Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & ors Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n proper perspective and after assigning cogent reasons arrived at a correct conclusion and hence does not require interference by us. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... M.A. Aziz J Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & others......Appellants. Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & others...... .Respondents. Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- Fo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Abdul Matlib and others Vs. Abdul Malik, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ......ainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abdul Matlib and others.......Appellants. Vs. Abdul Malik...............Respondent Judgment 8th May 2002. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate and J. N. D..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Abdus Quddus Vs. Administration of Waqf & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......in J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdus Quddus.............Appellant. Vs. Administration of Waqf & others.............Respondents. Judgment 16th August 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Ahsanullah Patwar..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Md. Abdul Jalil Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......r Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 94
State Vs. Abul Kalam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ...... Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent Judgment August 3, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Ramzan Ali, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mr. B. Hossain, Ad..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......dassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Sharif Uddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Janata Bank Vs. Khalilur Rahman, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ta Bank, 110, Motijheel Commercial Area, Police Station Motijheel, Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ...... J Judgment 20th July 2002 Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-Petitioners. Not Represent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......this case a piece of stone can be termed as a weapon of offence under section 324 of the Penal Code…………………. (16) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate (Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate with him), ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Abdul Hakim and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... or part thereof from 15th of April, 1971 till alleged termination of his service on 18th January, 1993. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed ......d Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd..........Appellant Vs. Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent Judgment 28th July 2004 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate (M. R. Hasan, Advocate with him) instructed..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 130
National Board of Revenue and others Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......p; National Board of Revenue and others...............Appellants Vs. Mustafizur Rahman ..................Respondent Judgment January 21, 2003. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: A. F. Hassan Ariff, Attorney General (Borhanuddin, Deputy Attorney Genera..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Mohiuddin and others Vs. Shwkat Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohiuddin and others...........Appellants Vs. Shwkat Ali and others .......Respondents Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Jobayer Hossain and others Vs. Noor Hafez and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ithout any order as to costs. Accordingly the suit is remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. Ed. ......enter into disputed title except to the extent that it would help the Court in finding which of the parties have prima facie title and exclusive possession………..(8) Lawyers Involved: Khandakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Abdus Salam Khan, Senio..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Meghna Textile Mills Limited Vs. Md. Barkatullah & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....six) months. 9. The petitioners are permitted to add additional ground. 10. The appellants are permitted to make the appeals ready for hearing within 6(six) months. Ed ....................Respondents, (in C. P .No. 901 of 2002) Md. Idris Ali & others...............Respondents, (in C. P. No. 902 of 2002) Judgment 12th June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Md. Badruddoza, Advocate instructed by Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
M/S. Concord Engineers & Construction Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer Road & Highways Dept, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order. For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Hashmat Ali Jamadar and others Vs. Asmat Ali Jamadar, 6 DLR 478; Sachindra Lal Das and others Vs. Hriday Ranjan Das being dead his heirs: Bimal Kanti Das and others, 40 DLR(AD) 56. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-Ul-Haq, Senior Advocate instructed by Mvi Md. Wahidullah Advocate..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 229
Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......2005. Cases Referred to- Mujibur Rahman Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 44 DLR (AD) 111; SP Sampath Kumar Vs. Union of India, AIR 1937 SC 386; JB Chopra Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 357. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Mvi. Md. Wahi..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Syed Afzal Nowab Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e in Bangladesh, the question of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ad Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Syed Afzal Nowab ...........Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others... Defendant-Respondents. Judgment 2nd June 1997 Lawyers Involved: M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-On-Rec..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Abdul Malek and others Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., felt difficulty to fault with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......t: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abdul Malek and others.............Appellants. Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other........Respondents Judgment 16th November 2003 Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate, instructed by Santi Ranjan Karmakar, Advocate-o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Sujit Chandra Roy and others Vs. Abdur Rouf and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....udges of the High Court Division rightly passed the impugned order and we do not find any legal infirmity for our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......R. Mudassir Husain J. Sujit Chandra Roy and others...................Petitioners. Vs. Abdur Rouf and another……….......Respondents. Judgment 5th April 2003 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huda Manik, Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 104
National Bank Limited Vs. Pragati Industries Limited, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd any error of law and as such it does not call for our interference. 19. In the result the appeal fails. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. National Bank Limited ............Appellant. Vs. Pragati Industries Limited..... Respondent. Judgment 8th August 2005 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108