Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abul Kashem (Md.) Vs. Anti-Corruption Commission and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ul Hoque J Abul Kashem (Md.)............Petitioner Vs. Anti-Corruption Commission and others.....................Respondents Judgment October 5, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Abul Kalam Shamsu......Shamsuddin, 14 MLR (AD) 153; Niranjan Mitra Vs. Monju Dey, 8 BLC (AD) 142; Md. Jahangir Hossain Howlader Vs. CMM, Dhaka, 26 BLD 83 = 58 DLR 106; Mohammad Abdus Sattar Khan Vs. State, 30 BLD 181. Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed, Senior Advocate with Abul Kalam Patwary and Madhu Maloti Chowdh..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 5 Oct, 2010 | Hits: 182
State Vs. Tajul Sheikh @ Md. Tajul Shaikh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ul Houque of village Dakhin Ujanchar, Makhon Baburpara, Police Station-Goalandu Ghat, District-Rajbari be stayed till disposal of the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:9 ADC (2012) 895. ............................................Petitioner Vs. Tajul Sheikh @ Md. Tajul Shaikh and others...................Respondents Order September 28, 2010. Result: Leave is granted. Lawyers Involved: Biswajit Dev Nath, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocat..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 28 Sep, 2010 | Hits: 15
Ain O Salish Kendra Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Manpower, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others….............Respondents Judgment September 5, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred To- HM Ershad Vs. Bangladesh, 21 BLD (AD) 69 and State V...... Vs. Bangladesh, 21 BLD (AD) 69 and State Vs. Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 60 DLR 660; M.C. Mehta Vs. State of T.N. and others, (1996) 6 Supreme Court Cases 756; State Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others, 30 BLD 369. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Naim Ahmed..Category: Women and Children | Date: 5 Sep, 2010 | Hits: 261
Hasura Begum Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....e Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others………………………Respondents Judgment August 24, 2010. Result: The Rule is disposed of. The Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 (Act No. VIII of 2000); sections......amp; 13) Cases Referred to- Ramesh Kumari Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), AIR 2006 Supreme Court 1322; State of Haryana and others Vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal and others, AIR 1992 Supreme Court 604. Lawyers Involved: Md. Sultan Uddin, Advocate - For the petitioner. Syed Haider Ali, Advocate -..Category: Women and Children | Date: 24 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 187
Prime Global Ltd and others Vs. Artha Ain Adalat No.4, Dhaka and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ears of the exparte decree against it when as per its own statements on oath in Paragraph-6 of its Writ petition No. 3434 of 2007 it impliedly admitted that at least on 19-2-2005 (through a notice of Rule in Writ Petition No. 5510 of 2004) it came to know about the pendency of the Artha Rin Suit No.......s.................Responded Judgment August 23, 2010. Result: The rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abul Khair Miah Vs. Abdul Latif Sarker, 32 DLR (AD) 167. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam with Md. Asaduzzaman with Anita Rahman and Nazia Kabir, Advoca..Category: Banking Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 2
Abdur Rashid Gazi Vs. Nur Ali Gazi and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....bdur Rashid Gazi……………………….Petitioner Vs. Nur Ali Gazi and others……………………….Opposite Parties Judgment August 10, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 1908); section 115 The concu......nd others Vs. Lutfe Ali Chowdhury and others, 49 DLR (AD) 73 = 2 BLC (AD) 33= 17 BLD (AD) 66; Bina Rani Dey and another Vs. Santosh Chandra Dey,51 DLR (AD) 81 = 21 BLD (AD) 99; 34 DLR (AD) 61. Lawyers Involved: Harendra Nath Nondy, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Bivash Chandra Bis..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 10 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 4
Ferdous Khan @ Alamgir Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and another, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦......................Petitioner Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and another………………………Opposite party Judgment August 1, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Punjtih Ali's case, 29 DLR (SC) 185. Lawyers......another………………………Opposite party Judgment August 1, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Punjtih Ali's case, 29 DLR (SC) 185. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta, Advotae - For the Petitioner Shaheen Ahmed, Advocate - ..Category: Banking Law | Date: 1 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 657
Rehana Begum and another Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....sult, the appeal is dismissed. Send down the Lower Court Record at once. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 75; 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 448. ......; 2009 Cr.L.J. 788 (SC) A; Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 116: 1984 SCC (Cri) 487; Ratan Singh Vs. State of Hariyana Prodesh, (1997) 4 SCC 161: 1997 SCC (Crl) 525. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shamsuddin, Advocate - For the appellants. Md. Mosharraf Hossain Sarder..Category: Women and Children | Date: 1 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 227
Md. Zahirul Islam Vs. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd., 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... Zahirul Islam…………………………Petitioner Vs. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd……………………………Opposite Parties Judgment July 20, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. In a suit for causing losses or damages, the plaintiff is required to g......tance of damages suffered by him and the exact loss caused to him for which the defendant is liable to be called upon to answer his demand.............(17) Case Referred to- 7 MLR 13. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Shafiuddin, Advocate - For the petitioner. Jamaluddin Ahmed..Category: Limitation Law | Date: 20 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 38
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 18 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 5
Mohi Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. Kashipur Tea Estate Company Limited and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ip;……………Respondents Judgment July 18, 2010. Result: The application is rejected. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908); Order XLI Rule 19 An application for readmission of appeal under Rule 19 of Order XLI is applicable till......llip;…………(4) Cases Referred to- Pasanda Bibi Vs. Sunaruddis, 4 DLR 157; Rejendra Lur Vs. Mahaslev, 27 DLR 232; Md. Adil Uddin Vs. Md. Adiluddin, 33 DLR 89. Lawyers Involved: SK. Sharifuddin, Advocate - For the Appellant. K. S. Salah Uddin A..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 18 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 140
Sonali Bank Vs. Sheikh Anis Uddin Ahmed, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....limitation canÂnot be wiped out. On such type of application unusual long delay of 9 years 5 months 5 days canÂnot be condoned………………(4) Lawyers Involved: No one appears. Civil Rule No.379 (f) of 2002 with First Appeal No. 841 of 1991. Judgment Sharif Uddin Chaklader J.-...... to the other side after prescribed period of limitation canÂnot be wiped out. On such type of application unusual long delay of 9 years 5 months 5 days canÂnot be condoned………………(4) Lawyers Involved: No one appears. Civil Rule No.379 (f) of 2002 with First Appeal No. 841 of 1..Category: Civil Law | Date: 15 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 49
Abeda Khatun and others Vs. Md. Idris Mia and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....€¦â€¦â€¦Defendant-Petitioners Vs. Md. Idris Mia son of late Korban Ali and others…………………Defendant-opposite parties Judgment July 14, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Harunor Rashid Talukder Vs Md. Mahbubur Rahman ......te. Cases Referred to- Harunor Rashid Talukder Vs Md. Mahbubur Rahman Talukder and others, 1 MLR (AD) 286; Punjab Ali Pramanik and others Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain, 29 DLR (SC) 185. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ashraful Alam, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Shamsuddin Babul wit..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 14 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 3
Ziaur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....d: Pankaj Kumar Kundu, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Jahangir Alam, Advocate - For the Respondent No.2. Writ Petition No. 6396 of 2008. Judgment Nazmun Ara Sultana J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling in question the orders dated 25-04-2007 and 23-07-2008 passed by the Ar......n also his right to challenge that order before the High Court Division cannot be denied on the plea that he did not surÂrender before the Court which passed that order………………(13) Lawyers Involved: Pankaj Kumar Kundu, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Jahangir Alam, Advoc..Category: Civil Law | Date: 14 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 48
General Manager, Meghna Petroleum Ltd. and others Vs. Sultan Ahmed and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... disposed of in the High Court Division expeditiously. This appeal is disposed off with the above observations and directions. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLC (AD) (2015) 1 ...... to office one holds and while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review the High Court Division cannot sit over the internal administrative actions taken an autonomous body…….(4) Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. ASM Kaleq..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 13 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 4
ATM Salim Chowdhury Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....e to be decided upon taking evidence by the trial court. This court cannot decide these questions in exercise of its jurisdiction under section 561A of the Code. We therefore find no substance in the Rule and the Rule is liable to be discharged with direction to dispose of the bail petition. I......te party Judgment July 13, 2010. Cases Referred To- Nizamuddin Mahmood Vs. Abdul Hamid Bhuiyan and another, 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 195; Shamsul Alam Vs. State, 60 DLR (2008) 677. Lawyers Involved: Munshi Moniruzzaman, Advocate-For the petitioner. Zoglul Haider Afric, A..Category: Banking Law | Date: 13 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 187
AL-Arafah Islami Bank Limited Vs. M/S. Nobel Enterprise, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....afah Islami Bank Limited……………………………Petitioner Vs. M/S. Nobel Enterprise………………………………..Opposite party Judgment July 12, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: No one appears - For the petitioner. Mohammad Imtiaz......d……………………………Petitioner Vs. M/S. Nobel Enterprise………………………………..Opposite party Judgment July 12, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: No one appears - For the petitioner. Mohammad Imtiaz Farooq Advocate, with ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 12 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 28
Kohinoor Chemical Co. (BD) Limited Vs. Unilever Bangladesh Limited, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... Vs. Unilever Bangladesh Limited…………………Respondent Judgment July 11, 2010. Result: The appeal is disposed of. The Civil Rule No.931 (FM) of 2009 is disposed of with observations. Lawyers Involved: Gazi Md. Neam......ellip;………Respondent Judgment July 11, 2010. Result: The appeal is disposed of. The Civil Rule No.931 (FM) of 2009 is disposed of with observations. Lawyers Involved: Gazi Md. Neamat Hossain, Advocate - For the Appellant. KS Salauddi..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: 11 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 269
Monir Hossain (Md.) and anothers Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... it was the decision of the Government. 3. The Government and the PSC contested the writ petitions by filling two affidavits-in-opposition. The case of the Government is that under the Rules of Business, the appointing authority has full power either to accept or to reject the recomme......ia, (1991) 3 SCC 47; State of Haryana Vs. Subhash Chandra Marwala, (1974) 3 SCC 220; Neelima Shangla Vs. State of Haryana, (1986) 4 SCC 268; Jatendra Kumar Vs. State of Punjab, (1985) 1 SCC 122. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rob Chowdhury, Senior Advocate (with Salauddin Dolon), instructed by Za..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 11 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 104
Category: Women and Children | Date: 8 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 335