. We find no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel. Accordingly, both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......other.........Petitioners (In both the cases) vs Messers Yunusco K. Textile Ltd. and others...............Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment March 23, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (With S. M. Munir, Advocate), ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Chair, BoD, Rajshahi Krishi Unnayan Bank & anr Vs. Md. A Motaleb & ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....04 and that by the amended Padannoti Nitimala the Board of Directors kept themselves away from the promotion process and left the whole matter of promotion with the Bank management in the sprit of Bangladesh Bank's BRPD circular letter No.3 dated 19.2.2002 and it was further mentioned that the p...... 10. The respondents are liberty to mention the matter fixed for hearing in the chamber. The petitioners are directed to prepare paper book within 6 (six) months. Ed. ...... 10. The respondents are liberty to mention the matter fixed for hearing in the chamber. The petitioners are directed to prepare paper book within 6 (six) months. Ed. ......ctors, Rajshahi Krishi Unnayan Bank and another.... Petitioners vs Md. Abdul Motaleb and others .........................Respondents Judgement: October 26, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahabubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Zahirul Is..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Mukter Hossain Khan (Md.) Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....etitioner. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 44 ; V ADC (2008) 358; 13 MLR (AD) 2008, 186; 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 53. ......etitioner. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 44 ; V ADC (2008) 358; 13 MLR (AD) 2008, 186; 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 53. ......etitioner. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 44 ; V ADC (2008) 358; 13 MLR (AD) 2008, 186; 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 53. ...... never shifted on the condemned prisoner in the absence of any proof beyond reasonable doubt that he was present in the house when the occurrence took place……….(7) Lawyers Involved: A B M Bayezid, Advocate—For the Appellant. A Rouf, Deputy..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71