Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdul Mohit and others Vs. Social Investment Bank Ltd & ors., 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Court Division stating, inter alia, that the Social Investment Bank Ltd. hereinafter called "the Bank" was incorporated under the Companies Act with 4 types of directors namely, Group-A Bangladesh sponsor directors, group-B foreign sponsor directors, Group-C Government nominated direc......terference with the impugned order. These appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 82. ......terference with the impugned order. These appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 82. ......36 Company Cases 250; Kishore Y. Patel Vs. Patel Engineering Co Ltd., AIR 1992; Md. Shamsuzzaman Khan Vs. M.S. Islam and others, 28 DLR 101; Chahia Fibre Co vs. Abdul Jabbar 20 DLR (SC) 335. Lawyers Involved: Shafique Ahmed, Senior Advocate (A.K.M. Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate and ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 147
Md. Nurul Islam Bhuiyan and another Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J. Md. Nurul Islam Bhuiyan and another..... ...........Petitioners vs The Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Netrokona and others.................................. of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 11. In the aforesaid premises, we find no substance in this review petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 11. In the aforesaid premises, we find no substance in this review petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......rokona and others....................................................Respondents Judgment January 29, 2007. Cases Referred to- 16 DLR (SC) 281; 25 DLR (HC) 476. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, appeared on behalf of Md. Fazlul Kar..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Joynab Begum and others Vs. Shaheb Ali Akunji & others , 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ain Singh vs. Gokul Chand Mahton AIR 1934 PC 68; Shankarlal Narayandas Mundade vs. New Mofussil Co Ltd AIR 1946 PC 97; Minhazuddin Talukdar vs. Abdul Jalil Howlader 3 MLR (AD) 58; Hafizur Rahman vs Bangladesh 47 DLR 583; Haq Brothers vs Shamsul Haque 39 DLR 290; Khurshid Ali vs Noorjahan Bewa 1 M...... Court Division being not sustainable is liable to be set aside. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 14. ...... Court Division being not sustainable is liable to be set aside. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 14. ......AD) 418; Shahana Alam vs. Ms Farida Begum 2 MLR (AD) 153 = 2 BLC (AD) 92; Md Yeasin Khan vs. DC, Brahmanbaria 2 MLR (AD) 211 and Nurul Islam vs Amirul Islam 4 MLR (AD) 363 = 3 BLC (AD) 222. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, Md Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record— F..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Noor-e-Alam Jahangir (Md), English Teacher, Rifles Pub School & College Vs. BD, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....or apparent on the face of the judgment sought to be reviewed. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 12. ......or apparent on the face of the judgment sought to be reviewed. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 12. ......or apparent on the face of the judgment sought to be reviewed. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 12. ......ed to reagitate grounds agitated in the rejected leave petition……………(5) Case Referred to: Mafizul Haque vs Mofizur Rahman 48 DLR (AD) 121. Lawyers involved: Md. Noor-e-Alam Jahangir—Petitioner-in-person. Aftab Hossa..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rabeya Khatoon Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rabeya Khatoon………….Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner and others......Respondents Judgment ......mity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 9. ......mity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 9. ...... petitioner as a trespasser in the disputed land, the suit for permanent injunction against the Government is not maintainable by such trespasser …………….(5) Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Bangladesh and others Vs. Nawab Abdul Malik Jute Mills Ltd., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....rted in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 7. ...... error of law in making the Rule absolute and the same requires interference by us. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with Costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 7. ...... error of law in making the Rule absolute and the same requires interference by us. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with Costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 7. ...... preparation of khatain or payment of rent by such owner does not improve his title in respect of the acquired land. ……(10) Case referred to- Abul Basher vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 11. Lawyers Involved: MA Azim, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by Firoz Shah, Advocate on Record..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Asaduzzaman (Md) Vs. Bangladesh, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....vision (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Asaduzzaman (Md).....................……………………………...Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & others........Respon......ion of India AIR 1982 (SC) 902 (911); Kazi Mukhlesur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh 26 DLR (SC) 44: Attorney General of the Gambia Vs. N' Jie 1961 (AC) 617 (634); All India Bank Employees Association V. The National Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, AIR 1962 (SC) 171. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain......usiness of the Society vest in the Managing Body. (Article 9 (3). In the General Body there shall be one representative each from the Ministries of Health and Population Control, Social Welfare and Women's Affairs and Relief and Rehabilitation and the Defence Division to be nominated by the resp....... Bangladesh 26 DLR (SC) 44: Attorney General of the Gambia Vs. N' Jie 1961 (AC) 617 (634); All India Bank Employees Association V. The National Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, AIR 1962 (SC) 171. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocat..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 170
Rafiqul Alam (Md) Vs. Mustafa Kamal and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....ide the uncontested election of the appellant declared on 16 January 1988. A fresh poll is to be held for the Union Parishad. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 137.......ide the uncontested election of the appellant declared on 16 January 1988. A fresh poll is to be held for the Union Parishad. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 137.......ide the uncontested election of the appellant declared on 16 January 1988. A fresh poll is to be held for the Union Parishad. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 137.......Inderjit Barua Vs. Election Commission of India, 1984 SCR, 1911; A.K.M. Hasanuzzaman Vs. Election Commission 1 SCR 493; Election Commissioner of India Vs. Shivaji, 1984 1 Supreme Court Cases 277. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on-Re..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 173
Shubra Nandi Majumdar Vs. Begum Mahmuda Khatoon, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....different view. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 133. ......different view. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 133. ......different view. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 133. ....... Prem Debi and others AIR 1959 Patna 570; G. Jaykumar Vs. R. Ramaratnam AIR 1972 Madras 212; M.K. Sowbhagiammal and another Vs. Komalangi Ammal and another, AIR 1928 Madras 803; 46 CWN 374 P.C. Lawyers involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Nurjahan Begum Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....ut we do not think it appropriate at this belated stage to issue a Rule for enhancement of the sentence. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 130. ......ut we do not think it appropriate at this belated stage to issue a Rule for enhancement of the sentence. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 130. ......ut we do not think it appropriate at this belated stage to issue a Rule for enhancement of the sentence. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 130. ...... house. This is sufficient corroboration of the statement of the deceased regarding the circumstances in which she received injuries to which she succumbed later on………………………(11) Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hosein, Advocate, (Joynul Abedin, Advocate, with him), instructed by Md...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Dr. Syed Matiur Rob Vs. Bangladesh and Others, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....ider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Dr. Syed Matiur Rob being dead his heirs Shamsun Nahar & others (in both the appeals) ……...Appellants Vs. Bangladesh and Others (in both the appeals)................................Respondents Judgment ......for making complete justice in a matter. In view of the above, we dismiss both the appeals, without making any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 126. ......for making complete justice in a matter. In view of the above, we dismiss both the appeals, without making any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 126. ......sanka Lal Banik Vs. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1969 SCMR 283; Daryao and others Vs. State of U P and others AIR 1961 (SC) 1457; Hazi Waziullah Vs. Addl. Deputy Commissioner 1989 BLD (AD) 135. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him), instr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Mohammad Ali Vs. Lt. Col. (Retired) Habibullah Bahar & ors. 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of the High Court Division in his turn came to a correct decision in discharging the Rule. No interference is, therefore, called for. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......of the High Court Division in his turn came to a correct decision in discharging the Rule. No interference is, therefore, called for. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......of the High Court Division in his turn came to a correct decision in discharging the Rule. No interference is, therefore, called for. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......t. There is no ingredient of Order VII rule 11 in the application filed by the defendant. The learned Joint District Judge is fully justified in rejecting the petition….(23 & 25) Lawyers Involved: Nurul Islam Bhuiya, Advocate- on-Record- For the Petitioner. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Kazi Shamsul Huq & others Vs. Robeya Begum & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....r in the review application shall apply and the provision of Article 182(5) of the Limitation Act is not applicable. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......r in the review application shall apply and the provision of Article 182(5) of the Limitation Act is not applicable. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......r in the review application shall apply and the provision of Article 182(5) of the Limitation Act is not applicable. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ther vs. Debdas Lola, AIR 1959 Calcutta 73; Chauthilal Vs. Badri Prasad and another, AIR 1960 Rajasthan 249; L. Bengali Mai and others Vs. Baijnath Prasad and others, AIR 1942 Allahabad 338. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Adv..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Sonar Bangla Service Station Vs. Government of the People's Republic of BD, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sonar Bangla Service Station…………………...Petitioner Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and other......nding instalments were paid in due time, that since 1965 the lessee was running petroleum business by the name and style Green Birds and Company upon entering into an agreement with the then Pakistan National Oil Company and on the liberation of Bangladesh with the Jamuna Oil Company, that the lesse......doning the delay. 12. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......er Vs. Mst. Katiji and others, AIR 1987 (SC) 1353; Province of East Pakistan Vs. Meajan Ali Ahmed and 15 others, 18 DLR (SC) 343; Government vs. Alauddin being dead his heirs, (2001) 6 MLR (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 205
Sree Amulya Ratan Chowdhury& ors Vs. Sreemati Shaibalini Ghose & ors., 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
.... Hajee Abdus Sattar's case applied more in the present case because P.W.1 who deposed for the plaintiffs' admitted that they were inducted into possession by Sadananda Ghose after the liberation of Bangladesh and they paid rent to Shaibalini Ghose after the death of Sadananda till August, ....... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ....... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......l Appeals) Judgment November 27, 1997 Cases Referred to- Hajee Abdus Sattar v. Mahiuddin & ors 38 DLR (AD) 97; Amritalal vs. Uttam Lal, AIR 1939 Calcutta 216. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Md. Umed Ali and another Vs. Mst. Hamida Khatoon and another, 1999, 28 CLC (AD)
....lorem Court fee in the trial court for the said relief within 3(three) months from date. 13. The appeal is allowed in the above terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......lorem Court fee in the trial court for the said relief within 3(three) months from date. 13. The appeal is allowed in the above terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......lorem Court fee in the trial court for the said relief within 3(three) months from date. 13. The appeal is allowed in the above terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......nd another……………...... plaintiff-Appellant Vs Mst. Hamida Khatoon and another ...................Respondent Judgment May 20,1998 Lawyers Involved: Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Ex-pa..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Md. Sadequr Rahman Vs. Munawar Jute Mills Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ound of maintainability. 2. Short faces are that the writ petitioner has been serving as an officer in the office of respondent No.1, Munawar Jute Mills Ltd. an enterprise of Bangladesh Jute Mills Corporation (BJMC) since 23.02.1981. By a letter dated 07.01.1998 respondent......d legal basis and as such not sustainable in law. The direction for refund is not legally sustainable. 14. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d legal basis and as such not sustainable in law. The direction for refund is not legally sustainable. 14. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......ellip;………………Appellant vs Munawar Jute Mills Ltd. and others ......................Respondents Judgment November 10, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque, Advocate, instructed by md. Nawab Alt, Advocata-on-Record-..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Md. Wasim Mia Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....emplated under Section 9(1) of the Ain. The submissions merit consideration. Leave is granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed. ......emplated under Section 9(1) of the Ain. The submissions merit consideration. Leave is granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed. ......emplated under Section 9(1) of the Ain. The submissions merit consideration. Leave is granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed. .........................Petitioner vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Netrokona…………..Respondent Judgement: March 28, 2004 Lawyers Involved: A. F. M. Mesbahuddin, Senior Advocate instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Selim A Khan Vs. Md. Harun Malik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......J Selim A Khan……………..Petitioner Vs Md. Harun Malik and another.....................Respondent Judgment January 2, 2005. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Samad, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advoca..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Abdur Rouf Sarder Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....o. In such circumstances we do not find any reason to lay our hands. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 800. ......o. In such circumstances we do not find any reason to lay our hands. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 800. ......o. In such circumstances we do not find any reason to lay our hands. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 800. ...... Vs The State...........................Respondent Judgment March 16, 2006. Case Referred to- Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 44 DLR (AD) 169. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Adv..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52